Vega 56/64 on Linux (vol. Proper review)

>>61899581
nice, he seems pretty enthusiastic.

>>61899581
Needs actual Linux drivers.

>>61900247
>It's phenomenal seeing the open-source driver support one day-one and that for Linux OpenGL games the performance even surpasses AMDGPU-PRO. This Vega launch is easily the most successful discrete GPU launch ever where it's backed by fully-open drivers.

Try reading the article next time

>>61899581
Linux users perfers nVidia's propretary drivers over AMD's open source hack.

More importantly, computerbase confirms SR-IOV is working!

https://www.computerbase.de/2017-08/radeon-rx-vega-64-56-test/

>>61900414
Is that really a confirmation that it works? It seems to me that they're just briefly mentioning the slide from before.

>>61900370
best be joking, nigger.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_36yNWw_07g

>linux
worthless review

>>61900328
It also said it didn't go past the loading screen in most games because it lacks essential things.

>>61899581
lacking gpgpu benchmarks.

>>61900414
Do I need a SR-IOV supported motherboard and cpu for this to work or is just a SR-IOV enabled vega is enough?

>>61901303
Kys

>>61901388
kisses to you too lover

>>61901377
No, the GPU just presents itself as multiple display adapters for SR-IOV

>>61899581
>using Fedora
>Vega 64 still not winning 1080 except 4k BioShock
>Want to play DXMD on Linux with high or Ultra setting in FHD but Vega 56 is close to RX580 and Vega 64 has some weird problems
>both Vegas eat more power and are hotter than 1070/1080
>I can't see any reference Vega in where I live
>prices of VGA cards here do not follow prices in USA and are a tad more expensive
>meanwhile most of the RX Vega 64 saw on Newegg have gone to 599.99, 100 above MSRP
To me Vega is DOA. Better just buy an el cheapo non-ref GTX1080 and wait for Volta.