explain how they fit 256gb on something that can fit in my peehole

It's a Wi-Fi card that connects to surveilled cloud storage. Don't fall for their tricks. You're only safe with 8 gb cards.

>>61914496
But it works on my chinkphone that doesn't have mobile data, i use it all the time not connected to wifi

File: 1500420124470.png (757KB, 963x973px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 963x973px

>>61914504
It's standalone wifi.

File: 1502064524298.jpg (41KB, 585x501px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 585x501px

>>61914540
b-but anon that doesn't sound correct, are you sure? I'm not good with the computers, so I will take your word for it if you are sure.

>>61914574
its chink magic, they can do some real crazy shit

>>61914466
Basically stack 32 layers of NAND on top of each other. On top of that is QLC which stores 16 bits of data in every cell, at the cost of durability. You're lucky if these can do more than 100 write cycles.

>>61914466
you can fit something over 1 cm wide in your urethra?

Keep in mind that that all 128 or 256 GB microSD and SD cards on eBay and chink websites under $50 are fakes and only store ~2 GB but report to the OS that it contains more.

>>61914466
science

>>61915320
Sharks work fine tho

>>61914466
>something that can fit in my peehole
Prove it

>>61915320
god, so much this. I use to work for a Verizon Indirect store, and was constantly having to explain this to people. They would always stammer back "but it says 1 million giga derp. but it says it, how can it say it if it doesnt do it" etc..

>>61914466
Your semen carries many petabytes of data and it passes through your peehole just fine.

>>61914466
So your benis can be a data stick too. Also you can transport data in your foreskin.

>>61914574
How do you think GPS tracking chips work? Satellites

>>61917124
this joke is actually really smart and philosophical

>>61917124
>people who think ai will destroy humanity will defend this

>>61917124
One truely does cum millions of years or innovation, apple would want to suck your dick

File: microsd.png (511KB, 1062x786px) Image search: [Google]

511KB, 1062x786px

>>61914496
this
never trust storage that doesnt have mechanical parts

>>61914540
devilish

>>61919785
kek

Simple
First you start with a 1mm thick slice of silicon
Then you apply a photoresist film to it
Then you power up your 5KW pulse laser to shoot a droplet of tin which produces a near x-ray radio wave
You use this to project an image to the film
Then you deposit metals in the reacted film
Done
Easy right

>>61920754
The best thing
This isn't even the limit
New inventions might enable 10tb microsd

>>61914951
I use a 128GB microsd card in my dslr. I do computational remote sensing so I fill it regularily. Got any data on the endurance of 128GB+ microsd cards? What happens whens enough cells die?

File: Mixza_128gb.jpg (200KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 640x640px

>>61915320
Lies

>>61920796
Your data corrupts
There are usually a few spare cells the controller knows of it can use but that's just the silicon lottery

>>61920816
Just like that? Surely they designed them so you'll get some kind of warning or heads up?

>>61920946
How would they communicate that to you?
Some filesystems try to track these things but most don't especially not ones your camera supports

>>61920946
Pro DSLR photographers preemptively discard their SD cards every so often to make sure this doesn't happen to them

>>61920968
Every time the controller detect a dead cell or one that has had the limit number of writes happen, record it. Have the controller also store the number of spare cells and make the sd card standard require the drivers to check that the number of deactivated cells don't exceed the number of spares? Then throw an error or warning when this happens? Or something like smart for hdds? My terminology might be wrong but you get the idea.

>>61920972
Is that so? Is irt possible to see how many reads/writes an sd card have had?

>>61921225
>>61921204
eMMC is a retarded protocol that was clearly never meant for this
Solutions have been made but they work on the software side like specialized filesystems
However a DSLR is not likely to support such a thing

Nano machines

>>61915320
Happened to me once with a 16gb one. I didn't even know back then that could be done. The seller sold it to me for the full price and didn't want me to refund it.

>>61921581
Of course he didn't want you to refund it when you had put it in your urethra..

>>61921786
>he doesn't have a flash storage alliance certified eMMC controller in his urethra
How do you ever expect to please a women

>>61921810
I only fuck women if they have an eSATAp port. Only the creme de la creme for me.

>>61914466
Are there such things as 512 GB 3.0 USB sticks?

>>61922589
>usb 3.0
I hope not you fucking caveman

>>61914466
The last 20 years of technological "progress" has been making shit smaller and smaller.
We got quite good at it.

File: Hardware-old-hard-drive-header.jpg (141KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 800x450px

Grandpa asked the same question once, about the technology that was impressive when he was young.
Then again, grandpa has a worrying peehole.

>>61914951
Pretty much this.

Don't buy SD cards over 8GB

>>61914496
Yeah but it works in my ipod classic that's made of metal, which acts as a faraday cage.