Did he do it /g/?
who did he mean by this
>>61737519
>>61737488
WannaCry killer
>>61737488
yes, next.
>>61737488
almost certainly not as charged, but I wouldn't be terribly surprised if he contributed a patch or something to the banking trojan.
No. It's a setup.
>>61740779
This.
Some fuckwit (the other defendant) has decided to take down a good guy. A good guy who actually works for GCHQ. This all stinks.
>>61737488
The CIA niggers made him do it