>Threadripper is slower than Ryzen 7 WHAT DID AMD MEAN BY THIS?

File: 90010.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

>>61832355
J U S T

>pay double for a slower CPU

>HEDT CPU for gaming
What did Brian mean by this?

File: 89860.png (39KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 650x350px

>>61832368
>still getting ass kicked by Haslel-E

Yay time for 10 billion cherrypicked single threaded benchmark threads.

>>61832355
>>61832365
i want /v/ to leave

File: 90026.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

At least I can still run Cinebench all day right?

>>61832355
>>61832375
Willing to bet using Process Lasso to stick the game on one of the two dies will improve performance.

wtf I'm buying a 1000$ cpu for gayms now

>>61832411
i too buy these 1000$ cpus to game instead of just buying a 300$ cpu

File: 90014.png (43KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 650x350px

>>61832396
Yeah, the fact that Threadripper is seen as a NUMA system is fucking over performance as nothing is optimised to take advantage of it.

>>61832365
>>61832436
These are both single threaded workloads. Also, i9 is basically NUMA as well. Just not as much.

Link the actual review, faggot. http://www.anandtech.com/show/11697/the-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-and-1920x-review

Who cares. Sandy Bridge forever.

>>61832355
Why would you buy thread ripper or an i9 for video games?

File: 90033.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

>>61832355
what a surprise
I know how to cherry pick too

>>61832419
*240$ CPU

>>61832506
>extra 4 fps
>10 W per fps

>>61832394
Can't wait to see how Arnold renders on this monster.

>>61832436
>Adobe
into the trash it goes
>Adobe Reader
when your trash can needs a trash can

>>61832355
>muh gaymes

File: 90031.png (40KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 650x350px

Buy TR if you wanna hide your anime

>>61832620
Confirmed best /g/ processor.

>>61832620
NSA BTFO

>>61832620
kikeripper surely was a success

>>61832435
i can tell you're a fatso.

>>61832543

tdp isn't power consumption

>A high core count cpu performs worse than an 8 core cpu in single-core performance
>It's almost like it's not meant for that.

File: 1488398566908.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>61832662
I-I-IT'S OK WHEN AMD DOES IT

>>61832355
>Shit non multithreaded for >4 threads
>waaah muh shit performance

Play better games

>>61832355
Good goy, games are the definitive mark of a CPUs power.

>>61832620
For paedophiles! AMD is paedophiles!

rendering's pretty good

>>61832355
> OMG THE i7 7960X is much slower than the i7 7700K for gaming!
WHAT DID INTEL MEAN BY THIS???

>>61832769
>ddr4-2400
Oy vey

>>61832781
That's pcper for you.

>>61832676
Nobody ever expects lower ipc, higher latency (IF) to perform better in low-latency tasks

It's not a gaymen cpu, if you want that, suck intel's cock or dial back to an adequate product

>>61832435
Look delicious senpai

http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r15/rankings?start=0#interval=20#cores=16#start=0

Pooripper gets DESTROYED by Core i9 even in Cinebench, this was over even before it started

File: Screenshot from 10-08-2017 16:00:57.png (62KB, 795x608px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 795x608px

>>61832794
I wonder what's the difference between their build setup.

>>61832852
Wow, a 5.6 GHz high ipc cpu cooled in liquid nitrogen performs well

More news at 5.

>>61832852
>LN2
Not even trying, shithead shill. Not even trying.

>>61832852
Now try and OC them on air or water and see which ones goes farther. Protip: i9 will melt a hole in your socket even with a custom loop.

>>61832910
>>61832908
maybe we should update the recommended minimum cooling solution of Intel cpus to liquid nitrogen? and counting that into the cpu price and everything?

File: 1498357899530.jpg (12KB, 292x282px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 292x282px

Why is Threadripper not even that good at transcoding? The 1950X only beats the i9 7900X in 1 out of 3 handbrake tests while the 1920X matches the i7 7820X in HEVC despite costing $200 more. Even worse is how the Ryzen 7s are beaten by the $389 i7 7800X in all 3 tests. Is it only Anandtech that has results like these?

>>61832852
"Yeah we're limited by the reference AMD boards, no doubt with board with better power we'll see better OC ;)"

Kikeripper gets 1000 Points less on a review sample motherboard from AMD

Just wait until OC boards come around, the jews will dissipate in the air like zyklon in a room.

File: THREADRIPPER-44.jpg (148KB, 614x649px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 614x649px

I'm not seeing a problem here, for gaming it'll do like a regular Ryzen, for something that can use the cores it's fast for the price.

File: ffs.png (122KB, 421x404px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 421x404px

>>61832355
You shills just need to stop

>>61832965
200 DOLLARS LESS
0
0

D
O
L
L
A
R
S

L
E
S
S

File: THREADRIPPER-72.jpg (87KB, 614x369px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 614x369px

>>61832965
I like how this fucking frog actually used 2600MHz for the entire test and then as a footnote did _some_ tests with 3200MHz

File: Dawn of War.png (51KB, 648x674px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 648x674px

Threadripper is AMD's biggest failure since Bulldozer.

File: 87733.png (35KB, 650x300px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 650x300px

>>61832375
>notices minimum fps
oWo, whats this

>>61833041
>>61833040
>>61832769
>>61832375
>>61832355

>>>/v/

>>61833040
MOAR CORES hahahahaha

>>61833040
> 720p

File: 1337595681485.png (487KB, 629x480px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 629x480px

>>61833040
come on, boy

>>61833040
>720p
SOPA ALLAHU AKBAR

>>61832951
Could be software optimization, or just Intel CPUs have cache layout that works better with Handbrake.

>>61833041
STUTTERFIRES

File: intel ceo JUST.jpg (119KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x1000px

>>61833040
Stop embarrasing yourself, Brian.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
INTEL MUST WIN
INTEL NEVER LOSES

File: 1502055755975.png (343KB, 672x794px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 672x794px

>>61832865
NOOOOOOOO

>>61833100
>>61833135
If you create a GPU bottleneck then all CPUs have the same FPS.

>>61833223
Does a cpu bottleneck matter if you play with a gpu bottleneck?

>>61833264
OYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
VEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYY
DELET THIS RIGHT NOW GOYIM
INFINITY FABRIC IS ANTISEMITIC

File: 90048.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

>The 1950X: the first CPU to score higher on the 2nd pass of this test than it does on the first pass.

But a first place is still a first place

>>61832365
Ayymd on suicide watch

>>61832506
Wow it's almost nothing. Intel hedt confirmed king

>>61832769
I expected bad latency but 250ns? You better just use DDR this shit is completely slow

Basically as all amd CPUs, it's aimed at cinebench and WinZip professionals

File: noesdelicioso.png (322KB, 672x794px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 672x794px

>>61833040
>Buy a 1k CPU
>Play at 720p

>buy the pajeets choice cpu
>spend 1k
>can barely play minecraft

amd for you

>>61833360
get a load of this intel shill.

>>61833401
SOPA DE MACACO

>>61833401
>minecraft
You must be 18 or older to use this website.

File: c010687d133b445936570f22551439ac056747732ac47e01aee13c3ecea5d6ee.jpg (119KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 800x600px

>>61832355
>>61832365
>>61832375
>>61832436
>>61832794
>>61833040

>>61832435
>pancakes AND french toast
Fatty breakfast/10

it was the same when ryzen launched
now we see software and games getting patches for ryzen, the same will happen with threadripper

File: 0505170446a.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

>>61832435
Faggit

>>61833163
Muh optimizations
Amd is literally sjw CPU or like the retarded children than need everything done a special way for it

File: Untitled-1.png (597KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1920x1080px

>>61833663
The i9-7900X still uses more power and still loses even when overclocked, though.

>>61833663
are you actually retarded? everything was developed with intel in mind because there was nothing with comparable performance from amd, shit needs to get fixed now

File: 10 cores uses more power lol.png (486KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1920x1080px

>>61833694

>>61833628
>>>/ck/

>>61833663
>Poojeet doesn't even know what a SJW is or how to use it in a sentence
>>>/r/techsupport

>>61833694
>1700 210
>1800x 212
that's some quality engineering by adobe right there

>>61833722
That's margin of error, really.

>>61832355

I don't give a fuck.
What did I mean by this?

>>61833722
What did you expect from a company that includes adware/spyware/bloatware in their downloads?

ITT: /v/

>>61833733
but it shouldn't be, there's a difference of 0.6GHz between the 1700 and 1800x

>>61833663
>Be consumer with tight budget
>Want good power for low cost
>Only option has been to hope for price drop
>Amd goes full force attack on this issue
>Drops ryzen
>Into literally sitting g themselves to the point of rushing the X series and I9 to the point of consumer and industry struggle and confusion
>Intel literally went full retard after getting blown the fuck out the most direct way possible
>Buy ryzen 5 1600 and rx480
>Outperforms my i7-5000 and 1060
>Only issue has been ram speed stuck at 2333
Intel got blown the fuck out with ryzen and now threadripper with in showing up just to break the final barrier with a 5nm architecture like "oh hey by the way were releasing this next year" only to go into their reclusive cave for another few years only to repeat this once more after Intel is literally on their knees begging not to get anally devastated into mindbreak

File: i9-7900X stock temps.png (53KB, 707x602px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 707x602px

>>61833694
>>61833709
We'd already established when i9 was released that the only way it manages to get it's high performance is by raising the clockspeeds and temps to housefire levels. With the crappy TIM, it can barely overclock. Threadripper can overclock much easier with it's soldered dies. No delidding, no $300 custom loops.

>>61833040
>AMD Threadripper 1950X (UMA)
>UMA
Is AMD trying to say something?

File: 1491259532131.png (108KB, 684x576px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 684x576px

>>61832355
> mfw brainlets think this is a vidya processor.
> mfw most eceleb videos are vidya benchmarks
> mfw idiots post vidya performance as if it means something
> mfw it's probably a good thing

File: 1498754740021.gif (127KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 600x600px

>>61833709
DELID DIS

>>61833663
Sure it's summ.. oh wait, every thread about CPUs is summer because of braindead people such as you

File: satensmug.jpg (29KB, 429x381px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 429x381px

>>61832355
>dummy dies
>abysmal latencies
>xawks HUEG socket
>just throw moar coars at it
[segfaults internally]

>>61833773
and also NUMA
two memes in one cpu

>>61833799
SOPA.

>>61833040
>720p
lmao, are these idiots even serious

>>61833773
Threadripper 2 will be called DELICIA

File: latency-pingtimes-1950x3200.png (138KB, 602x389px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 602x389px

>>61833799
>PCPer shows latency with slow-ass 2400 speed RAM
>HURR DURR SHIT LATENCY

Kill yourself.

File: 4WFKhkpkdFmjTRLjzFHtFU-650-80[1].jpg (14KB, 480x289px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x289px

http://www.techradar.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x

>>61833902
So this is the power of Sopa De Macaco

>>61833306
1st pass is for rate control.
2nd pass is the encode.

literally no one use 2 pass. crf is what people use.

>>61833799
>[segfaults internally]
http://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ryzen-Segv-Response

>AMD was also able to confirm this issue is not present with AMD Epyc or AMD ThreadRipper processors, but isolated to these early Ryzen processors under Linux.

>>61832355

jewtel is getting desperate I see.

>>61833902
So how much did Intel pay them to do such ridiculous graph?

File: thinking.png (15KB, 859x851px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 859x851px

>Choose AMD and have a little bit gay, but a good time.
>Choose Intel and have macaco soup

Thread theme: https://youtu.be/0HR4hp_-kSI?t=1m2s

File: Mx9fYWabrzMzgFWwbMWjAU-650-80.jpg (14KB, 480x289px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x289px

>>61833953
I think they're just retarded.

File: Megamind_ugh.png (226KB, 259x412px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 259x412px

>>61833902
Lol nice try anon that graph is obviously fak-

> Checks link
> It's an actual legit graph
> mfw

>>61832355
Tone it down a bit, this gaymur shitposting was fine with Ryzen 3-7 since it's a probable use case, but only utter morons buy 10+ core workstation CPU's to game on.

>>61833902
>Ready for the ultimate mega-tasking
someone please give me that picture

File: megatasking_intensifies.jpg (77KB, 493x493px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 493x493px

>>61834736

>>61834826
Thanks, anon

>>61832396
I don't want to be tuning the suspension on a fucking truck to be able to come close to the performance of a decent car making some very specific turn

I'll have the fucking porsche that is good at everything stock thank you very much

>>61834885
It doesn't make a huge difference either way desu.

https://www.techspot.com/review/1465-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-1920x/page6.html

>>61834214
Not if you use same CPU for gayning and work
One thing these fuckers don't bench I wanna know VM performance

File: 1343845431003.jpg (16KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 400x300px

>>61832620
>50% faster than Intel's latest and greatest

Holy fucking Christ Intel is so fucked.

File: 1446094845242.png (328KB, 672x706px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 672x706px

>single thread benchmarks on an HEDT platform
Is intel really stooping this low?

xeon vs epyc gaming benchmarks when?

>>61832355
>Games making use of 16c/32t
SOPA

>>61835145
It's a lackluster in single threaded performances, that's a fact. Still a great CPU but I don't see why they wouldn't bench single threads performances for a review.

File: 90013.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

>>61835762
Ironically i9 loses some of the single threaded tests anyway due to cache layout changes.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11697/the-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-and-1920x-review/9

All memes aside, threadripper will be good for video rendering right?

>>61835463
Explain this dumb meme right now.

>>61835905
Yes, from the benchmarks it's supposed to be fastest at rendering.

>>61833223
Which means that the CPU doesn't matter so there is no point benchmarking it at all.

>>61835936
A couple weeks ago, an Intel defender posted .br links. So /g/ inherited a /int/ meme of a Brazilian guy eating monkey soup.

Sopa Macaco = Monkey Soup
uma delicia = It's delicious.

>>61834885
It's hitting a button when you get in your semi to make it have have a better 0 to 60. how do you find /g/ when you have no concept of different use cases?

>>61835145
>xeon vs epyc gaming benchmarks when?
Gayming reviewers would do anything to fellate their jew overlords so they're going to benchmark epyc and xeons for gayming too.

File: image[1].jpg (84KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 500x500px

>>61832355
>>61832375
>>61833040
>>61834095
>Gaming
>HEDT

>>61836413
Get ready for epyc vs xeon gayming benchmarks.

>>61836420
>Epyc can't do 500fps at 480p CS GO
Dead on arrival

>>61836446
neither can xeon :^)

>>61836463
Xeon is for servers.

>>61836475
So is EPYC.

File: DDqTjPBUMAA8vul.jpg (90KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1200x675px

Since the release of Ryzen all AMD fanbois suddenly became content creators. You are truly pathetic.

Everybody who posts on /v/ should be banned from /g/.
While you're at it ban all phoneposters.
Maybe then we could stop having those retarded threads.

File: untitled-4.png (44KB, 683x786px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 683x786px

you faggots are gonna shill all day.

the only place intel wins is in 1080p gaming lol.

at 1440p where everyone who will buy these high end cpus, the difference is fucking minimal.

What you do get with ryzen tho is this:
>more cores for less money
>way better value for your money
>performance equal or beating intel in everything that matters.
>still costing fucking less.
>64PCIE lanes
>cooler cpu

You faggots can whine and bitch about your shit tier 1080 gaming. but anyone who buys a cpu like this couldnt give two fucks about 1080p.

so enjoy your shilling while we enjoy our glorious 16/32cpus

pic related. in 1440p the cpu doesnt even fucking matter.

>>61836501
Might as well buy 7350k in droves because single core is all you need and therefore dual core is overkill :^)

>haha those retarded construction companies buy trucks instead of sportcars
;^)

File: 1495560024754.jpg (56KB, 1276x720px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1276x720px

>>61836509
You must be quite retarded. How do you even manage to breath?

>>61836344
fine, but the button is like on the outside of the truck, you'll have to stop and get the fuck out (reboot to bios) to adjust your settings for the next turn

0-60 is irrelevant

>threadripper
>Gayming
Choose one faggot threadripper isn't gayming CPU
>>>/v/

>>61836565
0-60 being irrelevant is my point. It's a metric for sports cars not semis. If you're buying to for games god help you you aren't going to switch back and forth at every turn.

File: 150232041457.jpg (52KB, 400x565px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 400x565px

>>61836541

>>61836610
cuck

>>61836541
>>61836541
>How do you even manage to breath?
Look who's talking, how do you even manage to fuck up "breathe"?

>>61836565
https://www.techspot.com/review/1465-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-1920x/page6.html

The difference is pretty negligible, seems like it'd be best to leave it in gaming mode 99% of the time.

>>61836658
Do you expect Brazilians to know English?

>>61836704
I've noticed a large influx of Intel shills that can barely speak English, it's pretty obvious and pathetic at the same time.

>>61836658
>>61836704
Autocorrect you fucking mongrels.

>>61836849
Dumb phoneposter

99% of the AMDkeks didn't even know about cinebench till Ryzen was released. Now you bring it up all the time to save some face. You are sad human beings.

>>61832569

>Arnold
>2017

I hope you're just a poorfag using a pirated Maya's built in Arnold because there's no fucking excuse to be using that when VRay, Corona, Redshift and Renderman exist.

>AMD starts winning in gaming benchmarks, but loosing in productivity tasks/benches
>AMD shills will start saying that only gaming matters and productivity tasks are worthless trash

Screencap this.

>>61836849
kys phoneposting cuck.

File: projector.jpg (176KB, 1200x673px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1200x673px

>>61836959
>>61836984

>B-But you can buy a HEDT CPU at a great price!
>Caring about money when it comes to the enthusiast platform and not pure performance.
kys poorfags.

>>61837020
They cost the same, retard. Intel's more expensive 12+ cores aren't even out yet, and they're likely to reach housefire levels that put even the i9-7900X to shame.

I have a Ryzen 1700. Came from 3570k. AMD is sometimes better than Intel. Intel is sometimes better than AMD. You guys fight iver pointless shit and harsly even buy anything. Just fet whatbworks for you and fuck what everyone elae thibks. I had my 3570k when i was a kid and gaming. Now im picking apart sanboxes malware in VMs and use my "moar corez" AMD. Different strokes for diff folkes. Neither are better AMD just tends to not jew you around. When will these pointless wars end and we can just discuss and not fight?

>>61835936

Something about an intel shitposter being a br, so people just spam le monkey soup meme.

File: cqjL53sxmHc7Rig9ZuZ2vb.jpg (48KB, 480x289px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 480x289px

>>61833902

Why do you lie?

>>61837084
Intel better than AMD?
get a load of this uma delicia. Ammirite? Can I have an upvote?

>>61836849
Stupid phoneposter.

File: eienlol.jpg (87KB, 346x347px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 346x347px

>>61836413
>ayyylienware is now workstation
>the absolute state of amdrones

>>61837108
>[Editor's Note: the original version of this review included charts that inaccurately represented the benchmark data. This has been now corrected, but the data remains unchanged.]

>>61837258
Ayylienware makes X299 PCs too, not that it matters, dipshit.

File: 1501290850471.png (143KB, 400x550px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 400x550px

>>61837328

>there are people who don't get 9001 fps on 360p

>GAYMES
kill urself

File: autism demon.png (127KB, 403x433px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 403x433px

>>61837351
t.autism demon

>>61832435
that's more than I eat all day

>>61832769
thats some nice graph you got there.

You know what I'm waiting for? A 35W 4-8 core desktop CPU. I've used a silent PC (with a pretty big radiator and two hueg, slow Noctua fans) for too long to get 95+ W shit that needs real cooling.

File: 1490736970102.png (13KB, 500x301px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 500x301px

>>61837258
I don't care waht DELL sticks in those boxes.
They just want people's money. That doesn't make HEDT the choice for gayman.
Get a 1600X or a 7700K faggot.

>>61837439
NoFan CR-95C is good for completely fanless cooling of any CPU below 95W TDP, without any need for case fans, provided you have a lot of fan grills in your case (most importantly at least one in the top since it relies on convection cooling).
I think they didn't bother to make a new mount for Ryzen, but you can shell out for the one board that has old mount compatibility or just jury-rig something.
Fully fanless PC is pretty nice.

>>61837439
There are the Bristol Ridge 'E' APUs for that.

>>61837761
Are they faster than an i3?

>>61837439
As I understand it, Ryzen undervolts pretty nicely if you downclock it to around 3 GHz.

>>61832375
>$500 more for 8fps
SIGN ME UP, MOTHER FUCKER

Why do we call Intel shills Brazilians?

>>61832355
>Threadripper is slower than Ryzen 7
Just means the game can't use TR's all modules.

>>61832999
A few of the motherboards support 3600MHz too, I haven't seen any tests with that.

File: 1288354519821.jpg (170KB, 400x500px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 400x500px

>>61837258
>If you put The Stig in a 1100CC Polo it becomes a race car.
Well played Mr. merchant. But you're not fooling me.