Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: faphat.jpg (234KB, 1600x900px) Image search:
[Google]
234KB, 1600x900px
>want to do some shit in c++
>cant be that hard to put it windows
>install a c++ complier
>add it to path
>try to compile the program
>nothing
>try some fixes but its not having it
>try another one after uninstalling the old one and that does the same thing as the one before
>install visual studio
>works
Based Microsoft saves the day again.
>>
>>61892984
MSVSC produces slower, more bloated binaries and embeds software with spyware. There is no point of MSVSC now, plain and simple
>b-bu-but muh intellisense
Language server protocol has been implemented in all major languages and this is why M$ ported that shit to Linux compatible MSVCode
>>
>>61892984
I never did much C/C++ programming in DOS. Mostly just Turbo Pascal, QuickBasic, and Assembler. Part of it was because my first C/C++ experience was with a 32-bit flat memory model and I was hooked immediately, so I could never go back to C/C++ in DOS even though I had Turbo C++ at the time.
Been programming in unix/C++ ever since Linux/slackware became available.
>>
>>61892984
>Based Microsoft saves the day again.
>from Microsoft-related problem
lol
>>
>>61893821
The problem was with the other compliers being shit.
>>
>>61892984
>Based Microsoft saves the day again.
sounds more like microsoft was the problem to begin with.
also, their C and C++ compilers are probably the worst..
>>
>>61893986
>put C++ on Windows
>compliers
obviously you have no business messing with computers
>>
>>61892984
Installing g++ and gdb is easy. You must be retarded or just baiting.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1