When will AMD realise that releasing Bulldozer over and over again isn't going to work? Consumers these days aren't dumb enough to fall for the 'moar coars iz betur' argument, the Threadripper release today has been marked by nothing but disappointment and damage control.
>Consumers these days aren't dumb enough to fall for the 'moar coars iz betur' argument
>/r/amd
Yes they are
>>61837383
>>61837398
Brian, why are you using gaming consumer "arguments" for a HEDT CPU?
i9 7900X falls under the exact same shit for gaming.
>>61837398
this
>>61837383
One of the laziest shitposts I've seen on here in a while
>>61837383
my dude no one uses a CPU for gaming
>>61837398
>Threadripper performs identically to Intel CPUs in games
OMG Intel literally blown the fuck out!! How can they recover! AMD4LIFE!!
This board is literally /v/ now. Just fucking rename it already.
>>61837383
>HEDT CPU for heavily multithreaded tasks
>Comparing them to consumer CPUs in 1080p gaming benchmarks
>>61837383
Ryzen forced Intel to start making hex/octacore chips for the desktop, so it did at least one thing right. Coffee Lake will be great.
When will Intel realise that releasing Sandy Bridge over and over again isn't going to work? Consumers these days aren't dumb enough to fall for the 'muh 15% ipc increase' argument, Intel's response to the Threadripper release today has been nothing but butthurt and damage control.
>>61838117
Just like what happened to DUAL CORES a long long time ago
And dont forget OPTIMIZATIONS
>>61838203
Six cores? What do you need four cores for? You don't need two cores.
>>61837383
Remember when Ryzen 7 launched and the gaming performance was mediocre until some games got patches and people started using 3600mhz ram?
Gee, I wonder if a parallel process is likely to occur with Threadripper? *thinking*
>>61837383
>blaming hardware instead of the shitty multi-thread optimization in GTA V
Since when have console ports determined how good a CPU is? It's artificial stress-testing.
>>61838487
>>61838487
I think this is correct.