Leaked Vega Benchmarks

how is the 1080 Ti such a big jump from the 1080 anyway?

>>61887298
Moar ALUs.
Like 1k more ALUs.

>>61887270
hahaha
no.

>>61887368
>Wanting the competition to fail
>Not wanting a competitive market

ISHYGDDT.jpg

>>61887270
The FE versions supposedly throttle on air cooling. They also cost more than a 1080 and take more power.

>>61887517
Reminder to report shitposters.

>>61887298
The 1080 Ti is a fucking monster. I immediately switched to it the instant I got my GTX 1080. I don't regret it at all. I'm going to stick with my Ti for a while.

>>61887448
>Wanting hyped up products that can't compete be shilled as if they were good.

>>61887270
Lol, still slower than a midrange 1080? Fucking AMD is a joke

>>61888003
>1080
>midrange
?

>>61888016
Titan - Ultra high end
1080ti - high end
1080 - mid range

>>61888023
?
You've been drinking JHH's sperm for far too long.

>>61888023
1060 is mid range.

>>61888023
Oh good it's this retard again. Tell us again how 1060 is for poorfags despite also costing hundreds of dollars.

>>61888023
elitist "pay say gay mers" are fucking cancer

File: 1_Copy.jpg (93KB, 975x475px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 975x475px

>1927mhz core
>1100mhz HBM2
wew lad

>>61888003
>>61888089
>Clearly is slightly faster than a 1080
>slower than
>midrange

>>61888110
What's the point when it's bandwidth bottlenecked?

>>61888023
You realize the Titan is basically just a slightly, keyword being slightly, better binned 1080 Ti right?

>>61888134
Biggur numbers.

>>61888134
>bandwidth bottlenecked
Which bandwidth?

>>61888177
Memory.

>>61888177
Memory.

>>61888139
Titan has GDDR5X , and more cuda cores

File: FB_IMG_1502575556458.jpg (17KB, 720x343px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 720x343px

actual benchmarks

>>61888219
how can AMD even compete?

>>61888139
You realize that there are literally 6 GPUs faster than a 1080? P100, V100, Titan Xp, Titan XP, P6000, 1080ti , if anything the 1080 is at the very bottom midrange card.

>>61888219
Literally DOA

>>61888218
1080ti also uses G5X.
>>61888240
Now that's what i call mental gymnastics.

>>61887270
Gonna get the 56 and overclock that nigga if this is true.

>>61888189
>>61888196
From (945Mhz) 483.8 GB/s to (1100Mhz) 563.2 GB/s I think that allows a little more bandwidth.

>>61888218
Not enough to justify the cost in any capacity. In addition, the recent Titan X(Pascal) and Titan Xp fiasco has killed any smart consumer's trust in the Titan brand. Even Nvidia has no fucking clue why people buy Titans anymore, it used to just be what they were considering "absolute best we can physically make, but at a cost" but the release of the 1080 Ti and how it performed better in most games meant the people who paid almost double for the original Titan Pascal got screwed over.

The extra CUDA and GDDR5X don't really help the people who'd want to buy a Titan when performance can't even be guaranteed to be better than the less expensive card anymore.

>>61888302
The other anon should post effective BW numbers.
That OC will result in practiaclly nothing.

>>61888309
Need re-tests on memory bandwidth when it launches.

>>61888110
>53 C at 1927mhz
W E W

>>61888329
G*rmans will do that.
Hopefully.
The rest of "tech press" forgot B3D suite ever exists.

File: Vega_FE_Memory_Bandwidth.png (129KB, 800x574px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 800x574px

>>61888177
Vega 10 has 20-30% regressions vs. Fiji in raw memory bandwidth, effective texture bandwidth, and texel fill rates.

The real question that remains to be answered is whether the absurdly low memory bandwidth can be fixed with BIOS updates, because as it stands right now, Vega 10 is so bandwidth starved that Vega 48 with 945mhz HBM2 would be just as fast as Vega 64.

>>61887270
>literally a 300W 1080

WEW

LAD

>>61887270
I'd speculate that this is where they actually do place, it makes sense from a corporate and engineering standpoint. While a lot of people do in fact have the 1080ti, and it beats out the whole of the market, there are plenty of people (read majority) of people playing at 1080, and looking forward to 1440, as such it makes sense that they would offer a GTX1070 competitor and a GTX1080 competitor. Consider the market share that it offers being slightly better but similarly priced. Especially the 56 since it will be a key consumer card and directly parallels the 1070's price.

Looking forward if AMD adopts nVidia's release pattern it may indicate they too will release something kin to the ti in the near future, which will be an interesting battle.

>>61888304
I'd say people that bought titan xp hardly got screwed by release of 1080TI, sure the card has basically same performance at half the price, but also came out like 8 months later ? If you are the target market for titans, the extra 600 bucks you pay for "early access" is completely worth it, and not like 1080 ti is faster, it's only cheaper.

File: 1501088641596.png (85KB, 807x916px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 807x916px

D O A
O
A

>>61888240
It's all about target markets, not performance.

File: Qk2WB2M.jpg (167KB, 949x1866px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 949x1866px

>>61888633
A Vega 64 Liquid hit 25,000 this morning.

>>61888665
That's shit.

There should be fappening style leaks for hardware
Or some reviewer just making it stupidly easy to get their benchmarks early and then claiming to be hacked,

>>61887918
I was considering getting one but since I have a 1080 SLI since launch going for one ti is kinda of downgrade. Majority of titles iolay support sli

>>61888681
t.Jensen

>>61888685
Breaking the NDA is a bad idea m8.
>>61888694
No, it's shit, given the power consumption.
Perf/watt is atrocious (in gayms, that is).

>>61888218
>Titan has GDDR5X
so has the 1080Ti and the 1080

>>61887969
>aka your avg astroturfing stock shiller.

AMD NUMBA ONE!!!!!

>>61888702
It's not willfully breaking NDA if you are "hacked"

>>61888751
You're not beating their legal department, dumbo.
You're not smarter than a 15 page clause

>>61888681
I know, 3DMark is my favourite game and if Vega does not show well there, then I don't care how it performs in none synthetic situations.

>>61888768
3DMark is a good indication of gaymen performance.

>>61888783
Maybe for a certain balanced game engine.

>>61888633
>Still posting Vega FE benchmarks a day before launch
Trying to get your last few shitposts in? https://videocardz.com/71771/final-radeon-rx-vega-64-3dmark-performance

File: 430DF95700000578-4769230-image-a-1_1502140735860.jpg (64KB, 634x634px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 634x634px

>>61887270
Link pls

>>61888783
Not since about 2001

>>61888827
That's barely better.
It's still abysmal performance for 486mm^2 die.

>>61888766
>>61888751
I'm pretty sure they consider NDA to be a strict liability thing, it won't matter if you personally released the benchmarks are not. Ultimately they just won't trust you because you will have partially fucked up their marketing strategy and will have indirectly caused them damages.

>>61888827
The FE is better than the RX

>>61887270
If true, Vega 56 best card
> 1080 performance
> 1070 price

>>61888918
In reality

>1080 price
>1060 performance

>>61888918
1070 MSRP is $350. What you're seeing is inflation due to miners. Once initial stock is gone, expect Vega 56 to go up to even higher than a 1070 in price.

>>61888934
t. 815mm^2 die man

>>61888884
>It's still abysmal performance for 486mm^2 die.
Ah, I see you are still pretending to not understand that AMD is segmenting by memory bandwidth rather than die size? When a four HBM2 stack version comes out and trades blows with full GP102 in games (as it does now in geometry performance) what will the implications be for perf/mm^2 hmm?

>>61888934
>Titan Xp price
>GT 710 performance
>hurr durr look how funny I am hysterical laughter all around

>>61888304

Kepler Titans were literately "Quadro/Telsa" rejects. They were a cheap way for general compute and prosumers to get near-Quadro/Telsa-tier hardware.

Nvidia gimped their Maxwell and Pascal Titans because it hurt their Quadro/Telsa margins.

>>61888954
>4stack Vega10
Hooo boy $1000 MSRP?
The BoM is going to skyrocket.

>>61888942
At that point you're not gonna be able to buy cards so that's pointless.

>>61888063
no, 1060 is entry level.

>>61888954
>four HBM2 stack version comes out and trades blows with full GP102
And when exactly are we expected to see this? And why would they design their entire GPU around memory bandwidth that isn't there, lowering yields in the process? Sounds stupid.

>>61888934
I honestly don't get what you gain from this shilling. A competetive market would benefit even Nvidia fanboys.

>>61888219
If this is correct then Vega is a giant step down from the 480, and the 480 actually is close to the 1080 in crossfire.

However, where would this chart put the 1080 Ti and the Titan?

>>61888985
Late year or Q1

https://videocardz.com/71280/amd-vega-10-vega-11-vega-12-and-vega-20-confirmed-by-eec

Also you need to redesign Vega10 with 4 HBM PHYs in mind for 4-stack configuration.
Vega10 is DOA.
Maybe Vega11 will be less shit.

>>61889006
Vega20 is FP64 card.
It's not a bigger Vega10, anon.
It'll never be a consumer SKU.
Kill yourself my dude.

File: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9SLzgvNjkzMDQ0L29yaWdpbmFsLzAzLUNyZW8tU2NvcmUucG5n.png (37KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 711x533px

>>61888985
>And why would they design their entire GPU around memory bandwidth that isn't there
Because they wanted to use the same GPU for RX/WX/SSG/MI and for all of those segments except gaming vs a 1080ti, two stacks was enough.

Pic related. In pro rendering applications where Vega 10 isn't memory bound it trades blows with full GP102.

>>61888984
>1050 is entry level
>1060 is low-mid end
>1070 is mid-high end
>1080 is high end
>1080ti is ultra high end
>titan xp is rebranded workstation card with virtually no benefit over the 1080ti in the gaming department but 200 dollars more expensive

>>61888985
>And when exactly are we expected to see this?

It's Vega 20, coming next year, meaning it'll be on the market in 2 years.

>>61889038
They could've made Vega10 with 4 stacks in mind from the get-go.
Vega10 is a bottleneckfest.
It's almost as bad as nv30.

>>61889006
>According to the list from EEC, Vega 20 is currently only expected as GL variant, which means Radeon Pro/Instinct series.

It's not a gaymur card. Although 32 GB RAM sounds crazy.

>>61889019
All previous "FP64 cards" from AMD had a consumer version, so no, Vega 20 is likely to end up in this space eventually.

>>61889068
All previous FP64 cards from AMD had reasonable BoM.
Vega20 is gonna be bigger.
Much bigger.
FP64 is not free.

>>61889010
>Vega10 is DOA.
This is idiocy. SSG locks down a whole segment unchallenged, WX is a solid competitor for the P6000, and FE (with updated drivers) will be excellent an excellent OG Titan type card. Vega 56 > 1070 and Vega 64 > 1080.

The only segment Vega 10 isn't great in is vs. 1080ti in gaming.

>>61889053
>titan xp is rebranded workstation card with virtually no benefit over the 1080ti in the gaming department but 200 dollars more expensive

Titan X (pascal) =/= Titan Xp

>>61889081
>This is idiocy. SSG locks down a whole segment unchallenged, WX is a solid competitor for the P6000, and FE (with updated drivers) will be excellent an excellent OG Titan type card.
These are hilariosly niche.
Like no revenue-tier niche.
>Vega 56 > 1070 and Vega 64 > 1080.
This is what matters.
And it's BAD.
VERY FUCKING BAD.
Gaymen perf is everything.

>>61889061
>They could've made Vega10 with 4 stacks in mind from the get-go.
Two stacks was enough in every market they wanted to compete in with Vega10 except one. They already have Vega10 x2 on the schedule for 2H 2017, should be easier to go to 4 hbm stacks than doing a full on dual GPU card (which there would be no point in doing with Vega10 anyway).

>>61889108
4 stacks require GPU redesign, anon.
Vega10 is DOA for gaymen.
Good look to RTG designing a gaymen chiplet for Navi.

>>61889080
GCN ALUs can all do FP64 natively at 1/2, they do cost more registers and power that's why you don't see them.

Unlike Nvidia, which needs dedicated FP64 units independent of FP32 units, said FP64 units cannot do FP32 or FP16 like GCN can.


In short you're making assumption based on limited knowledge, fuck off.

>>61889102
>These are hilariosly niche.
>Like no revenue-tier niche.
Yeah, it's not like every studio in Hollywood could use these. Oh wait. They are also $6,999 a card.

>>61889134
>4 stacks require GPU redesign, anon.
They are already doing a four stack design anyway, they can just piggyback a four stack RX version off that work.

>>61889134
>expecting amdrone to understand chip design and on die memory controller configuration

>>61889163
kill yourself

>>61889163
Report a report is a report newfag

>>61889172
>Yeah, it's not like every studio in Hollywood could use these. Oh wait. They are also $6,999 a card.
That's still no volume.
Volume > margins.

>>61887270
I'd believe those numbers if they were showing DX12/Vulkan performance.

>>61889102

Sorry, kiddo.

The days of "performance" gaming performance is going away, even Nvidia knows this.

Both camps are moving towards general computer and HPC for their high-end platforms.

>>61889163
Lol

>>61889202
>reddit spacing

>>61889230
>reddit spacing

ANMD is just shit look at this embarassment, can't even beat a midrange Nvidia GPU 2 years old, I hope this shitty company goes bankrupt soon

>>61889257
In your fucking dreams Jensen.
You need to beg mommy for EPYCs first.

File: 1489534825515.png (172KB, 1424x320px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1424x320px

>shitposting intensifies
The Jewvidia Defense Force is here lads

File: 1266653006419.jpg (77KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 600x750px

>>61889273
>everybody is jensen

talk about paranoid persecution complex

>>61889257
>the 1080 is mid-range argument
>hurr durr finished and bankrupt
kys feg.

>>61889288
BEG FOR FUCKING EPYC YOU CUNT.

>>61889257
>I hope this shitty company goes bankrupt soon
That begs the question, wouldn't Nvidia be seen as a monopoly at that point? Would they even legally be able to sell cards anymore? This probably sounds retarded.

>>61889288
amd is basically a cult

>go to store
>someone looking at Rypoo CPU
>tell him he's supporting Islam since AMD is owned by muslim corporations
>decides on Intel

Saving a soul.

File: ricky.jpg (19KB, 222x293px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 222x293px

>350 watt house fire tier
>1070 level performance
>1080ti price

how do you fuck up THIS bad!?

>>61887270
Okay, so give a proper AIB cooler and give it a month or two of driver updates and it'll be fine.

Doom and gloom my ass, it's not the best but it's fine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l51WwFV8l6s
Oi whaddya fuck.
56 Nitro+ here i come.

>>61889350
It's only 1060 level performance

>>61889350
>>61888961

>>61889288
I'm almost convinced that "jensen and leather jacket" is a single poster fresh out of /r/amd.

>>61889311
>That begs the question, wouldn't Nvidia be seen as a monopoly at that point?
Yes, problem is AMD would have to fuck up massively with not only Vega but Navi as well. The fuck up would have to be so massive that the market share for Nvidia graphics chips winds up in the high 90s because AMD can't sell their products. But Nvidia would bail RTS out way before that, if they didn't they have to be split up and that way worse than just cutting AMD some slack.

>>61889406
https://rbt.asia/g/search/text/%22you%20are%20mad%20because%20you%20are%20angry%22/
Kill yourself.

>>61889371
driver updates barely affect performance, it's literally a meme made by /r/amd

>>61889406
Sopa de favela nigger.

>>61889408
Navi aka MCM GPUs will be a whole different ballgame. If they can get it to work, that is.

>>61889371
This desu, I just want a card that plays allows me to play my games in 1440p for the foreseeable future. Hoping interpolation doesn't look too shit on a 4K display.

>>61889466
1440p DOES look like shit on 4k display.

File: GTX-1060-UPDATE-100.jpg (66KB, 649x221px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 649x221px

>>61889436
And then you woke up.

>>61889477
Пoeшь гoвнa, бpaткa.

>>61889479
>hardwarecucks
>literally the premier AMD paid site

>>61889490
try another nationality paranoid street shitter

>>61889477
ayyy lmao

>>61889505
(You) are not even trying anymore, dear favela nigger.

>>61888348
>G*rmans
Said the Am*erifag 9-5 poor ass wagecuck who can't afford basic health care and housing.
go and kill yourself my man

>>61889385
what was this?

>>61889505
Mater ti umurtvenu najeben

>>61889521
>buttdevastated g*rman
Delicious.
>>61889538
FS ultra with 56 versus 1070,

>>61889474
FUCK.
>Vega 64 is too power hungry for my setup
>Want to get 56
>Don't want 1440p because muh future proofing and 4K is actually cheaper in some regards
What resolution between 1440 and 2160 don't look as shit on a native 2160p display that would run on a 56?

>>61887270
Raja DADDY

>>61889504
Affiliation change in the last month.

Tom's
Hardware Unboxed
HWCanucks

What else?

>>61889567
HardOCP, (((Steve))) (the curlyhair one).

>>61889567
I trust pcworld and pcgamer the most

>>61889567
Everyone that doesn't unendingly and unrelentingly shit on AMD. So basically, everyone that isn't /g/ shitposters and disqus comment trolls.

>>61889593
GamersNexus too, LTT and Salazar Studios are the most best

>>61889593
>pcgamer
Yeah, the idiots that made an article defending delidding. No bias here. http://www.pcgamer.com/meet-the-overclocker-who-made-delidding-your-cpu-idiot-proof/

>>61889619
Salazar is a faggot who is full of himself, he is also a closet intel shill.

>>61889665
no, eastern europeans are the snow niggers of europe.

File: 1500204282427.jpg (52KB, 600x583px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x583px

>>61889723

>>61889715
No Germans are the worst, they genocide the white race in their own country and in others. They should have been nuked to oblivion after world war 2.

>>61889752
>((( )))

>>61889053
Titan X (Pascal) = 1080ti with a few more cores, more expensive and shitty cooler

TItan XP > 1080ti, full blown GPU with work station features gimped until recently, buy this for the epene and 4k.

File: 1501432719729.gif (3KB, 124x128px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 124x128px

>>61889763
>>61889792

in order to be a succes it has to cost less or same as the 1080 ... unlikely . VEGA is a "fail" that only miners will buy

File: Worried laughter.jpg (102KB, 1170x688px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1170x688px

>Vega 64: 295W
>Vega 56: 210W
>Vega 64 liquid: 345W


Uhhhh guys?

>>61889881
It's 3.5k and 4k ALU.

>>61889873
We already know the Vega 64 is going to be priced at $499 which puts it even with the 1080. Also, I've seen more than one benchmark that puts the 56 15-20% faster than the 1070 in some benchmarks. It should be a pretty good overclocker too considering it's just a 64 with less computer cores. I don't see why it shouldn't come close to 64 clocks aside from binning. At $399, the 56 could be a 1070 killer.

>>61889887
ALU doesn't matter, Nano is 4k ALU and 150W

>>61889910
Clocks, anon. It's both ALUs and clocks.

>>61889910
Where would realistically a Nano end up in performance?

>>61889927
No one knows.
Ask Sweeney he has one.

>>61889927
Somewhere between 56 and 64 Vega, closer to 56 if not dead even.

>>61887448
always with this same narrative

fuck off

>>61887270
>400W TDP
>1070 performance
>$700

>>61890044
>450W TDP
>1060 performance
>$1000

AYYMD HOUSEFIRES

>>61887270
So what? Volta is just around the corner waiting to destroy AMD

>>61890101
You mean Q2 2018?

>>61890101
Volta is at least two quarters away (according to THE man himself).

>>61890101
You won't be seeing gaymer volta for another 8 months or more

https://warosu.org/g/thread/S61867830#p61888484

>>61890101
Volta isn't coming until next year

>>61890101
If there is one thing Nvidia can't do better than AMD it's getting people to wait.

>>61889907
Oc already Satan spawn

>>61890135
Most optimistic estimate is Q2 during GDC if he's not lying.

>>61890160
nVidia can't into CPUs, or memory.
>>61890175
>lying to shareholders
Ha haaa.

>>61889830
Slovenians are alright people desu.

File: 1496717862872.png (2KB, 193x261px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 193x261px

>>61889715

One more day. Just one more fucking day before we get official benches. Everything else is just hearsay and sandbagging. Yes even those supposed leaks and 3Dmark scores.

>>61890302
>>61889303
Shame the dude DELETed the video due to NDA.

File: 12.jpg (69KB, 1760x740px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1760x740px

>>61890302
Then we have to figure out which benchmarks are actually worth trusting

>>61890349
Oh, everyone is shilling AMD currently.
Don't worry.

>>61887270
So Liquid cooled Vega64 = 1080Ti stock

>>61890357
>>61889607

File: 580 1060 game breakdown.png (505KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1920x1080px

>>61890349
This is where 27+ game benchmarks can really help. Most reviews will only give you a fraction of that.

>>61890385
2% extra overall for 50% more power usage.

>>61887270
how many hours until real benchmarks appeare?

>>61890543
https://videocardz.com/71953/are-these-radeon-rx-vega-56-benchmarks
Soon™.

>>61890336
Shiiiiit, that would make Vega 56 breddy worth

>>61890560
Or not. >>61890557

>>61890557
great, 56 on par with 1070. i'm okay with this, let the wine age

>>61890604
It's shit.
It's 3.5k ALU card that barely competes with cutdown GP104.
Bigger Polaris would be literally better.

>>61890621
for you

>>61890640
For everyone.
Late, big, hot, underperforming.
Thermi of AMD.

>>61890621
That's what doesn't make sense...

Vega < Polaris at the same clocks

What kind of sense does that make for a new arch? That's why everyone seems to be pointing to AMD sandbagging.

>>61890658
>launch day benchmarks
>sandbagging
?
Polaris is better than Vega for gaymen.
It has better perf/ALU.

>vege is shit
THE WAIT MAY NOW CONTINUE

>>61890655
thermi?

vega 56 takes like 30 watts more than rx 580, it's 20% more, while the 1070 is like 30% better in benchmarks. it's not really a miracle, but even on release it's a better efficiency at a higher performance level

>>61890720
Anon it introduces fuckton of uarch features that make no difference.
Vega is literally R&D money and time wasted for nothing.
They could've made bigger Polaris a year ago for the same perf.

>>61888918
>1080 performance

Yeah, in DOOM and Ashes of Nobody.
In everything else, sub-1070 performance.

Any twitter accounts or ways to alert when the 56 is in stock?

>>61890764
>all new games perform faster on amd
sounds good to me

>>61890778
>"all new games"
>two games that are a year and a half old
>one of which literally no one played

Wow, sounds amazing, gonna preorder vega as soon as I can! Any tips from your #587th replay of ashes of singularity?

>>61890738
so they are all fully functional now?

>>61889988
Didn't you learn anything from Ryzen? If Vega fails, NVIDIA will continue to be a shitty company; that's not narrative, that's a fact.

>>61890798
Of course. It's launch day. DSBR and prim shaders make no difference.
It's worse than Polaris per ALU lmao.

>>61888984
that would be GT1030

>>61890825
haha

>>61890846
Funny ain't it.
They wasted a year worth of R&D time for nothing.

>>61887298
The GPU in it is much larger, what did you expect? A cut-down GP102 is still much better than a full-die GPU104.

I sold my RX480 for good money, now that the dust has been settled, I am going for a GTX1070.

The Vega56 will be way less power efficient and barely faster than a OC GTX1070 if at all.

Nvidia cards are OC kings.

funny. while you fanboys insult one each other, AMD is taking advantage of the crypto coins mining craziness...

>FE
Aren't the following cards supposed to be better?

>>61890906
your grammar is funny monkey....

>>61890951
They *were*.
Looks like it's not the case, Vega's perf/ALU is worse than Polaris.

>>61890906
It's the same story every time. "lol DOA" kids shitpost at max speed at launch day and disappear after a week.

>>61890961
UMA DELICIA

>>61890977
DOA. AMD is finished, again. This is 4th time in 3 months or 5th? I'm not counting anymore

>>61891031
AMD is not finished, they are too busy raping Intel to care about GPUs.
RTG is finished, yes (in gaymen market, which is the most important for GPUs).

Should i buy a vega 56 FE or wait for partner card

>>61891084
Buy a 1070.

>>61891084
Just Wait

>>61887270
Looks like some damn fine overclocking on that Vega 56. Shame about the 64, but the 56 could single-handedly prevent this launch from being a complete, humiliating disaster.

>>61891055
But /g/ told me 580 was DOA and it was nothing but factory overclocked power drinking mess of a 480 and lol it has 2 8 pins, but now I'm told it was the pinnacle of AMD. What a time to meme

>>61891092
Kill yourself.

>mfw AMD is now good at CPUs but bad at GPUs

>>61891113
Polaris is pinnacle of RTG.
Vega is simply worse than Polaris in every way imaginable.
>>61891119
They successfully assasinated Quadros. It's just RX Vega is morbidly bad at gaymen.

>>61891084
>vega 56 FE
Are they even doing that? I though retail was going to be all AIB?

>>61891119
>mfw shills try to spin this obvious amd victory and their superior and more modern gpus

>>61891126
Oh really? So i can preorder a partner card tomorrow?

>no game of benchmark mentioned
>just percents

DOOM Vulkan bs again ?

>>61890901
>now that the dust has been settled
>dust settled
>still no benchmarks
what did he mean by this?

>>61891163
3DMark scores.

>>61891125
>Vega is simply worse than Polaris in every way imaginable.
Expected nothing less, DOA again. I can't wait for the new DOAs next year. Let's meet again in that thread and ridicule Raja one more time with fresh memes!

>>61889387
It's 1050 performance

>>61890764
>>61890797

>>61890385

File: 1500258396130.gif (443KB, 611x470px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 611x470px

that's a nice 56

>>61889387
>>61891213

>>61888961

>>61890738
t. retard who doesn't understand how Vega works.

>>61891424
>vega
> work

What part of doa you not get

>>61888110
>pls dun steel image

Why do they even attempt this? Like Chinese faggots respect IP anyway

>>61891424
It works by regressing per clock perf compared to Polaris.
Bravo RTG!

>>61891424
It works by being massively memory bottlenecked for no real reason? Even on release drivers?

>>61891445

>>61891424
t. poojet koduri

>>61891455
DOA
OAD
ADO

>>61891483
>>61891457
>>61891455
>>61891445
You guys really are retarded. Please keep responding to me.

>>61891516
>m-merely pretending
t. Raja Poodori

>>61891552
More like Raja DOAduri

>>61891552
Keep at it. I love responses.

>>61891587
No, he made a very potent Quadro killer.
Vega just sucks at everything else.
>>61891594
>m-merely fishing for (You)s
POO

The poojeet loves to get shit on

>>61891613
>Acknowledges that I'm fishing
>Keeps biting the bait.
Well done. Please respond to this post as well slave-kun.

>>61891613
You aren't pooling anyone InDOAn. He is the DOA man

>>61891125
I assume the profits in the business/enterprise sector dwarf the consumer/mainstream one so hopefully they'll do well still.

>>61891683
No, check nvidia's quarterly revenue.
It's over 50% gaymen.

File: Radeon-RX-Vega-56-1440p.jpg (92KB, 955x602px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 955x602px

1070 performance

>>61892614
WIthout Vega 56 OC'd results that chart is useless. The whole point of the 56 is that it can OC to stock Vega 64 Air levels.

>>61892614
That chart has Vega 56 which is expected to be at 1070 levels. Vega 64 is still expected to be at 1080 levels.

>>61892662
Dude, they already pushed 14nm to the limit, it won't overclock for shit

>>61892690
It's shitposting, don't try reading into it

>>61892715
You OC the memory.
ALU perf is more than enough.

>>61892715
Can you at least look up the specs of Vega 56 and 64 before you shit post? Vega 56 has the GPU and HBM2 downclocked relative to Vega 64, there's plenty of OC headroom on it.

>>61892752
Soom all your lies will be revealed, pajeet.

>>61892792
That's low effort shitposting.

>>61888690
Same thing
I ended up switching from my 1080 sli to my 1080ti for convenience sake though

File: 1477263429243.jpg (298KB, 2162x1236px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 2162x1236px

forgotten reminder to ignore shitposts and nvidia can' async cant dx12 cant vulkan and gimpworks certified garbage

>>61892883
I thought DX12 was only win 10

>>61888885
This
I'm under NDA at my company and there is a specific clause stating that if any information I specifically know somehow gets leaked we all get in trouble

IE: if I get "hacked" it's my fault

>>61888990
It's not shilling dude it's just fun shitposting

Calm your moobs

How many cards in Crossfire can one get? Officially at least.

>>61890738
If they would stop shipping their videocardz to brainlets to do their releases and do performance testing beyond vidya like cuda to showcase its compute performance, maybe they'd draw interest. But they keep handing over their flagship products to these brainlets to run arbitrary vidya benchmarks and then you get this shit show you see...

>>61892912
yes

File: babysun.jpg (15KB, 300x240px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x240px

>>61893043
>Vega FE
>"lmao shitty gaming performance"
>WAIT FOR RX VEGA RX VEGA IS THE GAMING LINE REEEEEEE
>Rx vega comes out
>OH MY GOSH WHY ARE THEY USING GAYMEN BENCHMARKS FOR KIDS SHOW THE COMPUTE BENCHMARKS GOSH

>>61893247
theres no winning

we waited an extra month for gaming cards and now we aren't supposed to bench them with games?

>>61893043
You know your card is shit when this is the damage control you get
nobody was saying this shit for the 1070 or 1080 or 1080ti

1070 and 80 prices will be driven up even more due to this.

>>61893247
AMDrones wikk defend this

>>61893435
Are you having a stroke my dude?

File: 1479006788752.gif (2MB, 360x414px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x414px

>>61893455
yess my good sir

>>61887270
>gaming on a mining card

Stop that

>>61893670
That turned out to be a big lie

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6tig1i/70100_megahashes_per_second_rumors_untrue/

>>61889102
t. 1% yields

>>61893773
Still won't be able to get one at msrp because miners are retarded.
Feelsbad

>>61889752
>Jews
>White
Pick one

>>61893805
Miners aren't retarded they will do the math and go with whatever card has better roi with power consumption

>>61887270
thats not a benchmark its a graph of arbitrary numbers

>>61887270
Just barely faster than a 1070 and costs $100 more... Considering it's nearly 2 years late, this is actually unbelievably embarrassing for AMD.

>>61893852
I hope you're right. I haven't played PC gaming in years and i need a vega 56, btw do you know when the non FE's will be out?

>>61888465
TX Pascal is a better 1080 Ti and the Xp is the P6000 with faster memory.

>>61893870
>costs $100 more
Vega 56 is $400. 1070 can't be found for less than $450 due to miners.

>>61889102
4 out of 5 gaymen defaults to an nVidia card anyway and no amount of game performance AMD manages to pull off is going to change that.
RTG made a smart decision designing Vega for professional businesses foremost who do cost benefit analysis when making a purchases.

File: ECB1CD38-A4D4-47CE-BAA4-806AAA856DCA-7002-0000085422C99C5B.gif (564KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 800x430px

>>61894327
>le backhand tactics
>all games just like nvidia XD

>>61887270
That Vega56 performance is looking pretty good.
Hoping to find one for a decent price.

>>61893952
1070 was $300 without the miners. Vega 56 will be $400 without the miners. That's a 33% increase in price for a 5% increase in performance.

>>61892883
no ones gonna use dx12 fully until nvidia properly supports it

can see another keplar situation if volta has full dx12 capabilities

>>61894422
>1070 was $300 without the miners

in ur dreams maybe. more like $350-380 for a bargain bin reference cooler or $400+ for aib

>>61887270
what's with the "founder's edition" Nvidia cards? is it because those test better despite being stupidly expensive?

>>61894422
>1070 was $300 without the miners.
lol

>>61894373
Meme all you want. It doesn't change the fact that he's right. And try to use some different images when you shitpost. It's embarrassing.

>>61894546
Before etherium 1070's were going on criagslist for 300 used, all shapes and colors.