>current year 2 0 1 7 >not using superior Qwant search engine

Why should I use it?

>>61680762
better search results than ddg and it got those nice bangs too like !yt and stuff like that

File: scr.png (17KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 1024x768px

>>61680509
what does this have over a superior search engine

File: image.jpg (461KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 1280x720px

Safari on my iPhone doesn't have an option to set Qwant as a default search engine, so I guess its shit.

>>61680797
searx looks like shit and it loads slowly and is somehow sluggish for me

>>61680811
>not using a windows phone and changing the registry so default internet explorer has ddg and qwant, not just bing and google

>>61680852
Safari does have an option for ddg, and I actually set it to use ddg. Not really because that I am against Google botnet, its just Google is trying to force me into solving captchas every time I search, just because I connect to it through a vpn.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-01_23-22-51.png (68KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1366x768px

>>61680797

>>61680509
>log in
stop shilling your botnet

>>61680884
oh it's fine then, ddg and qwant are really similar, and also you can use google or startpage through them, just include !g or !sp in you search terms

File: 960001.png (33KB, 1263x802px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1263x802px

>>61680797
Disqualified for not working without javashit or working horribly.

>>61680902
You don't have to log in and they don't store data if you don't want them to

>>61680509
Is this yet another search engine like searx or startpage that just pulls google results?

>>61680960
nope, it's more similar to ddg, also the default search engine in Iridium browser, so that's a good point in my book

File: startpage_ss1_new.jpg (1MB, 4201x2714px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4201x2714px

>>61680509
Why not startpage?

>>61680935
You don't even understand javascript meme, it's not like javascript is good, but as soon as it is not closed source (searx is opensource and self-hosted), it's okay.

>>61680981
Well, if the search results are better than startpage or searx, I'm willing to switch.

>>61680982
you can use startpage if you want, though I find it kinda ugly and a little bit old fashioned. It's a good choice though!
Another con is that it just pulls google results, so it's not really anti botnet, it just uses the botnet for it's own good, so meh

>>61681000
Try it for a few days, you can use startpage too with it just write !sp in the search bar with your terms

File: 960001.png (66KB, 765x899px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 765x899px

>>61680902
The lite version is pretty cool, but serves server side ads so they have to be blocked manually.

>>61680997
Javashit isn't mandatory so html fallback is mandatory.

>>61681037
$0.15 were deposited to your designated shitting street.

>>61681054
Fuck off javashitter. You nigger only saw the login screen because you had javashit enabled. Way to go freedom fighter. Fucking pansy.

>Qwant will wind up like DDG

Tried it. No autocorrect, no smart results where engine shows usefum content on results page, no safe search for when in public places. I will continue on DDG.

>>61681100
It has safe search goy, who cares about autocorrect

>>61680509
Obviously yacy ia the best search engine. Everyone on /g/ should be running a yacy peer.

>>61681211
install gentoo

>>61681100
you're right about that smart result shit thought, that's a con that should be considered before switching

Why should I trust qwant just because they claim it doesn't track you. They don't even have the source code available.

>unironically using a search engine that employs dom cookies

>>61681269
yes that's lame

>>61681006
Basically my only problem with startpage right there. It looks like some middle schooler's web design project. Not even the typeface is good.

>>61680509
Why not just use Google lol