HAHAHAHAHA AMD HOUSEFIRES ARE BACK INTEL WINS AGAIN

>>61839315
But how?

>>61839542
>cpu+gpu
Check below the graph, it's obscured by the red line.

>>61839315
>OC
in the trashcan it goes

Fake as fuck

>>61839315
call nine one one

I sense suicide voltages.

>>61839646

the check box isnt fucking checked

>>61839315
What rate were these clocked to? If the indiatel is clocked at 3ghz and the AMD is hitting 5...

>>61839315
So Threadripper + Vega equals the end of this universe?

>>61840006
That's not funny.

Besides, it says Sytem power draw at the top.

>10% OC == 100% power draw


Ay wut

>>61840118
Where the hell does it say 10%?

>>61839315
>No source
>No system specs
>No CPU freqs
UMA

>>61839315
>no i9
>dubious OC values
myeh

>>61841326
How much is 400MHz out of 4GHz?

>>61839315
Why do you fuck create 10 threads per day about Intel/AMD? Gaymers BTFO!
>>>/pcbg/

File: untitled-3.png (11KB, 683x335px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 683x335px

>>61839315
Tom's fucked up somewhere. He's using an ANUS board, so it's probably their LLC boosting it to 1.6V or something.

>>61841442
Where's the numbers, faget

File: wat-2.png (362KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 700x700px

>>61839315
>amd 16-core use 35% more power than intel 8-core
>intel wins

>>61840039
>AMD is hitting 5
Now now, Anon. I want AMD to win too, but we all know that isn't true.

>>61841395
The 7900X is i9, it's just mislabeled.

File: i'm gonna make fx9590 look like a fucking joke.png (228KB, 489x394px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 489x394px

>>61841625
Can't wait for the 12+ cores. They're going to be even more ridiculous.

File: 10 cores uses more power lol.png (486KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1920x1080px

>>61839315
Where do you even find this garbage. What are they even testing? I couldn't even find any info on their site.

I'm really curious about the 8 core Threadripper. Has the turbo or XFR been revealed yet? It might actually be a relatively decent overclocker based on the results we're seeing from the 1950X.

File: amd_stack-100731237-large.jpg (60KB, 699x239px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 699x239px

>>61842186
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3214635/components-processors/ryzen-threadripper-review-we-test-amds-monster-cpu.html

Looks like similar specs however keep in mind it's 4 cores per die, so you're not going to get the same results as if it were just an 1800X that OC's better.

>>61841993
It's P4 vs. K8 all over again holy shit hahahahaha

8700K will send amd back to the designated street

File: 1501081015371.jpg (218KB, 910x1015px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 910x1015px

>>61842779

I think it will happen

>>61841957
>18 cores
>x299 socket can't support it
>it's on a new platform
>requires liquid nitrogen and a 2000w psu

>>61842779
Yes.. I can't wait for AMD to finally die.. it will be glorious day

>>61842818

yeah let Samsung buys AMD

>>61842779
>W-wait for Macaco Lake!

Dumb AMD retarded don't know how much money and effort Intel spends into making new architectures, they seriously think their bankrupt company can make something better they're fucking more delusional than Trump voters and should be gathered up and shot

>>61842964
Nice try Mr. Pedro Goldstein the Third

File: intel ceo JUST.jpg (119KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x1000px

>>61842779
>>61842805
>>61842818
>>61842826
>>61842964

>>61842818
>>61842826
>Samefag with the exact same broken English

Kill yourself.

>>61842964
>Dumb AMD retarded don't know how much money and effort Intel spends into making new architectures
All of their attempts were complete failures, you stupid fuckstick.

>>61843027
Dumb poojet piece of shit

File: Itanic.jpg (104KB, 672x371px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 672x371px

>>61843033
Kill yourself.

>>61843010

you mad

>>61842779
Intel can only do what they did with X299- ramp up prices, clockspeeds and temperatures and hope nobody notices the TDP has been completely blown past.

>>61843061
Learn English, and then kill yourself. Or just kill yourself. Your choice.

I like how OP's picture has *no* information about how far he's OC'd, whether it's under load or not, or even numbers on the i9.

>>61843093
>it's the mad "kill yourself" amd shill episode

In other benchmarks I've seen Threadripper drawing less power at stock than Skylake-X.

>>61843192
They were all paid off by AMD, thus completely wrong and biased

>>61843202
But the ones paid off by Intel are completely honest and 100% accurate :^)

>>61843202
So AMD paid off all the reviewers, fascinating things to do with literally no money in their pockets.

File: pooripper housefire.png (84KB, 1112x833px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1112x833px

>>61843192
Nice try poojeet

>>61843312
>4 watt difference for 3.9ghz
Considering that TR has twice as much processing power, more power draw isn't surprising, but that tiny leap for OC is pretty good

Especially since i9 7000x has twice its normal power draw for...what, exactly? It's missing any OC numbers. Awful convenient.

>>61843391
>Idle

>>61843391
*7900x, my bad

>>61842418
Is the Ryzen 7/1700 the cream of the crop there?

>>61843407
We all know winblows does a stupid amount of "idle" process bullshit.

>>61843438
He's trying to mislead you with idle numbers, load numbers are a completely different story.

Speaking seriously, is Ryzen 16-core a good choice if I plan on a workstation build for multiple simultaneous virtual machines (no real gaming)?

Or should I just save up for a xeon

>>61839315
>power consumption
>housefire

You got your memes mixed up.

>>61843497
Intel is always better

>>61842818
You have to be paid to think this is a good thing for the industry.

>>61843556
I love computing, AMD has sliterally destroyed innovation, progress by their glued slow core shit

>>61841670
>>61839315
>Mislabeled graph is a reliable source of information
\g\ has really gone to the shits lately.

File: .jpg (91KB, 720x539px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 720x539px

ruh-roh

>>61843603
O MY DELICIA MACACO

File: 90026.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO ME

File: 90024.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

I MADE MY MISTAKES

File: 90021.png (41KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 650x350px

I'VE GOT NOWHERE TO RUN

>>61843679
>>61843662
>>61843650
No one cares for rendering, 99% of people are fine with a dual core.

File: 90020.png (44KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 650x350px

THE NIGHT GOES ON

>>61843692
2 cores? Why do you need 1 core? Nobody could actually use a FPU anyway HELP POLICE THIS MAN IS THREATENING ME WITH 8-BIT INTEGERS !!

File: 90031.png (40KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 650x350px

AS I'M FADING AWAY

File: 90016.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

I'M SICK OF THIS LIFE

File: 90028.png (41KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 650x350px

I JUST WANNA SCREAM

>>61839315
Fake News.
Damage Control.
Sad!

>>61843497
Don't listen to this macaco fucker >>61843503
Threadripper is great value (32 threads for $1K) and won't have anemic clockspeeds like the Xeons.

>>61839315
nigga that's 16 cores, of course it's going to draw some watts, plus all the PCIe lanes (64)

>>61843639
>3% higher power draw
>15-30% higher pwerformance
looks fine

>>61843869
see >>61843639

Looks like intel is going all out with the shilling today.

>>61843897
see
>>61843650
>>61843662
>>61843679
>>61843695
>>61843712
>>61843761
>>61843797


inb4 single thread benchmarks on a HEDT platform

>My old FX6300 is up there with the i7s and Threadrippers

What the fuck man, its way too slow for this power draw.

>>61843943
see >>61843639

>>61842762
nah, at least till zen 2 intel has single core over amd, p4 v k8 was a complete bloodbath in amd's favor as far as performance was concerned.

File: Screenshot-2017-8-11 PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks - High End.png (103KB, 782x928px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 782x928px

>>61839315
How will intel ever recover?

>>61843913
sure, at stock the 1950x does even better in comparison. but even when OCed it's not exactly bad.

>>61843167
>>61843503
>>61843603
Kill yourself.

>>61843497
look into iommu groups and if threadripper has the same issues ryzen has.

I want to say threadripper is worth it regardless but if it has the same issue its a pain in the dick to deal with.

>>61844077
IOMMU groups have been fixed a while ago

>>61843996
DELID THIS

File: frus.jpg (115KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 640x480px

>>61844073

>>61840006
Pretty sure that's not a checkbox but a legend

>>61843635
I didn't say that, I just said there is an i9 on it.

>>61843797
Is that supposed to be 89.9 billion instructions per second?

>>61843996
DELID THIS REEEE

>>61839315
7900x only on 284 while 99% of the reviews put it on 353
oc threadripper blows everything out who would have knew!
its like physics apply to amd!

>>61842814
LN2 is cheap they gonna bundle it with phase change cooling with liquid helium inside
literally the way cern cool down the super collider

>>61843968
the world is moving away from that single core meme few games and few applications are what is left

>>61843692
>dual core

File: 1200px-Fire_fighters_practice_with_spraying_equipment,_March_1981.jpg (190KB, 1200x776px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1200x776px

cant wait to see that 18 core i9 being OCed

not even industrial level capacitors will be able to feed it

>>61843312
>up to 10% workload on 16 cores vs up to 10% workload on 10 cores
>objective proof that AMD is ~1% more efficient per core
>Intel wins

>>61844652
Yes

>>61846353
They cool the LHC with Liquid Helium Cooling though.

>>61846591
i literally stated this

>>61846353
LN2 AIO when?