Ryzen + Vega thinkpads when?
>>61816960
Soon(tm).
probably never
those will most likely stay intel and if its a model with dedicated gpu it will be nvidia
sad but true
>>61816960
Vega is a housefire so no.
>>61816960
Vega is overkill for Thinkpads. Professionals will be okay with ravenridge
>>61817049
4K ALU card runs hot?
No shit pal.
>>61817067
GTX 1070 and 1080 run in laptops. AMD can't do that because Vega is not efficient.
>>61817150
vega architecture has the same efficiency at a higher performance.
>>61817579
It draw much more power...
>>61817046
Ryzen or raven ridge(forgot which) is confirmed. Called the a470 and a270 I believe. Probably coming out early next year?
I'm excited.
Also looks like vega is rather efficient when they're not going for such a high performance target and should do okay in laptops and as a polaris replacement.
>>61816960
never probably
I hope never
>>61816960
Next years, maybe show models on CES2018
whenever 7 nm APU laptops are available I'm getting one.
>>61817150
AMD offers no Vega10 in laptops the same way nvidia offers almost no GP102 in laptops.
>>61818203
Its A475 and A275.
>>61816960
Comfy Ryzen Vega Thinkpads with a preinstalled Arch, C and Haskell, BOTNET and CIA-Niggers.
>>61819207
DELET IMMEDIATELY, CIA NIGGER
>>61818077
with less gayming performance, yeah yeah right fuck off shill
>>61819958
Cant you elaborate pls? How vega is better?
>>61816960
>vega
>>61820446
wtf man, just at the numbers yourself
>>61816960
My nigger. Vega sucks over 250W from the wall in it's lowest form of spec. It would be truly weird to have a 45 watt CPU like a core i7 for mobile and a vega that uses 5 times that.
I'd prefer Ryzen + nvidia GPU to be honest.
>>61820524
There's a 150W Nano coming out.
Mobile doesn't need 4k shaders nor does it need 1600MHz clock, like any modern GPU architecture it can scale down to below 10W
>>61821177
but i want a fucking 13Tflop card in my laptop :<