Object Oriented Programming or Functional Programming ?
multi paradigm
>>61882934
OOP with multi paradigm
>>61882925
nobody uses functional programming
so kill yourself
>>61882953
I use functional programming thus YOU should go commit sudoku with a butter knife.
>>61882925
OOP if you want a job
>>61883070
Yes but best jobs are fp.
>>61882925
>.gif
>>61882934
came to post this
procedural
Programmation Orientée Objet
>>61884656
Objektorienterad programmering
>>61884679
Mine's better. I'll give you a hint...
POO
Objective-oriented functions
>>61884656
Olio-ohjelmointi :^)
>>61884731
>Olio-ohjelmointi
meme language. here have a few k's kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
>>61884754
You're just jealous because creature programming sounds so much cooler than OOP.
Functional obviously, POOP sucks.
But you'll come to the same conclusions, you just need some more experience
>>61882925
The problem is most OOP languages are shittily designed, and are permeated by beginner programmers and spaghetti code. Java, C++, C#, etc.
Functional languages are more academic and attract better programmers, so the bar is higher.
A well-designed OOP language (e.g. Ruby, Smalltalk) is as much of a joy to program in as any functional language.
None of those. Learn Go (Golang):
https://tour.golang.org
https://www.golang-book.com
>>61884986
A golet, HAHAH
>>61884986
None of those. Gulag.
>>61882934
>>61883741
>>61885118
these, /thread
>>61882953
actually it is very useful if you know your number theory because Haskell (for example) is meant to interpret recurrences the way math books interpret them
>>61882925
>using a language that restricts you to a single paradigm
>>61882925
OOP, but Smalltalk's OOP not Java's.
>>61882925
Think and plan functional.
Write functional with an underlying procedural.
>>61884656
short for POO ...I am sure you know what follows next
>>61882925
OOP is just functionnal where every function is curried with a datastructure.
>>61884689
>POO
It's fun because in Spanish we say "Programación Orientada a Objectos".
Give lambdas to OOP language, developers love it.
Give objects to FP language, developers don't give a fuck.
There is no debate, OOP is doomed.
What if both have their own pros and cons?
>>61887382
The utility of OOP is directly proportional to how much of a shitshow your project is. It allows people with no discipline or forethought to participate in large projects, but it has no "pros" in the general sense.