Why do things run great on Intel CPUs?
Faster Function Units. It's a known fact that Intel has better FUs than AMD. Their superscalar professors are just naturally better because of this.
Because Intel paid you to say so.
/thread
>>61899787
AMD CPOOs are inherently cheap knockoffs. That's literally the only reason AMD exists - making budget clones of Intel chips. Some things never change.
>>61899829
Or maybe it's because Intel products don't stutter.
>>61899882
>one gaymen benchmark
>>61899846
Nobody buys Intel stutterfires anymore since Ryzen is smoother and infinitely better in every conceivable way.
>>61899919
Runs great on my PC.
>>61899954
Now for the actual proof
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JypkqwpOtNI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6Ovmxfejvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBKHsMar1Jo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZcCqnE5mRw&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qswrFCb5sMQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuQu-y0GnPM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybF7r4rogHc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11NfsMykyAk
>>61899993
That's all well and good, but an i7 still runs great on my machine.
>>61900009
That's because you think stutters are normal.
>>61899787
|
|>
|
|3
|
|
>>61899954
No matter how many times you post this, you will never be any less of a faggot.
>>61883972
>How convinent that the 7900X isn't on that chart and you just happened to pick the image using a R9 Fury (why?)
>And the other GPU they test with is a 1080, not even a 1080ti. Anandtech's testing has been a fucking joke lately.
>Ironically the "ultra best gaming GPU" 7740K does just as bad as TR here. Even though I'm sure there's some other problem with their testing methodology.
>>61899882
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/amd-threadripper-review-1950x-1920x/
>>61899846
Get back to work, Brian.
>>61900199
The results of this test already got debunked, Intel is way ahead.
>>61900228
Source?
>>61900228
o vey
>>61900234
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/08/mistakes-in-our-testing-methodology-wrongfully-cause-7900X-to-appear-slower-in-some-titles/
>>61900345
>uppercase X in fake URL
You didn't even try and make it believable. 0/10.
>>61899882
>no doom benchmanrk
into the thrash
>>61900888
nice digits, but doom is trash and should be in the trash
ITT: good goys
>>61900921
Best game of last year, bro.
>>61899787
>>61899787
>Why do things run great on Intel CPUs?
>Implying they do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE7qMJVll5U
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-admits-problems-pentium-iii-1,235.html
https://www.pcper.com/news/Editorial/Yes-Netburst-really-was-bad-CPU-architectures-tested
>>61901083
Ah yes, let's not forget the recent Atom - blunder of the decade.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11110/semi-critical-intel-atom-c2000-flaw-discovered
>>61900921
>literally the best game in terms of optimization
>also great game overall
>thrash
is this what shills belive?
Sorry, I couldn't resist
>>61901274
If it runs better on AMD, it's trash. That's how it works, didn't you get the memo?
>>61901297
10/10.
>>61901297