Well now that the Threadripper benchmarks are out and it's

>>61834662
>and it's a huge piece of shit for gaming
Are you even looking at the same benchmarks? It's as good as Ryzen, I don't know how you were expecting any better when it's basically the same CPU, only two of them now.

https://www.techspot.com/review/1465-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-1920x/

Remember to sage and hide!

>>61834662
>Will the Coffee Lake 8700K be something to look forward to or should I not get my hopes up?
Will probably be another shitshow rushed housefire like X299 to be honest.

>>61834662
Wait more. amd will deliver next time

>>61834662
>buying a 16c/32t for gaymen

SOPA

>>61834751
That's what I was told after thuban too

What gaymes are you playing that require you to buy expensive CPU's?

File: s-s-tutter.png (86KB, 930x916px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 930x916px

>>61834693
>'it's as good as Ryzen'
>this is what AMD fanboys actually believe

>>61834836
All of them you shitmuncher. GPU performance has moved on astronomically since the era of Sandy Bridge, CPU performance has not. Every single fucking game is CPU bottlenecked these days.

>>61834852
There are always going to be some games with launch day issues, and there's always going to be dipshits like you cherrypicking them. Kill yourself.

>>61834852
>higher performance with stock clocks than OC.
What did he mean by this?

>>61834873
>five year old game
>$1000 flagship getting minimum framerates half as good as a fucking 2500K
>(((launch day issues)))
Guess if I buy a TR chip I'll just exclusively play 2017 and later AAA titles.

File: modern_marines.jpg (31KB, 540x717px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 540x717px

>>61834852
Read your Anandtech, most games benefit when you switch it to NUMA mode.

File: lolpng.png (149KB, 1120x977px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1120x977px

>>61834852
>fucking pentium is better
>muh moar coars smooth gameplay

>>61834852
>5.1GHz (a totally realistic overclock) 7700K only 10% faster than 3.9GHz 1700X

What did Intel mean by this?

File: btfo.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>61834950
Pic related is you.

>>61834751
>>61834804
>>61834852
>>61834902
>>61834946
>>61834988
Kill yourself.

File: If_you_cant_slam_with_best_philosophise_with_the_rest.jpg (98KB, 455x587px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 455x587px

>>61834982
Overclocking doesn't scale performance linearly, never has.

File: 1496952171379.png (871KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 801x1500px

>>61834995

File: frustmacro.jpg (259KB, 800x1004px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 800x1004px

>>61834995

>>61834662
What did you expect you stupid cunt, you were honestly looking at 12/16 core cpu's for gaming?

Save money, get a 7700k and get the best gaming performance

File: AMD fucking finished.jpg (180KB, 935x923px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 935x923px

>>61834995

>>61835214
Kill yourself.

>>61835214
wojaks should be brown

>>61834662
Mazda RX-9 gaming benchmarks coming in 2019

>>61835214
Crazy how a 2015 port doesn't know how to handle 32 threads. But you know that, it's just more fun pretending to be retarded.

>>61834662
DAMAGE CONTROL!!!!!! DAMAGE CONTROL!!!!!! DAMAGE CONTROL!!!!!!

File: 1502373140446.png (105KB, 831x537px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 831x537px

>>61834902
Just set up (UMA) delicia mode

>>61835214
>But but all those gaymer led motherboards what we gonna do now

>>61837606
It's workstation LEDs

>>61836692
>32 threads are actually useless for gaming.

File: latency-pingtimes-1950x3200.png (138KB, 602x389px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 602x389px

>>61837583

File: 1502383967065.png (1003KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1003KB, 801x1500px

>>61835022

>>61837583
>>61837707
>250ns delay
>amdfags will defend this

File: latency-pingtimes2.png (113KB, 602x389px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 602x389px

>>61837778
200ns you mean? There's nothing to defend. i9's mesh latency is consistently shitty, even if you increase RAM speed and overclock it.

>>61837689
>Quoting something I didn't say
It's almost like you have to write programs for the hardware they'll be used on. You're right I'm sure they tested the game on xenons. It's AMDs fault it's not working.

>>61837831
Yep yet mesh has much more scalable performance inter cores. Not that you will consistently use cores 1 to 20 bingback on seon, but it you don't need to worry about numa on single die xeon.
Zen is effective 2 levels of numa ccx and die.

>>61837831
You need to oc the mesh not the cache