how will intel even compete?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/new-releases/electronics/229189/ref=zg_b_hnr_229189_1
>>61723518
DELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET
Every fucking Intel cpu I see on that list is 3.5 stars . I didn't realize quite how fucked Intel currently is
The whole kabylake-x line-up is shit
They still hold the best gaming cpu's with the skylake/kabylake i7's though
It will be interesting to see what Cannonlake will do
>play a game
>put the fire out
did they even know what they were making?
>play a game
>it's eve online
oh wow it can play my space spreadsheet simulator where I pretend to be a jewish scammer who just had his NAP violated
>>61724841
Intel is subliminally still dreaming of that ancap society where they could legally murder their competitors and scam consumers.
>>61724705
1600 is literally tied with 7700k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfNMn7RWgLw&t=256s
costing less
with less tdp
there is absolutely zero reason to buy intel for the next 2-3 years
seems not too many at Intel bothered to remember their nightmare that was Thunderbird
>new Intel chips certainly cant run hotter than their Pentium 4....
>>61724705
>They still hold the best gaming cpu's with the skylake/kabylake i7's though
Sure if all you care about is playing CS-GO at 500fps at 640x480 then kabylake is great.
>>61723518
rush another Refreshlake on a new Socket
>>61724705
>The whole kabylake-x line-up is shit
WHAT DID YOU SAY, GOYIM?
>>61725160
OY GEVALT!
DELID THIS! YOU HAVE TO TEST IT ON 480P LOW SETTINGS
>>61725160
>1600 is literally tied with 7700k
>this is what AMDrones actually believe
>>61726205
>>61726129
update!
>>61726358
I know that this is some form of launch craze, but still, pretty EBYN
>>61723518
caught me off guard
>>61726205
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Ryzen-5-1400-and-1600-Review.225218.0.html
The i7 7700K is still better in single core workloads, but loses if all cores can be used.
Cincench R15:
Single core: 194 vs 148 (+31% for the i7)
Multi core: 984 vs 1143 (+16% for the R5)
>>61723518
>>61726635
That's not even a fair comparison anyway, because the i7 7700K is 100 dollars more expensive. Also the board for the i7 is more expensive.
>>61726205
30 games tested
half wins on amd
half wins on intel
literally the same shit
>>61723518
>ref=
Yeah, no
>>61727804
well 1800x launched
amd compared it to 6900k literally destroying it
shills constantly tried to compare it with 7700k
i guess its time to return the favor
a cpu that costs less
has less tdp
and 2 more cores
literally destroys the sole reason 7700k exists
>>61727804
Ryzen 5 1400 is $160
7700K is $320
Based on PC part picker. That's twice as much.
>>61727859
He's comparing R5 1600. That's about 200 bucks.
>>61723518
>raven doing oribtal bombardment
Buying X299 will bring Dust back??