>AMD's $1000 1950X ThreadRipper outperformed by a year

>>61832251
>MUH GAYMES

I hate this board so much

>>61832251
>10 year old single threaded pos designed to get 200fps on dual cores from 10 years ago doesnt make use of 30 billion threads
WOWWWWWWWWWWWW REALLLLLYYYYYYYYYYY?
>>61832279
they dont even shitpost properly

>>61832251
I don't get it

>>61832291
>a shitty 7700K gets DOUBLE the performance of threadshitter
Looks like AMD is releasing Bulldozer again, fucking lmaoing at the kids who have been awake all night waiting for this NDA to be lifted, what a disaster.

>>61832251
>Source engine at 1080p

What's next, Minesweeper?

Hide SOPA threads.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11697/the-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-and-1920x-review

File: K2UFgMqJ7b0OtBUg.jpg (178KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1000x562px

>>61832251
>3200 MHz RAM vs 2666MHz RAM
toppest of keks

>>61832251
>Testing a 16c/32t CPU with counter strike
Oh what the fuck

>CS GO
kys gayming manchild

>>61832251
Threadripper sucks at gayman workloads as it's basically seen as a 2 socket system with the problems associated with NUMA, hardly anything is optimised

>>61832251
>CSGO
nothing to see here

>>61832251
fuck linuskiketips, this is a fucking joke right

>>61832251
Holy shit, what a disaster.

>>61832307
I still don't get it. How is a 7700k shit?
What was wrong with bulldozer? Isn't Zen a new architecture? How are they even related?
Why are you saying it's getting double the performance when it's clearly not in >>61832251

I just don't understand...

File: s-s-tutter.png (86KB, 930x916px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 930x916px

>a-a-a-am-md-d-d c-chips d-d-ont s-s-s-s-tutter

What now AMD fanboys? Let me guess it's fine when ThreadRipper stutters, but when 7700K stutters Intel is bankrupt and finished?

Someone should make a thread with actually relevant benchmarks

>>61832370
Why are you typing like that?

>>61832367
Do you not know what Z270 is?

>>61832367
7700k is a stuttering housefire that almost nobody buys except poorfags.

>buy 8+ cores cpu to play game
people can be this retarded

>>61832352
amazing how hes an AMD Intel and Nvidia Shill at the same time isnt it?

>>61832272
DESU if these cpus are not performing that good at gaming I don't want to imagine how are they going to perform in more advanced or complicated tasks.

>>61832251
Reminder to report shitposters.

>>61832251
Gaymers BTFO
>>>/pcbg/

File: ripjewtel.jpg (707KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 3840x2160px

>muh gaymes

>>61832408
big if true

>>61832251
>16c/32t
>gaming benchmarks
You can't be serious

>>61832397
7700k runs games well according to the benchmarks ITT though

>>61832388
I don't understand why you felt the need to ask that.

File: 1498937081067.png (162KB, 633x900px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 633x900px

>>61832251
>posting benchmarks for poorly optimized video games as if it means anything at all
The desperation is intense

>>61832251
(You)

>>61832370
Willing to bet using Process Lasso to stick the game on one of the two dies will improve performance. I bet it's spreading the game across all 32 threads which is obviously not that great optimization.

File: absolute disaster.png (91KB, 867x842px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 867x842px

Topkek, overclocked ThreadRipper is slower than a 2500K at stock clocks, is ThreadRipper literally the blunder of the century?

If any AMD fanboys are feeling a little BTFO and are having suicidal thoughts, get some help, call 1-800-273-TALK [8255].

Why do people buy 600+$ CPUs just to play games?

>>61832440
I don't understand what you're trying to say with these...

>>61832425
Singl cur perfurmac is al dat wi ned

>>61832422
Do you have autism?

>>61832440
WOW. Core i5 BTFO Core i9. INTEL IS FINESHED.

This board is so shit.

>>61832449
As a matter of fact, no I do not.
I think op does though. Just look at his post. What's he even trying to do?

>>61832448
dats y i buy 7350k :) overclock n two core all we need

>>61832451
tfw when you are competing with your own cpus

File: another massive dissapointment.png (38KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 650x350px

Another Massive Disappointment, they should have called it AMD Ryzen ShitStutter.

File: jewtelbtfo2.jpg (160KB, 2125x1082px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 2125x1082px

when intel need CUDA to even compete.

>implying quadros are cheap

>>61832458
if you take all these posts as a joke, you may find them humorous. in fact, every post on this board is a joke.

>>61832479
When GPU does all the work but you still put your CPU name next to the benchmark

File: jewtedestroyed.jpg (175KB, 2129x1092px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 2129x1092px

>>61832503
topkek

pay me $2000 goyim

>>61832251
>>61832307
>>61832363
>>61832370
>>61832408
>>61832440
>>61832477
This board is a fucking overflowing sewer of shit.

>>61832500
Y'know what, I like your attitude.
NOVIDEO POOFIRES BTFO

>>61832440
>1950X OC 4GHz 115 fps
>1950X Stock 133 fps
Gaymershill benchmarks are garbage, more at 11.

>>61832519
tutali wort it, single cur perf is al dat maters, amd perf is shyt ant it runs laik oven

>>61832251
Yeah because I'm going to buy a $1000 CPU to play fucking games. Jesus Christ are you fucking braindead.

>>61832524
Underage faggots will be underage faggots. It's like they want to get fucked by Jewtel forever.

File: wtfspin.gif (1MB, 210x144px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 210x144px

>>61832448
>>61832467
>>61832547
Think you need a new keyboard, dude.

>>61832554
>B-BUT IT ISNT FOR THIS
>IF YOU WANT T-TO PLAY GAMES, JUST BUILD TWO PC'S
>ONE THREADRIPPER, ONE 7700K
Nah, you're retarded, I think I'll just use an i9 instead and be able to do both.

>7900X's lowest power consumption is higher than 1950X's highest

Toppest kekkeroni my house is on fire.

>>61832568
i9's are trash at games though.

>>61832568
remember to keep a fire extinguisher in your room :^)

hello /v/!
It's ok not to understand what threads are, but please keep it on your board, ok?

love, /g/

>>61832568
i9 doesn't play games well either you fucking mongoloid.

>>61832594
and a nuclear power plant for high workloads

File: 1492772535665.jpg (7KB, 274x227px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 274x227px

>>61832251
You silly amdplebs. You don't even understand what separates Intel from your pathetic little "competitor". No, it's not the fact that Intel CPUs outperform AMD """""cpus""""" in every unbiased and relevant benchmark. It's not the fact that Intel has a superior R&D team which is light years ahead of anything AMD can pull together. It's not even unmatched stability and reliability of Intel products. It's not even continuous revolutionary technological breakthroughs, which have shaped IT industry of today.

No.

It's the fact that you, AMDfags, you will always be silly plebs, penny-wise simpletons, chasing "more cores 4 cheap" and falling for AMD bait again and again.

People who are buying Intel products have a completely different mindset. We posses the mentality of Roman patricians, we are educated and enlightened, we are true blue blood aristocrats with noble and refined taste, who can easily afford to pay a little extra for a work of art. And yes, all Intel CPUs are such products. Exquisite, polished, flawless, refined. Made specifically for individuals who can appreciate these qualities.

AMD slaves will never be able to understand this... like a filthy hairy barbarian will never be able to understand Caesar. You will never be able to get it. All you AMD serfs can do is to chase muh cores and few extra fps in pleb games. You will never be among us, among the select few, among the chosen people. Let that sink in, AMDpeasants.
Ave Intel!

File: 1489100922662.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>61832586

>>61832568
>>61832434

File: watercooled_i9_7980XE.jpg (106KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1280x720px

>>61832568

>>61832606
You must be fun at parties.

File: IMG_1678.png (547KB, 606x836px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 606x836px

>>61832606
Wow you sound like Caesers Legion from Fallout New Vegas! :DDDDDD

>>61832251
800 fps with faster ram?

File: KPE7E0s.jpg (12KB, 480x289px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x289px

AMD BTFO!!!!!

Selling my shares right now before the stock price tanks.

>>61832655
Holy shit, AMD are finished and bankrupt.

>>61832655
dubs are truth

time to short your AMD stocks for a 1 fps difference!

File: jew_basic.jpg (19KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 220x220px

>>61832655
>>61832671
>>61832606
>>61832440
>>61832370
>>61832334


good goy!

>>61832655
Just look at how much longer Intel's bar is!!!

File: Mysterious Merchant.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>61832655
Buy intel

>>61832606
>select few
This. Intel marketshare will shrink to the point in a few years that you will be counted as a rare species.

>>61832251
CSGO runs on a garbage engine from the previous decade that doesn't even support multithreading and only goes up to dx9

>>61832671
>>61832690
>>61832694
>>61832698
>>61832708
Source: http://www.techradar.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x

:^)

File: download (14).png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>dummy die
wait soo half the CPU is useless?

>>61832762
yes. amd claims it's 16 cores but it's only half the cpu you get. what did you expect from them?

>>61832762
They are subtly saying intel fans should become deceased

>>61832384
He's typing that on a Intel rig.

Jesus Intel shills on full force again

@61832777 (You)

>>61832759
>>>61832708

>only gaymen benchmarks.

Stop it sholomo

>>61832762
They re-used the same socket and layout as Epyc, but there's two 8 core dies instead of four.

>>61832762

it's probably binning from epyc chips, if it didn't have dummy cores it'd need a different socket than epyc and probably different heatsinks making both products far more expensive and more niche, they did something similar with the 3 core phenoms a while back

>>61832334
>shittier storage than Intlel
>shittier memory than Intlel

They're not even trying to hide it anymore, are they?

File: J U S T.png (1MB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1002x1480px

>video games are the ultimate benchmark for processors

lmao intel shills at it again

>>61832836
Shills have gone so far that they don't even bother trying to hide their efforts of crippling the competition in testing.

>>61832823
According to amd those dummy cores dont even have transistors in them, exist just for thermal purposes

>>61832556
t. Poojeet

>>61832836
It seems that they are benching their alienware TR edition


Therefore it has worse airflow, drives, ram, etc than their handpicked bench rigs

>>61832251
you're getting desperate

>>61832823
>>61832864

The dummies are literally just blank pieces of silicon. Not defective or switched off dies.

>>61832873
No, they aren't.

>>61832655
>This is from an actual review
Kill me

>>61832973
What's wrong? Untel iz klerly superior

>>61832251
>threadripper has 32 threads
>csgo uses only 3
really makes you think

File: intel BTFO.jpg (14KB, 480x289px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x289px

>>61832759
INTEL BTFO

>>61832803
kek

File: 1502356622080.png (111KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 640x640px

>>61833008

>>61833022
>90 to 95 not incremented with 0.1

Intel shill site confirmed

File: SOPA.png (891KB, 1912x1072px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 1912x1072px

SAY WITH ME MONKEY
SOPA

>>61833054
90 to 93.5*

>>61832708
Untill i see the white man do better i will side with the jews. AMD failed, the white man failed.

File: DE.png (404KB, 1274x704px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1274x704px

DE

>>61833086
but jews are whites as well

File: 89809.png (43KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 650x350px

HOUSEFIRES EVERYWHERE

>>61833094
MACACO

>>61833110
Not bad for a 16c cpu.

>>61833108
You know /pol/ will doxx you if you say that.

>>61833110
it's like cooling doesn't exist in 2017

come on, shill, you can do better than this

>>61833114
UMA

File: india inside.jpg (387KB, 1500x1164px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1500x1164px

>>61832866
>Poojeet

File: macaco.png (423KB, 1280x714px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 1280x714px

MACACO

>>61833110
It's a 16core CPU, anon.

i can understand the usual shilling of idiots
but this thread tops it all

>>61833129
> Internet out of the toilet
sums up intel pretty well

File: Ryzenmaster_legacy-980x531.png (272KB, 980x531px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 980x531px

>>61832251
im sure they used the legacy mode on threadripper eh?
no? what you mean no?

Who in the fuck would buy a threadripper to play games on?

>>61833221
Retards

>>61833221
People who listen to infomercials

File: 1496047966090.png (142KB, 398x399px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 398x399px

>>61833184
Do us a favor find a hostel go there and take and overdose.

File: 1498692555928.jpg (112KB, 691x771px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 691x771px

>>61832251
w-w-we got em this time goys!

e-everyone say it with me!

jews are my greatest ally!

>>61833299
Singl kur perf iss stiiil beter rigt? we ar stil numero uno in single cure, right?

amd shills in fucking suicide watch

so fucking GLAD i didnt buy rypoo / pooripper

>>61833328
SOPA DE MACACO

>>61833332
UMA DELICIA

>https://semiaccurate.com/2017/08/10/cannon-lake-going-impact-intels-margins/
Does anyone have Charlie's good goy account?

>>61833110
Guess what, retard? Because it's soldered, you can actually keep it cool under load.

>>61832251
From all the benchmarks there, which I might add, threadripper CPUs did somewhat fine in, you chose only one perticular benchmark. Misleading much?

fellow g/amers will still chose intel because its better

>>61833418
fellow gaymers?

>>61833418
you mean fellow non shills

>>61832251
Wait for optimizations

>>61832251
>using an engine that can only utilise 4 cores so the highest core speed wins
nice benchmark

>>61833466
> wait for optimizations
> engine is from 2004
> only uses 4 cores max
> uses new and up to date technology like dx9

>>61833466
>Valve
>optimizations
Come on.

>>61832370
>Muh process lasso
>It almost beats skx in hand break

Now we know the real consequences of glued cpus

File: 1379089177388.png (889KB, 840x608px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 840x608px

>>61832251

Didn't even open the thumbnail. It's a benchmark of a single threaded game, isn't it?

>>61832251
DELET

>>61833494
It does win in Handbreak by like 6%, but there are clearly some issues with the software, or it's just optimized for Intel's cache layout.

>>61833063
Nice idle now try loaded

>>61833418
g/ay

>>61833512
its not you fucking moronic shill

>>61833130
What ? 60% extra cores for 10% extra performance? This toy cores are really good

File: tidus.jpg (30KB, 475x343px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 475x343px

>>61832762
>dummy die
>amd literally calling their customers retarded

File: 1500260377912.jpg (96KB, 638x710px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 638x710px

>>61833299
j-jews are my greatest ally!

>>61833851
You're not funny.

>>61833851
You're hilarious.

>>61832606
Fuck they almost got to me
I was waiting for these reviews to see if TR was worthy of being the successor to my ancient 980x 6c/12t monster

I was expecting it to be but after that anandtech review I just don't know anymore

NUMA shit, such high TDP, such bad single threaded performance

if anything that review leaves me more impressed with the 7900x

I realised reading that I'd always be doubting if I made the right choice. Like driving a Hyundai knowing I could've had the BMW if I just waited a little longer

File: iQiGfR3djpgmaxwidth640shapethumbfidelityhigh.jpg (45KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 540x304px

INTEL in dead.

>>61832477
Is that also with a generic Intel motherboard and underclocked ram?

File: 90024.png (42KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x350px

>>61834397
It barely wins Intel with 60% extra cores
On older or light threaded it drops like a rock

Can someone tell me the target market for TR?

Exactly how many non gaymer enthusiast builders are out there to buy these??

Here's how you fix this gayming CPU bs for yourself.

>Buy 4K monitor.
>Your CPU is now mostly irrelevant.

That did it for me.

>>61834514
>10C kicking the shit out of 12C

>>61833128
D E L Í C I A
E
L
Í
C
I
A

>>61832272
*compiles gentoo*

>>61834562
Don't worry anon.
What TR did to Intel is that now, they can't really keep the clocks up on more than 10 cores SKUS without making them look like absolute housefires.
18 cores is gonna barely outperform the 7900X, because it's gonna run that much slower.

>>61832568
except I9 is trash at games as well .

>>61834514
the hell is that 1950x-g?

File: 10 cores uses more power lol.png (486KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1920x1080px

>>61834397
>such high TDP
lol wut? Who cares when it can't even keep itself cool and takes overall more system power?

>>61834624
it wont be perfect till they bench 1950x against g450

>>61834631
The 16/18 core is going to be a housefire to end all housefires. """""165 watt TDP""""". AKA will draw even more power than the 7900X which is already pushing the boundries of what the motherboards can handle even at stock.

File: 1482062830703.jpg (81KB, 600x904px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 600x904px

>>61834624
>buys HEDT CPU
>watches anime and browses 4chan the whole day

>>61832408
Consider suicide

>>61834677
> says that 165w tdp is too high
hold my beer
> overclocks bulldozer

>>61832524
>waah people are being mean to my f-favorite company! !! waah!
KYS please

>>61834654
INTEL BTFO

>>61834718
>> overclocks bulldozer
>overclocks 7900x
>suddenly you need a 380v line in your house

File: 66034.png (40KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 600x600px

>>61834718
>bulldozer
Don't remind me about that abomination

File: i'm gonna make fx9590 look like a fucking joke.png (228KB, 489x394px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 489x394px

>>61834718

MAE

>>61832900
>No, they aren't.
>literally says they are in the image

>>61834745
Kill yourself.

File: IMG_2174.jpg (124KB, 900x948px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 900x948px

>>61834774
>>61834769

FUCK OFF WITH YOUR GAYMEN SHIT
SINCE WHEN G BECAME V?

>>61834763
True, though I justify price by setting up wind turbines next to car radiator fans that I use to cool it

>>61834780
That is from an older video.

File: laughingsluts2.gif (762KB, 300x170px) Image search: [Google]

762KB, 300x170px

>>61834769
>mfw amdtards are now saying that bulldozer was on par with SB

>>61832251
It looks like TR is the best CPU on the market right now, but I thought it would perform better to be honest.

>>61832606
>>61834397
>actually taking that shitpost seriously
>not reading multiple reviews from different sources
Brain damage.

>>61832440
>Buying a $1000 CPU for gayming

kys

File: 1502009527671.jpg (44KB, 657x960px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 657x960px

>>61834805
they gonna bundle them with phase change cooling solutions

File: denial.gif (1MB, 296x218px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 296x218px

lol amd fags are absolutely seething in this thread

>>61834878
HNNNG SAUCE

File: Unbenannt.png (3KB, 167x127px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 167x127px

>>61834943

File: __amada_kokoro_amd_and_original__18ba610ffdab0fde4c85b2ad59594dfc.jpg (83KB, 964x960px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 964x960px

>not having your own anime
https://youtu.be/JE3Utg8Xclg?t=7m44s

Intel BTFO.

>>61832334
They were reviewing the Area 51 Threadripper which comes with 2666 RAM. Ram speed doesn't affect Intel much either way.

>>61834856
>implying one post will cement my decision
it does touch on my feeling tho in that I feel the same way: AMD is like Pepsi "cola" to the real thing

I need to see the phoronix review tho
currently around 80% chance I'm not buying it

>>61835001
Only way you're going to get more performance is if you wait for the 16/18 core Intlel housefires and pray to god they don't explode in flames at stock settings. And they'll cost $700/$1000 more.

>>61834941
Reminder to report shitposters.

>>61835018
Hey, what do you expect, fire is not cheap

>>61834644
game mode , or legacy mode , disables half of the threads , basically a built in processes lasso to keep latency down and improve performance in less thread aware games or simply to increase stability w/ programs that cant handle being spread across 32 threads

>>61834787
Right after you :^)

>>61832251
This trash is getting absolutely tiresome. Can someone give me a step by step guide on how to filter out AMD VS Intel shit? I use 4chanX but it looks too complicated and I don't know how to use it.

>>61834994
Ram affects Zen greatly.

The culprit is with Dell screwing their customers tho

>>61834688
>browse 4chan
>cpu mine some shitcoin
well thats what im doing on my R5 1600 rn

>>61835043
It does not disable half the threads, as seen here. https://www.techspot.com/review/1465-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-1920x/page6.html

You know intel lost when they're shilling gaming benchmakrs on a fucking HEDT platform.

>>61835068
Luk gujs, ur $2000 cpu iz better at giming then $1000 shitmd cpu!!!1!1

File: Intel exposed.jpg (804KB, 1846x1923px) Image search: [Google]

804KB, 1846x1923px

Buy Intel, goyim!

>>61832434
You can set the system to show up as two NUMA nodes from the BIOS, which makes the scheduler force all related threads on a single node when running non-NUMA aware software and it does improve gaymen performance, quite a lot in some cases.

File: Capture.png (22KB, 650x291px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 650x291px

>>61835043
Game mode disables SMT and puts the CPU in NUMA mode which reduces memory latency while potentially sacrificing bandwidth to do so.

>>61835125
Intel bribes to OEMs were so big when AMD offered free CPUs they couldn't take them

>>61835057
>wasting power for no reason

File: watch_v=9voQqU73-Mg 00_05_22.822.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61832408
For (You). 1/?

>>61835187
>building shit that no one buys

>>61835195
>making a few hundo a month of a P&D
yea totally wasted power there

File: watch_v=9voQqU73-Mg 00_05_31.864.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61832408
For (You). 2/?

>>61833595
>CS:GO
>proper multithreading and optimization
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

File: watch_v=9voQqU73-Mg 00_05_37.637.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61832408
For (You). 3/?

File: watch_v=9voQqU73-Mg 00_05_41.374.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61832408
For (You). 4/?

>>61832777
>>61833642
/g/, everyone.

File: 3DA156F0-7CD1-4804-9BAE-883F54E79630.jpg (491KB, 2048x1149px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 2048x1149px

Reminder that Intlel factory overclocked 18c/36t will be a housefire to remember

File: watch_v=9voQqU73-Mg 00_05_45.745.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61832408
For (You). 5/?

File: watch_v=9voQqU73-Mg 00_05_49.716.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61832408
For (You). 6/6

>>61835219
>>61835233
>>61835253
>>61835276
>>61835298
>>61835318
>Synthetic benchmarks that are easily cheated
It's obviously a lemon. Call me when AMD makes a processor that beats intel in real productivity like Excel or Photoshop. And by beats I mean actually mean beats, not "Well actually for the price and if you don't factor in the electricity costs...".

File: intel ceo JUST.jpg (119KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x1000px

>>61835342
Give it up, Brian. Shareholders aren't paying you to shitpost.

>>61835219
>>61835233
>>61835253
>>61835276
>>61835298
>>61835318
Hahaha he shat his pants right now

>>61835342
>7-zip
>Blender
>Synthetic
So this is the intellect of the intel shills.

File: 0735C768-1DBC-4E44-899A-D7AAF095FCF5.jpg (409KB, 2048x1153px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 2048x1153px

Reminder that Intlel will be a housefire WITH an AiO.

>>61833466
They did add Vulkan support, so someday, when valve is not jerking off to esports

Where's the 800x600 Skyrim benchmark?

File: Excel.png (39KB, 1295x959px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1295x959px

>>61835342
>Excel

>>61835433
Finally a CPU that can withstand my excel workloads

File: 1501941722385.jpg (853KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

853KB, 1920x1280px

>>61833595
Source only uses 3 threads Mr Macaco

>>61835342
Actually factoring in electricity costs intel loses even harder.

>>61835445
He asked for it, he got it. As for Photoshop, it's a notoriously single threaded application. You'd be better off with a 7700K for pure Photoshop work, not even kidding. It's that bad.

>>61835433
t-that doesnt count

File: 1501022432783.jpg (112KB, 440x647px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 440x647px

What were you doing when Threadripper was released today

>>61835551
You are correct, I was very exited about i9's great performance and price/single core perf ratio

File: 1492139297054.jpg (282KB, 752x548px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 752x548px

>>61835219
>>61835233
>>61835253
>>61835276
>>61835298
>>61835318

>>61835594
i9 is DOA garbage forever.

>>61835617
nuh uh. Fake news.

>>61835594
>price/single core perf ratio
Wouldn't that be an i7-7350K?

>>61835711
that was a joke

>>61835711
Meant i3-7350K. Whatever.

>>61834964
This desu, intel is for faggots.

>>61835048
You can filter by words, just filter amd and intel

>>61835855
Don't forget ayymd

>>61832251
I am monitoring the continuous dick comparison between AMD and Intel during the last few weeks.
But I lost track. What does this numbers even mean:
Z270
X299
X370
1950X
1920X
??

>>61835902
Intel consumer chipset (Kaby Lake)
Intel enthusiast chipset (Skylake-X)
AMD consumer chipset (Ryzen)
AMD 16 core 32 thread CPU
AMD 12 core 24 thread CPU

>>61832251
can we get some 800x600 benchmarks for deadlock shrine wars?

>>61835902
chipset, chipset, chipset, cpu, cpu.

>>61835996
>he thinks drops to 100fps are acceptable in a competitive fps
kys

>>61832251
>Dummy dies
>Doesn't even support delidding(TM) for better thermals
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
A M D C U C K S
M B T F O
D T
C F
U O
C
K
S

>WON'T EVEN REPLACE YOUR SPACEHEATER IN WINTER
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP

>>61836034
In that case the only option is K-series i3/i5/i7, but you already knew that.

>>61836070
>intel_circumcision_tool.jpg

>>61836169
Do you really think it would help? He is a goner

>>61832836
they were testing a premade computer amdrone relax

File: 1357233902252.jpg (636KB, 2262x2050px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 2262x2050px

>>61832334
3200/2666 are optimal for DDR4
these chips give the best performance in nearly every case

anything else lowers performance 1-10 fps on the high/lows in just about every case.

Prepare yourselves for Epyc vs Xeon gaymen benchmarks.

File: DDqTjPBUMAA8vul.jpg (90KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1200x675px

Since the release of Ryzen all AMD fanbois suddenly became content creators. You are pathetic.

>>61832318
I will never understand why people use Source as a benchmark. Source is literally dinosaur shit at this point.

>>61836459
And now all intel users became dedicated /v/tards.

>>61836408
That's not the point. The point is that it was established long ago, that slower ram gimps ryzen architecture performance.
Meaning that if you bench Intel at 3200 vs ryzen at 2666 you are gimping TR performance.

>>61836459
I want Mary to sit on me.

>>61836479
>you are gimping TR performance
I don't see the problem.

|
|>
|
|3
|
|

>>61836459
More like AMD brought affordable computing power to the masses while Intel was content with jewing the market to death.

>>61832334
1950x supports only up to 2666. so fuck them for using the max speed AYYYmd will allow

>>61836859
Nice try poo in the joo

>>61836859
Kill yourself BR glueeater.

>>61836859
So does Intel, Pajeet.

File: optimism.png (12KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 100x100px

If AMD has 2 blank dies, why didn't they released TR with 2 Vega dies?

>>61837102
That's their secret plan

>>61837102
A vega die is way larger than a ryzen one. But a shrunk down version... soon.

>>61837102
because nobody would buy $300 mobo for integrated shit just to burn down your house

>>61837223
I think you mistaken AMD with Intel

File: 1281470360227.png (15KB, 730x413px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 730x413px

>>61837102
>>61837141
TR4 APU with CF Vega

File: dork.png (52KB, 347x469px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 347x469px

>>61837102
256MB SRAM cache in TR 1.5. Mark my words.

>>61832335

Yeah this is betong stupid.

BTW setting the graphics to ultra and 1440p makes all the cpus almost similar.

>>61832291
Its called cherry picking anon.
The Ryzen kept up or exceeded in every test except CS:GO

>>61837457
t. clueless retard

File: SRAM-X01-DH-7-speed-component-group02.jpg (95KB, 975x975px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 975x975px

>>61837457
>SRAM
>>>/n/

>>61837223
I already have, iGPU comes in handy for GPU passthrough setup without resorting to two dedicated GPUs for host and VM.
I won't even consider AMD as an option until all the problems they have with vfio are sorted.
Having more cores would be nice for cpu pinning but they don't seem to have an option with an iGPU. I do have an older dGPU now but I would need to buy a higher wattage PSU to accommodate both which is wasteful.

>>61832545

Thats why gamer nexus and Linuss cannot be trusted. I mean who tests a 16/32 thread ripper with csgo

>>61837680
pls gib more free intel chips

>>61837680
It's an important test because it indicates performance in older titles that aren't well optimised for multiple cores.

>>61837779

>It's an important test because it indicates performance in older titles that aren't well optimised for multiple cores.

Which is why its worthless on a product that is explicitly designed for parrallel throughput. All CS:GO testing for ANY chip in the HEDT market is just retarded reviewers trying to appeal to retarded gamers who can't understand an indepth analysis of a product to save their life.

In fact CS:GO is irrelevant full stop because - shockingly - it doesn't even linearly scale with single thread performance because it doesn't use modern instruction sets explicitly designed to increase throughput.

>>61837779
We already knew that the moment Ryzen launched and old shit still ran better on high speed quad cores.

Since when is /v/ allowed on /g/?
MODS

>>61837842
But the point is, Threadripper is a middle ground between something like a Xeon which someone would never ever use for gaming, and a i5 someone would never ever use for productivity work. The kind of people Threadripper was/is marketed at are people who are primarily after extreme productivity performance, but may also want good gaming performance. Don't try and pretend AMD didn't market it also as a gaming chip in addition to having strong productivity performance, they wouldn't have included the 'gamer' mode otherwise, and the launch motherboards wouldn't all be RGB crap.

In my opinion Threadrippers gaming performance is kind of a disaster, but it obviously shits all over anything in the i9 line for any real work, especially from a price to performance standpoint. The reality is a lot of people were expecting Threadripper to be a 6950X type CPU, with godlike performance in everything, it BTFO's Intel in productivity but gaming performance is nonexistent.

>>61832762
AMD probably chose such design because of better thermals (more separated cpu-s) and cost efficiency. They probably assemble epyc cpu-s on the same line. And maybe they use threadripper as a test bench for epyc to make sure that everything works.

>>61837975
It's another thing where some games have launch issues just like they did with Ryzen. Workaround is to set gaming mode and use Process Lasso to force games to run on one die so they aren't jumping all over the place from one die to another and causing massive 200nm memory access latency spikes.

>>61837975
It performs exactly like 1800x in gayms.
Nothing more, nothing less.

>>61832251
NEW TECHNOLOGY
this is what happens when you don't fucking release the same architecture over and over again. Don't kid yourselves you all know that intel hasn't done new shit since haswell. Microcode update, plus developers of games will put patches out and why the fuck are you playing CS:GO on a 16 core CPU? that game runs on dual core i3's

>>61838029
That's what people were expecting, but it doesn't, see:
>>61832370

>>61838025
I'm not going to pretend I know anything about how thread distribution works, but it seems like the gaming issues Threadripper has is due to latency between the dies, something that isn't going to just magically disappear with a hotfix. I don't know much about Process Lasso, but I suppose if it works it works.

>>61838089
It's one ancient console port that can't handle 32 threads.
Brian you need to shop shitposting and rethink your fucking life before Board kicks you straight into the trashcan.

>>61837975
>Threadrippers gaming performance is kind of a disaster
You don't know what disaster means. i9 is a disaster.

>>61838089
This is closer to reality than that single gaming benchmark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmRQmr_G3ew

>>61838109
It's not just that game though, every game runs like roasted shit on Threadripper, Gamers Nexus even said they couldn't even get some games to launch because the game just sees 32 threads and crashes.

>>61838148
>the game just sees 32 threads and crashes
Sounds to me the game needs to git gud.

>>61832370
>2600K
You go sandy! Six and half years old and still kicking!

>>61832545
That retard is a hack fraud

>>61838089
>something that isn't going to just magically disappear with a hotfix
We had saw the same issues with ryzen and history is repeating itself. Cross die latency wont change but you can modify a program/scheduler so that it doesnt cause unnecessary and avoidable cross die communication, which affects performance. The consumer market hasn't seen anything other than monolithic designs for almost a decade so software adjustments are going to be needed. At least AMD added the NUMA option as a somewhat preemptive measure.
>inb4 wait™ egs dee

>>61838195
It's because the CPU automatically clocks itself up to 4.2 on four cores when left alone, but max all core OC is 4.0, dummy.

File: 1312236333605.jpg (106KB, 437x333px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 437x333px

>>61832545
>>61837680
>>61838195
The XFR makes stock better for poorly threaded games
Fucking retards
Instead of just watching the sea of reviews on this that all say the same

>>61838148
>every game runs like roasted shit on Threadripper
Talking out of your ass.
>the game just sees 32 threads and crashes.
Yeah this toally won't get patched or anything.

>>61838210
>>61838240
>18 more fps
Yeah nah that retard is a hack fraud

>>61833553
>he doesn't know

>>61838243
>Talking out of your ass
Not though. Threadripper consistently has lower minimum FPS' than even shit like a 2500K.
>>61838243
>Yeah this toally won't get patched or anything.
Yeah because every game dev out there is going to come out and patch their years old game just because AMD launched a new line of processors.

What a shithole /g/ is. Shitposting threads everywhere. Or are people just retarded mostly here?

When I heard on the news about hacker 4chan, thought this place will be some sick ass underground hacker headquarters with 4chan as their leader....

Boi I was wrong... Now that I think, 4chan might not even be real person...

>>61832422

It gets good average frames but it stutters while playing so it's not a good experience, even stable sub-60 is better than non-stable 60+.

>>61835001
>>61834397

Nice blog. Where could I subscribe

>>61835708
>hotter
>less power efficient
>much more expensive
>slower in pretty much everything except muh gayms
i9's look pretty crap to me, famalam

File: basically you are fucking stupid.png (46KB, 150x262px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 150x262px

>>61834397

>>61837102
>180W TDP CPU with 2x300W TDP GPUs, lets optimistically say 2x200W if they use binned chips and lower clocks
>nearly 600W total
that would be a SSS-class housefire

>>61838565
All AMD needs to do than is to release CPU with integrated LN2 cooling.

>>61838633
SOPA

>>61838673
DE

File: EQ4LVue.png (73KB, 946x280px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 946x280px

>>61833110
stfu idiot.

File: _XM06UtD9mEfd5TxWSsEOY5qdl7Oi52Kw-F-2f8A0pQ.jpg (125KB, 933x650px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 933x650px

c

>>61838729
Please be so kind and delid this.
Thank you for understanding

File: asda.jpg (198KB, 1333x885px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1333x885px

>>61838747
Sry can't hold my self against false propaganda by intel fags.

>>61832408
>>61832251
This game probably is 4 cores or less so not surprising that a cpu with somewhat higher ipc and much higher frequencies is faster.
Who the fuck still plays old shit like counterstrike?