/wt/ watch thread

first for rolex explorer shills

File: Cuck.png (156KB, 313x321px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 313x321px

>>61826062

File: IMG_20170702_165048.jpg (284KB, 1200x974px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1200x974px

I remember back when I preordered the Explorer and everyone else wanted one, now I bought an Explorer and everyone wants that too.

>>61826111
36mm explorer is the best sports watch ever made

File: 7.5_in_41.2_lug_36.1_dia.jpg (3MB, 4008x4008px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4008x4008px

>>61826074
Hi :^)

>>61826062
>shills
I don't think you really understand that words meaning

Has anybody here stuck their Rolex Explorer up their ass?

How good did it feel? Been thinking about doing it for a while myself, thanks.

>>61826163
<3 Even though most seikos are gay i still love you seikofag

>>61826179
The Explorer II is the one designed for spelunking, make sure you don't try it with an Explorer I.

File: memesplorer.webm (3MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x480px

>>61826111
Nice explorers :^)

>>61826111
>>61826217
that thing is actually excellent value for money... assuming they aren't shit.. how are those?

>>61826282
Exactly as you say, pretty great for the money. The explorer IIs have been sold out for a while now though. Who knows when obris is going to do another run of watches.

File: IMG_3780.jpg (749KB, 1952x2461px) Image search: [Google]

749KB, 1952x2461px

Ayyyy Ubaku brand with a Skagen knock off signing in. It's slim with a stainless steel band and minimal.
My daily watch. I also have an Invicta Explorer Railroad approved edition that I love,

File: IMG_0682.jpg (181KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1200x1600px

Posting again for some reason...
But here is my blue Seiko 5 that I ordered alongside this one >>61822524 that I posted in the previous thread.
Both exquisite watches.

>>61826301
Every single watch on their site is sold out or discontinued. Are they still in business?

>>61826364
They're just a microbrand that makes watches in small batches. Usually there's a number of months between runs. So if there's a new run you have to put in the order quick before they sell out.

>>61826347
This can't be real. Where are you finding these? is this a new meme? Is this the Canadian Seiko fag from the future?

>>61826335
>Skagen knock off
Why though. That's like buying a knockoff Casio.

File: 1491847184958.png (2MB, 1312x744px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1312x744px

>>61826347

>>61826388
it obviously doesnt say Skagen but the similarities are the same as far as style and color.
Im a poor fag and this watch was in my price range. Its a trooper and well made.

>>61826347
Lose weight

File: 17136464505_a153c7a1ae_h.jpg (762KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

762KB, 1600x900px

>>61826364
They make small runs of a single model at a time and then it's usually a pretty long wait until they do the next one and I don't think they usually repeat previous models. You probably will have to pre-order and wait if you want one. I like my Obris Morgan, it's not perfect but it's a pretty nice watch for the money. It's a bit too big and I'm not sure I'm such a big fan of the bead blasted finish, but the dial is very good looking and it's all surprisingly high quality and well put together.

>>61826347
How the hell does one get so thicc that fat starts to accumulate in your wrists? I understand your biceps or thighs, but your wrists seems like one of the last places that your body would put fat.

>>61826455
Everybody on /g/ is either a malnourished lanklet or a 400lb+ hamplanet

>>61826649

Im fit but i am a manlet and possibly mentally retarded

File: seiko5.png (2MB, 1200x1812px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x1812px

>>61826347

>>61826664
I feel like he may actually be attempting to amputate his hand.

File: Invicta Explorer Railroad.png (235KB, 381x419px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 381x419px

Heres the Invicta I mentioned in >>61826335
pic related but mine is in storage.
I replaced the nylon strap with a nice piece of leather. Its so comfortable.
Its has weight but not cumbersome. The large face and glow in the dark number and stick dial gives it a classic feel. cyclops magnified day date makes it all easy to read. Another reasonably priced find.

File: 1490751567398.jpg (88KB, 846x960px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 846x960px

>>61826347
You think this is a game?

File: 1501477839563.png (647KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 900x1200px

>>61825664
why do wristlets have to compensate by wearing huge watches

File: 1423657470466.jpg (156KB, 687x1000px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 687x1000px

>>61826681
>invicta
>storage

File: im full of chocolate.jpg (20KB, 374x240px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 374x240px

>>61826664
>>61826676
You can tell he's been leaning on that poor bracelet as you can see it leaving an imprint on his fatty wrist flesh.
Props to the strength and quality though amirite!?
pic related, its you.

File: b8e77b3b605757cf9397758a967aebbc95811a8f48881de41dcf1397e153241a.jpg (144KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1000x750px

>>61826727
>fat shaming shaming

>>61826714
I think most people wear watches like the first two, only chad, douchebag and fag wear it on their hand

>>61826714
When the average watch size in 2017 is 40-42mm, 39 is humble but also not prehistoric.

>>61826761
Honestly if you wear a dress watch larger than 38mm you better fucking be the rock.

>>61826749
it isnt fat shaming, its consumer shaming. Why could he just make the proper adjustments? Like taking it to a watchsmith.

>>61826756
Go on kikestagram and search #rolex, every single person has it on their hand

>>61826761
Go ahead, follow the shitty normie trend

>>61826788
His wrist is a balloon, it should probably be loosened a bit but not a lot

>>61826787
Some people who aren't as antiquated as you have different taste. You can reeeee all you want to but you can't change trends.

File: Chad watch.jpg (99KB, 733x550px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 733x550px

>>61826787
Wish most dress watches go back to 36-35mm like before, 38mm+ really trigger my autism.

File: 1502180448794.jpg (39KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x500px

>>61826664
That's a lot of fat

File: wellington_bristol.png (786KB, 912x788px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 912x788px

>>61826030
Did i do good?

>>61826877
u tried ur best that's what matters

File: 1502271415143.jpg (58KB, 714x682px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 714x682px

>>61826877
>DW

File: 1495065295707.jpg (88KB, 669x696px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 669x696px

>>61826877

>>61826877
You're doing great and everything will work out alright in the end, I believe in you. The watch is shit, though.

What are you /g/entlemen wearing today?

>tfw havent been able to wear my sarb in weeks because i lost the link holder tube, so now the link holder keeps slipping off the bracelet

reeeee

>>61826890
So that means I failed, right?

>>61826686
Nice shitpost.

File: IMG_3951.jpg (197KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1080x1349px

>>61826952

File: 20170809_234134.jpg (2MB, 3399x1244px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3399x1244px

>>61826952

Thinking about vintage Grand Seiko. How ass raped would I be if I wanted to service it?

File: 1502329448230.jpg (2MB, 3749x4162px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3749x4162px

>>61826952
Vintage seamaster
>>61827059
I don't think it will be that expensive.

>>61827059
Not any more than any other vintage watch, really.

>>61827059
Depends on the movement in it, and how available replacement parts are for said movement. Generally you wouldn't need to replace parts though.

>>61827059
Keep in mind the resident Seiko evangelist does not recommend any vintage grand seikos; the Suwa grand seikos don't have the sacred power of the DAINISTRONG, and the 44GS/45GS he notes are subject to excessive wear, often requiring donor parts.

>>61826877
I respect an honest (you) farmer such as yourself.

File: 67146ae2-77f2-41da-ac63-af621f016f0f.jpg (721KB, 1906x1744px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1906x1744px

>>61826821
Just classify any watch larger than 38 mm as a dressy sport watch. Problem solved.

>>61827255
But that orient is not a sports watch.

File: Louis-Vuitton-Escale-Minute-Repeater-Worldtime-aBlogtoWatch-5.jpg (147KB, 860x756px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 860x756px

None of us will ever own one but wel can all hate on it right?
I love this watch

>>61827373
>Date
>Red-tipped seconds hand
>water resist
What, next you're going to tell me that the SARB033 is a dress watch?

File: Casio_silver_gold.jpg (1MB, 1253x1700px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1253x1700px

>>61826952
Comfy

Which amphibia case should I get? 420, 710, or 090?

Anybody know what watch face and crown looks nice inside an snk809? I'm thinking about buying one and modding it

>>61827869
stay stock

File: 79389594.jpg (29KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x500px

Thoughts on this?

File: 8176257328_3802230c42_o.jpg (883KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

883KB, 1280x853px

>>61827869
Not snk809 but a decent mod.

File: barfing.jpg (55KB, 452x321px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 452x321px

>>61828154

>>61828154
love the oyster band on this but the hands really don't match imo

>>61828154
when a shitter tries too hard not to be a shitter

File: Amf1nc_1-500x500.jpg (43KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x500px

>>61829985
>420 case
>That dial
>Stock bezel and bracelet
Gross. If you're going to get an Amphibia with that dial, at least get a 710.

>>61827895
SNXS7x right?

cheap, humble, honest.. reliable, even?

i'm tempted too, especially since i'm in the mood for something vintage-ish and similar in looks to the Rolex President

i'd buy the silver dial model, though

what keep me from pulling the trigger is the strap: the black dial model seems to have been coupled with a more president-ish bracelet..
other references (blue, silver, gold dials) seem to have bracelets with a slightly different design (judging by pictures)

File: Breitling-Chrono-Matic-6.jpg (304KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1024x768px

Never saw such an odd dial layout. Kinda like it in a weird way.

>>61827895
may look better with a leather strap or better bracelet

File: U63Ac56.jpg (840KB, 1925x2743px) Image search: [Google]

840KB, 1925x2743px

MAN ON THE FUGGING MOOOON

>>61826998
Fucking lol. I hope that's a Chinese knockoff.

Chinese Panerai are more tasteful than the real thing.

>>61830306
You wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

File: image.jpg (86KB, 1024x311px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1024x311px

>>61830351
wtf i love china now

>>61827092
Girl?

>>61830530
chinklet, you were not the first to ask

>>61830570
tfw you will never have qt hairless arms

File: 4L_HGU0bvz2.jpg (250KB, 2423x1767px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 2423x1767px

>>61830597
I barely know this feel.

File: IMG_0695.jpg (40KB, 964x643px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 964x643px

What about Fiyta?
>100$
>Automatic
>Hacking and winding
>50bar
>Pretty stylish

File: IMG_20170810_115748.jpg (980KB, 1564x1564px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 1564x1564px

>>61826074
Daini Seikosha master race reporting in.

File: 1499051260970.png (29KB, 1770x567px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1770x567px

>>61830944

>>61831012
But this looks a lot better than DW or some shit. Sapphire crystal, Seiko 24 jewel movement. Find me a flaw other than "I don't recognize that brand".

>>61831012
Haha I heard Zhang Mihn worked on his watch

>>61831254
if you really want to

>>61828154
oh boy

>>61830017
t. no taste

File: fraud.png (1MB, 1259x926px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1259x926px

rofl

>>61831513
What website is this? ill take a shit in half and hour and try to sell it for 650.

>>61831557
It's fake merchandise from Bali.

https://www.gumtree. com.au/s-ad/burswood/watches/watch-diesel-and-mk/1156351028

File: 1502307944803.jpg (56KB, 358x429px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 358x429px

>>61830484
They didn't bother trying anymore huh

File: IMG_1603.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

choose your next shitter

File: IMG_20170810_083502.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

Hmmm I might need to contact Shane... I'm really skeptical this is normal. I let this run down over the weekend so I could get the second hand closest to zero as possible to test my suspicions. I set the time Sunday night within one second. Now it's 8:34 and I was showing 8:31 (picture is a bit off I took it after). This seems really off.

>>61831922
datejust

>>61831930
misaligned hands

>>61831955
i mean from these

>>61827059
That mostly depends on whether it ends up needing any parts and whether, in turn. you are forced to buy any donor movements to secure those parts. The number of NOS vintage GS parts is pretty limited.

Assuming you didn't need any parts, there is no reason servicing a vintage Grand Seiko would be any more expensive than any other vintage watch.

The real issue is to do enough research to learn which vintage GS models to avoid for having movements known to develop issues.

>>61831922
A lot of these are legit nice-looking.

>>61832019
pick one you think looks best?

>>61831922
None of these

>>61827118
The reason I don't recommend them is that I typically think the vintage market overvalues vintage Grand Seiko relative to vintage King Seiko, and because most of the vintage GS models were Suwa Seikosha designs and have movements with known tendencies to develop issues.

Basically, buying vintage GS means you have to be willing to overpay and be careful to choose the right model.

File: IMG_1604.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

kay, how about from these?

>>61832030
Hard choice, either:
>middle row, third from the left, black 12-6-9 dial, sword hands
>almost top row, second from the right, black 12-6 dial, baton hands, black day-date disks

>>61832095
>white 12-6-9 dial ones
>one on the top with white dial, gold indices and hands
>top row, second from the right, white dial, chrome indices and dauphine hands

>>61831986
the one that looks like a datejust

>>61831930
That would be really off. If the behaviour continues I would get in touch with him about it.

>>61832095
Seikos are fucking shit m8

>>61832222
so?

>>61832190
got it.

>>61832174
thanks senpai

>>61832305
np, now buy them for me!

>>61832222
Hence the word shitter.

Opinion on Seiko 5?
Want something for under 200 bucks.

>>61827864
420 is the only acceptable choice.

>>61832608
I've never had one, but it is that, Vostok, or some Chinese shit if you want a cheap mechanical. If you are really into the mechanical aspect of it, get something with a display caseback. If you just want a good watch, regardless of mechanical or not, get a quartz seiko, casio, or citizen. Apart from that, as long as you find a style you like, it's hard to go wrong (unless you are retarded or weight 700 lbs).

File: 20170810_101121-4032x3024.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Good morning wt

>>61833007
Very nice, quartz or electronic balance?

File: maxresdefault.jpg (140KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1280x720px

Name a better Rolex sports combo deal

Explorer I + Two Tone Sub

>>61833187
This is a esa9162 tuning fork designed by Max hetzel who also designed the Accutron, the 9162 has some improvements, particularly in shock resistance and positional variance. Also found in the Omega f300, Omega speedsonic, Tissot tissonic, and others.

File: INGERSOLL LTD LONDON.png (85KB, 1454x525px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1454x525px

alright...

>>>/fa/12671201
>>>/fa/12671201
>>>/fa/12671201

>>61833238
>Short-hands fat Explorer and gold on a sports watch
Can you name a worse combo deal?

File: 1501926353538.jpg (24KB, 599x338px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 599x338px

>>61833238
Terrible choice really.

>>61827869
I swapped an snk809 and an snx809, and I like both better. SNK looks better with a polished case, and I like the lume of the SNX more.

>>61833574
pls respond

>>61833656
Get a proper watch instead, if you areworry what other people might think about you.

File: 10891a2010228-rolex-explorer-reference-rolex-114270.jpg (23KB, 332x500px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 332x500px

>>61833238
lol faggot

File: 3fa93534-b101-4ce2-ad4e-e367c16f0099.jpg (416KB, 1141x1706px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1141x1706px

>>61833325
Have a sweep webm?
>Tissot tissonic

>>61834356
I'll try to post one tonight.

File: Seikoo.jpg (47KB, 330x612px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 330x612px

>>61826030
What does /wt/ think of two-tone watches?

>>61835100
Almost never a good idea, especially not that one

Can look good if you can pull off the sexy rapist look. Most people can't without looking like an actual rapist

File: mqdefault.jpg (12KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 320x180px

>>61835100
that watch gave me cancer

>>61835680
More like aids.

File: akari_shrug.png (376KB, 940x720px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 940x720px

>>61835680
>when your Wrist Candy Watch Club NATO straps give you flock worker's lung

>>61830174
Archie does know that it never really happened, right?

File: IMG_20170810_115414_HDR.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

Casio F-14 arrived. Time, date, two buttons, no stopwatch, no alarm, no backlight, no 24-hour time even. Now this is minimalism.

>>61836048
Why though.

File: IMG_20170810_115210_HDR.jpg (977KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 3264x2448px

Also the straps, the caseback and the two buttons are all one piece of plastic (polyurethane?) held in place by pins similar than on the F-91W. Interesting design, but you're fucked if the strap breaks. Also it's NOS and I even got the original manual.

>>61836080
Because it's an interesting 80's piece, and a cheap addition to a vintage watch collection. The bare bones electronics is kinda refreshing to the dozens of functions crammed into the most basic LCD watch nowadays. Belissimo!

File: IMG_20170810_115338_HDR.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>61836080
Oh yeah, and it's Japan made, probably completely. All you proles with Chink G-Shocks and Edifices can eat yellow dick.

File: tristano.png (120KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 300x300px

>>61836048
>>61836126
>>61836150
Sexy

File: 20170810_191331.jpg (574KB, 1564x781px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 1564x781px

>>61833238
Explorer II & Paul Newman Daytona.

>>61836150

>bitch wrists mode

haha you can front all you want

File: 560032_419556621460878_991356392_n-272x300.jpg (19KB, 272x300px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 272x300px

>>61835100
Dogshit apart from 2 tone Datejust with baton indices and champagne dial.

>>61836201
>>61833238
Too lazy to edit, but Pepsi GMT and green Milgauss

>>61836218
I don't think they are, but thanks for the (You) anyway fatso.

Is the SARB a meme? I'm thinking of getting one as my first 'good' watch.

File: IMG_20170304_105200_724.jpg (2MB, 2988x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x2988px

>>61836246
Do it, I love mine.

>>61826030
nice watch

>>61836150
Oh yeah, it turns out it still had the original protective sticker on the screen. I thought that it had a plastic crystal that's degrading. I took it off and looks like on a new F-91W.

I think this guy I bought from has a few more NOS F-14's. I can look it up if anyone wants one.

>>61836243
>green Milgauss
???

>>61836246
Which SARB? It is pretty hard to go wrong though.

File: f-14.jpg (87KB, 819x650px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 819x650px

Fuck it, here it is:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Casio-F-14-Vintage-Watch-34x32mm-NEW-OLD-STOCK/302382324109

Everyone get one, it'll be the new /wt/ watch.

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170502_170320.jpg (3MB, 2290x2290px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2290x2290px

>>61836233
Looks even better on a good croc strap in my opinion.

File: rolex_milgauss.jpg (2MB, 2600x1727px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2600x1727px

>>61836368
The black one is also the green one because of the crystal tint.

File: mdv.jpg (217KB, 1037x692px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1037x692px

Calling all Casio MDV-106. I love mine, I just wish I wasn't a wristlet.
I put the stock strap back on for now, it's pretty decent and doesn't soap up water. I might pick up another nato strap that sticks with the nautical feel.
Only downsides are
>date only shows day, no idea what month it is and it's a couple days off at the end of the month. Maybe it'll synchronize soon
>weak lume

File: megir_chronograph.jpg (55KB, 700x723px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 700x723px

Cop or not?
Looks fucking nice if you ask me.

>>61836425
I thought that was what you meant (although the blue one has the same tint), but I was hoping that there was an obscure reference I didn't know about.

>>61836440
I like mine a lot. I'll wear it when things might damage mechanicals, like in hot tubs or at the shooting range.

>>61836448
Does the chronograph function work, or is it decorative only? It may be difficult to read with that dial/hands combination, but if it is cheap enough, sure, it isn't much of a loss.

>>61835680
>Tfw also had lung collapse days after getting my padi diploma thing
>never ever got around to buying a dive watch
Never again familia ;_;

>>61836670
The chrono does work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3khzv08JVew

>>61836682
How did that happen?

You may still be able to dive.

File: Rich-Piana.jpg (91KB, 850x850px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 850x850px

>>61826030
What would be the perfect watch in a self defence situation?

>>61837145
A beater.

>>61836440
I like mine too. Got a zulu band since the silicon band was uncomfortable.
But I have to deal with military faggots that don't realize submariners all look alike.

>>61837310
Which one would work the best?

1st time here
can someone explain to me that seiko fags population?

>>61837732
Basically poorfags trying to justify the fact they can't afford real watches so they argue about which is the best of the cheap shitter watches.

File: 1466646963253.jpg (276KB, 1345x1009px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1345x1009px

>>61837790
>real watches

File: daniel_wellington.jpg (46KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x600px

>>61837732
These bitches can't afford real watches

>>61837732

Most people are poor... Poor people cannot afford nice things... Seiko makes watches that cost no money . . poor people buy them. When some of those poor people get enough money to buy a real watch they have deluded themselves so much into believing their shitty watch was good all these years that they buy an expensive Seiko.

>>61837732
Seiko makes plenty of decent watches with interesting designs. However they also make tons of bland mall shitters like>>61832095

File: 1426390098818.jpg (423KB, 2100x2054px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 2100x2054px

>>61837821
but DW are cheap watches

File: tgv.png (148KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 300x300px

>>61837932
I would prefer to use the word affordable.

>>61837732
Seiko is a bit of an odd watch company in that they make everything from cheap mall watches all the way up to extremely expensive hand made watches. They also tend to offer the best value for money in most price brackets.

Most people who don't know much about watches or who don't know much about about watches beyond brand marketing tend to disregard Seiko as a serious watchmaker.

File: roamer_searock_auto_vintage.jpg (192KB, 1392x1856px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1392x1856px

I just finished servicing/restoring one of these. What strap should I put it on? Not black croc, anto or perlon, I already have a ton of watches with that.

>>61838779
The problem on /wt/ is almost all of the Seiko posts are about those cheap mall watches.

>>61838898
Lizard strap.

>>61838898
Cork.

File: 1501591242112.jpg (22KB, 324x299px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 324x299px

>>61838951
the fuck are you on?


all I ever hear about here is the sarbs, skxs and alpinist meme watches. jdm seiko is the ultimate seiko meme. basically jdm anything is a meme

>>61836425
this is what my father wears daily and he is a CEO

>>61839204
CEO of Stinky Pete's Pizza?

Very little smartwatch discussion in here...

File: seamaster_scrapped_concept.jpg (25KB, 484x273px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 484x273px

>>61837145
the Quartz Seamaster that they made for the bond films, only two or three of them exist with the working laser

>>61839226
No, a health insurance company

>>61827440
I love it too, in fact it's one of my top 5.
If you work hard enough you'll be able to buy one anon, trust me :)

File: maxresdefault.jpg (70KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1280x720px

>>61839230
kys and go back to shitposting about gentoo, then kys again

File: whatever.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x270px

>>61839279
Nah

Okay gents first time watch pleb here looking to jump on the Seiko 5 bandwagon. Wanna buy a couple but poorfag budget of £200 Sterling. Thoughts on the following?

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B008EWSA6W/ref=ox_sc_act_image_3?smid=A13S80O1OURIK9&psc=1

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B004JI1DV4/ref=ox_sc_act_image_2?smid=A13S80O1OURIK9&psc=1

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B0051VUDB4/ref=ox_sc_act_image_1?smid=A13S80O1OURIK9&psc=1

Thinking of buying first and last URLs and giving them leather straps.

>>61839324
Only the first of those three is anywhere near acceptable.

>>61839324
PS wanted the SNKL23 but can't find it available in the U.K.

File: 9200000074858733.jpg (55KB, 550x740px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 550x740px

very tempted lads, should I?

>>61839368
Excellent that's the one I'd definitely wanna get

who /onewatch/ here?


post watch pls I wanna be inspired

Does a watch exist with a full analogue display that also has an alarm?
How about comfy light up numbers on the dial?

>>61839115
> all I ever hear about here is the sarbs, skxs and alpinist meme watches

Those are cheap mall watches. The kind of watches you buy with your first ever McD's pay check.

>>61839543

https://www.poljot24.de/en/poljot-alarm-traveller-watch.html

>>61839614
How about with the light up numbers?
I mean specifically numbers that are coated with the paint.

File: 1496565802094.jpg (70KB, 599x785px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 599x785px

>>61826179
>seikofags

get a decent job you pathetic weeb. you are a detriment to this thread

File: RevueThommenCricket.jpg (163KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1280x960px

>>61839652
Those indices do light up. You mean you want actual arabic numberals?

File: 20170810_171730.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

No Citizen love?

>>61839797
Did you buy the most expensive citizen in the mall?

>>61839825
T. Jewish Subverting Seikofag

>>61839952
HI THIS IS KIKE FROM KIKE ISLAND WATCH.COM LOOK HOW AMAZING THIS WONDERFUL SEIKO IS. AS YOU CAN SEE I ONLY ACTUALLY BUY ROLEX'S BECAUSE EVEN GRAND SEIKO'S ARE SHITTERS BUT YOU STUPID GOYIM SHOULD DEFINITELY BUY THESE SEIKOS AND ORIENTS. OY VEY I JUST GOT BACK FROM SWITZERLAND AND HAVE CONFIRMED WE WILL BE GETTING 50 NEW SQUALES. BE A GOOD GOY AND BUY AT LEAST TWO SO YOU CAN DOUBLE PHIST THEM LIKE ME.

>>61839721
>seikofags
I own two special edition omegas and a rolex sub, I also own 5 seikos. Fuck you for shaming people for owning a certain watch because in your eyes they are not worthy.

>>61840078
Just don't reply to b8 m8.

File: f644e9382d69b21389baae293e4a475b.jpg (64KB, 404x404px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 404x404px

>>61839825
>millennials are the most financially successful generation of all time

>>61837821
0/10 troll, try harder

What do you guys think about Junkers and Junghans? I'm considering getting an automatic watch in bauhaus style with domed crystal and cut out back. I'm looking to spend around 500-600GBP that Junkers seem like one of very few options. Pic related is Junkers 6060-5 for 400GBP

File: junkers_6060-5_perspective_view_medium.jpg (152KB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 960x1440px

>>61840348
Forgot pic

File: 20170701_205146.png (2MB, 1431x1431px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1431x1431px

>>61839797
I love my Citizen.

>>61840348
Go for the junghans max bill. Cleaner design.

>>61840078
t. brainlet

File: 20170608_102558.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>61839543

>>61840407
he meant mechanical and that watch has no lumed numerals..fucking seicucks

File: meme-omatic.jpg (117KB, 1024x939px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1024x939px

>>61840438
:^)

File: Seiko-Samurai-SRPB51K-3.jpg (274KB, 1690x1127px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1690x1127px

>>61837889
Interesting does not mean good.

The best looking Seikos are the ones with the most boring-ass designs. SBGW039 or Credor Eichi II. And at that price point you have a LOT of other options.

Every single one of you - and I know there are a lot - who can look at this image and think "gee, that's a nice looking watch" needs to go see an eye doctor and ask to have your eyeballs surgically removed and donated to someone who can make better use of them.

>>61840681
>Some people have different taste in watch aesthetics
Shocking, I know. I'd rather an SLA017 than that though, if only it were cheaper.

>>61840707
Yet another example. I'm not against spending $4000 on a Seiko at all, but at that price you've got many good looking high quality watches. Not a particularly compelling product unless you're a fanboi or just a contrarian who wants to be able to go "oh but you THINK it's cheap because seiko but AYCKTYUALLY it was $4000 look how much I know about watches have you heard about grand seiko I bet u haven't heard about grand seiko"

That's probably the thought process going through most people's heads when they buy one.

File: Two_Rolex_2.jpg (973KB, 1600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

973KB, 1600x1000px

>>61833238
>>61836201
Rate lads

File: 1423476707318.jpg (193KB, 1024x763px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1024x763px

>>61840681
>hour hand

JUST

>>61840765
>That's probably the thought process going through most people's heads when they buy one.
Projection

File: theimplication.png (678KB, 625x925px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 625x925px

>>61840781
The implication/10

>>61840765
You're looking things that aren't there, from what it seems to me m8. One would only cough up the cash for an SLA017 if you knew what the 6217 from the 60s was and really wanted one. Nothing wrong with having a niche focus in an already autistic niche.

>>61840787
But it's "interesting" so it must be good right?
>>61840806
>One would only cough up the cash for an SLA017 if you knew what the 6217 from the 60s was and really wanted one.
Translation: I betcha don't know about the 62MAS did you know about suwa and daini? Betcha don't know as much as I know about obscure stuff!

Same shit different words

>>61837130
t. Coyote Peterson

>>61840836
One can have interests without being snobby or overbearing, just saiyan. I'm sure you or I could go on about some specific watch, it's history or whatever makes it unique, if prompted.

File: S-SARX019_a_1024x1024.jpg (71KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x768px

>>61840681
Sure thing.

>>61840765
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rnZhkTINV4
EOM

File: vomit.webm (3MB, 1080x606px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1080x606px

>>61840863
Sure but at the end of the day it's jewelry for men. I can blather on about my closed channel stitching and weinheimer vs ilcea box calf but legitimately no one gives a shit, the key thing is (a) that I can walk all day and be comfortable while (b) people who look at my shoes think "this man has good taste and is definitely not poor". And to that end, as far as watches go, Seiko is a rather poor choice whether it's a GS or a shitter
>>61840868
>"dress watch" design cues
>diver proportions
pic related

>>61840681
>>61840765
So "stop liking what I don't like" basically?

>>61840958
If I like the design and aesthetic of a watch I will buy it. I don't worry "oh gosh people will think I am poor or something for wearing a SEIKO"

>>61840958
>(b) people who look at my shoes think "this man has good taste and is definitely not poor".
Oh yeah. I bet that's exactly what they're thinking.

>>61840958
Recognition from normies seems to me to be a rather shallow reason to prefer some watches over others m8. Even that snobby cunt archie recognizes how well made GS's are.

>>61841024
Archie is actually very knowledgeable and has a deeper understanding for watches than most posters on /g/ do.

File: P3240240.jpg (140KB, 950x713px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 950x713px

>>61840958
>diver proportions
Oh, and who IS doing classically proportioned watches at a sub $1,000 pricepoint? That aren't garbage in every other respect?

>>61841008
No, it's stop pretending to like something because of m'horological virtue or whatever woo-woo nonsense you tell yourself. If you like a watch, fine. But most people will go through all kinds of mental gymnastics to rationalize an ugly ass shitter like all but maybe 3 or 4 watches that seiko produces because "oh wow this 13.9mm thick, 42mm wrist fedora has SPRON it has more horological virtue now" as if that actually means anything
> I don't worry "oh gosh people will think I am poor or something for wearing a SEIKO"
No, you think "hmm, I can't buy this quartz Swatch Group product because it doesn't have horological virtue, the Fedora'd Gentlemen said in the youtube that I need to get that one because it totally punches above its weight" (whatever that means). In your head, you are listening to a bunch of internet personas arguing about stuff that doesn't matter, and you end up wearing an ugly watch and justifying it to yourself and that's your definition of "liking" something - assimilating a confused set of ideas because of aspirations to haute horologie that are totally unrealistic
>>61841024
>Recognition from normies seems to me to be a rather shallow reason to prefer some watches over others
Yeah much better to have the quiet confidence that if I ever met the urban gentry he'd give me the wink of approval. Screw normies, they don't know shit.

>>61841150
The point is to just get something you yourself would be satisfied with, regardless if it gets the normie/TGV approval or not.

>>61841108
>That aren't garbage in every other respect?
You mean "that don't have a quartz movement inside"?

I think you're overinflating the "horological virtue" of those cocktail times, a display back belongs on an actual high end watch, not on those things. Quartz is fine.

>>61841182
Fucking kill yourself

File: 2fcc23212259c84289b1198a3c8d008b.jpg (914KB, 1522x1125px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 1522x1125px

>>61840958
>>61841150
>Sure but at the end of the day it's jewelry for men. I can blather on about my closed channel stitching and weinheimer vs ilcea box calf but legitimately no one gives a shit, the key thing is (a) that I can walk all day and be comfortable while (b) people who look at my shoes think "this man has good taste and is definitely not poor". And to that end, as far as watches go, Seiko is a rather poor choice whether it's a GS or a shitter
Ah, so you simply have no interest in horology then. You are one of those for whom a watch only exists as a totem that carries the marketing manufactured "prestige" imbued into it by the advertising created by the watch company, and thus a watch only has value based on how much imagined social status you image it gives you.

Yeah, I can see how Grand Seikos wouldn't really appeal to you.

>>61841150
>>61840958
>I don't like watches
>but I am cucked enough to wear one and choose it based on what other people think of me

>>61841058
Paul doesn't know shit about watches other than as luxury goods. He's also a delusional retard who thought LV luggage would make him happy and who took out loans to buy watches.

>>61841182
Display casebacks are fine on any mechanical watch. The inner workings of mechanical things are interesting, a d interesting to watch.
However, I do think that any sort of open-faced or skeleton watch should be reserved for high-end pieces. In that case the function of exposing the movement is aesthetic, so the movement itself should be aesthetic.

>>61841182
No, I mean that don't have awful case/dial/hands and bracelet finishing for the price. Non high-end quartz are typically even worse in all of those respects than anything else you could find in traditional watch sizes at in the sub $1,000 range.

>>61841234
Did I say something wrong?
>>61841238
>Ah, so you simply have no interest in horology then.
Correcty, I have no interest in making excuses for shitty watches just because they are mechanical. That is /g/'s working definition of "appreciating horology"
>Yeah, I can see how Grand Seikos wouldn't really appeal to you.
Some Grand Seikos appeal to me. That one, not so much. I mentioned a few that I like in an earlier post.

>>61841305
>Display casebacks are fine on any mechanical watch
No, they really aren't
>However, I do think that any sort of open-faced or skeleton watch should be reserved for high-end pieces. In that case the function of exposing the movement is aesthetic, so the movement itself should be aesthetic.
I fail to see the difference. The entire case of a display back watch is compromised in order to create a view on a mass produced, uninteresting movement. It becomes needlessly thick and needlessly gives up water resistance. It also needlessly increases the price, and at cocktail time price ranges, that is not a small thing.

A mechanical movement on a watch in this price range serves one purpose: to make the second hand move in a more attractive way. As for how it accomplishes that, given the nastiness inside the case, better to leave as much to the imagination as possible.

>>61841422
Well at least the new cocktail time is thinner at 11.8mm.

>>61841422
>A mechanical movement on a watch in this price range serves one purpose: to make the second hand move in a more attractive way.
It's like there are literal retards on /g/

Where is the best place to get an skx013

>>61841422
Why are they not fine? Display case backs that is.

File: 1501872181639.png (66KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1000x1000px

>>61841422
I thought you didn't care about horology? Why, then, do you care about the movement being "uninteresting" and why would you judge the inside of the case as "nastiness"? I thought you said quartz would be fine too and you don't care about mechanical movements at all?

>>61841570
You mean other than the myriad reasons I gave in my post? Nothing, I guess. What are you getting at?

>>61841422
I agree. Very happy they did not give the alpinist a display back.

>>61841605
Your reasons are
>stop liking what I don't like

Is it the weekend already?

>>61841581
Whether the movement is interesting to me or not has nothing to do with your definition of "horology"
> I thought you said quartz would be fine too and you don't care about mechanical movements at all?
I never said that, you're making a lot of wild assumptions based on typical /g/ logic

>>61841422
Water resistance isn't an issue until you reach depths that you need a purpose built diver anyway. It use to be a massive issue but the tech has caught up you can get 200m divers watches with display backs so yeah not really an issue.
I agree it's not as attractive but it's still cool to see the everything moving.
It does add a mm or 2 to thickness but so what it is cool to look at and it's not that much in the grand scheme of things.

File: IMG_5991.jpg (19KB, 261x273px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 261x273px

>>61841657
>Whether the movement is interesting to me or not has nothing to do with your definition of "horology"
Which definition of horology is that? I thought you only cared about whether people who look at your watch say "this man has good taste and is definitely not poor"? What is the relevance of how the movement looks to this since its hidden by your wrist?

>>61841689
>Water resistance isn't an issue until you reach depths that you need a purpose built diver anyway.
That isn't actually true though, anyone who spends a decent amount of time outdoors has a good reason for wanting higher water resistance, because over time, especially in sub-optimal conditions, a case designed with water resistance as a priority is going to do better than one that's designed with other considerations in mind. If you spend all your time in an air conditioned room, then sure. But as another anon pointed out, they put a solid caseback on the alpinists for a reason

Also, 2mm is not "not much" in the grand scheme of things. It is, in fact, enough to turn a decent looking watch into a fugly wrist hamburger.

>>61841717
>Which definition of horology is that?
The /g/ definition. "If it is mechanical then therefore it is good". I do not agree with this point of view.
>I thought you only cared about whether people who look at your watch say "this man has good taste and is definitely not poor"?
That is important. And a tastefully proportioned watch says a lot. Any adult running around with a 42mm wide, 14mm thick wristwatch trying to pass itself off as a "dress watch" looks like a fool. The sort of person who might put on a matching tie and pocket square set thinking it looks "fancy"
>What is the relevance of how the movement looks to this since its hidden by your wrist?
The display caseback juts out and makes the entire watch needlessly bulky

>>61841725
>But as another anon pointed out, they put a solid caseback on the alpinists for a reason

No, Anon said he was glad they didn't put one on. Reason for that choice was not discussed.

quick question, I'm new to /wt/ and wanted to get my first 'nice' watch but you guys just confirmed to me that it's a huge circlejerk and debates about frivolous shit.

my question is what is the cheapest way into a quartz watch that has good finishing in a modern style?

>>61841725
Your right, meeting diving criteria and performance is a terrible indication of water resistance. They wouldn't have a clue what they are on about. By the time the watch needs a service you are reaching the point you could replace the case back with one that is still up to mark. Again if your using your watch to the point the case back fails you should consider it just like I said with the purpose built diver. If you by a watch that doesn't meet you needs you it's not that it's a bad watch it's that you are retarded.
I agree that it can make a watch unattractive and again if that's a requirement you want for your watch buy one that suits your requirements it's not the watch it the case's fault you got a watch that doesn't meet your requirements.

>>61841811
Daniel Wellington desu

>>61841811
Seiko 5

File: IMG_20170810_183123796.jpg (3MB, 2340x4160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2340x4160px

I'm not sold on the black strap, should I swap the brown strap onto the admiral?

>>61841761
>The /g/ definition. "If it is mechanical then therefore it is good". I do not agree with this point of view.
Nice strawman. It's also less true about /wt/ than virtually any other online watch discussion forum on the internet.

>That is important. And a tastefully proportioned watch says a lot. Any adult running around with a 42mm wide, 14mm thick wristwatch trying to pass itself off as a "dress watch" looks like a fool. The sort of person who might put on a matching tie and pocket square set thinking it looks "fancy"
Please provide a list of affordable (sub $1,000) dressy sports watches or actual dress watches in 38mm or less size that aren't complete dogshit in terms of case/dial/hands/bracelet finishing. I'll wait.

You are attacking Seiko's sub-$1,000 models for a sin committed by everyone else in the watch industry in the same price range.

>The display caseback juts out and makes the entire watch needlessly bulky
But this has nothing to do with the appearance of the movement, which is what you were talking about, even though you claimed not to care about it.

>>61841807
You make a good point. I technically should have phrased that sentence differently. Ordering a SARY078 now
>>61841827
>Your right, meeting diving criteria and performance is a terrible indication of water resistance.
You're really terrible at making your arguments, I guess you think this is funny or something?

>>61841811
What do you mean by "modern style"?

File: Seiko_alps.jpg (918KB, 1328x1367px) Image search: [Google]

918KB, 1328x1367px

My Alp

>>61837145
Whetever watch Piana is wearing. It looks to be about 5lbs, could probably use it like a palm sap but on your wrist.

>>61841856
Hey now don't be all particular about what you're saying and then backtrack when you lie and claim if phrasing. You're all over the place with this shit.

>>61841856
I am actually having a giggle. One of your reasons display backs are shit is that they aren't water proof even though they can meet the standards.
Your other argument is that they don't meet your requirements for what you personally want from a watch, in that case don't get a watch with one. Your taste doesn't make them shit it just means it isn't your taste and that's fine.

>>61841865
something that is it modern size and doesn't look like I'm trying to relive the 1950's

it doesn't have to be bahaus

>>61841913
I think most people could consider 38mm modern yet tasteful.

>>61841811
There are a few faggots who post bait, false flag, and shit everything up with the same antagonism regularly. That's on you for browsing during the Summer though.

Depends on what you mean by modern style. Look at Swatch, Seiko, Citizen, and Casio.

>>61841884
Have you seen the video where he discusses his watch collection?

>>61841854
> It's also less true about /wt/ than virtually any other online watch discussion forum on the internet.
You just got done telling me how I feel about Grand Seikos based on a remark about quartz movements being ok. You realize Grand Seiko itself has a line of quartz watches? I don't suppose you did, but now you know.
>Please provide a list of affordable (sub $1,000) dressy sports watches or actual dress watches in 38mm or less size that aren't complete dogshit in terms of case/dial/hands/bracelet finishing. I'll wait.
"aren't complete dogshit" is pretty vague. You might want to look at a tank style quartz watch from Baume & Mercier, Raymond Weil, Longines, or something like that
>>61841899
> You're all over the place with this shit.
No, you're just making a lot of unfounded assumptions about what I like and don't like based on the degree to which my preferences intersect with your own

>>61841937
>No, you're just making a lot of unfounded assumptions

Coming from the guy who assumes!

>>61841931
>Have you seen the video where he discusses his watch collection?
Just watched it, never heard of Invicta before. The big 63mm one looks to be $600 online, thought it'd be a lot more desu

>>61842087
Invicta has little value apart from being a great base to mod, but oh baby, they are just so perfect for him.

File: 10154.jpg (316KB, 478x1000px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 478x1000px

>>61841937
>You realize Grand Seiko itself has a line of quartz watches? I don't suppose you did, but now you know.
Wait, you mean that the company which pioneered the quartz wristwatch and was at the forefront of the quartz revolution in watchmaking still makes high end quartz movements? Truly, this news will be shocking to those of us actually interested in horology.

>You might want to look at a tank style quartz watch from Baume & Mercier, Raymond Weil, Longines, or something like that
That's right kids, you too can spend $1,550 on a piece of shit Baume & Mercier with a $10 quartz movement rather than getting any value at all for your money!

File: Maison Celadon.jpg (452KB, 1280x1704px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1280x1704px

>>61841108

>>61842193
While I agree with you, I'm not exactly sure that Maison Celadon would be what the type of brand whore who looks down their nose at Seiko would have in mind as an answer to my question.

>>61842156
>those of us actually interested in horology
lol
>rather than getting any value at all for your money!
Yeah because buying an ugly thick Seiko for $600 because "mechanical means it's good" is such a good "value". The urban gentry said so!

>>61842223
If they don't like mainstream and they don't like microbrand, what else is there?

>>61842223
I assume that passive-aggressive remark is directed at me. I don't look down my nose at Seiko. I look down my nose at people who make excuses for Seiko's worst products because youtube told them to do so.

File: 20170810_191113.jpg (244KB, 649x1153px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 649x1153px

>>61826952

>>61842274
So to you is everyone who likes Seiko brainwashed by youtubers and bloggers?

>>61827440
wow that is tacky

>>61842304
You realize Seiko has been around since before WW2? Youtube didn't exist back then.

>>61842288
Nice

>>61841937
I totally agree with you. Its like a giant group of poor people jerking each other off over toyota and lexus automobiles.. Look at this beautiful trueno or omg check out my supra.. fucking ferrari plebs just have a bank account and can't appreciate muh fine automotive engineering. Meanwhile your fucking turbocharged shitbox is nowhere near as good as ferrari and never will be. MUh 6r15 camry engine is so well made by robots and so reliable its super accurate without a service for extended periods of time. Your fragile unfinished patek engine is obviously inferior.... please fuck off .. I am fucking poor as fuck i am a student right now.. i have only shitty watches but i am not going to delude myself and spout bullshit about how my fucking shitty watch is actually excellent.When i do have the means and add more expensive peices to my collection.. I am not going to argue with people saying my shitty watches are shitty..... Get your heads out of your asses. And while some grand seiko movements are cool notably the high beat ones not the quartz watches you faggots like... The cases are all totally out of proportion just like their sarb and sarx lines... The watches are all fucking shit tier style wise. I maybe like 3 watches that say seiko on them and 2 of them are vintage and one is the totally overpriced reissue that is already sold out.

>>61842324
Let me rephrase my question then

>>61842304
So to you is everyone in contemporary times today who likes Seiko brainwashed by youtubers and bloggers?

File: Longines-Grande-Classique-1.jpg (1MB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x2448px

>>61842250
>Yeah because buying an ugly thick Seiko for $600 because "mechanical means it's good" is such a good "value". The urban gentry said so!
It's absolutely much better to spend $1,500 on that ugly piece of shit Baume & Mercier that had more spent on its marketing than its manufacture, certainly.

Hey, maybe you can spend $1,100 on this Longines beauty with a literal $30 quartz movement in it instead? Indeed, it is 36mm after all!

>>61842403
For the most part people defending SARBs and SARYs and crap like that are, yes, brainwashed by bloggers and youtube.

They are ugly watches. Seiko is more than capable of making good looking watches. I know because I have one, which was made about 50 years ago. I know because they have made like 2, since the turn of the century. They can, they just won't

They won't, because retards make excuses for the fugly garbage they shit out. Without exception in their sub-$1000 watches, but also most of their "higher end" ones. I was in the GS boutique and they had a hideous diver, a hi-beat no less, that pretty much looked like a goddamm invicta. I don't remember the price but it was somewhere north of $3000.

>>61842421
Those hidden lugs are very nice

File: 1501731863351.png (249KB, 534x419px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 534x419px

>>61842494
>Why don't others have the same taste as me?

>>61842421
>manufacture
Babby's first horology vocab, this is adorable
>Hey, maybe you can spend $1,100 on this Longines beauty with a literal $30 quartz movement in it instead?
Keeps better time than your 6R15, so, yeah. Good plan.

File: IMG_1439.jpg (478KB, 1080x1073px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 1080x1073px

>>61836440
love mine too even before discovering /wt/ bought it with the stock bracelet some years back but now with some natos, it is what it is great bang for the buck but yeah weak lume.

File: new-raymond-weil-toccata-grey-dial-quartz-men-s-watch-5588-st-60001-71cdc1a75de56195eee8ba8e234f448f.jpg (213KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1600x1200px

>>61842551
Here is another wonderful option, in the form of a $500 Raymond Wiel with another glorious $10 quartz movement and yet more exemplary finishing. I'm TOTALLY sure that more wasn't spent on advertising this steaming piece of shit than making it.

>>61842588
That's a great choice anon. Although I don't know what your point is regarding advertising, Seiko probably spends more than the entire swatch group on "grassroots" marketing. They even got to Archie

>>61842421
>>61842588
Plenty of thin Seiko/Seiko Lassale quartz on ebay. Ultra thin so ultra comfy. Got mine for like $45.

File: un.gif (2MB, 219x186px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 219x186px

>>61842494
>I don't like things
>this proves I have discriminating tastes
I know I speak for all of us when I say that's very impressive. True horological genius.

>>61842616
>That's a great choice anon
I thought you were against dressy watch in diver sizes? That RW is a decidedly unclassical 39mm. It's almost like you have some sort of...agenda or something? :^)

>>61842655
> That RW is a decidedly unclassical 39mm.
Well then I take it back. Unlike you with your SARBuyers remorse, I can admit when I was wrong.

>>61842619
I'm aware, but that would go against the ridiculous argument one of our resident shitposters is trying to make, so instead he's suggesting $1,000+ laughably finished pieces of garbage with $10 quartz movements.

>>61842665
Alright, time for the next batch of suggestions for sub-$1,000 classically proportioned watches that aren't absurdly, hilariously overpriced relative to their level of finishing and cost of manufacture. I'll wait.

>>61842616
>They even got to Archie
Seiko had successfully propagandized one of archie's friends into buying a GS. Then they got said friend to show archie his GS, all for the goal of swaying his opinion on seiko. Truly amazing.

>>61842689
Maybe tomorrow, had too much wine and I'm going to bed. It's been fun, gnite /g/

File: Candy-O.png (792KB, 874x878px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 874x878px

>>61842665
>Y-you have buyers remorse too! You just are not admitting it!

File: 1371413291768.png (964KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

964KB, 612x612px

>this thread

>>61842745
>>61842745

>>61842745
>>61842745

>>61842421
which daniel wellington model is this?

>>61826030
These are the bro threads for the tech-illiterate, right?