THANK YOU BASED MOZILLA NOW EVERYONE CAN BROWSE FASTER WITHOUT

Name 30 poor coded add-ons/extensions slowing you down

Firefox is garbage now. Addons now need to be approved by mozilla - no "controversial" ones such as adblock or the (((coincidence detector))).

okay, time to switch to ESR. the end is near.

how to switch mercurial branch to esr? I don't see ESR here: https://hg.mozilla.org/

File: exxxxx.png (43KB, 762x676px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 762x676px

Am I fucked when the new version releases?

File: weeaboo2.gif (10KB, 146x133px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 146x133px

>>61691522

is there any way to check which addons are going to be kill? i'm on stable

File: addons.png (271KB, 843x947px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 843x947px

>>61691522
>>61691540
rip

As long as uBO and HTTPS Everywhere still work

>>61691522
You were fucked long before the update.

>>61691548
wtf I hate Firefox now

>>61691548
holy shit dude

what the fuck were they thinking? this kills the fox

>>61691566
nowadays telemetry is louder than voices.

>>61691548
>HTTPS Everywhere and UBlock Origin on the chop block

Time to start using Links, I guess

>>61691548
>Firefiox without extensions
Why bother?

Why do my addons still work after updating?

>>61691606
ublock origin sucks though. adblock works better

>Have used adblock since forever and it's always worked
>Tried ublock origin on /g/'s behest sometime ago
>Within an hour of using it, a youtube video ad slipped through

NEVER AGAIN. Fuck that piece of shit.

Well great. I sure hope the makers of these add-ons update their shit.

uBlock Origin alone is enough to shit

>>61691551
>>61691606
https everywhere webext: https://www.eff.org/files/https-everywhere-test/index.html

>>61691636
>adblock
ublock origin is an adblock, what are you going on about?

>Within an hour of using it, a youtube video ad slipped through
You must be retarded then.

>>61691636
Maybe you should have enabled some filters

File: 1489401593944.jpg (8KB, 250x238px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x238px

>>61691636
>there are people on /g/ so tech illiterate they don't know you need to provide filters containing rule sets for what the extension should be blocking

>>61691636
Funny, I've had the exact opposite experience with ABP

>>61691656
>ublock origin is an adblock, what are you going on about?
Wrong. It's a wide-spectrum blocker.

>inb4 autism spectrum jokes

>>61691636
adblock and similar variants rape cpu and memory scanning and storing the entire list all the time. I had to filter my filter list to keep it in check before switching to ubo.

File: 2017-08-02 15_32_55.jpg (72KB, 518x722px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 518x722px

top rofl

File: botnet.png (14KB, 427x176px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 427x176px

>>61691642
fuck off with your botnet

>>61691443
>not using esr

>>61691726
>foss
>botnet
End yourself
Nothing wrong with these permissions.

>>61691443
LIARFOX
I
A
R
F
O
X

>>61691739
that's only delaying the inevitable

>>61691803
Yes, and we will have a solution by then.

File: pepsi barf.jpg (55KB, 500x447px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x447px

fucking mozilla wtf

they are alienating their loyal userbase with this shit. might as well use chromium or fucking brave at this point

>>61691726
>A tool designed to rewrite HTTP requests to encrypted SSL/TLS connections requires access to your browser's website data and navigation features
Really makes you think, anon.

>>61691803
This. Just switch to Chrome, or Chromium if you care about "muh botnet". It doesn't have more Google in it than Firefox does.

>>61691832
It's already here. See above.

>>61691842
>It doesn't have more Google in it than Firefox does.
Stop lying.

>Just switch to Chrome, or Chromium if you care about "muh botnet".
Firefox even without its extensions is still better though.

>>61691726
it's actually pure garbage literally just use umatrix honestly

>>61691755
it being foss doesn't deter botnet whatsoever

>tfw it's not a meme, nightly is way faster.

>>61691867
You have absolutely no idea what https everywhere does, don't you?
uMatrix can't replace it.

>>61691892
Yes it can. Have you even used umatrix or are you talking out of your ass again like you have this entire thread?
Go shill elsewhere for that shitty project you contributed once to.

>>61691443
is this photon? I'm hyped

>>61691867
their blog shows how to disable these features and they warn you about it at the download page

the idea is that by using nightly you can help test the newest features and its optional

you arent forced to use it at all

>>61691496
>Install greasemonkey
>Use the greasemonkey script that gets updated daily rather than the dedicated extension
Wow, that sure was difficult

>>61691854
>Stop lying.
Prove it. Firefox comes with Google as a search engine, Google API key for geolocation, Google malware lists (which for some reason needs to send all your visited URLs to Google even though the list is stored locally) and other things. Chromium has the same thing but not more than Firefox.

>Firefox even without its extensions is still better though
Better how? Not when it comes to performance.

firefucks is good except for videos/streaming

>>61691842
>scared of muh botnet
>suggests to use chrome or chromium

fsf and GNU all say that firefox is better than even chromium because they ship binaries and have data-mining features that google devs implemented

thats why linux distros ship firefox

>>61691933
>not exclusively streaming videos through mpv so you don't have to run non-free javascript on websites

File: 1494692512005.png (119KB, 818x897px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 818x897px

>>61691908
>Yes it can
Are you a retard or a troll?

>Have you even used umatrix
Pic

>>61691496
>(((coincidence detector)))
????

>>61691930
you can change your homepage and remove or add any search shortcuts

those arent botnets idiot

>>61691496
>such as adblock
>ublock origin is at the repos
???

>>61691942
You fucking retard. I said you could use Chromium if you don't want to use Chrome because only Chrome has the things you're talking about. They're not in Chromium because Chromium is open source so it would require Google to open source their proprietary code.

>>61691951
It puts ((())) around any jewish names or organizations/companies controlled by jews. There used to be an extension for it, but the greasemonkey script is the recommended one to use instead.

File: Browser_usage_share,_2009–2016,_StatCounter.svg.png (111KB, 916x599px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 916x599px

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/extensions/?sort=users

oh wow look at the most popular addons (i.e. the only fucking reason anyone would still use firefox) and count the ones that are 'compatible with firefox 57'.

out of the top40 addons, there are a total of five that work with v57. five. and they're all shit.

they are sacrificing all that customizability for muh 0.02s faster loading times. this is the fucking end. we've had a great run folks, but it's over now. firefox won't recover from this, it will be just another chrome clone like opera.

i'm fucking mad
what the hell mozilla. fucking WHY
they are spitting in the faces of the users they still had until now. the internet is getting worse by the minute and dropping xul isn't helping.

>>61691964
ok thanks will add it

>>61691496
they dont have to be "approved"
they are audited for malware and then signed

you can distribute them on your own website if you want to

apple does the same thing and so will google since they keep getting malware in the playstore

>>61691976
It's made by some pajeet from /pol/ though so don't be surprised if websites take ten times as long to load

>>61691930
Un-googling chromium is actually quite a difficult process. See https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

>Better how?
In tons of ways. The fact that you can have more than 30 tabs open at the same time without wanting to kill yourself and the lazy loading of tabs are enough to make it superior.

>>61691675
>replying to normies

>>61691970
>implying normies even know what a addon is

youre just upset because you use a esoteric program without proper devs

File: firefag-fs8.png (116KB, 748x575px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 748x575px

WOMENS/HOMOS/TRANNIES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ADD-ONS

EICH 4 LIFE

#WeBRAVE

>>>brave.com

>>61692012
normalfags are currently not the target audience for firefox. chrome has that covered.

mozilla is trying to change their target audience from power users to normalfags with v57, dropping a shit ton of features in the process, why wouldn't i be upset?

they don't care about the people that made them big in the first place anymore.

tell me, once xul is gone for good, what reason would i have to use firefox over some other foss browser? i was sticking to the fox because i could customize it to my needs, but they're throwing all that out of the window.

File: RcAhC6Ag.png (55KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 512x512px

>Waterfox is a me-
I told you faggots

>>61692114
it is exactly the same

>>61692084
Exactly. Add-ons are basically the only reason I tolerate Firefox at all. Get rid of those and there is zero reason to use it over some Chromium browser.

>Guys, I'll switch to waterfox or cyberfox when they get rid of extensions or plugins
>Forgetting that both are just fancy recompiling of upstream firefox and will be worthless when the flags and code is removed entirely

>>61692084
why do they care about markey share then?

all they care about is open standards for the average person they dont care about autists

use icecat/waterfox/palemoon/tor for that which are downstream projects that benefit

File: wake up why.jpg (87KB, 826x801px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 826x801px

where do we go now

I R SWITCH CUZ NO ADDON SUPPORT

NEW BROWSER NO ADDON BUT IT OKAY

HEH HEH

:^)

someone at mozilla is getting paid by google to sabotage the fox

>>61691681
Nah, I agree. I've been using uBlock for years and have never seen a YouTube ad make it by. The info points to user error.

What is the logic in being mad about losing certain customization options and then retaliating by switching to a browser that has even less customization options like chromium?

File: waco.93.hillary.jpg (71KB, 600x366px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x366px

>>61692215
Just shush, alrighty?

remember to complain about this on their bugzilla tracker and their IRC channel: irc.mozilla.org #nightly and/or #firefox

we need a compatibility shim NOW.

>>61692215
how else would you show mozilla that what they're doing is not ok, if not by switching browsers entirely? they don't listen to feedback, they only look at the number of users. if the userbase is decreasing even further after 57, maybe they'll bring back support for legacy addons.
switching to esr and eventually switching browsers out of protest is the best thing you can do if you don't like the current development.

File: trump.eye.roll.jpg (115KB, 854x793px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 854x793px

>>61692180

>>61692215
Maybe someone at Mozilla will realise that they've been doing everything wrong for years once they lose the last bit of market share they have.
Probably not though.

>>61692252
So you switch to a browser that literally invented all of the things that you're against?

>>61692215
Why use a cheap knock-off of chromium that performs worse when you can just use the real thing? Point is pretty much the only selling point (add-ons) left for FF is about to die.

>>61691970
This will hopefully be the last straw for freetard devs, since even normies like Firefox for the extensions. Hopefully one of the big name projects will become a proper fork.

>>61692265
i'm switching to uzbl, not chromium

>>61692248
>we
What 4% of their total users?

Face the facts that normies don't use the stuff you use.

Go back to the botnet if you don't want to use newer technology.

You're like the enterprise using <2.4 kernels.

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/feedback/

>>61691443
But Legacy addons still work fine for me?

P A L E M O O N
I told you so. I told you all.
It'll continue to expand until it becomes a true "fork".

>>61691963
This must be bait

>>61692275
>implying normies know what firefox is
>implying normies even use addons on firefox or chrome

you have been in the echo chamber too long

>>61692283
hush, shill

>>61692283
>>61692309
all normalfags have switched to chrome a long time ago. they do not make up the userbase of firefox.

i'm pretty sure that more than 90% of current firefox users use some legacy addon.

File: 1493210097927.jpg (65KB, 601x601px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 601x601px

 note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.
 
 note: rustc 1.21.0-nightly (dd53dd5f9 2017-08-01) running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
 
 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace
 
 thread 'rustc' panicked at 'Box<Any>', /checkout/src/librustc_errors/lib.rs:434:8
 note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
 stack backtrace:
    0: std::sys::imp::backtrace::tracing::imp::unwind_backtrace
              at /checkout/src/libstd/sys/unix/backtrace/tracing/gcc_s.rs:49
    1: std::sys_common::backtrace::_print
              at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:71
    2: std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}
              at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:60
              at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:380
    3: std::panicking::default_hook
              at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:390
    4: std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook
              at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:610
    5: std::panicking::begin_panic
    6: rustc_errors::Handler::span_bug
    7: rustc::session::opt_span_bug_fmt::{{closure}}
    8: rustc::session::span_bug_fmt
    9: <rustc_typeck::astconv::AstConv<'gcx, 'tcx> + 'o>::ty_of_fn
   10: rustc_typeck::collect::fn_sig
   11: rustc::dep_graph::graph::DepGraph::with_task
   12: rustc::ty::maps::<impl rustc::ty::maps::queries::fn_sig<'tcx>>::try_get
   13: rustc::ty::maps::TyCtxtAt::fn_sig
   14: rustc::ty::maps::<impl rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'lcx>>::fn_sig
   15: <rustc_typeck::collect::CollectItemTypesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> as rustc::hir::intravisit::Visitor<'tcx>>::visit_item
   16: rustc_typeck::check_crate::{{closure}}::{{closure}}
   17: rustc_typeck::check_crate
   18: rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt::create_and_enter
   19: rustc_driver::driver::compile_input
   20: rustc_driver::run_compiler
 
 error: Could not compile `style`

>>61692248
You have one, asshat. Quit using nightly and jump on ESR.

>all these people suggesting botnet chromium

>not even suggesting ungoogled

weak bait

>>61692301
I think Mozilla is planning on allowing legacy addons on nightly but they're not going to make an effort to keep compatibility with them like they used to. Before if a change broke an addon Mozilla would back out the change and try to work out a way to fix the problem or just avoid the problem altogether. Now if an update breaks an addon it will remain broken unless someone fixes it. Stable releases will not support the legacy addons at all.

>>61691908
>no reply
rekt

>>61692340
>implying you can fully ungoogle it
weak bait

>>61692353
W/E

File: screen_2017-08-02-16:24:16.png (109KB, 1468x411px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1468x411px

Why I don't have it yet?

>>61692344
>Stable releases will not support the legacy addons at all.
great, so i'll have to switch to an unfinished version of the browser that is full of bugs and potential security flaws just to use shit i have been using for over 10 years. how can anyone be fine with that?

>>61692368
>download and install 56
>check for updates
>it installs 57
not that hard

>>61692336
and 1/3 of my addons stop working because "muh signed addons"

fuck off, shill

>>61692370
Hopefully the addon makers will update their shit.

>>61692180
Like 80% of Mozilla's revenue comes from Google anyway so they're all being paid by Google.

File: screen_2017-08-02-16:27:40.png (300KB, 1221x368px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 1221x368px

>>61692384
Not on linux

>>61692389
mail the addon dev and ask for them to get it signed by mozilla

simple as that

if they resist thats kind of suspicious... just saying

>>61692405
Add the PPA for Firefox Nightly.

>>61692344
Could be the case. Still, personally I don't care about legacy that much.
Only addon I'm gonna miss is RikaiChan with RikaiCake dictionary. There's a decent replacement, Yomichan, but dev is too lazy to write a converter for Cake dictionary to make it available in Yomichan. He doesn't think that 5000 words are worth it but eh, what can you do.

>>61692398
except webextensions prevent the best addons from doing their thing; webext only really have access to the content of pages and limited-to-none power over browser functions themselves.

>>61692389
How is it shilling? Do you even know what that word means?

>>61692405
>>61692426

Oh shit you're right, it's 56a, not 57.

Fuck. I'm not sure how to install 57 then.

>>61692309
Everyone has heard of Firefox

File: konig.tux.uberkomputische.jpg (231KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 800x450px

>>61692426
Oh, Thanks!

>>61691443
>using Nightly
I don't get this meme

>>61692423
>github-released addons
>suspicious

piss off, shill.

>>61692405
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/
should be here 'somewhere'

>>61692453
>not wanting optimized software
>not wanting proper tab sandboxing
>meme

Good day shill.

>>61692477
>nightly
>'optimized'

>pre-alpha software
>'optimized'

now that's some quality bait right there

>>61692457
>implying that there was never malware 4-5 years ago in the mozilla addons store

File: old internet is dead.jpg (2MB, 3569x3018px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3569x3018px

it's dying and mozilla isn't helping right now

>>61692477
>implying these and the current addon ecosystem are mutually exclusive.

jesus fuck you're a bunch of gullible shits.

have some splenda with your kool-aid.

>>61692507
>shifting blame
that was entirely their fault and they reacted in the most lazy way possible.

>>61692423
If I was the creator I would ask you to do it yourself.

>>61692389
Did they disable unsigned addons on esr? Is there any way to enable it again?

>>61692489
>not using nightly
>pretending you know about its performance

>implying it hasent been optimized compared to stable

you have to be blind to not notice the speed improvements.
Which leads to believe you dont even use firefox nightly ;)

>>61692533
>Did they disable unsigned addons on esr? Is there any way to enable it again?
1. Yes.
2. You need to install another addon, otherwise "no"

>>61692517
people are afraid to visit new websites these days

most just sit on the front page of some aggregator

>>61692532
is it googles fault that they have malware in the playstore?
>inb4 yes

well what can they do?
>inb4 audit and sign just like apple

>>61692555
Woah cancer

Firefox is dead, just switch to Chrome or Pale Jew and stop whining

>b-but muh speeeed
JUST USE A FUCKING WEBKIT BASED BROWSER AND LEAVE MY FUCKING ADDONS ALONE REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: hackerman.jpg (57KB, 540x531px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 540x531px

don't worry guys, i'm working on a replacement as we speak. my browser will have support for firefox xul addons as well as webextensions, it's going to be the shit.

>>61692568
>botnet or legacy firefox palememe

>>61691496
They just check them for tracking/malware and give you comments which you're free to ignore.
You can also sign it yourself and distribute it.

File: comfy-stallman.jpg (15KB, 340x180px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 340x180px

>>61692600
I'll do the logo.

>>61691548
>>61691566
>>61691606
>>61691629
This isn't accurate, this just uses a flag. uBlock and others still work fore sure.

>>61692568
>>61692604

https://github.com/iridium-browser/iridium-browser

https://github.com/iridium-browser/iridium-browser

it's a out-of-the-gate ungoogled chrome

File: tmp_1150-R0144174 (Custom)-786529809.jpg (974KB, 2000x1325px) Image search: [Google]

974KB, 2000x1325px

Can someone post de-botnetting guide for firefox

>You can override the setting to enforce the add-on signing requirement by changing the preference xpinstall.signatures.required to false in the Firefox Configuration Editor

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-on-signing-in-firefox

>Why use signing

Add-ons that change your browser's settings without your consent or steal your information have become increasingly common. Some add-ons can add unwanted toolbars or buttons, change your search settings or inject ads into your computer. Firefox will now verify that the add-ons you install have been digitally signed by Mozilla. This article explains the add-on signing feature and how it works.


if you get infected mozilla isnt responsible the second you disable it

>>61691970
>adblock plus
Deprecated by uBlock Origin
>uBlock Origin
Webextension version available or waiting for a single bug fix, not sure.
>Video DownloadHelper
youtube-dl
>Easy Screenshot
Literally built in functionality now.
>NoScript
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1214733
>Firebug
Deprecated by builtin devtools
>DownThemAll
>download accelerators in 2017
>GreaseMonkey
Webextension alternatives already exist
>iMacros for Firefox
Selenium
>Download Youtube Videos as MP4
youtube-dl
>Cisco WebEx Extension
lmao
>Flash Video Downloader - YouTube HD Download [4K]
youtube-dl
>LastPass Password Manager
>botnet, web extension version possible
>Google Translator for Firefox
I don't use any such extension personally but that well within the capabilities of webextensions
>Tab Mix Plus
I don't know if a replacement exists right now but https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1333837#c9
>Random Agent Spoofer
Again well within the capabilities of webextensions
>Yandex.Bar
lmao
>FlashGot Mass Downloader
>download managers in 2017 + youtube-dl
>Download Flash and Video
youtube-dl
>1-Click Youtube Video Download
youtube-dl

And that's the entire first page. Nothing of value is lost.

>>61692688
about:config
turn off sync and reporting and pocket

change your search provider and homepage

>>61692688
look at what icecat and tor disables
its literally firefox

>>61692754
too bad nightly is exact opposite of stable and its a major improvement

>>61692744
>Deprecated by builtin devtools
Why are they builtin? Why did they not make them an addon? In fact, what was wrong with firebug?
I did notice that the builtin devtools are laggy as fuck in comparison to firebug, making them unbearable.

>youtube-dl
There was an xul addon that allowed you to spawn an instance of mpv with the current url as an argument, does it work for webextensions?

How about the tab manager?

>>61692825
tab features are being integrated and mpv can intercept urls from the browser with a library called mpv-*** something

forgot the name but im sure you can find out in /mpv/

File: firebug is dead.png (175KB, 1202x413px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1202x413px

>>61692825
>Why are they builtin?
Because it's a very basic feature.
>I did notice that the builtin devtools are laggy as fuck in comparison to firebug, making them unbearable.
Probably because you have firebug installed. Firebug is also known to increase request times to unreasonable amounts.

>There was an xul addon that allowed you to spawn an instance of mpv with the current url as an argument, does it work for webextensions?
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Native_messaging

>How about the tab manager?
What tab manager? An api for selectively hiding tabs (for creating tab group extensions) was just recently approved.
They are working on new apis.

>>61692899
>tab features are being integrated
What the fuck? Why?

>>61691951

>being this new

>>61692919
>Because it's a very basic feature.
It's a feature that already existed as an addon.

>Probably because you have firebug installed
I do not.

>What tab manager? An api for selectively hiding tabs (for creating tab group extensions) was just recently approved.
>They are working on new apis.
They should have waited until the new APIs were ready.

>>61691951
>>>/pol/

File: aloe.jpg (115KB, 750x663px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 750x663px

>150 replies itt
>not a single sane alternative posted

it's over

>>61692980
that's because FF is the sane choice.

It's not perfect but it's better than the competition.

>>61692951
>It's a feature that already existed as an addon.
Well now it's built in, just like in literally every other browser and that means that it won't break every time a new firefox version is released.

>They should have waited until the new APIs were ready.
Firefox is still 3 versions away from deprecating legacy extensions.

>>61691443
I'm using nightly. I updated to 57 but my legacy extensions still work. Weren't they supposed to stop? Or is it something that will happen only when regular firefox hits 57?

>>61693028
>Well now it's built in
And this is a retarded bloat.

>and that means that it won't break every time a new firefox version is released.
They should simply keep a stable API then.

>Firefox is still 3 versions away from deprecating legacy extensions.
Considering how fast they release new versions this does not seem like a long time.

>>61691636
uBlock vs Adblock Plus is the console war equivalent of adblocking.

>>61693054
>devtools
>bloat
Leave /g/.

>They should simply keep a stable API then.
That's the whole fucking point of webextensions.

>Considering how fast they release new versions this does not seem like a long time.
104 days.

>>61693040
Only when regular hits apparently.

>>61693095
What happened to 'Adblock'

>>61693095
ADB+ lost that one when they sold out to jews.

>>61693103
>Leave /g/.
Once you have a proper addon system adding crap that you can't remove to the main installation is bloat.

>That's the whole fucking point of webextensions.
They could have made the devtools a webextension then. They decided not to however, instead they integrated that shit into the browser because they enjoy bloat (and probably because they were too stupid to keep the xul api stable back then).

>104 days.
Not a long time at all.

>>61693135
What?

>>61693095
It's not. ublock is objectively better.
The only reason why adblock still has normie userbase is because it has "adblock" in the name.

>>61692786
Will install when I'm on the same continent as my Linux machine

Just need something for my Wincuck laptop

>>61693144
Yet it has still a number of shills.

>>61693155
There os a popular add on called 'Adblock'. I'm pretty sure it still has more users than ABP

>>61693175
>There os a popular add on called 'Adblock'.
Never heard of it.

>I'm pretty sure it still has more users than ABP
Maybe because normalfags like the name.

>>61693155
An addon that is tighly integrated with browser internals and a stable unchanging api are not compatible ideas.

>>61693187
Found it: https://getadblock.com/
scroll down a bit and it gives its position in popularity

>>61693164
You expect there to be any jew owned property that doesn't have shills running around?

>>61692405
>>61692440
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2017/08/2017-08-02-10-03-02-mozilla-central/firefox-57.0a1.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2017/08/2017-08-02-10-03-02-mozilla-central/firefox-57.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2

>there are people IN THIS VERY THREAD that support these changes

get out

>>61693221
My mistake.

>>61692825
>There was an xul addon that allowed you to spawn an instance of mpv with the current url as an argument, does it work for webextensions?
you don't need that if you unix-like
http://ix.io/xoM

>>61693235
>Anyone who hates innovation, leave.

You sound like the anti-Systemd crowd.
Get with the times, grandpa!

File: 1487415760889.jpg (328KB, 1342x1412px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1342x1412px

>>61691443
Fuck your browser. Feeding little black girls in Africa is a lot better way to spend money than to spend it on CIS white male programmers in California.

>>61693272
Are you Google?

>not hiring white males is progress
>spending 150 million to hire non white minority employees

face it, mozilla cant even compete with SJW cucklord google

>>61693272
it's not the browser nigger

it's the faggots at mozilla corporation

Can someone try installing legacy add ons on a fresh profile with 57? I don't think you can

File: firefox.png (479KB, 1368x1011px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1368x1011px

>>61693272
Maybe you should open the firefox page instead.
That's like opening microsoft.com and complaining that Windows is not the main focus of the page.

>>61693272
>t. eich

let me guess...
install, brave?

LOL!

>>61693370
If you were a ally to FF, you would have it installed yourself.

>>61693387
Mozilla has ONE PRODUCT. Only one! It's the ONLY product that makes them money.

You'd think that it would be the thing they promote and feature on their homepage... but you'd be wrong.

>>61693442
Mozilla has plenty of projects, and standards under their name.

You sound pretty triggered there, bud.
Don't take it so personal!

>>61693442
>firefox
>thunderbird
>rust
>big driving force behind asm.js and webassembly
>the only force slowing down google's lock-in
The "internet for people, not profit" slogan isn't even a meme.

>>61693483
>projects
I said products! You know, shit that actually makes MONEY and keeps them ALIVE.

>>61693442
Mozilla has plenty of projects, and standards under their name.

You sound pretty triggered there, bud.
This isn't a safe space though.
Don't take it so personal!

>>61693530
>>firefox
product

>>thunderbird
got rid of it. they spend the money on SJW issues instead

>>rust
LOL! not a product. huge drain on resources. worthless.

>>big driving force behind asm.js and webassembly
WGAF. not a product. no one cares.

>>the only force slowing down google's lock-in
bullshit. their marketshare is falling.

>>61693553
face the facts you dont care about any of the technology you are just a butt hurt kid from /po/ who needs someone to hold his hand

>>61693553
>got rid of it. they spend the money on SJW issues instead
It's still very much there.

>LOL! not a product.
It's a product used in the only thing you accepted as a product.
It's also the first even remotely successful attempt at providing an alternative to C++ in some use-cases.

>WGAF. not a product. no one cares.
Without Mozilla we'd have this and Chrome would be the only usable browser https://developer.chrome.com/native-client

>bullshit. their marketshare is falling.
That doesn't contradict my point in any way.

>>61693155
You're a fucking moron lmao
Mozilla employee leagues and leagues of people to think about this stuff, do you're judgements as a /g/entooman are nearly as well reasoned or thought as the firefox teams?

Firefox will continue to improve, and retards will continue to complain about whatever is changed.

>>61693387
what the fuck is a free range browser

>>61693649
>Mozilla employee leagues and leagues of people to think about this stuff
Ah yes, the retarded non-programmer hipster designers and social relation niggers, huh?

>>61691976
lol

>>61691443
YES ANON THAT'S GREAT, NOW ENJOY YOUR (((DRM))) BROWSER

>>61693662
>he doesnt understand comedy
they are making fun of the california hipster

>>61693707
>continues to suggest chrome or a varient with DRM enabled

>>61693707
>What is EME-free

>>61693662
a dumb SJW joke

File: bleachbit.tshirt.jpg (117KB, 576x768px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 576x768px

>>61693759
Delete this.

>>61691538
my body is ready, now fuck me in the ass faggot.

all web browser are fucking faggots, fuck yourselfs witha dragon dildo and die of french newfie aids you fucking sjw cucks.

>>61693793
Don't talk to Google Chrome like that!

Fucking white males...

File: mozilla funding.png (310KB, 1898x1444px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1898x1444px

>>61693553
>they spend the money on SJW issues instead
People keep mentioning that but nobody mentions pic related

>>61693842
Bro, I'm trying to shill here.

Can you just... not?
Thanks!

>>61691702
It didn't block you.

Does Waterfox work with all of Firefox's addons? And is there a quick import feature so I can just seamlessly switch?

>>61693713
i've seen mozilla homepage and it wouldn't surprise me if this hipster shit is 100% serious

>>61691522
>hentai
>kitsune
you're not japanese and cartoons are not real.

>>61691548
Welp. Time to switch to Chrome.

File: 1472376299496.jpg (1MB, 3652x1588px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3652x1588px

Mozilla doesn't give a fuck about the Firefox.

>>61693945
>>61693943

>Google commits $150 million to diversity hires
>Google donates $4 million to refugee causes
>Google donates $30 million helping vulnerable women in Mexico

File: ublock.png (165KB, 1574x1091px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1574x1091px

>>61692200
yeah been using ublock for a year now and its worked like a champ. i guess people don't know they can add more filter lists...

So when is the new Photon theme coming with the square tabs?

>>61693943
yeah switch to a browser that doesnt have you addons because lack of addon support

makes a lot of sense

File: 1498937302094.png (34KB, 883x615px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 883x615px

>>61693842
>People keep mentioning that but nobody mentions pic related

>>61693994
Why are you comparing Google, a MULTI-BILLION dollar company to Mozilla, which has EXTREMELY limited resources???

>>61694030
>>>/pol/

>>61692744
>youtube-dl
>replace your deprecated browser plugin with a completely different piece of software not associated with your browser
that's not a proper replacement and you know it

>>61694048
because all you care about is SJW yet you cut people with money slack?

mozilla makes plenty of money to allow a couple pictures of minorities

how much do you expect that to cost?
you must be braindead

>>61694030
>>61693945
that makes me sick. how did this sjw nonsnse infect the tech industry?

File: 1501232243806.jpg (149KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 800x820px

>>61694063

>>61692069
Are there any youtube extensions for Brave? I think it has adblock by default, but I need extensions to customize Youtube.

File: 1485896467307.jpg (529KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 800x820px

>>61694077

File: 1488269980128.png (96KB, 916x599px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 916x599px

>>61694074
>you must be braindead
Ha! Says a retarded SJW dipshit who's defending Mozilla's huge waste of money... which is one of the root causes of their incredible downfall.

RIP Firefox
RIP SJWzilla

>>61691496
Sounds terrible. Conspiracy is poison to reason.

>>61694030
What are they replacing slave/master with?

>>61694110
Cuck/dominatrix

>>61694076
blame google for enabling virtue signalling and forcing everyone else to or else they are shunned by normies

>>61694093
>using a chrome clone

>>61694148
I'm pretty much open to anything at this point. Chrome is also getting fucky with extensions and disabling my Youtube extension by default because it "modifies website data". No shit, it makes Youtube usable on a PC again you fucks

>>61694100
ive yet to see evidence of this heavy spending shill

cry more about your lack of safe spaces eichy boy

>>61694110
iirc child and parent. though its been awhile since i last herd what their plan to change it to was.

embrace botnet itself instead of a clone

>>61694182
>It seems like the word "slaves" will be replaced by "replicants" or some other form of it. Since Buildbot uses the master/slave model, the word "slave" is used all throughout the documentation and code (example here). Rewriting that will be a fairly large project.
>This is not the first time Mozilla is fighting for political correctness. A few months ago an anonymous Mozilla developer complained on Reddit about how Christie Koehler was "batshit insane and permanently offended at everything". Shortly after those posts Mozilla's CEO made a public statement threatening to fire the anonymous employee if he was found.
>It seems like Mozilla is working very hard for political correctness ever since their previous CEO was forced to step down last year after it was revealed that he had donated 1000 dollars to Proposition 8 (anti-gay marriage bill) a few years earlier.
replicants for slave. not sure about master. what's pretty sad is that you can sugar coat the name all you want. the "replicants/child/whatever will always be treated and behave as a slave because it is a slave.

>>61694197
12 rupees have been deposited to your google wallet, sundar

File: be8.png (156KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 330x319px

>>61694030
>$15k
>Remove the term "slave"
>FIFTEEN
>THOUSAND
>DOLLARY DOO DOOS

I'm fucking dead lmao.

File: 1473422066864.png (485KB, 885x3193px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 885x3193px

This is what those retarded SJW feminist programmers at Mozilla spent their time on.

LOL!

Imagine, their browser is losing share every month and there's less and less people using slow af browser and what do they do? They waste more of their time on total fucking bullshit.

Incredible how retarded SJWzilla managers are. They're running the place into the ground.

Anyway, fuck'em! Just move away from that insecure, slow, generally total shit browser.

>>61694260
>>61694030
The real question is, why would a simple re-factoring cost 15k?

>>61694239
Meh, the botnet isn't so bad!
It's actually pretty helpful.

Too many autists here, that need to relax.

Just a tip: Chrome=cozy
Thank me later!

>>61694271
ayy notes seems pretty reasonable 2bh

>>61694277
Go be a botnet cuck somewhere else like plebbit

File: 1501022202545.png (345KB, 620x640px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 620x640px

What are the alternatives? Waterfox? Palemoon? Cyberfox? Which one will allow me to keep my extensions?
Firefox is just so comfy I don't want to jump ship.

>>61694288
What extensions are you using?

>>61694260
>>61694273
can you read?

the cost is to improve buildbot and they arent giving specifics about where is distributed

File: hdd_jumper_ma.jpg (46KB, 425x440px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 425x440px

>this triggers firecucks
you sperging now firecucks?

File: 1500258651109.jpg (15KB, 622x407px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 622x407px

Friendly reminder from SJWzilla: never read the comments!

Close this tab now and never come to 4chan again. You don't want to read the comments on this site.

>>61691443
GNU Icecat master race checking in

>>61694271
>slow
>insecure

update your FF bro
nightly is fast as fugg

File: 1474066504074.jpg (11KB, 606x121px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 606x121px

>>61694306
Also, make sure you donate money to SJWzilla so they can fix social ""issues"".... like this one.

File: 1475887971552.png (21KB, 776x252px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 776x252px

>>61694323
>implying you can fix this kind of shit in a year

File: extensions.png (31KB, 540x401px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 540x401px

>>61694296
pretty basic shit but stuff I wouldn't use Firefox without

File: Capture.png (594KB, 849x476px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 849x476px

>>61694271
They also spend their time on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JQW08xD7k8

Pic related, actual Mozilla employment footage.

File: 1485969353054.jpg (121KB, 1536x864px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1536x864px

>>61694273
>The real question is, why would a simple re-factoring cost 15k?
This is the team that worked on it. You tell me.

>>61694343
so you agree they should be chaning the components to improve security?

thats before sandboxed tabs btw

>>61694346
>Complete jewtube server
youtube-dl
>private tab
Hmm, this is an issue, however I have a separate browser for private browsing
>uBlock Origin
Isn't it ported?
>uMatrix
I don't use it so I can't tell

>>61694227
>dismissing someone for being an asshole to their management is being an SJW

>>61694364
>our engineers are amazing. they're magicians. they can make anything happen
but they can't make a secure browser.
kek

>>61694371
The anon who replied to me before gave a helpful answer unlike you

holy shit, it's so fast. I'm going to use this as main browser, until November

>>61694288
i like waterfox. developer of it seems pretty sane. a fine example is for lincucks users that mozilla gutted out alsa support. so you need pulseaudio for sound now in firefox.

waterfox developer put back alsa support in its lincucks version. he also does a great job at purging the botnets from it. example from the new 54.0.1 release he:
>Block data being sent to Google Analytics on the internal about:addons page
didn't even know about:addons even communicated with google.

File: 1476809198786.jpg (46KB, 587x502px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 587x502px

Thank you Mozilla.

>>61694416
Legend has it Mozilla didn't bother with a sandboxing all this time because it resembled the walling out of Mexicans from USA.

>>61694390
and yet, he wasn't. he didn't walk into mozilla go right up to the freak and start acting like an asshole to them. instead, he went on a internet board, with an anonymous name to vent his frustration about the toxic environment at mozilla.

what would you rather him do? vent out his frustration in an anonymous setting or walking into mozilla and shoot up the place?

please just install brave...

#BeBRAVEwithUS

>>61694474
I would rather he vented his frustration to HR, not on an internet forum.

What he did is a fireable offense at any company, it's not something unique to Mozilla.

>>61694477
I would install and use Brave but this issue holds me back
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/issues/8854

>>61694529
well then you just arent brave enoug bro

#BraveOldSouls

>>61694100
I hope you posted that picture ironically. The arrow points to when the CEO was ousted.

>>61694528
awww look at you. pretty little snowflake <3 did you remember to pack extra underwear like mommy told you to do?

File: 1491426838063.jpg (52KB, 597x484px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 597x484px

Thank you Mozilla.

File: 1500107285951.png (28KB, 429x459px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 429x459px

>>61691443
Shoud I install Nightly or is it a overrated meme?

File: pfft.png (359KB, 1019x355px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1019x355px

>>61691522
>mfw there are people who can't into the Panda without an add-on
>in 2017

File: 1480678515939.webm (42KB, 566x424px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 566x424px

>>61694563
Sorry, I have no idea what you wrote. I'm just following SJWzila's advice.
Kindly, fuck off SHITLORD!

>>61694586
it really is quick

>>61694598
You posted this 3 times now. What browser do you shill?

File: lgbt-hq-google.jpg (162KB, 645x366px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 645x366px

>>61694598
thank god you havent paid attention to chrome/google search decorations

poor guy would of had a heart attack because you arent used to having your ideas challenged

>>61691496
Not been updated since 2017-03-08

>>61691606
LuaKit is active again.
Adblock and userscripts out of the box,

>>61694638
A NON SJW ONE OKAY!??

>inb4 what one
WHO FUCKING CARES SHILL

>>61694680
Are you having a stroke there?

>>61694680
>what one
pajeet, calm down

>>61691548

What >>61692628 said

It's just a compliance flag

>>61694595
It's astounding

File: poolsclosed.jpg (20KB, 400x466px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x466px

>>61694578
had to post this

>>61694595
To be honest, they had some really retarded arbitrary requirements for people who just want to jack off.
From what I've heard of online bitching, the wait period is way longer now, you need to interact more and delete specific cookies to access exhentai, so it's no wonder people resort to the add-on.

>>61691443
>mfw i literally only used firecucks for flashgot downloader and thats it and i dont even need that anymore

Goodbye you turd of a browser

Chrome + edge master race

>>61694943
The wait period is literally nothing. And what the hell do you even need to interact with?

>>61694943
Never done anything besides browse desu. Yet to have any problems with access even with months of no use.

>>61694595
Are you kidding me? You have to edit some cookies, I am not doing that shit manually every time.

File: 1466760005587.jpg (52KB, 325x357px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 325x357px

>>61695015
You only have to do it once

>>61695015
>editing cookies
>every time
Pure bullshit. I can use sadpanda on my phone, for fuck's sake, where I can't edit cookies or use the extension, so why can't you too?

>>61695086
Every time you want to login.

>>61695100
No, you muppet. You can get use sadpanda from your phone.

>>61694977
Apparently some people needed to comment on galleries before being able to access Exhentai. Also as of late there were people reporting wait periods of a month.
Although I don't know how true any of that is. And it seems only to apply to more recent accounts.

>>61695008
It seems to depend on when you made your account. If you made it earlier it's fairly easy, if you did it recently it's more of a pain.

>>61694227
it's like they don't want to improve the software but recruit people for replacing useless things just like these
i'll tell you, i'll never give my support to firefox
they have been fucking over my laptop since 2007

>>61695118
>You can get use sadpanda from your phone.
So what?

>>61695091
>where I can't edit cookies or use the extension
What do you do exactly in order to login then?

>>61695121
What's the point of all this bullshit even. It is only useful in order to track you.
Can one even connect via tor even?

>>61695137
>So what?
Do you think I'd be bothering on my phone if I had to edit cookies every time? There's a much simpler way to get past the panda which is only a google search away.

>>61695159
>Do you think I'd be bothering on my phone if I had to edit cookies every time?
Considering that you are a phone-using retard I would say yes.

What do you do exactly in order to login then?

Reminder that firefox has tons of questionable homephoning etc. by default
https://github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js
https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.j

>>61694379
>sandboxed tabs

Using sandbox on everything is going to be a new meme soon. You heard that firat here senpai.

Sandbox this
>unzips cock

>tfw sandboxing amd gpu on nvidia hardware
AMD fags btfo'ed again.

Possibilities are endless.

>nobody mentioned Qutebrowser

File: 1492614779156.png (575KB, 600x839px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 600x839px

>switch to Waterfox
>it instantly reads all of my firefox folders and opens with the tabs I just had open in firefox with all of my addons and everything working exactly the same

So, I'm safe now, right?

>>61695945
no. waterfox is a fork of firefox, it will drop xul as soon as the update hits stable.

>>61691636
You didn't even configure ublock origin?

>what is the settings button
>what are those 3rd aprty filter lists that do everything i could ever dream of

Get out

>>61696028
But isn't Waterfox made specifically with addon availability in mind?

>>61696028
>>61696067
Nevermind, I searched it up and apparently the creator does indeed plan to keep XPCOM/XUL alive as long as feasible: https://www.reddit.com/r/waterfox/comments/5ysn9e/proposal_please_turn_waterfox_56_into_an_esr_and/deut7uq/

>>61694288
IceCat

Anyone got 4chan x to work?

File: updated.png (330KB, 1522x703px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1522x703px

>>61692405
Its already updated

>>61696615
How long until you revert to previous version?

File: addons.png (62KB, 1260x397px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1260x397px

>>61696658
That is a VM that im using to play around, i really use IceCat but i use these addons, i just updated to see what is going to happen to firefox, if is going to die slowly or if they are going to save it, in any case is fun watch how they burn and die

>>61694169
what extenion?

File: Screenshot from 2017-08-02 12-31-00.png (238KB, 620x349px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 620x349px

I only use ublock origin. Will I be fine once the PPA updates?

File: About Mozilla Firefox.png (86KB, 698x366px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 698x366px

>>61691443
>winblows 10
lol fucking retard

>>61694021
You mean switch to a browser that is the real thing as opposed to a thing trying to copy it.
Perfectly rational if you ask me.
If Firefox wants to be an inferior Chrome, then might as well use Chrome.

>>61697143
well, that is also available on chrom*, so i figure it should be easy enough for gorhill to make it work for the new extension scheme ff has.
only one i am missing now is the tree style tabs, but the tab center they had on their test pilot program was pretty good. doesn't work on 57 though, so hope they fix that and i should be good with that and ublock origin.

>>61697816
just checked the github for tab center. tab center redux works with 57, i guess i'm good after all.

File: 1496649197419.png (91KB, 241x234px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 241x234px

is Nightly free as in free speech?

>>61697816
>chrome
botnet detected