Why is forth such a superior language? It offers the most bang

Vimscript is better

File: 1501373321420.jpg (319KB, 1062x1500px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1062x1500px

>>61857781
Wow that's a low blow man

>>61857677
>It offers the most bang for your buck
Forth is cool, but what does this even mean?

>>61857677
The limitations (eg. function must fit in this space or it's too big) it has bundled with the low level features (eg. the only data type is a cell which is literally a bunch of bytes, also a bunch of assembly-like features) it has effectively force you to write better code and to use bottom-up iterative approaches to coding (not that placebo TDD that's so popular these days).

http://wiki.c2.com/?ForthReadability

>>61858594
>word cans not be too big

Implement your own subroutines pleb

>only data type is a cell

The only datatype in any programming language is a cell under the hood. They just abstract that bit away from you so your precious head doesn't need to worry about it.

>assembly-like features

This is for low level programmers who like to be hardcore

>readability

What you mean you can't read forth? Perhaps you don't know the language then.

>>61858804
You are the one who is illiterate, anon. You basically said the same thing I said with retarded exposition and an overuse of whitespace.