This is your reminder /g/ that net neutrality will result in

>>61850408
Yes. Net neutrality, a free internet that is already in effect but is now being endangered, and (((Net Neutrality))) are two different things.

>>61850504
In what ways?

>>61850577
(((Net Neutrality))) is a push for more unnecessary regulation that will be used to act against free speech in the future. ISPs are so shitty today, because the government prevents competition. Not all ISPs can run their lines through places without the local government giving the green light, which for smaller companies this barrier is virtually impossible to overcome without already having money.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/04/one-big-reason-we-lack-internet-competition-starting-an-isp-is-really-hard/
So you shouldn't support government regulation that is made to "fix" problems the government made themselves.

>>61850676
Okay, I see I'm on the page here as you are

File: 1501203602906.jpg (190KB, 534x550px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 534x550px

Good.

>>61850737
That's not a good thing, but /g/ supports net neutrality anyways