>Techradar
That kills the man.
>>61833429
since when g became v?
>>61833449
2011 or so
>>61833449
Idiotic tech websites has nothing to test for "workstation cpus"
>>61833478
no cause then they wont get any money from intel
>>61833429
>mfw it's real
I still kinda don't believe this.
>>61833429
Gaymers BTFO
>>>/pcbg/
>>61833429
Holy fucking shit
yep this makes sense
>>61833764
>they're not even shills
>they're actual retards
>>61833429
When you see it...
>>61833429
Holy shit :^)
Those scale bars though.
>>61833429
>>61833764
>>61833764
How the fuck do have .5 of a frame, who the fuck measures framerate like this
>>61833665
>Tech board
>Currently talking about cpu and benchmarks
Brainlet btfo.
>>61833764
>>61833429
Good Lord the almighty, this isn't even fake. Meme magic has gone too far.
>>61833429
>1 frame difference above 60 fps
oh no, i can totally see that!
>>61833950
>0.1 frame
>>61833429
nVidia Graphworks™
>>61833429
This is so fake and so gay...
>>61834300
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x
Scroll a little, you'll see.
>>61833654
>>61833710
>>61833869
>>61833950
>>61833994
from this page http://www.techradar.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x
comes this
http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/cqjL53sxmHc7Rig9ZuZ2vb-650-80.jpg
not intel fanboy, i prefer amd but this is insane bait
>>61833429
>.1 frame increment spaced out massively to make the bar look big
Jesus Christ. Are they trying to look like shills for Intel?
>>61834335
>>61834349
>its real
>>61834349
> they actually changed it with the same filename without updating the article
ENGAGE DAMAGE CONTROL MODE
>>61834335
>>61834349
I'm seeing regular graphs starting at 0. Did they go damage control?
>>61834699
Seems so
>>61834390
we wuz water filters n shiet
>>61833429
AMD IS OVER AND FI-
->>61833764
>>61833429
A WHOPPING ONE FRAME FASTER
>game mode
Why? Why only on the threadripper?
>>61833478
>threadripper
>workstation
>>61836083
>He doesn't want his workstation to have an awesome name
>>61834349
>Ready for the ultimate mega-tasking
Did Chris chan write this
>>61833429
Reminds me of this
>>61833429
>>61833764
someone post that pic of the apple presentation meme for CPU performance
>>61836172
>>61833429
>>61833764
THESE BENCHMARKS ARE REAL
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>61836162
>>61836172
>>61836253
>>61836162
newest tegra probably rapes them
>>61836323
can you really compare hardware when the software makes such a huge difference?
>>61836323
In power consumption?
>>61833950
Probably the software they were using did this by default considering the range of data and they were too fucking stupid to think to change it.