Should I get AMD Threadripper?

>>61741112
install gentoo

>>61741125
What does Linux have to do with any of this?

>>61741144
install gentoo

>>61741112
No, it would be perfect

>>61741144
Install Gentoo

Intel i9 is a safer bet, AMD architecture is weird and nonstandard

>>61741186
SOPA

>>61741112
considering that adobe is currently adding support for vega in general id say buy a vega (IF and only IF the benchmarks are close to 1080ti because most surely they will go above it in time)
now for threadripper i suggest to wait a bit cause im sure someone will try to see if they can use an EPYC on TR4 motherboards

>>61741186
Why would I9 be better than threadripper?
Wouldn't I get more performance per dollar with AMD?

>>61741202
EPYC is a little overkill.
I am trying to find a decent balance between Ghz and cores. I don't want my gaming performance to suck.

>>61741208
It isn't.
Yes.

>>61741216
Buy Intel

>>61741186
he wants to render video, not burn his house down.

>>61741112
If you donna use things like handbrake etc, just dive in.
GPU video processing right now is disgusting, proprietary and don't give you the best results.

File: 61f18e8f8d908d311e6a43d2a065cb40f1426b3e1607db8091d264d1f70df7c7.jpg (26KB, 377x306px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 377x306px

>>61741186
Nice try intel. We don't want your funeral pyres.
>nonstandard architecture = not intel

>>61741243
But isn't CUDA acceleration faster than software rendering which is run by the CPU?

You do work, you don't buy repurposed desktop dies glued together inelegently for work you would be a laughinstock in pro circles

>>61741223
Fuck off

File: aaaaa.png (36KB, 377x432px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 377x432px

>>61741186
UMA DELICIA

>>61741254
Honestly, I don't give a shti about heat, power consumption, or architecture.

I care about price, and performance. I'm going to be using 1000 watt power supply and dual 480mm radiators anyways.

>Intelfags have literally dropped trying to argue specs and have resorted trying to sell on brand name alone


JUST FAVELA MY MACACO UP

>>61741270
You should, I bet you don't want burn your render farm

File: ebyn.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>61741270
>I care about price, and performance

another pleased Threadripper customer.

>>61741276
Because they lack in every department.
Threadripper has more L1,2,3 cache, more ghz, lower price, etc.

>>61741276
This shitty meme needs to die already

>>61741259
It is faster, yes.
But what it makes in speed it lacks on software support.

>>61741287
Considering I will be cooling it (and my GPUs) with dual 480mm radiators, heat dissipation is not a concern for me.

The liquid cooling I will be using will be able to dissipate >1000 watts of generated heat.

>>61741320
>he says that after posting his 400th wojak since May

>>61741112
I guess it depends on how fast you want to render. I think Jaytwocents is currently using a 1800x to render his videos now. I

>>61741325
"Software support"
Dude, I'm using premiere pro. Software support isn't going to break my leg in that category.

Plus, I am not paying 300+ more USD for "software support" That's bullshit.

>>61741340
I will have to produce content for lots of clients. So, I am hoping on being able to render video clips in a relatively quick amount of time.

>>61741356
Then buy a Intel i9 18 core

>>61741367
SOPA DE MACACO

>>61741367
Dude, that's 2000 dollars. I am not spending that ludicrus amount on a fucking CPU. That's more than the cost of both my GFX cards...

>>61741367
At that price, he'd be better off with an Epyc CPU. 32 cores is better than 18.

what is the best threadripper motherboard senpais

Reminder that the $1000 kikeripper is still in the top 10 best sold CPUs on amazon since preorders started, Intel's skylake -x is around #40, and the most expensive in top 10 is a $300

The TR costs over 3 times more.
Intel has surrendered HEDT

>>61741406
one with the most RGB you can find

>>61741356
Does premiere benefit more from a higher core count or more from offloading to gpu. Thread ripper has more PCI lanes so it with a Nvidia GPU is probably the safest bet.
>>61741367
he's isn't going to have water cooled VRMs too

>>61741406
Literally any motherboard from gigabyte or ASUS is a safe bet.

Not a big fan of asrock or MSI. Software sucks, and the motherboard quality is sub-par.

>>61741393
Threadripper will be more than enough at a very pleasant price point. The Intel alternative for performance is significantly more expensive and not worth considering. The whole "glued together desktop dies" and "no software support" is a meme.

>>61741445
Hahahahahahahaha!

>>61741112
Do you wntn inconsistent performance and unexpected bugs? If yes, buy threadripper

>>61741462
Do you want a new house? If so, buy Intel Core i9 and better home insurance.

>>61741451
He'll also be using a socket that won't get dropped after 2 years.

File: ibm.jpg (27KB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 852x480px

>>61741462
Yes,yes.
"Nobody ever got fired for buying intel".

>>61741479
Not a problem unless you're poor.

>>61741112
Yes you should. Threadripper is better in every way than Intel can provide (price thermal, power draw and performance).

>>61741486
>$1000 cpu and $300+ motherboard
>lol ur poor xdd

>>61741445
gigabyte is out of the question for amd this round

they literally cucked themselfs for unknown reaons

>>61741486
he's running a business, it's not a matter of being poor, it's about proper financial decisions. You don't buy Koenigsegg Regera as a work truck. Why should he spend 2000 dollars on a platform that won't last as long? Just to brag to clients he has an i9 and can render videos their videos and extra 15 seconds faster?

>>61741515
So then, what would be a good motherboard for threadripper? I don't want to buy the most expensive one from ASUS because I have a budget I want to stay within.

>>61741505
One who isn't poor doesn't look st price, that's why he can throw $2000 for a cpu and $500 for mobo for the most consistent performance.

>>61741521
asrock is the best bet
dont buy the one with the over the top wifi shit tho

>>61741520
THANK YOU!
Finally someone understands. Thank. Almighty. Fucking. Kek.

That's exactly the point I make here. I'm not poor, I make six figures. That still doesn't mean I can't spend my money conservatively.

>>61741531
I am more worried about overclocking performance, fan headers, reliability, and a good BIOS. Recommendations?

>>61741544
you wont get past 4.2ghz anyway so why worry? lol
proper cooling solutions for threadripper is going to come on late q3 for now we are stuck with a universal bracket that doesnt cover the whole chip

>>61741535
Making up excuses again, there is literally no reason for thrradripper to exist in the face of more consistent and proven intel architecture
It's two different CPUs for fucks sakes! It's like two sockets! All the drawbacks, none of the benefit!

>>61741112
I did find this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rl_ioGy2dds
for render times in premiere for the 1700x

>>61741561
"Consistency" nobody has been able to prove that. And, I don't give a shit if it's 5 different CPUs. I want performance.

>>61741556
Well, I will be using dual 480mm radiators. So, cooling and overclocking are already covered.

File: 1501246371370.jpg (16KB, 258x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 258x360px

>>61741367
>intel is this scared

>>61741535
Doesn't the NDA for threadripper lift on the 10th? You could just wait for the reviews

>>61741523
>intel
>consistent performance
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

FUD campaign in full throttle, Intel's acting like their favorite toy got taken from them

>>61741596
True, what also bugs me is how much it is going to cost after a few months. The ryzen 7 lineup had around a 20 percent price drop after a few months. I wonder if the same will happen to threadripper?

>>61741569
in a nut shell ryzen renders faster than intel, but premire doesn't seem to be fully utilizing either CPU to it's fullest, so you might not get huge gains at first with thread-ripper, at least until adobe updates now that cpus with more that 4 cores are on the consumer market now.

>>61741583
no point just buy a simple 280 rad that is compartible with it till the proper blocks are out

>>61741611
Will threadripper still be able to help with megatasking? (Running a lot of shit that takes up a shit ton of processing power at once...shit.)

File: IMG_1672.jpg (23KB, 494x484px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 494x484px

>>61741413
What the fuck you are talking? Who the fuck care about skylake x and decade old core architecture?

>>61741614
This is going to be a completely custom loop.
And considering I will also be putting my GPU sli setup in the loop as well, 280 would be underkill.

Do you want me to burn my house down or something?

>>61741624
>,decade old
>still faster than new Amd arch

File: t.JUSTnich.png (1MB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1002x1480px

>>61741561
hi Brian, don't you have some (((work))) to do?

>>61741561
>none of the benefit!
besides
>less power
>less expensive to purchase
>less expensive to upgrade later
also
>consistent and proven intel architecture
you do relisea they are both x86 and AMD64 cpus right? the main difference is the interconnect between the cores. AMD's solution is that each CCX can communicate with any other CCX with IF, so multi thread work loads like OP wants have better gains, and the CPU can scale more efficiently in the future. Something Intel is currently struggling with ring.

>>61741621
What other things do you plan on doing while videos render?

File: 43.jpg (8KB, 300x295px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 300x295px

>>61741186

>>61741674
Gaming, streaming, Uploading content, and skyping. That's probably the most I will do at one time.

>>61741695
7900X sounds perfect for that

>>61741633
you wont find blocks for it so whats the point there isnt currently a single block out there that is actually fit on the socket late q3 or early q4 for proper blocks

>>61741705
>Anon is not trying to break the bank.

File: latency-pingtimes-7900x.png (148KB, 602x389px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 602x389px

>>61741705
uhm, no sweetie, try again

>>61741695
Then yes, I was thinking you where going to try and run two instances of Adobe and render two things at once, which you might be able to do with a VM or something. It still might be a bit overkill, especially how long it take Adobe to update, and i might still wait until NDA drops for thread ripper just in case there is something weird about it.

another video of someone running a 4k editing station with a ryzen 7
https://youtu.be/8JRDi7COw2Y?t=183

>>61741705
how is that perfect? he didnt specify arsoning as a feature

>>61741687
This should be an enemy in the next DOOM game.

>>61741715
EKWB says they'll be releasing one soon. I am hoping to build this computer later down the line anyways, so, I am not worried about lack of water cooling blocks.

>>61741735
yeah but its not a proper one it will fit on the bracket only
there is currently a problem with some motherboards and their vrm's cooling solution that prevents a proper TR4 blocks to sit

>>61741727
Amd = 180W

Intel = 140W


Try again pooman

>>61741726
from this video even he can multitask well on the 1700x while exporting video and do other things just fine so threadripper might be just overkill, then again he didn't mention gaming

File: disgust.gif (2MB, 265x257px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 265x257px

>content creator

>>61741746
>6 more cores
>HAHAHA 40 MORE WATTS AMD POORFAGGOTS BTFO

>>61741746
If skylake-x actually stuck to its TDP rating its all core turbo wouldn't even be 3.5ghz

In summary, kill yourself favela monkey

>>61741743
So, when do you think EKWB will come out with proper cooling?

Do you think cooling would be a problem? I don't want to have to liquid cool any VRMs.

>>61741746
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/intel-core-i9-7900x-processor-review,5.html
140 tdp on paper
in reality 353
literally put fx95xx to shame

>>61741769
it wont be aproblem but it wont come in launch thats why i said but a simple 280 rad for now and wait for proper blocks

>>61741746
You mean 500 W for Intel.

>>61741786
I can wait a while for a good liquid cooling block. :/

>>61741561
Shouldn't you be calling the fire department about now?

>>61741768
>>61741772
>>61741790
TDP is not power consumption dumb indians

Trump will fix it.

>>61741805
So your argument is that a completely meaningless number on the box is lower on the Intel side? Wew.

>>61741664
It's worse than that, since Intel switched from their "consistent and proven" bingbus to inconsistent and unproven mesh architecture.

File: 1498161708831.png (26KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 711x533px

>>61741805
alright, let's update their rating to a whooping 250W then?

>>61741805
You're about as consistent as Intel's architecture.

Why do you need Threadripper? Just use the industry standard of Nvidia CUDA powered graphics cards

>>61741828
But what is it compared to threadripper?

>>61741828
Prime95 is not a game

>>61741843
Man, the future is surely fun, knowing how the industry hates both Intel and nvidia.

>>61741856
>100% workload on all cores is not a game

holy fuck, back to /v/

>>61741856
You're right, in gamimg ryzen uses 50W

>>61741259

Take a look at how hardware rendering results in lower quality versus software rendering.

>>61741726
>>61741112

OP are these videos helping?
i did find someone gaymen and rendering at the same time on a 1800x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFa4kSkq0jg
>>61741843
he wants to do other things like play games and stream while video renders with out it choking

Hi OP, sorry but /g/ is a trashheap now it's not like it was years ago. If you're legit, here's what I have to say;

Get a Threadripper if you have to go new

Random question though, why don't you buy a used R620 with dual E5-2697v2s and 256GB of RAM? You can pick them up for 2-3k and that's 24 cores and 48 threads for the cheapest money you can buy. You can run it in a closet and just run the cables to your monitor or use RDP to work on it and do your rendering workloads, and not have to worry about overbuilding a desktop PC.

>>61741880
That's bullshit and we both know it.

>>61741876
Intel cores use more power because they're more powerful.

>>61741906
Give it up monkey, nobody buys your nonsense.

>>61741884
I have heard though that games aren't smooth while rendering with a 1700 Ryzen.

The videos were useful tho. thanks! ^_^

File: 2017-06-26.jpg (74KB, 512x286px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 512x286px

>>61741906
>5% faster
>60% more powerconsumption

stop shitting here, pajeet

>>61741523
Says the guy who did not recommend the Xeon Platinum/Gold in Dual/Quad socket arrangements.

>>61741892
I never take 100 percent of my advice from the dumbasses at 4chan. Don't worry. ;)

Also, I still need emphasis on gaming performance, not just purely rendering.

>>61741112
Stupid question:

I've been using Adobe premiere to render videos for my work.
My 2600k doesn't even go beyond 60% usage
My gtx1080 is doing all the work

I always hear about how editing needs cores
Why do I need a 8+ core CPU when Cuda does it for me?

>>61741934
I'm not using it purely for rendering, I'm also using it for multitasking.

>>61741843
Considering Java's plans to create OpenCL threadpools to execute stuff on automatically (you as a programmer don't have to do anything more than using doubles instead of int s, pretty much), and considering how massive Java is in the server world, CUDA is going to die.

>>61741926
Intel then, 7700k isn't bad at rendering

>>61741934
see
>>61741726 at 4 minute mark

>>61741944
I really doubt CUDA would die, anon.

>>61741948
Why are you trying to sell your junk hardware on /g/?

File: 4334a3f907ca744525136b88d4bec44b7f62c2de31d56019d2514631d131a497.jpg (92KB, 710x533px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 710x533px

>>61741948
7700k over Ryzen for rendering video

File: 62e6a422-affa-40e4-a150-8dfbb3b31b70.png (28KB, 756x567px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 756x567px

>>61742023
WTF that was not the picture i picked, what the hell is that?

File: 1453418606926.gif (3MB, 365x341px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 365x341px

>>61741186
Here's your 5 rupees, Rajeesh

>>61742052
You're confusing me with AMDpoos, I'm white.

>>61742058
The only thing white in you is that monkey hair you ate.

File: 1449208284736.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>61742058
White people never work in shilling departments. Nice try, Pajeet.

>>61741968
If Java does it, .Net will do it.
There will be libraries in other languages that does the same thing, since they can look at OpenJDK and see the implementation there.

In the end, there will be even less reason to use CUDA. Older CUDA stuff will still be around, but why do anything new in CUDA, when you can do it much easier in your favourite language?
Once one of the big guys figures out a cool trick the others tend to implement the same thing to stay competitive.

>>61741926
Im suggesting you get two systems.

>>61742031
One of the greatest games of all time.

File: nun.jpg (236KB, 691x625px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 691x625px

>>61741112
>content creator

File: 1498347843216.jpg (308KB, 1160x984px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1160x984px

>>61742058
>brasilian
>white

hahahhahahahhahha

>>61742031
>AMD SIX CORE LOSING TO INTEL 2 CORE!!!!

>>61742071
So, what will they replace CUDA with?

>>61741726
>>61741955

So it's only good for multi tasking
Maybe I'll just get a 1700 then.

>>61741125
>>61741168
>>61741181

Why is this board so cancerous?

>>61742114
Wait foe coffeelake

>>61742114
the 1800x if you want to gaymen while you render>>61741884

>>61742107
OpenCL or, and I think this is more likely, heterogenous computing capabilities in their own preferred language.

There's no reason to lock yourself into using nVidia cards anymore.

>>61741186

>400 TDP
>Safer bet

>>61742147
>memes
>memes memes

>>61741112
Install Gentoo

>>61742142
When do you think they will replace CUDA?

>>61741216
Muh gaymz. Bunch of fucking manchildren

>>61742101
Well i should hope a 4 thread CPU from this year could beat a 6 thread CPU from 2013

File: 1497926056171.jpg (273KB, 800x1011px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 800x1011px

>>61742158
>tested by numerous sources
>memes memes

disgusting

>>61742158
Tears, but also macaco.

>>61742183
>MACACO MACACO MACACO!!!!1!1


This is NOT fucking funny.

>>61742071
Not a shill. Don't have a side.
Own Nvidia Vidya and will soon own Radeon Vidya.

CUDA and OpenCL run on both Nvidia/AMD cards. CUDA isn't going anywhere and has features that OpenCL doesn't. CUDA also has far less latency than OpenCL in a number of things.

>>61742164
CUDA isn't going to get replaced. OpenCL will just get better and appear as a possibly equal or better alternative. OpenCL runs on Radeon and Nvidia cards. So, i'm not sure what the chatter is about.

>>61742193
UMA DELICIA!

>>61742193
O, MY RUBBER FAVELA.

>>61742023
is that how intel mesh is made ?

>>61741921
MFW Indian satellite is really called SCATSAT

>>61742193
>MACACO SOAP TIM
UMA DELIDIA!

File: 3_2.png (255KB, 560x614px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 560x614px

>>61741523
This is how to recognize someone who doesn't have money. People who earned lots of money themselves did it by smart investing and getting the biggest RoI with calculated risk. Now please go play some gayms or change wallpapers or whatever. You are too stupid to post here.

>>61741112
Threadripper would be perfect, but I wouldn't recommend higher than the 1920x. 1950x just seems like its higher price for a slight boost in speed but nothing more, which, if you're worried about going overboard, would be overboard for you.

File: 1498746210421.jpg (154KB, 888x676px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 888x676px

>>61742232

>>61741208
The guy recommending Intel is just shilling/shitting you.

>>61742193
>>61742183
Why did a dying 'meme' in /int/ over a month ago suddenly became popular here?

>>61741561
Take it easy pajeet

File: 1494107702447.jpg (58KB, 547x547px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 547x547px

>>61741112
>content creator

just a reminder amd will most surely release non x variants of the chips so its better to wait

>>61742197
>CUDA on AMD
Well... I guess it's the...
> HIP
thing to do these days?
Carlos.png

But really, CUDA is a neat thing, but heterogenous computing is coming, and many people have been working for it for a long time. I just don't think CUDA is going to shrink in terms of new projects.

And OpenCL is kinda not that great yet, but it shows the way forward. I think that the future will have heterogenous computing where you send your threads (or workloads) to the most fitting pool. And after that, you might have a JIT-like system dispatching them automatically.

>>61742271
There's one retarded BR intel shitposter.

Wait for the threadripper reviews which literally come out in 5 days you faggot, if it's better than the i9 CPU's, costs less and has a less TDP, you're gold dickwad

>>61742271
Because THAT one particular shill(not the cancerous tripshit), has accidentally posted anti AMD FUD links to a .br group a few days ago.

That's where this meme got revived here, we spent 4 month arguing with a cannibal

File: Intel-Skylake-X-and-Skylake-SP-Mesh-Architecture.png (91KB, 921x591px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 921x591px

>>61742217
a million hours is gimp

>>61742282
Hurr durr, I mean that CUDA will shrink in marketshare and fade away, not that it won't do it.

>>61742101
>Losing
Not even. AMD is still winning by 0.5
Also
>Fresh architecture from this year vs 2013

Or get two machines, get a 7700k gaming machine and either a new threadripper workstation or the cheapo yet sufficient Dual Xeon workstations

>>61742304
>monkey on cache
no wonder why its made in brasil

>>61741270
its okay when intel does it

>>61742311
>buy 2 machines because one is 5-10% faster in gaming at 1080p with a clean Windows install and nothing running in the background.

>>61742058
Sure you are Rajesh

>>61742321
>buy fast RAM with tight timings
>as fast as 7700k Housefire™ Edition in gayman

>>61741561

SOPA
DE
MACACO

>>61742373
bump

>>61741112
> I am a content creator
Don't use Adobe and you'll be fine on a midrange machine. Problem solved.

> Threadripper
Should be overkill, you will barely need a 1700 and a decent GPU. But feel free to use it.

>Multi-core doesn't matter!
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
>Power usage doesn't matter!
>Temperatures don't matter!
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>Stutters don't matter!
>Streaming doesn't matter!
>Data centers don't matter!
>OEMs don't matter!
>Hyperscalers don't matter!
>Upgradeability doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Locked platform features don't matter!
>*NEW* Synthetic loads don't matter!
>*NEW* Burnt pins don't matter!

Intelcucks 2017

>>61742083
This is the correct answer. If you are planning on Gaming and rendering at the same time both are going to suffer. Get a rendering machine and a front end/gaming machine.

>>61742506
Tests already showed that even a stock 1700 can easily handle gaming, streaming the game to twitch and watching the stream back. It's the 7700k that shits itself absolutely in such a scenario. I'm sure a threadripper can handle gaming and rendering at the same time.

>>61741186
Nice try cache-let

>>61742536
>Cache doesn't matter!

>>61741314
This, especially more L3 cache which is very beneficial for premier pro and other adobe applications

>>61742506
Videos posted in thread say other wise with people running 1700 1800x. I can imagine threadripper will handle it just fine.

>>61742533
Streaming to twitch which uses built in video encoding and rendering which is done in software or accelerated via cuda/opencl are not the same thing.

>>61741609
Threadripper is already very competitively priced vs the i9, but then again, its AMD

>>61741515
How so?

>>61741521
Forgo the gaymen boards and Wait(tm) for workstation boards

>>61742563
That's why I mentioned the threadripper at the end since I knew you would point this out. A stock 1700 can do much more than a oc'd 7700k. A threadripper should handle gaming and encoding at the same time.

>>61742494
>Raidkeys doesn't matter!

>>61741746
>Actually believing the Jewish tricks

>>61741186
>Dez reais foram depositados em sua conta.

File: 1452418470139.jpg (90KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 720x960px

>>61741208
I could also buy a 2TB usb drive from some chinkshit website, that doesn't mean I actually get what I ordered
Look anon, the answer is simple, just google around, this isn't an intel vs AMD battle, but rather a case of you needing to find an extremely specific processor that works under those specific conditions, so google around a bit rather than succumbing to some shitty "war"

>>61742494
U M A

M

A

>>61741186
>t. intool

>>61741112
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Premiere-Pro-CC-2017-AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-1800X-Performance-909/
This may help you op

>>61741640
In single-core performance for intel shill cumstains to emulate playstation games. people who do work want performance/dollar in multithreaded workloads, not six year old i5s.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-05-01-46-54.png (267KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1920x1080px

>>61742735
>>>61741186
>>t. intool
Kek

>>61741445
>Buying niggerbyte

>>61741270
It doesn't matter what cooling solution you use, temps will be shit due to Intel's unique toothpaste solution between the die and IHS. The heat isn't making it to your CPU cooler in the first place.

>>61741851
It's not out yet you fucking mouth breather

>>61741216
No offense, but you don't get the right to care about CPU cost when you want dual 1080ti's. A SINGLE 1080ti handles ALL games to their max right now. Getting two is grotesque waste of money.

You're more of a content creator, so I'd invest the money in a single 1080ti and focus on getting the best CPU instead, which will so EVERYTHING else other than disgusting "game" performance.

Finally, if you're coming to this board, and not /v/, then you already know the answer.

You're going to get laughed at, given idiotic responses (intentionally, because it's plain to me and everyone else you have no clue what you're doing and just want to throw alleged money around).

This is why you get install Gentoo responses. You're likely not too stupid. Your options above Ryzen are basically a stronger more expensive i9, or Threadripper. That's basically it. It's not hard math. Past that, you're looking at an EPYC.

I am having a hard time believing you can't fit the pieces of the puzzle together. That or your Google-foo sucks. There is plenty of benchmarks, price to performance ratio charts, and endless videos that ready answer you.

So much official response is, and what it should have been, ...

install gentoo

>>61741200
>>61741267
>>61741276

>Macaco is now memed hand in hand with i9

What did I miss?

>>61741186
0.1 dollars has been deposited into your account, Pajeet

>>61741186
t. Fired marketing intel employee

>>61741112
>I am going to be processing 4K, 30fps, Color Graded footage in Premiere Pro

Does anyone know if Threadripper will help with Sony Vegas renders? I'm familiar with it... but not with Premiere and don't really want to learn an entirely new video editing software. If anyone could weigh in and compare the two and explain if Threadripper will help... that would be fantastic.

>>61742130
Because you obviously didn't install Gentoo

>>61741112
>Should I get AMD Threadripper?
>Do I regularly poke pussy?
Both these answers are the same

>>61743092
Intel shill accidentally pastes google.com.br link, confirmed to be from Brazil

>>61741112
>But also, I do a lot of multitasking. The most tasks I would be doing at once would be streaming, gaming, rendering footage, uploading footage, and running background tasks like skype and steam all at the same time.

You are just an asshole trying to pass as someone doing real work

>>61741208
i9 is literally hot shit, don't fall for him, he is trolling you.
Get Threadripper or if you want an absolute overkill wait for EBYN.

>>61741112

I would wait a few months after release. Ryzen has an SMT bug that has yet to be fixed and a segmentation fault bug that can be triggered on demand without SMT enabled under heavy loads. It could cause issues with your workloads.

>>61741451
>>>>no software support
Yeah, sure, if AMD had invented a new architecture.

>>61741561
is this the new level of Intel baiting?

>>61741921
has meme magic gone too far?

>>61742130
welcome to 4chan we are between facebook meme groups and funkyjunk.

>>61741144
Install Gentoo

File: 1496030508850.jpg (29KB, 342x342px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 342x342px

>>61741186

File: 1486934308065.jpg (260KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 800x1200px

>>61741112
>(((content))) "creator"

>>61748991
Wow, a few more years and the procedures will be do good you wont even be able to tell the difference.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6rrbsp/epyc_confirmed_to_suffer_from_the_segfault_issue/

>Buying Pooripper with segfault crashes

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>61741406
>>61741445
>>61741515
>>61741531
what should i even be looking for when evaluating x399 motherboards? im pretty new to the whole ULTRAPREMIUM builds space so i don't really know what are the important features and what's fluff.

>>61749052
DELET

>>61749030
You mean their obviously Jewish phylogeny right?

Woah mama