Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: download (2).jpg (7KB, 191x192px) Image search:
[Google]
7KB, 191x192px
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Samsung-128GB-SSD-SATA-3-0-MZ5PA128HMCD-010DA-/222614538902?epid=114748199&hash=item33d4dc4a96:g:Jp8AAOSwIMdZk2nt
http://www.ebay.com/itm/LiteOn-LAT-128M2S-2-5-128gb-SSD-/172808916853?hash=item283c36cf75:g:AmUAAOSw~uxZhkkb
What do you guys think about these as a budget ssd?
>>
>>61925513
3Gbit first gen 7 year old trash. Expect buggy firmware and shit performance If you want to lose your data so badly why don't you just right click on it and select delete.
>>
>>61925513
These SSDs are actually pretty good.
They just can't push sequentials above 300MB/s as they're SATA 2.
Write endurance is decent on both and they don't seem to dump data on hard resets like old crucials, adata, and kingstons.
Reliable but a little slower.
It is used flash though, don't trust it 100%, RAID 1 or RAIDz1.
>>
>>61925513
You are retarded trash
>>
>>61927677
Ok. That really seems like a pretty well thought-out explanation in response to my question. Thanks dumbfag
>>
>>61927520
>>61925513
first one is a Samsung 470 series, which is extremely old at this point. you can probably get a more recent refurb sandisk/crucial 128GB for around the same price.
>>
Get a Crucial, sometimes there are "factory reconditioned" units available for really low prices.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1