[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Firefox completely DESTROYED by Chrome

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 58
Thread images: 11

File: 1481727996844.png (197KB, 680x390px) Image search: [Google]
1481727996844.png
197KB, 680x390px
ARES6:

>Firefox 83.89 ±3.73ms
>Chrome 44.92 ±2.88ms

diff. 86%

MOTIONMARK:

>Firefox 237.41±3.00%
>Chrome 407.03±7.15%

diff. 71%

SPEEDOMETER:

>Firefox 58.6± 1.1
>Chrome 85.9± 3.2

diff. 47%

JETSTREAM:

>Firefox 149.00 ± 4.2022
>Chrome 142.28± 2.2044

diff. 5%

Meanwhile Mozilla shills and fanboys are in FULL DAMAGE CONTROL

https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/6rxm0z/firefox_a57_performance_still_far_behind_chrome/
>>
File: nigger.jpg (45KB, 656x600px) Image search: [Google]
nigger.jpg
45KB, 656x600px
>ms

i swear these threads
>>
>>61763429
I gave you those ms over stability and usability.
>>
>>61763429
Woah man! You got me again with your superior browsers! I will have to use IE Edge now because it runs on chrome.

Thanks Microsoft for your help in advertising and showing me the true way!
>>
> DESTROYED by Chrome
am I retarded or FF won 2:1:1?
>>
>>61766005
>am I retarded
yes
>>
man who fucking cares
>>
File: sage.png (1KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google]
sage.png
1KB, 128x128px
>.08389s
IT'S OVER
AN ETERNITY HAS PASSED BEFORE THIS COMPLETES
>>
You can tell they have been paying extra people to shill v57, I've never seen /g/ hit so hard by Mozilla's viral marketing department in my 10 years of being here.
>>
File: performance-results-overall.png (219KB, 1897x1295px) Image search: [Google]
performance-results-overall.png
219KB, 1897x1295px
>>61763429
ARES6
meanwhile, Safari...
>>
Edge is faster than both... embarassing
>>
>>61763429
oh no its slighty slower or faster or whatever
who cares , i use chrome for its nice things like bookmarks and passwords across devices , also pinning 26 tabs like a madman bc i have 24gb of ram and nothing to loose
>>
>>61766082
>have been paying extra people to shill ff
when? don't you remember the daily ff hate threads
the v57 threads today may be just some autist
>>
>>61766363
yea but its edge
>>
Chromium is the objectively best browser.

I cringe every time someone uses Firefox, and even more when they see themselves as tech-savvy and EVEN MORE when they say things like "firefox is more technologically advanced than chrom*".

Everyone should just switch to chromium, it would save everyone thousands of hours of development wasted on firefox, thousands of hours wasted for webdev to make cross-browser compatible code. Firefox was fine 15 years ago when there wasn't any good open source browser, and it was open source while being the best of its time. But now the best is Chromium, and it's open source. Firefox has nothing going for it. No better performance, no better support of web apis, standards. Firefox is now holding the web back, and it's time to drop it. Mozilla's only good product is finished, once firefox dies they'll go back to being irrelevant, and quickly die off because they allowed themselves to be leeched on by SJWs without any mean to stay afloat in case firefox dies.
>>
>>61766431
>pinning 26 tabs like a madman
you're not a madman because 26 tabs is many, but because horizontal tab management is fucking retarded.
>>
>Firefox: 0% botnet
>Chrome 100% botnet
Discussion over. If you use Chrome, you're a moron.

>BUT CHROMIUM
Still a botnet with deep hooks to Google watching everywhere you go.
>>
File: her.gif (907KB, 360x640px) Image search: [Google]
her.gif
907KB, 360x640px
>>61766510
"ungoogled" chromium doesn't exist
chromium doesn't allow for noscript by design
chromium doesn't allow for customization by design

basically just fuck off and kill yourself
>you don't need X feature because I SAID SO!!!!!!!!!
>>
File: microsoft-edge.webm (2MB, 1786x892px) Image search: [Google]
microsoft-edge.webm
2MB, 1786x892px
>>61766363
>>
>>61766453
Internet explorer is just used to download Firefox
>>
>>61766697
works on my machine
>>
>>61766453
So... better than Firefox and Chrome?
>uses way less memory
>can play 4K video without turning your CPU into an IED
>glorious UWP instead of archaic Win32 garbage
I'm not saying it's worth installing 10 for, but if you are using 10 and you're not using Edge you're a retard.
>>
>>61766697
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA
>>
File: 1493963874105.png (456KB, 804x876px) Image search: [Google]
1493963874105.png
456KB, 804x876px
>>61766697
oh my fucking god HAAHahahahah
>>
>>61766225
My iPad Air gets 100 score
>>
>>61763429
>firefox 57 vs chrome 60
that doesn't seem very fair
>>
File: 6192894110_d9b71feb9b_b.jpg (294KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]
6192894110_d9b71feb9b_b.jpg
294KB, 1024x683px
I use Firefox because I can have the classic UI. That's it.
>>
>>61767067
Yeah, those foxes are outnumbered by 3 chromes. Very unfair.
>>
Iiterally reddit
>>
>>61766697
http://www.zdnet.com/article/whats-2017s-fastest-windows-10-web-browser/
>Chrome, once unquestionably the fastest of the fast, has fallen behind both Edge and Opera. While its HTML5 support is still superb, Google needs to retune it for greater speed.
>>
>>61763429
Speed isn't everything. I still like Firefox better.
>>
How is there so much shilling on /g/ about firefox?
>>
>>61767298
I was going to say the same thing about Chrome. Who cares which is better. Use the one you like.
>>
>>61767333
>Chrome
>being shilled on /g/
>literally everyone hates it and google
ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>
>>61767352
I don't keep track of which is shilling the most.
>>
>>61767371
Just understand that at least Chrome and Firefox don't have their devs and ceo shilling their browser here directly. The same can't be said for Brave or Vivaldi.
>>
FAKE & GAY
>>
Yeah, I don't use Firefox for the performance, but for the extensions. Unfortunately I'm going to have to be changing from Firefox to Waterfox shortly because Mozilla has decided "let's throw away the one thing that sets us apart from everything else."

Under no circumstance am I getting rid of tree style tabs.
>>
>>61767405
Right. I use in fact both Chrome(ium) and Firefox. Plus I like to encourage extension devs by sending them a few $$.
>>
>>61767298
It used to be the superior browser for tech savvy people.

/g/ is full of pseudo-intellectuals who can't actually make choices for themselves, so they just adopt any opinions that respected tech savvy people share with them and then defend them vigorously from people they perceive as less tech savvy.

Eventually, when the technological climate changes, those tech savvy people change their opinions accordingly, but the swarms of retards on /g/ stick to their guns because they don't actually understand anything about the changes. When the tech savvy people tell them "hey, this has changed, and you're backing the inferior horse just because we told you to back then for reasons that no longer apply", the retards get confused and just try to vigorously defend their deprecated opinions like they're used to, and end up spurning the tech savvy people they originally worshipped.
>>
>>61767447
>/g/ is full of pseudo-intellectuals
prime example is >>61767447
>>
File: jewgle.jpg (74KB, 389x427px) Image search: [Google]
jewgle.jpg
74KB, 389x427px
>>61763429
very good goy
>>
Chrome is botnet. It's all i say. I can wait 0.006 seconds.
>>
>>61767447
sounds like you're the retard. do you honestly believe there are NO reasons to use firefox over botnetium?
>>
>>61763429
This is why servo is being developed...
Delete your thread now.
Everyone is aware of it, even firefox devs.
>>
>>61768113
>servo

Won't be out until 2019

Firefucks I swear...
>>
>>61766363
I would use ie b4 chrome
>>
>>61768113
Servo? You mean that thing Mozilla has been working on for 5 years?
>>
>>61768113
>servo
Looks promising so far
>>
>>61768173
>>61768260
chromcucks, in my /g/?
it's more likely than you think.
>>
>>61768173
>Firefucks I swear...
I just stat facts.
Yes firefox is slow.
They made bad decisions regarding the future of the browser.
We ALL know the problems and servo is the official solution to them, there is ABSOLUTLY NOTHING we can do but wait.
You don't want to? Good for you, it just happens that alternatives exist, use them and fuck off.
Retards I swear... They can't be the least bit logical.

>>61768260
yep, it the last chance for firefox to stay alive.

>>61768282
If only the development was a bit faster.
>>
1ms of difference. It's 0.001 second. What do you do with that much time?

I swear these benchmarks are pointless
>>
>>61766893
>no add-ons
>literal botnet
>uwp
>>
>>61766697
This sums up my experience with anything microsoft pretty well.
Especially seeing as cropping from the left on windows actually makes the window crop on the right and then quickly moves it in place to give you the illusion it's cropping from the left.
>>
>>61767352
>reeee fuck ff
>ff is ded
>rip ff
oops some chorome/ium thread just accidentally popped
>>
>>61767298
The Mozilla xir crew are trying to alienate everyone by pushing a worse product on every update and /g/ is way too autistic to even consider change
>>
>>61763429
when will you obnoxious fags realize the only people some of us keep using firefox is because we have no alternative browser than isn't a full blown botnet,vapoware fork or has no support for add ons
>>
File: E66.jpg (38KB, 633x960px) Image search: [Google]
E66.jpg
38KB, 633x960px
>bunch of benchmarks that don't reflect real world performance
>most of them reflect Firefox is barely slower than Chrome; by less than half a second, in fact
>the only one that reflects a huge difference only compares specific JavaScript features that aren't even widely used yet
>"completely destroyed"
Does it hurt being this retarded, OP?

PROTIP: add "BTFO", " HAHAHA", "SJW", "cuck", " in suicide watch" and (optionally) "(((" to the autohide filters to improve /g/'s quality tenfold. Since those buzzwords are the entire "argument" in the post they appear in, they can be safely ignored.
Thread posts: 58
Thread images: 11


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.