Apple has a hierarchical structure where everything needs to go through Tim Cook and VPs, thus limiting their flexibility to change.
How do you organize a company to best suit respond to change? Are there any examples of companies that do this exceptional well?
Samsung Electronics is literally fast follower: the company. Quite ironic considering how rigid gook management tends to be.
Microsoft, too, has become very agile under based Nutella's leadership. They beat Google to the blockchain meme, for crying out loud.
>>61859152
Apple's brad from Steve Jobs was about creating change, not responding to it. Apple's senior staff fails hard at this.
You do realize Tim Cook is an extremely mentally ill person (ie homosexual), RIGHT?!
Obviously the answer is Agile.
>>61859152
>examples of companies that do this exceptional well
Arguably Google with 20% time.
IBM is probably a good example too given they've outlasted mainframes and still going strong.