>Techradar That kills the man.

File: 1460064850747.jpg (8KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 100x100px

>>61833429

since when g became v?

>>61833449
2011 or so

>>61833449
Idiotic tech websites has nothing to test for "workstation cpus"

>>61833478
no cause then they wont get any money from intel

File: LACBnQy.jpg (99KB, 1279x832px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1279x832px

>>61833429
>mfw it's real

I still kinda don't believe this.

>>61833429
Gaymers BTFO
>>>/pcbg/

>>61833429
Holy fucking shit

File: IMG_0342.jpg (68KB, 1242x778px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1242x778px

yep this makes sense

>>61833764
>they're not even shills
>they're actual retards

File: 1493083391515.gif (407KB, 200x120px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 200x120px

>>61833429
When you see it...

File: 1490830221114.gif (999KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

999KB, 640x480px

>>61833429
Holy shit :^)

Those scale bars though.

File: 1488824375582.jpg (43KB, 600x637px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x637px

>>61833429
>>61833764

>>61833764
How the fuck do have .5 of a frame, who the fuck measures framerate like this

>>61833665
>Tech board
>Currently talking about cpu and benchmarks
Brainlet btfo.

>>61833764
>>61833429
Good Lord the almighty, this isn't even fake. Meme magic has gone too far.

>>61833429
>1 frame difference above 60 fps
oh no, i can totally see that!

>>61833950
>0.1 frame

>>61833429
nVidia Graphworks™

>>61833429
This is so fake and so gay...

>>61834300
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x

Scroll a little, you'll see.

>>61833654
>>61833710
>>61833869
>>61833950
>>61833994

from this page http://www.techradar.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x

comes this
http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cqjL53sxmHc7Rig9ZuZ2vb-650-80.jpg

not intel fanboy, i prefer amd but this is insane bait

>>61833429
>.1 frame increment spaced out massively to make the bar look big

Jesus Christ. Are they trying to look like shills for Intel?

File: 1502344318640.jpg (15KB, 302x319px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 302x319px

>>61834335
>>61834349
>its real

>>61834349
> they actually changed it with the same filename without updating the article
ENGAGE DAMAGE CONTROL MODE

>>61834335
>>61834349

I'm seeing regular graphs starting at 0. Did they go damage control?

>>61834699
Seems so

>>61834390
we wuz water filters n shiet

>>61833429
AMD IS OVER AND FI-
->>61833764

File: original.gif (15KB, 440x220px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 440x220px

>>61833429
A WHOPPING ONE FRAME FASTER

>game mode
Why? Why only on the threadripper?

>>61833478
>threadripper
>workstation

File: whats-wrong-with-you.gif (726KB, 446x251px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 446x251px

>>61836083
>He doesn't want his workstation to have an awesome name

>>61834349
>Ready for the ultimate mega-tasking
Did Chris chan write this

File: IMG1398-M.jpg (41KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x400px

>>61833429
Reminds me of this

>>61833429
>>61833764

someone post that pic of the apple presentation meme for CPU performance

File: a6x_performance-580x340.jpg (19KB, 580x340px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 580x340px

>>61836172

>>61833429
>>61833764
THESE BENCHMARKS ARE REAL

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

File: twotimes1453846369997.jpg (102KB, 967x1080px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 967x1080px

>>61836162
>>61836172
>>61836253

>>61836162
newest tegra probably rapes them

>>61836323
can you really compare hardware when the software makes such a huge difference?

>>61836323
In power consumption?

>>61833950
Probably the software they were using did this by default considering the range of data and they were too fucking stupid to think to change it.