B-but Mozilla is not SJW! b-but Mozilla is better than google

Whatever happened to just making a good product and not shoving your goddamn politics in everyone's face?

>>61844634
Everyone knows Mozilla is worse at this point don't they?
Hell Brave Browser was created by Eich after he was forced out from Mozilla over his political views.

File: WaterfoxBrowserLogo.png (57KB, 320x331px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 320x331px

>>61844634
Mozilla firefox uses google analytics in one of their addons page on their own website.

USE
WATERFOX
(Brave and other forks work aswell.)

File: Thank you goyim.jpg (370KB, 1696x1122px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 1696x1122px

>>61844666
>666
Mozilla is 100% kosher

>>61844679
This. I use Waterfox and fucking love it. Dev is awesome too and wants to continue legacy support. Palememe is solid too

>>61844666
I agree with Satan over here.

>>61844679
brave is a chromium fork like iridium

>>61844666
even fucking satan is complaining

>>61844634
Uninstall SJWfox right away folks!

>>61844707
>Dev is awesome too
except he don't fix security issues posted on the github

>>61844634
>-fight-on-fake-news
I don't see anything wrong with it

>>61844724
>he don't fix security
>he don't
>don't
Come back when you can speak english pajeet

>>61844666
Blame your children, satan.

>>61844739
whatever just check the hundreds of issues there that he ''forgets'' to fix

>>61844751
>whatever just check the hundreds of issues there that he ''forgets'' to fix
>not linking anything
fuck off fag

>>61844759
>calls me a pajeet
>can't find an "open source'' project
https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues/178

>>61844707
>palememe is solid too

i use palemeem. what is the difference between watermeme and palememe

>>61844767
>can't find an "open source'' project
I can find it just fine retard, I'm not going to waste my time looking for "security" issues he's not fixing that you claim exist.
And that is hardly that big of an issue. It's privacy if anything and something you can fix yourself in about:config if you aren't a lazy jew. Hell you can go grab and addon if you want something spiffier.
>>61844792
Waterfox is Cuckfox but x64, strips out telemetry bullshit, unsigned addons, any plugin and the dev wants to keep legacy addon support. Basically Cuckfox with less shit.

>>61844792
Palemoon is developed by a furry and waterfox by an incompetent 23 year old kid

woolyss chromium > waterfox > iridium > qupzilla > everything else

File: 1502073205426.jpg (80KB, 846x1024px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 846x1024px

>>61844814

so my options are :

sjwfox

furryfox

23fox

chinese theatre


botnet


EDGE


and seamonkey

>>61844867
Brave

>>61844887
does brave come up with about:config to delete the telemetry jew?

File: 1499254314405.jpg (71KB, 750x573px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 750x573px

>>61844634
Fake news is a problem
SJW is a problem
Russia is a problem
Trump is a problem

all true at the same time, brainlet

>>61844907
>we don't rely on american banks
neither do i

>>61844829
>woolyss chromium
No chromium based browsers are shit. No customization what so ever.
>>61844867
Waterfox, Palememe are your best bets
>>61844814
Wrong
>>61844907
kill yourself

>>61844634
No one, and I mean NO ONE, cares if a company leans left.

Every company leans left. Liberalism is popular now-a-days.

"Wahhhh they spend too much time catering to those who have it harder, wahhhh they like gay people"

No. One. Fucking. Cares.


Booo hooo call me a cuck. Like most of this country, I'm slightly left of center. I'm even most likely going to date a mixed race girl! My god, what a cuck I am! I also use software...based on whether it works the best or not!!! My god what a cuck!!!

I'm even a normie with a degree, friends, and a girlfriend, and guess what, no amount of crying is gonna make me leave!

>>61844792
>>61844707
installed palemoon and it can't import bookmarks from firefox. would uninstall but don't have the time

>>61844920
you're a ghetto nigger level retard

don't reproduce

File: super-male-vitality.jpg (55KB, 934x550px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 934x550px

>>61844907
you're on the wrong website, globalist

>>61844941
>nigger
>>61844932
Try harder retard: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=15794
Search engines are your friends

File: Gla9zmQ.png (31KB, 628x640px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 628x640px

>>61844904
Check for yourself
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop

>>61844945
really? tell me more about this globalists, little brainlet

>>61844957
>Unfortunately, due to Mozilla's incessant changes to the different storage formats of data in the profile, that are not directly compatible with Pale Moon and regularly cause issues, we currently do not have an easy way to import existing Firefox profiles as a whole.
brainlet

File: 1501181963881.png (10KB, 645x773px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 645x773px

>>61844966
>tell me more about this globalists, little brainlet

>>61844968
He said bookmarks not the entire profile retard. Try reading next time

>>61844982
import from html doesn't work either. fix your browser, b

>>61844978
says the infowars shill while posting on his affordable computer made possible through global trade

>>61844993
Probably does you're just too retarded

>>61844666
based satan

>>61844978
what is globalists, little brainlet? did your rich homosexual republican brainwashers tell you what it is?

>>61844731
The definition of "fake news" is very loose, it can easily become anything that goes vs mainstream.

>>61844666
this has always been the way the world worked, since capitalism was invented.

the civil war wouldn't have happened if there wasn't a heavy business interest in maintaining slavery.

>>61845007
are you using improper english purposefully or are you ESL

>>61845039
funnily enough the cotton gin was just recently invented, so the south wouldn't have been dependent on slaves if they just waited for the technology to spread

>>61844928
>reddit

>>61845028
if you think the mainstream is "hiding" something from you and is so bad, you're already a little crazy

but unfortunately young kids often fall into that trap

File: 1492931106077.png (744KB, 1003x685px) Image search: [Google]

744KB, 1003x685px

>>61844666
Preech it!

>>61845053
It's actually literally the opposite. The cotton gin revitalized the slavery industry as it became more profitable to be in the cotton industry. Slaves still had to grow and pick the cotton

File: 1499124228579.jpg (36KB, 587x454px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 587x454px

>>61844666
a planetary size catastrophe happened, a rat eyed moron con man became president

no matter what you do you can't sit this one out

Does anyone else feels that PaleMoon has a Low Quality Youtube Playback? I tested Chromium + Stable Firefox and Nightly vs PaleMoon and there were significant differences in Quality and Colours, I googled a bit but couldn't find a proper explanation, maybe some technology used in Youtube works better with Chrome based browsers, I'd love to use Palemoon, but since it doesn't work well with youtube is a no go for me.

>>61844634
Still better than SJW shit like Chrome

>>61845119
>implying Cunton would've been any better

>>61845068
>>61845054

:o

:'(

but wait, I'm still here, and just like the vast majority of the western world, I'm still a liberal! Amazing!

Ffs this place used to lean heavily left until about 3 years ago.

File: adadaddaadaad.jpg (51KB, 500x625px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x625px

Daily reminder there's literally nothing wrong with George Soros

>>61845069
Because having a monopoly on "free speech" is such a great idea.

File: 1478842132723.jpg (195KB, 480x519px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 480x519px

>>61844634
What if I tell you Soros is actually anti-jew and a holocaust denier?

>>61845147
yes, a team of sane professionals running the executive branch would be infinitely better

>>61845147
It probably would've been less of a political shitstorm that has news sites pressing f5 on the president's Twitter for hours on end waiting for "news"

>>61845162
>just like the vast majority of the western world, I'm still a liberal!
Got any sources to back that bullshit claim up? Even if true, with the growing backlash vs the left I doubt it would last long.
/g/ used to lean left because it was filled with NEET manchildren. Nowadays it's filled with edgy kiddies and shills.

File: updated.jpg (736KB, 1598x2218px) Image search: [Google]

736KB, 1598x2218px

>>61845201
>jews never work in both sides
besides jews are natural destructive people they will end up killing themselves after their multicultural anti-white agenda

>>61844666
That's not very woke of you

do any of the tree-style tabs addons work on palemoon yet?

>>61845202
>unironically believing in different outcomes under different presidency in the 21st century
you will take it in the ass one way another, there's no better or worse

>>61845207
it has viewers, which is profitable so why shouldn't they be doing it?
oh you thought it's all real, ok

File: 1482787442723.jpg (496KB, 1024x732px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 1024x732px

>>61844634
Google's just as bad as Mozilla. And probably much worse tho.

>>61844694
What's that about?

>>61845266
every american company is compromised by jews/communists
the only way to decrease the jewry is by using a txt browser, Dooble or qupzilla

In b4 cia nigger mods put this thread on autosage too.

>>61844867
>>61844814
If I had to spare one furry from being killed with fire it would be the Pale Moon dev, the guy is doing legit good job. Just use the fucking browser and stop thinking about the yiffing

>>61845300
what is the difference between Paleshit and Firefox other than muh aesthetic?

>>61845147
>Implying there were only two choices

>>61845195
the whole point is that main stream news reporting is very diverse and it covers every angle, believe me

do you even know what the word monopoly means? I don't think so

>>61845231
If Brave is autistic, then I don't wanna be normal.

Honestly if Pale Moon focused more on privacy I'd use it instead of waterfox

Rumor: "Pale Moon is a one-man show and does not have the manpower to keep up with Firefox"
>FALSE
>Pale Moon is no longer "just me" and hasn't been for the majority of its life. There are some talented and dedicated people at work in our little community to make Pale Moon what it is, and actually has seen support in many ways by many people over the years. The fact that I am the one leading this project and holding the keys and making the overall decisions about direction doesn't mean that no others are involved. To name a few other people currently actively helping with the project's core development: Matt A. Tobin, Travis W. (trava90), Axiomatic, Antonius32. Don't forget our beta testing team, either. Or the people helping with extensions and extension compatibility. Or theme porting (thanks Ryan!). Or even the community as a whole providing support to users. People doing translations. I can go on. One man? I think not. Of course since it's crowdsourced, it's easy to forget the numerous people in the background who play their part, but please don't forget them.

>>61845228
Dems have won 6 out of the last 7 popular votes during presidential elections, Dems obviously would have won this past election if they hadn't made some massive strategic failures, almost all corporations lean left, massive liberal victories have been won in the supreme court. Even the "conservative stars" of today are mostly liberal with just a hint of anti-extremism (Dave Rubin, Joe Rogan, Milo seems to actually be a liberal who just wants to cash in, sargon, etc.), The Young Turks is the most popular web-news in history.

The pendulum is swinging back right, I'll admit, but we're far, far away from actual conservatism. Gay marriage, for example, will never be delegitamized in the US again.

File: 1495330955858.png (460KB, 750x1020px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 750x1020px

>>61844666
Digits checks out
Satan is the true moral leader of humanity

File: c66eaac706b6c8fd5f5b591bec4442c87949d31dc0ab15f71cb58b28b7b6af86.png (107KB, 372x376px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 372x376px

>Got tired of Google's shit recently
>Delete Gmail etc
>Uninstall Chrome
>Switch to Firefox
>Just got everything sorted and to my liking
>Now this

idk what I was thinking desu, what browser should I be using now? Waterfox? Brave?

>>61845119
>implying anything would have been different

File: 1502078029696.png (38KB, 499x338px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 499x338px

>>61845341
>mainstream news reporting is very diverse and it covers every angle
t. CNN

>>61845318
No bullshit blat """features""", no idiotic UI changes just to mimic Chrome, no killing of nearly all essential addons just round the corner, active community and development by a dedicated dev, development not driven by political agendas, massive performance and memory use improvements.

Just install it and tell it to use your Firefox profile, it should reopen all your windows and tabs out of the box and you'll be blown away by how much faster and snappier it works.

>>61845400
Anyone with a brain knows this isn't true.

I'm trying Brave out now. Does anyone else have issues with the responsiveness of it? It's a bit laggy for me.

>>61845249
> there's no better or worse
there is, and there is definitely sane and insane
and there is Steve Bannon the foreign policy maker, and Sebastian Gorka the fake PhD terror expert, and jersey shore Guido press king, and getting nuked by Kim Jong Un, if not fried by climate and poisoned by deregulation and bankrupted by the next financial collapse and ...

>>61845366
>implying you pay sufficient attention to what's going on

>>61845400
>implying all news have more than one angle

>>61845420
better than obongo

>>61845134
It'll only play at 360p or 720p at 30fps due to DRm or something, you'll get full quality by opening the link in a dedicated media player

>>61844634
No wonder we've seen a massive rise in pro webextensions shills in thr last few days.
I was honestly wondering where the connection was.

>>61844634
>theborneopost.com
Why are you reading chink news? Is this even real news? If it is real, atleast they don't fire people for having different views.

>>61845419
to me it's very fast the only problem I have is the lack of customization (about:config)

>>61845438
exactly
CNN and USA media every day makes 300 stories about Trump to punish the american people for electing him

>>61845438
we still live in Obama world more or less, if we don't get nuked in the meantime then Trump "policies" and lack thereof and his insane appointments and lack thereof will show their full effect in a couple years

USA MEDIA is like this:
---------Fake news-------- on top
----CNN---- attack Trump based on fake news ----Fox News---- defend Trump based on fake news

The SOURCE is always unreliable. 99% of what happens in democracy is a reality show

>>61845494
>The SOURCE is always unreliable.
if the story has multiple confirmations then it's very reliable, you just don't understand how journalism works

>>61844634
Still not enough to switch to Google AwSnap.

>>61845341
>main stream news reporting is very diverse and it covers every angle

k

>>61844634
>Katharina Borchert is a German journalist and since 2010 managing director at Spiegel Online. She studied law and journalism at the Universities Hamburg and Lausanne. Katharina Borchert is the daughter of the former German Minister Jochen Borchert.

Why is a German Journalist, Chief Innovation Officer at Mozilla?

She doesn't have the degree to make an internet browser.

All her past jobs are literally diversity/journalism shit, nothing related to creating internet browsers and fixing software bugs or maintaining code.

>>61845532
>>61845400

idiot kids, I wish you lived in Venezuela or something, it would do you so much good

>>61845444
>>61844634
>>61845444
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2017/08/08/mozilla-information-trust-initiative-building-movement-fight-misinformation-online/

>>61845516
>if the story has multiple confirmations then it's very reliable
The confirmation is always from people inside the fake news industry
EVERY DAY is a day of breaking news.
They need stories to justify the money they make
We will never know what is going on in the Trump administration we can only hope and trust he is not going to fuck up like Obama, Bush and Clinton
>>61845556
because germans are the best pro-multicultural people. They know how to spread the agenda better than other europeans
Firefox spend 99% of their resources on multiculturalist parties and 1% on development.

>>61845589
>This german globalist used the pizzagate as an example of fake news that hurt people
Mozilla is 100% kosher

>Blake Aaron Ross (born June 12, 1985) is an American software engineer who is best known for his work as the co-creator of the Mozilla Firefox internet browser with Dave Hyatt
>Recently Blake Ross, lead developer of the Firefox Web browser had an item on his blog describing an encounter between his Grandfather and the “head Rabbi of Israel” at a Florida airport.
http://jewlicious.com/2005/07/firefox-is-jewlicious/

File: Blake-Ross-net-worth.jpg (176KB, 606x606px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 606x606px

>Blake Aaron Ross (born June 12, 1985) is a Jewish-American Software Engineer who is best known for his work as the co-creator of the Mozilla Firefox internet browser with Dave Hyatt. In 2005, he was nominated for Wired magazine's top Rave Award, Renegade of the Year, opposite Larry Page, Sergey Brin and Jon Stewart. He was also a part of Rolling Stone magazine's 2005 hot list. From 2007, he worked for Facebook as Director of Product until resigning in early 2013.

>>61844679
Windows version?

File: fired.jpg (73KB, 630x380px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 630x380px

>>61845678
>>61845715

>>61845053
You should probably re-read that chapter in history

>>61844634

>mfw you retards are taking the SWJ scapegoat b8

yall niggas getting played so hard, literally seeing SJWs everywhere, even the local dog is an SJW to you guys at this point.

>>61845976
t. reddit pajeet

>>61845980

whatever makes you sleep a night anon, you're just as gullible as the libtards are

>>61845976
>There's SJWs but today that term is being used to describe anyone who disagrees with someone else
>Guess there's no SJWs

>>61845976
Well, it's fucking George Soros.
Every cent this man spends is to somehow ruin civilization.

>>61844928
Things are swinging back to the right anon. Your days are numbered.

>>61845997
>literally using Soros backed software to censorship
>b-but you are obsessed with SJWs!
shut your lying mouth pajeet

>>61844634
I'm a good goy, I like Jews for their intelligence. I ditched Chrome and Googlag search because I don't want to support a company who fires engineers for being less leftist and doesn't respect the freedom of speech.

File: 85e.jpg (73KB, 680x490px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 680x490px

>>61844994
>global trade
Globalism is not about free trading fellow pleb, it's about the destruction of western cultures to weaken national identity, making the idea of countries irrelevant, and pave the way for a global crony capitalist government run by the political, corporate and banking elite, and basically you won't have rights anymore, you will own nothing, and will be a blissful slave.

>>61846050
Or more specifically, the dream of taking over the world, that some try to realize every night.

>>61844907
>Fake news is a problem
>SJW is a problem
>Russia is a problem
>Trump is a problem

Right, but Mozilla is only doing this initiative against "fake news" because Trump won. Do you really think they'd be doing this, right now, if Hillary had won? Hell no dude.

All the things you listed *are* a problem, but the real problem is the inevitable biased that will be influencing the algortithm/AI/whatever that determines what's true and what's "misinformation".

The reason why people are up in arms about this is because this is the route that will lead to internet censorship, behind the backing up quotes like "tolerance over hate" (actual Mozlila quote) It's some 1984 shit

>>61846030
again, even the "conservatives" are largely liberal. I recently graduated from college, the vast vast vast majority are liberal, and even those who listen to crowder, southern, milo, etc. are just libertarians.

>>61846049
>he believes mozilla respects freedom of speech

>>61846073
Not to mention Mozilla in their blog cited explicitly ''pizza gate'' as something that hurts democracy
They are literally calling for censoring anything that isn't broadcast by CNN/ABC

File: NGO-Trafficking.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

Soros' organizations directly fund the NGO's currently engaging in government sanctioned human trafficking across the Mediterranean.

>>61844679
Nevermind i found it https://www.waterfoxproject.org/downloads its deep within their downloads page.

File: isis-israel1.jpg (22KB, 274x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 274x400px

>>61846101

>>61846097
Yeah that's why I mentioned the Trump thing. They specifically mentioned him several times in their blog post and implied that "fake news" is the reason why he won. It might be, but they are very, very clearly biased and biased people should not be working towards censorship. In a perfect world, at least.

>>61844634
>B-but Mozilla is not SJW!
Said who?
>Mozilla is better than google
Well, maybe. Especially in light of recent events.
>>61844666
>Whatever happened to just making a good product and not shoving your goddamn politics in everyone's face?
Well, people happened. It's impossible to make a product completely detached from your views and beliefs.

File: Superior Moon.jpg (18KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x300px

>>61846134
>It's impossible to make a product completely detached from your views and beliefs.

File: damage control.gif (372KB, 2000x1153px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 2000x1153px

>>61845589
Where does it say anything about Soros or his fact checking foundation?

>>61845631
Don't see anything about pizzagate either. Google damage control?

>>61846131
Even if everything that CNN has said about Trump being a russian spy is true Mozilla(a fucking web browser company) tricking hipsters and programmers to have the leftist pro-censorship mentality is abominable
Leftists are worse versions than jews when it's not jews that are leftists.

File: hmm.jpg (17KB, 294x296px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 294x296px

>>61845589
>The first is a deeply reported and thoroughly fact checked story from a credible news-gathering organization. Perhaps Le Monde, the Wall Street Journal, or Süddeutsche Zeitung.

Wall Street Journal? Credible? Lol... they revealed themselves to be manipulative liars after the whole Pewdiepie fiasco (as bizarre as it was)

>The second article—designed for virality—accumulates shares.

This is literally all news today. Everything is click bait with an attention grabbing title. So Mozilla is working towards censorsing *all* click bait? Or only when it goes against their political agenda?

File: file.jpg (215KB, 1768x376px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1768x376px

>>61846162
>Don't see anything about pizzagate either.
You are retard

>>61846089
They're not a public company to the same extent as Google, Google is being constantly taunted by social media such as The Guardian for its intolerant search results, company policy, unfair wages etc. In other words, Mozilla is a lesser evil than Google, and Firefox 57 nightly is really blazingly fast.

>>61845976
>literally seeing SJWs everywhere
maybe this will stop when they stop acting like cancer spreading their shitty ideology everywhere they can.

>>61846202
These Wall Street Journal and NY Times articles they included in the blog posting is not even fake news, it's simply damage control saying that ''no official CNN/ABC broadcast has ever aired anything on this story".

>>61846082
And what's your point? Most people have liberal (in the true form of the word) views, that's party independent. It's your media that portraits every Republican as Christian fundie. My country's liberal party is actually conservative.

All your friends are probably smart enough to shut up when their personal views collide with the leftist groupthink.

File: updated.jpg (1MB, 2928x2216px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2928x2216px

>>61846211
>In other words, Mozilla is a lesser evil than Google
Not anymore. As of August 8 Chromium, Iridium, Brave and Pale Moon are superior, not to mention more obscure browsers such as qupzilla and Midori

>>61846215
Agreed it's an appeal to authority. It's like saying only the richest News orgs are trustworthy, and they're often ironically the most corrupted.

>You can trust these news organizations we specify. They would never lie to you, embellish or manipulate. They are infallible.

Bunch of bologna

>>61846226
The actual problem that the current leftist views are becoming too extreme and ridiculous. The memo lad is a bright example of that.

File: lenin-bronstein.jpg (210KB, 770x658px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 770x658px

>>61846247
>are becoming
It is at least since 1905

>>61846232
These forks are minorities, I don't want to use second-class products, Firefox is only the alternative.

>>61846263
I feel the same. If anyone thinks a Fork will be as feature rich or security hardened as a Google/Mozilla flagship, they are delusional. I'm all for people doing forks and fighting the good fight, but they won't win the masses in the end.

>>61846263
Chromium and Pale Moon currently are vastly superior to Firefox in everything: speed, memory consumption and privacy
You COULD argue that Chromium has botnet but at this point Chromium (or iridium) are not explicitly calling for censorship in the name of ''helping democracy xD"
Mozilla and their millions of dollars invested in "safe internet'' will end up in pure and blatant censorship.

File: 1497744610759.gif (583KB, 188x145px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 188x145px

>>61844634
The beauty of free software is that if I want, I can simply leech the product, without giving anything back.
Do I like George Soros and this "fake news" hysteria? Hell no, but they aren't using resources I'm giving to them. Mozilla doesn't profit if I use Firefox, Google profits if I use Chrome. This is the main difference in this whole SJW debacle. If you cared this much about who develops your software you might as well throw away everything electronic you own, because almost every hardware or software is designed in California by liberals. Even Richard Stallman is a far left socialist, so should we boycott GCC or Emacs now?n

>>61846289
>calling for censorship in the name of ''helping democracy xD"

"Tolerance over Hate" is the preferred nomenclature.

>>61845581
>believes other countries should lower their standards because communist shitholes exist
Great post, my friend.

>>61846303
>Mozilla doesn't profit if I use Firefox, Google profits if I use Chrome
You are a fucking radical centrist retard
Google ''donated'' 300 million dollars to Mozilla in the past few years.

>>61846232
Doesn't Iridium phone home to Google as well?

File: cri.png (13KB, 530x208px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 530x208px

>>61844679
fuck no, it uses 270MB to just run /g/

>>61846321
Yeah I was about to say. There's no such thing as a free lunch. If you aren't paying for the product, you ARE the product in way or another. Maybe they aren't directly selling your analytics, but they're using you one way or another. Their access to you is very valuable.

The problem with Mozilla is now they are having 20+ events per month funded by obscure companies (even Google funds mozilla!) to spread that censorship is good and healthy
They don't want to censor child pornography, they are explicitly saying that everything that hurts progressive people's feelings are a threat to democracy

Mozilla’s 2014 annual report: Revenue up 4.9% to $329M, 90% came from Google and Yahoo
https://venturebeat.com/2015/11/25/mozillas-2014-annual-report-revenue-up-4-9-to-329m-90-came-from-google-and-yahoo/

File: 1492793470390.jpg (77KB, 595x688px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 595x688px

>>61846289
I wonder who could be behind this post.
Google is the first in line in "censoring" """fake""" news.

>>61844634

>taking Soros money
>do fuck all all
>use it to employ some dev sec guys and improve Firefox in general

I don't see a problem here

>>61845351
That's what you think, faggot. :^)

https://reps.mozilla.org/events/#/period/future/
>The Mozilla Reps program aims to empower and support volunteer Mozillians who want to become official representatives of Mozilla in their region/locale.

As you can see in that link most of their ''events'' are honest in third world shitholes. They recruit people to volunteer for their products. These people do the free work for them in exchange of some t-shirts and pictures

In 2014 Mozilla finished the year with 329 million dollars in revenue.
Where did the money go? 99% of their fixes are committed by volunteers

>>61846289
I switched to Firefox 57 nightly, it turned out to be surprisingly fast and consumes noticeably less CPU than Chrome. I can't tell about memory because I have a big deal of RAM and I didn't pay attention to that.

>>61845589
I like how they cite growing distrust in the online media AND think it's because of fake news - not because almost every reputable newspaper shows a hidden agenda. And don't get me started on the """"defenders of the truth"""" like Politifacts - everyone with a working brain can see through their shit.

>>61846366
>I can't tell about the memory

about:performance

in your address bar. I'm also using Nightly and it's blazing.

49 upcoming events
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contribute/events/

22 of 49 only in India

>>61846247
>current leftist views are becoming too extreme and ridiculous
Agree, demanding higher life standards for everyone and giving equal civil rights to each and every human being are absolutely ridiculous.

>>61846206
I thought Mozilla is always broke because they constantly beg for donations.

Why do they keep wasting money on stuff like removing master and slave from documentation and this political shit today?

>>61846380
>I thought Mozilla is always broke because they constantly beg for donations.
That's what they want you to believe, that's why in their front page they act like the good goys
"We are not for profit xD We make browser with love xD"
It's a fucking lie and scheme. They make over 300 million of dollars. There are huge companies that employ 10,000 people that don't even make 100 million.

>>61846378
Oh fuck off with your simplification and watering down of the issue.

>>61846375

Process ID     Resident Set Size     Unique Set Size
1805                    188 MB                    106 MB
9311             111 MB                    43.9 MB
Parent            345 MB                    245 MB

>>61846378
>demanding higher life standards for everyone and giving equal civil rights to each and every human being
These aren't even meaningful topics in modern left wing politics. All these retards care about is identity issues.

>>61846407
last time a leftist cared about workers was in 1904 when Lenin realized his friend Karl Radek had a better plan to control the peasants.

>>61846378
Why are you bringing here this stupid sophistry, everyone understands what I was talking about?

I guess that the fired memo lad is not an everyone and doesn't deserves the higher life standards and the freedom of speech.

>>61846378
Except your average upper-middleclass college lefty is disgusted by low-income working-class people.

>>61846159
Is it made by living being? If the answer is "Yes" there's 99% chance it was created with some sort of sociopolitical views in mind.

Bash the fash

>>61844634
Google and Facebook already joined this

Mozilla is just playing catch up. All big companies become SJW.

I wish Terry A Davis spent 8 years developing a web browser and not some crazy distro

>>61846343
yeah Soros became a gajillionaire because he gave away millions for no return

>>61846407
>These aren't even meaningful topics in modern left wing politics.
Then it's clearly not "left" in any form.
>>61846441
>Except your average upper-middleclass college lefty is disgusted by low-income working-class people.
Cool story bruh.

>>61846516
You're asking for someone who built a soapbox car to make a Ferrari next.

/v/
>So what if the devs are SJWs?! It's just 19 bucks! DIE /pol/
/g/
>So what if Mozilla are SJWs and is doing business with Soros? are you a fascist or something?!?!

4chan was a mistake

>>61846543
>world view gets challenged
>brain shuts down

Lefty 101

>>61845341
>main stream news reporting is very diverse and it covers every angle
nice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggotnice shitpost faggot

>>61844634
https://archive.is/PDSEZ

Firefox has been doing this for awhile. And now it comes to light.

>>61846562
Reading tech news in 2017:
>SJW thing
>SJW thing
>technology
>SJW thing

Oh I wonder why it's on /g/ so much. Must be /pol/.

>>61846587
>"if that's not actually hate speech, it's pretty damn close"
/g/ will deny we are living in 1984

>>61846599
>he is still denying mozilla is sjw and calling out loud for censoring the evil patriarchal white nazi males
I can smell your putrid hair from here

So it's not a ministry of truth if you don't call it one?

File: 1493372587490.jpg (107KB, 920x613px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 920x613px

Please don't take the fake news away from us. We'll have nothing left!!

>>61846694
Dude how else am I supposed to praise kek?

>>61844907
>>61844928
>>61844966
>>61845007
>>61845185
>>61845341
>>61845420
>>61845997
>>61846162
>>61846263
>>61846284
>>61846343
>>61846378
>>61846599
>>61846694
>>61846718
>>>/v/
>>>/v/
>>>/v/
>>>/v/

STAY THERE

>>61846343
you really believe that? no strings attached?

>>61846774
>answering to /v/eddit contrarian bait

File: 1501820718863.jpg (51KB, 450x539px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 450x539px

>>61844634
>Soros
This is the line for me.

Soros is pretty cool.
They really care about future of humanity.

>>61845357
>>>/a/

>>61846694
These people will be the first to hang in the day of the rope. They are giving the Goyim resistance a bad name while encouraging the view of the kikes that our revolution is led by retards.

File: nice.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>61846789
good taste

File: nervous.png (129KB, 354x504px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 354x504px

>>61846831
>they can use guns
>they want to shoot leftists
>not in our side
>worrying about who is going to fire the bullets
:)

>>61845162
kys

File: paul-joseph-watson-prison-planet-conservatism-is-the-new-counter-13578405.png (158KB, 500x774px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 500x774px

>>61846831
>encouraging the view of the kikes that our revolution is led by retards
>implying you're not

>>61846864
>alt lite clickbait who won't name the real problem
Makes you think.

>>61845228
>/g/ used to lean left because it was filled with NEET manchildren.
Nah, that's why it leans right right now - because edgy manchildren are all about muh tradishuns *tips traditional headwear*
It did lean left because it was about programming and programmers lean left.

>>61846864
>unironically using pay pay
>unironically quoting a shill who will never name the jew and blames it all on the muh elites
Good Goy

File: jewish-creators-of-communism.jpg (257KB, 937x960px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 937x960px

>>61846882
>programmers lean left.
>he is saying this while Richard Mememann last line of code was written 34 years ago

>>61844867
((((w3c)))) made sure that it is impossible for enthusiasts to create a competitive browser

>>61845283
apparently complaining that CIG bought a professional grade coffee machine with the accompanying price tag. with dozens of coffee drinkers in the office anything else would constantly break and a good coffee increases prodctivity so I don't see the problem.

>>61846894
>that pic
There are retards who genuinely believe this.

>>61846920
>he believes a 20k coffee machine increases productivity because le caffeine xD
You are also implying there is productivity in Star Citizen
Anyway, die kike.

>>61846937
as I said to a german once: "It doesn't matter if you believe in islam or not. There will be a islamic dick in your ass regardless''

>>61846959
Haha epic
If he was a redditor, I'm sure he'd have a great laugh at this reddity joke

>>61844723
so what would /g/ reccoment to use if you want privacy and stability but you also want to use addons that do youtube ripping and gallery thread mass downloading?

>>61846973
I was going to say inb4 tips fedora but then I wanted to see if /v/ was still in the thread.
Hi /v/
bye /v/.

>>61846987
>addons that do youtube ripping
use 9xbuddy brazilian retard
Also install Palemoon or Iridium.

>>61846994
Bye /pol/

File: 1496609522436.jpg (38KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 540x304px

>>61844634
first post from Brave browser

suck it Mozilla

File: This is what a v user looks like.jpg (118KB, 576x1024px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 576x1024px

>>61847011

>>61847024
btw load screens really are faster

>>61846920
>implying cocaine or adderal wouldnt be more effective and cost <= as much

File: ss.jpg (194KB, 1544x715px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1544x715px

we trigger /v/eddit faggots

https://brave.com
https://linux.palemoon.org
https://chromium.woolyss.com
https://www.qupzilla.com/

File: GNU PLUS LINUX YOU FAGGOT.jpg (25KB, 565x375px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 565x375px

>>61846134
>>61846455
>Is it made by living being? If the answer is "Yes" there's 99% chance it was created with some sort of sociopolitical views in mind.
>It's impossible to make a product completely detached from your views and beliefs.
I'm pretty sure this is bait but exactly how many hand crafted woodwork did you see last year with #Clinton2016 carved/painted onto it? What did the Shamwow explicitly say about the 1% and occupywallstreet in it's design? Does your grandmother knit sweaters and quilts with the gadsden snake displayed or is it just the generic puppy/kitten fabric? I seriously hope you aren't this retarded anon.

>>61846553
t. Someone who hasn't even wrote a compiler

>>61846949
it's not 20k but 13k, which is not an excessive price for a professional machine. what would you use to supply dozens of office workers with coffee? good coffee increases productivity not just because of the caffeine but because sipping on something tasty is an easy way to increase comfort.

It wont be long before Firefox comes with a hardcoded hosts file that blocks "fake news".

>>61847165
Epic, simply epic

Question, so Chrome, Edge and Firefox developers said Pale Moon has almost no security. And pretty much any non-reputable websites will install viruses onto my system. Is this true?

>>61847208
>Chrome, Edge and Firefox developers said Pale Moon has almost no security
?
The only thing I can imagine is that PaleMoon has "Safe''browsing disabled and every sane firefox user disables ''safe''browsing
In my PC chromium and brave are faster but Pale Moon is not a bad browser at all

Why are progressives so much superior technologically? Firefox, Debian, the entire fucking GNU project. Are right wingers even trying, or is being retarded and illiterate a core part of conservatism?

>>61847242
Technological inclination correlates heavily with IQ.

>>61847242
I love to answer to this kind of bait so there is:
you say that while GNU is 3% or less of Linux and we are moving to a future free of GNU/FSF kikery thanks to FOSS and thankfully people are becoming aware of Debian's insecurities and lack of polish

>>61847255
I guess that makes sense.

http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Psychological-Science-2012-Hodson-0956797611421206.pdf

>>61844928
>I'm even most likely going to date a mixed race girl! My god, what a cuck
>I'm even a normie with a degree, friends, and a girlfriend
So do you actually have a girlfriend or you just tgink about the possibility of having one?
>I also use software...based on whether it works the best or not!!! My god what a cuck!!!
Looks like you actually are. Mr. Stallman is dissapointed in you.

>>61847242
This is bait.

>>61844907
DRUMFPTLETS BTFO!!!

hey /v/ fuck off
not welcome here

>>61847149
it is an excessive price, la marzocco is like ferrari of coffe machines, you can get professional 2 group machines for 2500-3500 thousand dollars

File: 1465660823135130490.gif (35KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 250x250px

Conservatards will no longer be able to propaganda so much.
No more shilling from krokodil-injecting drunkards and pedophiles. As someone who prefers MILFs, I don't want any of this russian bullshit which treats not wanting to rape kids as western illness.

Thanks mr. )))Soros(((!

>>61844634
I swear to Christ, the second Brave lets me selectively allow scripts, I'm done with FF. I can get pretty much anything else I want on a chromium-based browser except for NoScript.

>Unlike other "Firefox alternatives" that basically ride Firefox's release cycle and add extra layers on top of that like Classic Theme Restorer, Pale Moon's front-end and user interface is its own, is built on the fully-customizable XUL/toolkit framework of pre-Australis versions of Firefox, and there is no reason at all why this would have to change as Pale Moon continues to develop.

Even a Furry can do a good thing for society why can't you?

>>61847329
PA UCIEK PA WYŁANCZA

File: 1493895000515259411.png (27KB, 238x326px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 238x326px

>>61847362

what's a good browser that, unlike firefox, doesn't suddenly gain 1GB and writes it at 15 MB/s to disk every 10 minutes?

>>61847281
>In an analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative United Kingdom data sets (N = 15,874), we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology. A secondary analysis of a U.S. data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact. All analyses controlled for education and socioeconomic status.
It's actually science. There's a reason why all the greatest technological projects are all progressive. There will never be a conservative Google or Twitter, because right wingers are less intelligent than average.

>>61847385
Chromium, Brave, Iridium, Pale Moon

>>61847403
pale moon does it too.

>>61847379
>>61847329
Is this a Stephen Miller cartoon?

>>61847386
No citations, and no definition of the term "racism."

>>61847386
>a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact
so, progressives

>>61847410
http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Psychological-Science-2012-Hodson-0956797611421206.pdf

>>61847407
I have 2 tabs opened on pale moon it's consuming 500mb with ublock
Not too bad

>>61847414
>Trusting in ''neuroscientists'' and psychologists that also believe being gay is not a mental disease
Sure anyone can produce this low quality ''randomized'' papers and publish in magazines.

>>61846334
>There's no such thing as a free lunch. If you aren't paying for the product, you ARE the product in way or another.
OMG! I'm not going to use Emacs anymore. I'm sure that it will somehow make a product out of me.

>>61847386
Have you considered taking up fishing as an actual hobby? May do you some good to get out of the house/

>>61847414
>Racism.
Attitudes toward racial out-groups were assessed in the NCDS and the BCS with the same five items (e.g., “I wouldn’t mind working with people from other races” and “I wouldn’t mind if a family of a different race moved next door”; αs = .82; Deary et al., 2008; Schoon et al., 2010). Items were reverse-scored; higher scores indicate a generalized antipathy toward racial out-groups, rather than antipathy toward a specific racial group.

Looking at that definition, it seems they are saying that just because you don't want to live next to someone, you hold antipathy (defined as a feeling of repulsion). I'm not repulsed by children, but that doesn't mean that I want them in my house under normal circumstances, and would prefer a neighborhood without them. Does this mean I hate children, despite the fact that I actually play with my friend's children regularly (just on my own terms), or are they conflating repulsion with preferences?

>>61847445
Actually Psychological Science is among the most influental and trusted scientific journals. Your research has to be pretty good at what you do to get published with them. You continuing to perpetuate the stereotype of retarded conservative by denying scientific facts in front of you doesn't surprise me at all, though.

>>61847149
shut up kike

>>61847445
This
It's almost as retarded as trusting "geneticists" who don't believe in intelligent design.

WHAT IN FUCKS NAME IS UP WITH NIGHTLY'S NEW ICON

WHAT IN THE FUCK

WHY DID THEY TURN IT INTO A GAY NIGHTCLUB FOX

IT WAS FINE AS A BLUE PLANET

JESUS IM MAD

>>61847462
>The same people that believe that being gay is not a mental disorder are responsible for the most trusted ''journal''
Stop roleplaying as a scientist because you can download .pdfs published by a ''neuroscience'' psychology magazine

>>61847414
>>61847460
That's funny, racism is defined that you believe your race is superior to others, and they didn't ask anything along those lines, just about people's personal preferences.

>>61847479
It's a real study in a respected scientific journal. Reals before feels, moron.

>>61844634
Will that cancer reach ESR?

How the hell can these SJW tards understand the end user's message: NO MORE POLITICS IN MY PROGRAMS!

>my ones and zeros have to make a political statement
Fuck no, kys.

>>61847487
The two authors of this shit study are psychologists. They have 0 training in biochemistry and neuroscience. Your pdf is irrelevant just like your psychology ''scientific'' journal

>>61847472
>GAY NIGHTCLUB FOX

It's liberal and progressive, not gay!

>>61847497
>uhh it's not real science if it challenges by predisposed beliefs!!
You just keep proving the study right with every post you make

>>61847511
>it's real science produced by two psychologists who spent 4 years reading Foucault, Freud and Jung
nah

File: 1489195997347.gif (19KB, 518x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 518x400px

>>61847497
>They have 0 training in biochemistry and neuroscience.
Challenged retard grasping at straws
>b-but they don't have tangentially related education therefore statistics don't matter!

>>61847487
It is, but they chose to define "racism" as "a preference to live alongside your own race," rather than, "The belief that one race is superior to another," or, "Hatred of another race or other races."

So, if you don't have a problem with Indians, but would simply prefer to live or work separately from them, then that qualifies as racism in the study, even though it isn't the traditional definition of racism.

Furthermore, no reasons were given as to WHY people would prefer to live they way they do? Perhaps the liberals never had to live next to other races growing up, due to their socio-economic bubble, and conservatives DID, and, due to their experiences, would prefer not to experience it again.

This study is garbage-tier, and was obviously done with a predetermined conclusion and shoddy methodology.

>>61847527
You dirty psychologists have scientific fetish because you know those pdfs make up for the lack of training you have in every field that is worth: from biochemistry to neuropatology
Your opinion is literally scientific as Freud's "hysterical'' patient report.

>>61844634
Mozilla
>one product they didn't abandon
>always losing market-share
>complete failure and in the shadow of a former success
>people use SJW fox out of laziness and inertia

>>61847518
Foucault is a philosopher and Freud and Jung are more like historical figures in psychology and are pretty much irrelevant in modern psychology. It's clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.

>>61847532
What's your point? Just replace "racism" with "a preference to live alongside your own race" if it bothers you that much. Like "a preference to live alongside your own race correlates with lower general intelligence (g) in childhood".

File: Task_Manager_2017-08-11_11-29-47.png (31KB, 485x481px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 485x481px

ONE TAB
9 PROCESSES

1.2 GB


THANK YOU /g/.

>>61847242
>>61847281
>>61847386
>>61847410
>>61847445

This feels a lot like samefagging.

Anyway, as for the correlation between IQ and political inclination, you have to look at it through more dimensions than just IQ in order to understand it. It's become very popular recently to discuss personality traits (the big 5) and such psychometrics recently, so many here may be passingly familiar with these concepts.

Anyway, left-leaning political inclination is correlated with openness, which is a psychometric trait. This is a trait that determines how receptive you are to new ideas, and how loose you are with the concept of borders on all levels of abstraction. It's correlated with creativity. This trait is also positively correlated with higher IQ, as higher IQ does mean that you are able to think in more complex ways which does necessitate the ability to let borders between ideas, concepts, etc. be more fluid.

Right-leaning political inclination is more associated with conscientiousness, which means orderliness and industriousness. You like to build borders around things, and you like to keep them. This trait is not correlated with IQ, at all. Which is to say that you can't say that just because you're very orderly and industrious you're likely to be high IQ, or unlikely to be high IQ. But you are much more likely to be conservative if you're high in conscientiousness. So in fact, there will be lots of highly conscientious people that are also high IQ. These people are typically managers and such. Not necessarily the creative types, although open (trait) and conscientious people also exist.

So what do these things mean? They mean nothing, really. But they explain why intellectually intensive fields tend to be a little more left-leaning than they are right-leaning. There is significant overlap, however (a concept with which I hope everyone is familiar now, given recent happenings). But they do explain certain patterns.

>>61847536
It's not out of that, it's out of the fact that there isn't anything available that offers what Firefox does. If brave released an update that let me selectively allow scripts, like NoScript, I would abandon ship at this very moment.

>>61847558
Email and contact them about it I am sure they would allow it.

we're going to end up with censorship-at-the-point-of-browser thanks to an unholy combination of big money and teams of virtue-signalers

>>61847543
What's your point? Just replace "racism" with "a preference to live alongside your own race" if it bothers you that much. Like "a preference to live alongside your own race correlates with lower general intelligence (g) in childhood."

Because that's not what you were arguing. You were arguing that conservatives were stupid and racist.

>>61847543
shut up dirty psychologist fetishists
Download your pdfs and role play as a scientist

>>61847535
>well-conducted science and statistics gathered from thousands of samples don't count because they have been compiled by a group of specialists that I do not respect
This is the genuine, unironic opinion of modern right.

>>61847543
That's not really fair, racism as a subconscious bias isn't the same as racism as a conscious belief. The former is natural, the latter is not.

>>61847328
>2500-3500 thousand dollars
That makes 2.5-3.5 million. 13k is like nothing compared to 3M

>>61847578
>specialists that have 0 training in neuropathology and biochemistry
exactly
Gathering samples from other psychologists it's a work anybody can do

>>61847573
I was arguing that conservatives are stupid. It's you who got stuck on "racist", for some reason. Their definition is right there and it's okay if you disagree with it. Conservatives are still dumb and "have a preference to live alongside your own race".

>>61847577
Keep not reading books and thinking your opinion on anything matters

I just want to be a girl with a feminine penis.

When the fuck did /g/ start using Brave?

/g/ used to shit on it back in the day.

>>61847596
>I was arguing that conservatives are stupid. It's you who got stuck on "racist", for some reason. Their definition is right there and it's okay if you disagree with it. Conservatives are still dumb and "have a preference to live alongside your own race".

Define dumb. "Dumb," as in lower IQ? "Dumb," as in lacking common sense? Qualify your claims.

>>61847599
It began when the /vpol/ invaded

>>61844666
nigger-jews bad news

>psychologists roleplaying as scientists still think their meta-pdf are worth something
And people spend 150k in a 4 year program to read wikipedia and foulcatian literature

>>61847599
When Firefox was owned by the Jews and Google went to bed with one.

>>61847595
I am trying to understand what kind of twisted, irrational thought pattern is required to somehow directly connect neuropathology and biochemistry to general intelligence statistics.
I do understand that you consider neuropathology important - your mind is not working correctly so neuropathology is of huge importance to you - but you should really think your ideas through before you assume baselessly that they're rational.

>>61847599
I think some people began using it due to FF 57 and their bullshit political agenda, like spending tens of thousands of dollars to remove "slave" from their code, not because anybody complained, but because it /might/ hurt some theoretical person's feelings somewhere down the line.

>>61847601
General intelligence factor correlates with conservative beliefs. It's right there in the abstract. Did you read any of the study? Do I need to paraphrase the rest of it to you as well?

>>61844634
fucking firefucks.

>>61847556

And let's not make the fallacy that just because any given group is higher in IQ than any other, which is of course the case with many human populations, they're going to be right all the time. Of course they're not.

Rather, the best way forward probably lies somewhere in the overlap between these groups; in open communication in climate where authoritarian suppression (such as we have seen recently) is not the norm. At least this would be the case as far as political inclination is concerned, and I think this generalizes in how to run companies and such as well. You'll probably get a pretty good solution if you have people who are able to think radically, maybe so radically that their brains fall out, but can do so safely because there will be conscientious people there to moderate them and implement their ideas in a way that's actually viable.

>>61847596
>I was arguing that conservatives are stupid

But they're not. There are very intelligent conservatives, and there are very stupid conservatives. There are very intelligent liberals, and there are very stupid liberals. There is a lot of overlap.

And as for the matter of race, conservatives like to build clear borders around things. That includes living with your own kind. That does not mean that you're racist and/or stupid. It just means that you like clear borders.

>>61847621
"General intelligence" is not defined. What is "general intelligence?"

The fact that you aren't realizing how bullshit this study is, simply by me asking questions, makes me wonder about your intelligence (both your IQ, and your "common sense" intelligence).

>a bunch of roleplayng psychologists actually destroying the thread with their scientific fetish
Pathetic

>>61847633
>But they're not. There are very intelligent conservatives, and there are very stupid conservatives.
Just like there are smart and dumb blacks.
This doesn't erase the IQ gap.

>>61847634

He means g factor. Actually, I don't know if that's what he means, but that's what I'm hearing. Although he doesn't seem to know exactly what he's talking about, beyond the specific context of what is said right there. Anyway, it is a real thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)

>>61847633
>There are very intelligent conservatives, and there are very stupid conservatives. There are very intelligent liberals, and there are very stupid liberals. There is a lot of overlap.
That's a fair point, but as conservatives are on average less intelligent I believe it's fair to stereotype them as stupid. Their lesser intelligence also makes it natural that they're underrepresented in the tech industry.

>>61847634
"General intelligence" is actually a very specific psychology term that is clearly defined. You have no idea what you're talking about. Go read the Wikipedia page or something before you embarrass yourself any further.

>>61847660
>is actually a very specific psychology term
>he thinks IQ tests are meant for psychologists to roleplay as scientists

>>61847659
They don't define it as a g-factor. Therefore, I can't presume as much. This is a problem that keeps cropping up with the study. Shoddy definitions renders the entire thing worthless at minimum, and biased at worst.

>>61846202
Le Monde aren't credible either even though they're reputable they're biaised as fuck

File: 1497153557144.jpg (110KB, 723x1023px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 723x1023px

>>61847637
Anon I just want Milkies!

File: main-qimg-6a7f1af5d6f17afd68d8e7bb93b670b6.png (61KB, 644x362px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 644x362px

>>61847649

Gap? Well, there is a small gap between the means of the distributions, yes. Just as there is between men and women, for example.

>>61847660
>That's a fair point, but as conservatives are on average less intelligent I believe it's fair to stereotype them as stupid.

Would you also stereotype women as stupid? Because the same gap exists between men and women, you know. Which also makes it natural that women are underrepresented in the tech industry. This is extremely counter to the liberal claims, of course, and in line with the conservative ones. I wonder how you feel about this. I hope you'll approach this with a cool mind.

>>61847671
They do specify it as the g factor. Stop posting and go read the study.

File: 1502305717080.jpg (169KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1000x750px

>>61847680
The reason women can't do some kinds of work is not due to low IQ
It's way deeper. Their nature is totally different.

File: multicultutralism.png (802KB, 1313x625px) Image search: [Google]

802KB, 1313x625px

>>61847487
Stop Equating “Science” With Truth

>>61847660
>I believe

>>61847596
If you take such offence at preferring to be among one's own group, then detach yourself from your own group and live among minorities exclusively. Eat your own dog food.

>>61847704
>Stop Equating “Science” With Truth
This is your brain on right wing ideology

>>61847671

It's a pretty common and useful concept, especially when people start getting really smart, in which case the ways in which they are smart become very diverse. It basically just means that you let all the "ways" of being intelligent boil down to a single general factor.

File: GOODGOY.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

>it's published by a real scientific magazine organized by psychologists!
>IT'S REAL SCIENCE AND SHEIT

>>61847660
>"General intelligence" is actually a very specific psychology term that is clearly defined. You have no idea what you're talking about. Go read the Wikipedia page or something before you embarrass yourself any further.
You still don't get it. What are a-political people qualified as, or do they give them a test? What about libertarians? Anarchists? Communists? Do they get swept into general definitions of "liberal" and "conservative?"

Furthermore, it's not even "conservatives," that the claim is made about. It's "conservative authoritarians."

They also use general terms, like "right-wing ideologies," without defining what "right-wing ideologies," encapsulates.

>>61847714
Stop making an ass of yourself.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Stop+Equating+“Science”+With+Truth

File: 1316651201342.png (1MB, 1093x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1093x768px

Shut up anons! Take me home!

>>61847702
>It's way deeper. Their nature is totally different.

Well yes, that's also true. They have different personalities than men do. But as with IQ and everything else, there is so much overlap. But it does make certain patterns that emerge explainable. It does explain why we see fewer women (and conservatives) in tech, leadership positions, etc. But you have to keep a cool mind when you look at it.

BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGISTS KIKES

>>61847723
>the study doesn't confirm my opinions?
>it's clearly (((science)))

>>61847660
>I believe it's fair to stereotype them as stupid
Yeah, so that you can stick your head in the sand every time one of them says something legitimate and just say "no you're dumb just like Trump!!!!!" Do you know what irony is, son? Or, do you know what Othering is? You ought to, given the rhetoric you're using.

>>61847714

He's making a reference to a very left-leaning retort to the Damore memo. The leftist journalist basically says "just because science says so doesn't mean it's so".

>>61847680
>This is extremely counter to the liberal claims, of course, and in line with the conservative ones.
More straw grasping
>but some liberals are wrong about women, therefore the correlation of left-leaning views and general intelligence does not exist!

>>61847741
>meta-data organized by two 4 year graduates
>study

>>61844666
When did such a time exist? Never.

File: 1500165822418.jpg (25KB, 439x411px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 439x411px

>>61847738

BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES

>>61847752
So what's the problem with the data? I'm sure you can point out the flaws in their methodology and explain how they got past the peer review of a very respected journal.

>>61847414
And here's one that shows that libertarians are more intelligent than liberals and authoritarian conservatives:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042366

>>61847751
>>but some liberals are wrong about women, therefore the correlation of left-leaning views and general intelligence does not exist!

I have said no such thing. I am saying that such a correlation is VERY real, and that the same kind of correlation exists in other dimensions as well, such as sex. There is, however, significant overlap. You can't say that a woman is stupid because she is a woman, and you can't say that a conservative is stupid because he or she is a conservative, and you certainly can't say either with regards to a liberal either. But you can say that there is a difference in the expectation, as in the mean of a normal distribution.

This is a matter of statistical analysis. You are basing your entire argument on the principles that I am explaining, so please don't make a fool of yourself by misrepresenting what I am saying.

BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES

File: genocide8.png (2MB, 1152x4346px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1152x4346px

>>61847660
>people who are outwardly and unreservedly unpleasant towards people based on traits outside of their control are less intelligent than those who don't
Wow!

The thing to consider, though, is that it's en vogue among progressives to be outwardly and unreservedly unpleasant towards people simply for having pale skin, especially so if they are from a different intersectional minority yet do not carry the views prescribed for them by the progressive orthodoxy. So what does this imply about the average IQ among progressives?

>>61847753
Yes, I can't go to Lowes and pick up a doorknob or a light bulb without having them shove their politics in my face. It's impossible for me to go to a farmer's market and pick up an ear of fresh corn without hearing about the farmer's politics. I can't buy a chair without seeing "By conservatives, for conservatives," etched on the underside.

Fucking retard.

BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
>BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES
BAN THE TWO PSYCHOLOGIST KIKES

>>61847776
That study does a much better job of outlining their terms, too.

>>61847776
I expected conservatives to be less conformist.
It paints them as zombies with zero free will here, while liberals are very close to libertarians despite being a much more dominant group.

>>61844907
> Hates Trump, tax evaders, alt-right """""journalists"""""/clickbait SJW bullshit and identity politicking cunts.
B A S E D

>>61847794
Then stab your eyes out with a fork and then use earplugs. Problem solved.

>>61847824
He was being sarcastic, dumbass.

>>61847830

If he was being sarcastic then he can unironically drink Bleach along with this guy >>61844907. You also can an hero and save the day.

>>61847776
I take it that you're referring to "a relatively cerebral as opposed to emotional cognitive style", as the study doesn't actually appear to have any intelligence measurements. Anyway, you can't defer intelligence from the cognitive style.

>>61847809
>hmm, this study seems to support my preconceived beliefs. It must be the better study!
Sasuga /pol/.

>>61847867
I mean "deduce intelligence", of course

File: total.png (1MB, 2960x1219px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2960x1219px

>>61847867
I never stated it was a good or bad study. I simply stated that they did a good job outlining their terms.

I'm not conservative or libertarian, although I would be closer to libertarian based on a political compass test.

I consider myself a capitalist civic nationalist.