What extensions to install on Chrome?

>>61745004
Iridium

why on earth are you using chrome?

>>61745022
because i don't have autism

>>61745041
>posts on /g/
>not autistic

.......right

HTTPS Everywhere
Tampermonkey
uBlock Origin

>>61745053
wrong.gif

>>61745004
uBlock
Imagus

>not using Iridium
Enjoy your botnet, no extension will fix that.

>>61745041
then fuck off and get off /g/ you retard.

>using chrome
absolute state of tech illiterates lmao

File: 1475343953375.jpg (84KB, 900x507px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 900x507px

>>61745004
I'm making a concerted effort to move away from anything Google.

For mobile, I would use Brave or Opera Mini

For desktop, use Iridium or Brave (kinda buggy atm).

>Adguard Adblocker
>Canvas Defender
>Smart HTTPS
>CaretTab

>Vimium

Save your wrists lads

>>61747382
Funny, cause I'm just like you except completely opposite.

I use Google Chrome, Google Drive, Google Plus and Youtube. Anything I can expand this list with?

>>61747762
start surfing for porn at manhub, like all other google-enthusiasts

File: 1498435812579.png (825KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

825KB, 700x700px

>>61747762
I don't blame you, I used to be like you when I was younger. I've learned it's generally not good to trust a single company for all your online needs and to keep your online profile as anonymous and discreet as possible. The thing is protecting your privacy yet also the tech you use is comfy. Brave is actually good on mobile since it has a built-in ad-blocker so I've disabled Chrome and uninstalled Firefox from my phone.

>>61747366
haHAA firefox btw

>>61747964
Firefox 3.5 is still the best browser.

>>61745004
Firefox

Firefox is fucking slow and notably less smooth than Chrome. I guess you're all so scared of using a botnet that you haven't actually seen it for yourselves.

>>61748061
I thought this too and than I disabled 'hardware acceleration' and now it runs smoother than Chrome. Only reason I dislike it is because it seems like its an SJW company for some reason.

>>61748061
>Firefox is fucking slow
It hasn't been slow for a while now, sounds like you need a hardware upgrade.
>notably less smooth
Vague and meaningless.

>>61745004
Ghostery
uBlock Origin
Magic Actions for YouTube
Amazing screenshot (or something like this )

>>61748136
What I've noticed that really sucks I'm FF when compared to Chrome is how it manages a lot of tabs. Firefox feels autistic asf for this as it becomes slow and constantly reloads a lot of them. I'm Chrome this is smooth asf. Do the test for yourself, I'm taking about 60-80 tabs.

File: Capture25.png (22KB, 463x382px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 463x382px

>>61748136
I seriously just fucking did a side by side. Chrome is way quicker and definitely gives the impression of being more lightweight, though I don't actually know if that's the case. Also, my specs are fine.

File: tabs.png (5KB, 429x148px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 429x148px

>>61748188
Better performance with many tabs is literally the reason why I'm using Firefox.
With Chrome I wouldn't have any ram left for other applications.

>>61748061
why would firefags be afraid of the botnet when they use the botnet

>>61747812
>manhub
First time hearing about this. How did you come familiar with this site?

>>61748061
If you set Firefox to the dark compact theme its actually smoother than Chrome. It also looks better.

>>61748241

Impression is true if you have a good amount of RAM, if 4gb or less then you'll notice how it will soon struggle.

>>61748252

If low on RAM yes but I have plenty so I can use Chrome.

Also, I'm talking about flawless tab management, of course you can have 600 tabs opened with both, is how smooth you move between them what matters.

>>61747382
>move away from anything Google

BRAVE IS LITERALLY CHROME WITH A DIFFERENT UI

NOT FIGURATIVELY

LITERALLY

>>61745004
The Great Suspender
HTTPS Everywhere

>>61745041
>posting on 4chan
>not having autism
pick one

>>61748316
my little brother is a apple user

File: 1484785741997.jpg (26KB, 500x384px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 500x384px

>>61748347
Chromium is open source and Google Chrome is literally Google ad botnet on top of the Chromium codebase. Brave blocks the ads at its source so it never gets sent to your device whereas Google Chrome makes it difficult for ad-blocking plugins to effectively block ads (you still get served ads but they're just hidden from you).

Also on mobile Brave is the only mobile browser that blocks ads, Chrome doesn't have any of that kind of support.

>>61748341
>If low on RAM yes but I have plenty so I can use Chrome.
I have 16GB and that's just enough for Firefox, Photoshop, one or more Jetbrains IDEs, Visual Studio and a VM.
I don't close applications when I'm changing workflows. Chrome would easily use all 16GB for itself.

>is how smooth you move between them what matters
It's not "smooth", it's instant.

>>61745004
why you chrome if you want to install extensions?

ublock origin
enhanced steam
vimium

File: Mobile Browser Benchmarks.png (258KB, 2828x1708px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 2828x1708px

>>61747382
Opera mini is actually shit. Here's a benchmark list for all relevant browsers, but it's a bit outdated now.
Brave is amazing.

>>61748061
Works great on my machine. Literally no performance difference between chrome and firefox.

>>61748142
Ghostery is botnet and not needed if you already use uBlock.

>>61745004
All of them

uBlock origin
Tampermonkey
Magic options (for YouTube)
That extension that skins websites (i like everything in night mode)

>>61745004
why did you say that like you were searching it in google?

File: WaterfoxBrowserLogo.png (57KB, 320x331px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 320x331px

>>61748061
>not using Waterfox

its almost as if you enjoy torturing yourself

File: WaterFoxAddons.png (62KB, 1623x707px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1623x707px

>>61749285
Here are my extensions, Noscript is god tier and you can't get noscript on jewgle chrome.

>>61745062
>>61748359
HTTPS Everywhere doesn't actually do what you'd think. Use Smart HTTPS instead.

>>61749309
Noscript functionality is built into chrome. Click on the lock/info button to the left of the url.

>>61748396
>you still get served ads but they're just hidden from you
Have you never used an adblocker on chrome? Open the dev tools and you'll see tons of blocked requests, i.e. ads not getting served.

>>61748646
>Ghostery is botnet and not needed if you already use uBlock.
Can't speak to Ghostery, but I've been using EFF's Privacy Badger and found that it blocks a lot that uBlock misses, even with a heavy filter set. I'd say they complement each other.

>>61745053
This

>>61745062
*violentmonkey

also privacy badger

Should I give AdNauseum a try?

>>61747706
10 posts in and someone actually contributes to the thread on what OP is requesting. Holy shit g really is filled with autistic babies that will fight about anything.

>using botnet browser from botnetos

do you have a chromebook or windows 10 OP?

>>61749845
Explain.

>>61745004
Umatrix
SmartHTTPS

>>61745004
uBlock Origin and HTTPS Everywhere.

Also some dank flags you might wanna turn on:
chrome://flags/#overlay-scrollbars
chrome://flags/#enable-tab-audio-muting
chrome://flags/#enable-picture-in-picture
chrome://flags/#windows10-custom-titlebar (if you're on W10)

>>61745004
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/double-click-image-downlo/bkijmpolkanhdehnlnabfooghjdokakc

Umatrix
Noscript

File: Screenshot_9.png (41KB, 842x314px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 842x314px

>>61750814
from leddit

>>61751717
thanks cap

been a long time since I last saw someone on /g/ saying something legit useful

>>61751854
Does it enable https between subdomains like https everywhere can?