With Intel moving away from bing bus and IPC looking like it'll

>>61796024
for shitter games that run on a single thread, yeah, it is.

>>61796070
/thread

File: 1497585541845.jpg (22KB, 346x450px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 346x450px

>>61796070
>>61796145
Stop laughing at me for playing games, not everyone codes and installs linux distros all day.

>>61796162
HAHA NIGGER

>>61796070
>playing games that were released this decade
Must be over 18 etc

>>61796024
Wait, I thought Intel was using ringbus for Coffee Lake? So it should perform pretty much like a 6 core 7700K, right?

>>61796024
>7700K
>good
Kek

>>61796886
>unquestionably the best for gaming right now
>bad
?

>>61796882
Yes, they'll only use the mesh for the high core count dies, doesnt make sense for sub 10 core chips

The best for gaming RIGHT NOW. Give it a year however...

Why are you not investing in the future anon?

>>61797001
>/g/ says Bulldozer is futureproof
>6 years later it still doesn't beat the 2500K in games and stutters worse than Sandy and Ivy

>>61797040
/g/ never said that you fucking aspie.

bulldozer was always seen as shit

>>61796024
Coffee Lake S is using the same old ringbus and cache. It's not going to be a disaster like Skylake-X. Hopefully.
>>61797001
>>61797465
Skylake-X is going to be shit forever, too. Can't fix that mesh and cache changes won't ever be optimized for.

>>61797613
>wont be ever optimised for

You have the ability to see into the future and all you use it for to shitpost on your favourite Chinese cartoon website? Pathetic

It'll get optimised for because ringbus is shit for scale-ability and the monolithic die meme is dead

>>61797799
The cache changes were mostly for better workstation support (supposedly)

File: crysis3.jpg (114KB, 917x725px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 917x725px

>>61797040
*outperforms skylake*

>>61798054
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76-8-4qcpPo
I was going off of this where Piledriver gets massacred at stock. And of course the 2500K is the overclocking king so that wouldn't help FX.

Also GameGPU is generally an unreliable site, at least for newer games. There are numerous examples of newer games where their benchmarks were vastly different than every other reviewer.

>>61798054
>5960X still the gaming king
>none for fucking sale at a reasonable price

File: piledriver.jpg (50KB, 639x354px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 639x354px

>>61798108
Average out of a bunch of different current AAA games

>>61798256
HEDT has always been a scam since the motherboards are rarer and therefore more expensive even as the platform gets older. Also people tend to keep them longer probably, it's why the market is being flooded with LGA 1366 mobos now. Good luck trying to find X79 or first gen 2011 boards at a decent price in good condition. Threadripper will be just as bad.

File: 71a38552061ef260f9412e8fb00822f0902ffc61bae8292e6f63e3d5fef1aaf7.jpg (203KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 700x700px

>>61796024
Jewtel will just dissolve, along with all the jewtel shills.

>>61798054
blyat

>>61798375
As a Jewish AMD shill, hopfully. I made a fortune trading polaris

>>61798375
Off yourself animetard.

>>61797835
Not for workstation mostly for server loads. But skx shares same arch as xeon

>>61799137
anime site

>>61796024
Any game older than 3 years - it wont matter, any modern cpu is good enough. Any brand new games will be developed with multithreading in mind, especially now that Intel is going moar coares too.

So basically you just have this awkward small group of games where the 7700k is better.

>>61800037
>awkward
Like 99%?

>>61796070
rekt

coffee lake is coming it seems. august 21st.
https://newsroom.intel.com/news-releases/media-alert-introducing-new-8th-gen-intel-core-processor-family/

>>61801732
There's usually more motherboard leaks before a launch. If they're releasing this soon it means it's rushed way too soon, also mobo manufacturers will be unhappy because they can't sell remaining Z270 stock due to it not being compatible with CL. This would be a bigger disaster than Skylake-X

File: 5GHz.png (591KB, 1434x737px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 1434x737px

>>61796024
The 8700K is literally just a 7700K with six cores. None of the bingmesh and cache changes for Skylake-X. We've already seen leaks of it overclocked to 5GHz. Even the 7800X overclocks to 4.8GHz, and that has several disadvantages in design dragging it down, since the changes made increased heat and power draw. Changes that the 8700K won't have. There's literally no reason to think that it won't be around the same as the 7700K in terms of overclocking ability.

It's going to be the best gaming CPU on the market bar none, with all the single thread performance and 50% more cores, so not a stuttering piece of trash as soon as you start doing anything in the background.

>>61801838
it is obviously rushed. ryzen is on a roll. intel is trying to halt it. I'm expecting expensive cpus.

>>61801922
Hmm smells like housefire.

>>61801922
>six cores
Dunno man 6850k is kinda shit
7800X is also shit

>>61802021
The 6850K is shit because Broadwell is a bad architecture. The four core parts didn't overclock for shit either. The 7800X has poor gaming performance due to the aforementioned changes, which the 8700K won't have. But Skylake-X is a very good overclocker, when you can keep that increased power draw under control.

>>61796070
>for shitter games that run on a single thread, yeah, it is.
Then absolutly none. Your post makes no sense in 2017.
You're talking like we're still in 2004

>>61801922
Hitting an eng.sample at 5 GHz doesn't mean a whole lot when most 7700K's couldn't even hit 5 GHz, and they are better binned for high clockspeeds.

>>61802374
>and they are better binned for high clockspeeds

As you're clearly an Intel insider, please explain the difference in the binning process between the 7700K and 8700K.

>>61796145
Pun intended?
>>61796070
This. Any game not heavily multithreaded is either doomed, or more realistically can run fine on any cheap ryzen part. Single threaded performance will always be important but now there is more merit in how many cores you can jam in there. "gaming" CPUS haven't been a thing for like 5 years. A 2500k is good enough.

>>61801922
>3.2GHz base
>oc to 5.0GHz
>not soldered
>1.416V
That shit is a literal housefire, what the fuck.

>>61802401
I'm not but you're crazy if you think the 8700K is going to have 7700K clockspeeds.

>>61801838
A socket change a yea- twice a year keeps the goyim in fear!

File: Core-i7-8700CPUZ.jpg (80KB, 663x684px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 663x684px

you wish, rypoo shill

>>61802541
You forgot to add composite sync color banding. Doesn't look fake enough.

>>61802554
dont worry, everyone i know with rypoos is scared too

>>61802541
That score is 2% higher single thread and 33% higher multithread score than a 7700k.

Hardly impressive.

Sandy Bridge was the last Intel architecture that was worth buying.

File: india inside.jpg (387KB, 1500x1164px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1500x1164px

>>61802541
>rypoo
>>61802575
>rypoos

Industry insider here
Theres a reason Ryzen and Threadripper have amazing price/performance: AMD cut corners wherever they could. By Q3 2018 35%+ of Ryzen CPUs will be dead. With Vega flopping HARD AMD will not have the resources to honor the warranties. AMD will release no new products in 2018. By 2019 AMD will file for bankruptcy.
Expect shareholders to dump AMD stock as soon as Vega releases. Insiders know this. How? They orchestrated it. After Bulldozer major shareholders and insiders knew AMD wasn't going to survive the decade. Nvidia's AI play is poised to leave AMD in the dust.
Lisa Su's sole purpose at AMD was to give these majority shareholders an easy way to cash out of a dead company. She did exactly that. On Su's first day as CEO, she went to the GPU engineers and told them there was only word that should be in their head: cryptomining. Optimizing their GPUs for mining gave AMD the extra time/money they needed to throw together the biggest tech scam of the 21st century: Ryzen.
Lisa Su is a mastermind, however, after the Federal investigations in 2020, she will never work in tech again.

>>61802579
Also, CPU-Z is a trash benchmark, so there's that.

>>61802614
I agree check out these fives

>>61802184
Sure, that's why g4560 is more than enough even with Titan XP.
So many cores they use, left?

>>61802636
>not a single five


CURSES

>>61802614
This pasta sure is stale already.

>>61802648
Pentium G4560 literally can't take advantage of anything higher than a 1060 before it bottlenecks 100% of the time. DF did tests at 4k with the Titan and it stutters like crazy even if the average framerate is high. It's not meant for high end gaming, it's meant for 1080p and a midrange GPU.

>>61802441
1.4V+ was perfectly fine on air with Skylake.

>>61802443
No, you're just an ill-informed moron spouting your """""expert""""" opinion based on nothing. The 7800X is already hitting similar speeds to the 7700K. You can buy pre-binned 4.9GHz ones from several retailers, with 4.8GHz being an achievable figure on all of them. This is despite all the disadvantages it has in terms of achitecture (and so heat and power draw), which the 8700K won't have. 7800X clock speeds are a baseline for the 8700K, with more extremely likely.

Time to take your head out of the sand and pay attention to what's happening around you, anon. Near-5GHz hexa cores are happening right now.

>>61800037
>Any game older than 3 years - it wont matter, any modern cpu is good enough
Getting pretty tired of this meme, go download Company of Heroes (2006), install the FOV unlocker and try to get more than 40FPS with the map zoomed even half the way out. There are a billion demanding titles out there that are still heavily CPU bound. I've got a 1080Ti and still get shit framerate in games like Skyrim, Civ 5, Red Orchestra 2 etc.

2600K owner here.
I'm buying the 8700K on launch. Coffee Lake is going to be the next Sandy Bridge.

>>61802734
3570K owner here.
Waiting for the reviews just to make sure I don't get burned, but I'll be buying 8700K a few days after launch. Coffee Lake is going to be the next Sandy Bridge.

>>61796024
>Anonymous 08/08/17(Tue)08:12:33 No.617
no, the 6700k is the last good cpu from intel

>>61802714
>comparing HEDT CPU to mainstream CPU

You alright there, buddy?

>>61802785
Explain this meme.

File: IMG_1431.jpg (642KB, 2592x4608px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 2592x4608px

Who here /buying 8700K so long as its soldered/?

>>61802824
>so long as its soldered
>intel listens
>cpus now come soldered on to the motherboards

>>61802880
kek

>>61802824
Also known as Club Disappointment.

>>61802928
>not getting your hopes up anyway

File: muh gaymen perf.png (1MB, 1361x555px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1361x555px

>>61798054
>crysis 3

BRAVO INTEL

>>61802714
>1.4V+ was perfectly fine on air with Skylake.
That's true, but Kaby Lake ran hotter at stock than Skylake so Intel could push higher clocks.

>>61802824
shot and sword removed over a matter of yuni's butthole

>>61802632

Nah /g/ loves CPU-Z again now that it artifically gimped ryzen.

>>61796024
8700k already showing top tier single threaded performance. Plus 2 more cores for memes.

>>61802824
I'd honestly build a new computer if it was.

>>61802824
are people really hard up to upgrade to intel cpus or are people regularly upgrading their cpus?

>>61803677
More like the reasons to upgrade have become rather slim, and Intel's progress has stagnated, now there's finally a viable alternative so shit's going nuts.

>>61802948
y-you j-just cherry pick i-intel C-C-CPU d-don't s-s-s-st-t-tuter

>>61796024
No, 8700K is probably going to surpass it, especially in the future when games are going to use more and more cores. It's the same shit with 2 extra cores, if Intel manages to make it decent enough to hit the same clocks, it will be straight-up superior.

>>61803893
Yeah, i7s don't.

>>61804273
A lot of it is the iPhone effect. Before Ryzen, everyone said i5's were good for gaming, and i7's great. Now you have those same people saying i5's are unplayable and even i7's are bad at games. It's just like how people are happy with their iPhone until a new one comes out, and suddenly your phone is way too slow and you just have to upgrade. People who were previously happy with their hardware suddenly hate it because something better is out.

>>61803677
What the hell is the point of spending $500+ on any of the 4 core Intel processors right now if you still have an Ivy Bridge or later platform? Even if you are using something old as shit like a 3960X it's still a top tier processor, the market has been so stagnant.

>>61803042
yeah, haha, that was funny

>>61796024
if you missed the 6700k boat
you'd have to be massively retarded to buy intel
this is AMDs generation

>>61796024
Zen2 on a 7nm HPP designed to clock at 5.0ghz is is due Q4 2018. It will have more IPC and at least as much clockspeed across much larger numbers of cores and threads.

File: jew.jpg (74KB, 501x502px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 501x502px

>>61802734
>>61802781
yes yes good goy! get rid of those (((old))) and (((deprecated))) platforms! be a neophile drone and buy the latest!

>>61801922
>six cores on toothpaste TIM
Woohoo