>women are 'biologically' less likely to succeed in tech
Okayyy...
>>61799036
she looks like a dude
You do know what less likely means, right?
>>61799036
>Less likely means zero
that's a woman?
>>61799036
>using Lisa su an example
she is a qt tomboy so it doesnt count
>>61799036
This is your first time baiting, isn't it norman?
Here, have a sage.
>>61799036
t. someone who has never worked with women in tech
>>61799036
this half-chink engineer doesn't really count as a woman
she didn't have any impact on ryzen anyway
>>61799036
what do you mean by 'less likely'?? also 'bell curve'
saga
>>61799036
> there are no anomalies in nature
she studied EE didn't she? do you have any idea how hard it is to find a women in EE?
>>61799056
I was going to reiterate this.
OP is a dumb nigger.
>>61799532
>what do you mean by 'less likely'?
it means, not as likely.
>>61799036
>tech CEO
>knows how to program/engineer
not always the case.
>>61799865
She is a engineer imbecil
>>61799036
>she
probably has a bigger dick than half of /g/