Repeat after me: 1070 level performance

>>61663664
>Nvidia fanboys can be this desperate

>>61663695
like 300watt 1070 levels desperation?

>>61663664
With Nvidia's latest driver gains, more like 1060 3gb performance. The 580 has been bumped down to 1030 performance.

1070 level performance

File: 1461511265026.jpg (37KB, 640x437px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 640x437px

>>61663714
>RAJA right now at AMD

>>61663664
Vega FE is not for gaming. Try again.

gas the kikes, race war now!

File: amdrone.jpg (8KB, 179x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 179x200px

>>61663664
1070 L-LEVEL PERFORMANCE

>>61663744
this is radeon. get your eyes checked

>>61663776
Radeon has much better performance. Get your facts checked. That ONE benchmark is with Vega FE against 1070.

>>61663776
so i guess when vega fe kills p6000 that doesnt mean anything

/g/

>>61663862
yea to most of /g/ it wont because we're not 3d animation studios and video editors.

>>61663878
b-but we're gaymers right XDXDDDD
>>>/v/

>>61663664

>1070 performance now
>1080 performance in 6 months
>1080ti performance in 1 year

Is like you don't know History, anon. Hell, my Fury kicks 1070 ass in some scenarios.

>>61663878
so let me get this right
/g/ when amd wins on games
>but it cant beat nvidia on enterprise
/g/ when amd wins on enterprise
>we dont care about enterprise we are gumurz

got it

>>61663896
yea even /v/ knows AMD dun goof'd with this craptacular launch

>>61663910
>/g/ when amd wins on games

that rarely happens if at all

>>61663664
>1070 level performance
But it's between the 1080 and the 1080ti, at least it should be. Guess we'll know more when benchmarks are out on the 14th.

>>61663938
the sentient leather jacket is calling he forgot to give you a free sticker

>>61663938
>that rarely happens if at all
>I've been paying attention to the graphics market for AT LEAST 2 years now

>>61663960
This thread was started by a serial shitposter spammer who has been blubbering "1070 level performance" for months. You are wasting your time trying to talk any sense into the retard.

>>61663981
I've been following since fermi bro. the last shallow ATI victory

>>61663984
Yeah I've seen his posts. He's probably the same "AYYMDPOORFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH" guy that's been posting since, what, 2013? I don't know. Sometimes when I want some /g/ nostalgia I just search for that quote and see what thread comes up in the archives. 9/10 times it's a 970 vs. 390 thread and those are always fucking great.

>>61664032
No, that is someone else. Though I respect him for his talent and dedication.

File: 2374956924387.png (361KB, 858x725px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 858x725px

Goddammit I was hoping they would for once not fuck up and maybe even compete with the 1080 Ti.
Guess I'll just have to keep waiting for Volta, no need for Nvidia to bring Pascal prices down now.

I mean seriously, I didn't even intend to buy AMD and they still disappoint me, how do they do it?

>>61664032
>mfw 2500k and 390 faggotry are behind us

>>61664050
You think "repeat after me" is actually a different guy? Maybe there are more mentally deranged Nvidiots and shitposters out there than I thought.

>>61663704
more like 380 watts.

>>61664075
There's like three of them.

>>61664117
there are dozens of us; DOZENS!

truth is vega is complete an utter shit

I wanna know what these 'compute units' are about, and why are there only 64 of them?

Why are AMD's deep learning libraries such shite?

Nvidia is putting tensor cores in ONLY their enterprise cards (read: expensive as fuck) this is a huge opportunity for AMD to get their shit together and keep deep learning affordable.

>>61663664
1070 performance (or even better under DX12) with freesync its fine for me.

Enjoy paying expensive proprietary kike tech faggot

>>61663664
The only performance numbers we know so far are with buggy pre-alpha drivers on the FE card.

Card launches in 2 weeks, and they confirmed that they'll be adding tile based rendering to it then. So, once it is ACTUALLY OUT, it might have different performance than the FE card.

>>61664191
> once the drivers

Ohh you poor sap

I got banned from /r/amd because I told them that Vega will just barely match a GTX1080 and may even be closer to a GTX1070 in performance. Serves those fags right.

>>61663664
1070 level performance.

I wonder where are all the AMD shills:

>wccftech leaks was shit, the 375w power draw of the fe edition is fake, tdp=/=watts, wait the gayming drivers, fe is not a gaymen gpu, poor volta, it will be faster than titan xp, vega fe is only a cumpute card, undervolt for better performance, all nvidia cards are overclocked, the reviews are shill. AMD IS SHIT BECAUSE NVIDIA ARE JEW!

Amdrone should stop overhype their shit

>>61663664
> 1070 level performance
1070 was hit w/factory OCed RX 580.

>>61664155
t.leather jacket man

>>61664173
>implying AMD GPUs run on FOSS

>>61664263
Are y'all jealous because you can't wear leather?

>>61664283
No, I'm jealous of 1.7% yields.

>>61664253
lol. no

>>61664208
Not "once the drivers" are done, once the actual card is *available*.

>>61664268
>implying FOSS is useful in real world

>>61663664
1070 level performance

>>61664310

I'm not implying that, retard. I'm making fun of him for implying that AMD is Open Source while nVidia is proprietary.

>>61664339
I never said it was open source, i said that Freesync ITS FUCKING FREE instead of paying the kike taxes of G-sync faggot

>>61664408
Are you literally retarded ?

>Enjoy paying expensive proprietary kike tech faggot
>expensive proprietary
>proprietary

also

>implying paying 100USD more for VEGA than a 1070 is less expensive

>>61664408
It has additional hardware you are paying for.

>>61664239
>Amdrone should stop overhype their shit
They get paid to shit up /g/ do you think they'll stop over something like underwhelming performance, or amd being not worth the money?

>>61664268
AMD foss drivers are better than the proprietary ones made by amd.
Really makes you think.

>>61664449
So you like enjoy being jewed

>>61664594

>FOSS shit is better than prop. shit
>Cat shit is better than dog shit

>>61664558
At this point this is not even a joke. The r/amd leddit mods are all from AMD. At least r/nvidia mods are customers.

>>61663664
OP is a fag

>>61663902
And in 1 year nvidia will release something that performs better than 1080ti anyway, so congrats on always being 1 year behind.

>>61663664
Wait, so what's wrong with Vega again?
>Freesync
>4K capable
>VR capable
>priced competitively
>good drivers
>DX12 performance
>HBM2
>mining
Not really seeing the negatives DESU.

>>61663704
Poojet gpu. I bet the thermal material is made of shit

>>61664833
>priced competitively

WRONG !

Also Power Draw

>>61664833
>good drivers

>>61664833
>good drivers, hbmene, mining

>>61664833
>Freesync
Shit sink works like ass
>4K capable
Surely if you consider 30 fps acceptable
>VR capable
640x480 vr capable
>priced competitively
Not if you want better hardware. Anyway with crypto cucks it's fucked
>good drivers
Since when amd has good drivers? They can't even unlock "secret features'. Hell amd can't even publish drivers on montly basis
>DX12 performance
On selected titles that works better on Nvidia anyway
>HBM2
Another overpriced meme that doesn't translate into performance
>mining
And it's supposed to be good?

>>61664877
$499 and it's better than the 1080 tho?

>>61664846
You mean like when the 1080's were catching on fire?

>>61664943
Let's deal with truth if amd performance was any good amd would already posted benchmarks.

>>61664943
Too bad AMD themself said it's going to be 1070 level performance ...

>>61664833
You're wasting your time, this is a shitpost thread started by serial shitposting fanboy and is overflowing with retards. You will gain nothing arguing with the human refuse residing in here.

>>61663664
It's really not going to sell well, and rightfully so; the power consumption is just far too high for casual use. Performance is between a 1080 and 1080 Ti, but even if it was like 2x better than a 1080 it still wouldn't be worth it given the power consumption.

rolling for programming challenge

>>61663664
>AMD, can you achieve 1080ti-level performance?
>1080-level performance?! What do you need with 1070-level performance?!

>>61663664
>>61663704
>>61663714
>>61663716
>>61663741
>>61663769
>>61663776
>>61663925
>>61664092
>>61664155
>>61664208
>>61664239
>>61664330
>>61664440
>>61664558
>>61664658
>>61664846
>>61664877
>>61664936
>>61664996
>>61665158
>>61665620
All these faggots who came here just to shit on AMD. Before it's even out and before anyone even sees the final reviews. Really fucking pathetic.

File: 1260764288566.jpg (50KB, 400x445px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 400x445px

>>61665621
poor corporation :( you know where you are right?

>>61665621
>rx vega will be better than vega fe
Don't be stupid

File: amd3.jpg (66KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 568x612px

>>61663664

1070 level performance

Its because of clusterfucks like this that I havent upgraded from 1080p resolution

Not going to get nickle and dimed or shell out for a 1080ti

Waiting for $2-400 cards that'll have 40-50fps minimums in 4k

>>61665621
Come on you know its a fail. Everyone including amd drones know it

>>61665621
We all know the final reviews are gonna be worse than the ones AMD have cherry picked

295w with a single blower fan. That's r9 290x reference tier. 1080 ti sc gets hot even rated at 250w.

>>61665922
>Everyone else on the internet: It's going to be somewhere between 1080 and 1080 ti
>Shitposters on sewerchan: HURR DURR REPEAT AFTER ME 1070 PERFORMANCE :^))))))))))))

File: amd shotgun.jpg (156KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 633x758px

1070 performance

>>61665969
I'm expecting the final drivers to give 15-20% improvement which will easily put it above the 1080 in some games and on par with the 1080 in others.

AMD are retarded. Why don't they just use their ryzen which is power efficient and put it in a graphics card? noone wants to see another 300w gpu.

>>61666024
Are you dumb?

File: coby-shity-speaker.jpg (30KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x374px

>>61665991
I found the original design AMD copied from:
Coby cheap chinese speakers.
It even come in AMD colors

>https://www.amazon.com/Coby-Aluminum-Brick-Bluetooth-Speaker/dp/B00WLIR25U

Brick

>>61666060
hey cool post anon, want to bring it to the next thread?

>>61666078
You seem like a nice girl. Want to be my friend?

>>61666014
BWHAHAHAHAHA

>>61666110
Yeah sure just sit there and endlessly shitpost about how Vega is going to be GT 1030 performance or whatever you waste of space.

>>61666139
5% max.

Amd is faster

File: Nvidia-vs-Poojet.jpg (111KB, 700x544px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 700x544px

>>61666078
Made a nicer image just for (you)

>>61663664
>tfw you're preferred brand of CPU is getting shit on by ryzen, but you can just swap your shill hat and shit on Radeon

>>61666316
only retards have a " PREFFERED BRAND " i buy what is better . if tomorrow nvidia makes shit GPUS and AMDS MAKES a GPU that does 100 fps in all games at 4K i m going to buY AMD , despite me having a 970 , and in the past 4 years i always bought NVIDIA

File: Screenshot_2017-07-31-17-59-57.png (121KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 540x960px

We first link famous now

File: 1495051026483.png (95KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 653x726px

>>61663664
s-s-shut up!

>>61666358
>i buy what is better
Nah, fuck Nvidia.

>>61663664
1060 level performance? why do you want 1050 Ti level performance?

File: poo-hands.jpg (31KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x400px

>>61666529
>Muh precious

>>61666602
Best I can do is 1050 level performance!

>>61665642
>>61665679
>>61665741
>>61666012
>>61666110
>>61666253
>>61666364
>>61666529
>>61666602
>>61666614
Kill yourself.

Raja is so washed up. Apple really sucked the life out of him. Lisa hired a husk.

>>61666602
Theft

>>61666737
That was mean :(

You can thank the chinese retards at RTG for this abomination.
AMD should do the same thing they did with Ryzen, trash everything and start all over. They should have enough cash for that now.

>>61666253
http://www.gamersnexus.net/news-pc/3004-rx-vega-64-and-vega-56-power-specs-price

>Turns out, RX Vega isn’t just a matter of restricting power target, they’re actually doing something for power optimization. We couldn’t get explicit examples at this time. One thing we do know is that the voltage targets change, so voltage checks are at different frequencies than FE, and voltage should be lower. We’d expect that this will align with our findings in the undervolting testing on Vega: Frontier Edition, where power consumption can equalize while improving performance. It’s still AVFS, but just a better tuning profile than FE.

The architects loosely confirmed that tile-based rasterization was in fact disabled for Frontier Edition’s launch, which we think mostly aligns with statements about pushing the card out in time, and noted that DSBR will be enabled on both Vega FE and RX Vega on launch of RX Vega.

tl;dr shit was just disabled for FE Vega.

>>61666529
Underated

Why can't nvidia fanboys meme like AMD Bros?

File: 1501510708307.jpg (690KB, 1263x1920px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 1263x1920px

>>61663664
nah, Vega 56 will be 1070/Fury X performance and Vega 64 will be 1080 performance, they are very late in the game though, Volta is already in the horizon

>>61664658
>The r/amd leddit mods are all from AMD.
And some of these guys are probably janitors now.

>>61668072
Pajeet gets paid to distribute memes for amd. Nvidia owners don't get paid to do the same, so they generally don't.

>>61663664
1070 level performance

>>61668413
>entire thread full of Novidya shills
>hurr durr AMD does it for free

>>61668717
I saw a RedTeam+ /r/amd pajeet poster start a thread on /g/. Ge even had a pajeet name. Did he do that for free?

File: redteam.jpg (2MB, 8624x3896px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 8624x3896px

>>61669165
>RedTeam

>>61669165

>Did he do that for free?

Free = Cow piss

File: 64112177.jpg (70KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 630x420px

>>61666898
>muh special features

>>61666898
Yeah well fuck you
Retard

>>61664213
You got banned because you're a fucking shitposting retard.

>Nvidia fanboys are so fucking retarded that they will continue to buy Nvidia midrange cards every 2 years.

>>61663664
>P6000 levels of professional/compute workloads

>>61670294
>BTFO tripfag getting buttblasted again

>>61670495
>Okay so it's going to be somewhere between 1080 and 1080ti perfor-
>You:LUL 1070 PERFORMANCE BECUZ OF FE BTFO AMD FAGS
>no it's going to be 1080 performance at the very least becau-
>You:LUL 1070 PERFORMANCE TEAM GREEN FOREVER HAHAHA GET FUGGED AMD
>get banned
>Wonder why it happened

>>>/v/

>>61670553
Not even him
you're so far up your own ass you think anyone replying to you is the person you started flinging shit with

>>61663664
>Listen and Believe

>>61670563
>Not even him

Definitely means you're him

>>61664239
the 375 watt claim comes from the limitation of the power the 2x 8-pin plus PCIe (150x2 plus 75)
I'd expect aftermarket top tier overclocker units to add another 6 or 8 pin
it's the typical "AMD is just shy of the top NVidia card, but cheaper and uses more power" pattern.
all signs seem to point the Vega56 to 1070ish, the Vega64Air to the 1080, and the Vega64Water to somewhere in the middle of the 1080 and 1080 Ti
not like anyone would want these cards anyway, blowers sound like jet engines

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 9.45.25 PM.png (263KB, 1714x948px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1714x948px

>>61670592
Not even close kiddo

>>61670674
Oh I'm sorry, guess you're just defending false information and shitposting from Nvidia fanboys.

>>61670786
>defending anything
No, just laughing at you for getting continuously buttblasted and wasting your time fighting for companies who don't know you exist

Pretty pathetic man

1080ti level performance

>>61664823
GOOOOOD GOOOOOOOY BUUUUUUUY MOOOOOOOORE

>>61664823
Why would I buy a GPU every year?

>>61670797
you're doing the exact same thing though.

>>61670845
I've seen this on /o/ before, he will reply something along the lines of "sperg more" or "[brand x] on suicide watch!"

>>61663664
At the same price? it better fucking be.

>>61670845
I'm not defending anything mang
Just laughing at you

You're so far gone you think anything directed towards you is pro-nvidia anti-amd

>>61670866
Never been on /o/ besides asking "wtf is this noise"

File: Low_0c507c_6118356.jpg (60KB, 500x457px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x457px

>>61666898
>Nvidia a shit for gimping cards!!!!
>AMD intentionally released gimped cards, but that's ok, because they're not Nvidia!!!!

>>61670871
>I'm not defending anything

Except when you defended the Nvidia fanboy shitposter.

>>61670912
Didn't defend anyone bud
Just laughed at you

>>61670917
>Call out Nvidia shitposter
>You:LUL YOUR HEAD IS UP YOUR ASS LUL IM LAUGHING HAHAHA

Yeah that's defensive shitposting

>>61670890
Nissan GTR vs Chevrolet Corvette is basically their version of AMD vs Intel
>AMD has more cylinders
>muh Intel turbocharger technology
it even has the same habit of back and forth shitposting that is repeatable enough to think a script is writing it
then the teslafag shows up and yells about some car he can't afford

>>61670936
Not even close
You're too far gone man, god speed

I'm out

>>61670945
Bye, you won't be missed shitposter.

>>61670940
who tesla in this analogy

>>61666300
I think Nvidia cards actually look pretty cool but what's the point if you're not supposed to buy reference designs anyway, and all the others add a lot of gaudy-but-necessary fans on them?

>>61670797
>>61670674
>>61670563
>>61670495
>>61670111
>>61670110
>>61669165
>>61668413
>>61670945
>>61670917
>>61670910
>All these cringy Nvidia fanboys are so buttblasted Vega is going to be released that they shitpost actively on the tech board of an anime website.

>>61670960
that guy who brings NVidia into a argument about CPUs, for example.
usually a retard who can't understand the topic

>>61670982
Makes perfect sense

>>61670952
you are mad because you are angry

Anyone buying reference (yes even the SE and AIO versions) is a fucking idiot.

>>61663664
>even AMD admit it performs like shit
>AMD pajeets still try to spin it as a driver issue

>>61671100
Anyone buying the Vega is a fucking idiot

>>61671100
unless SFF,
/thread

>>61671100
Third party ones will be just as shit.

The only Vega worth buying is the Nano for ITX builds, but even then Zotac have a 1080 Ti mini that will destroy it.

>>61663664
Remind me, why does your opinion matter?

>>61671130
What kind of bullshit excuse are you going to pull out of your ass?

>>61671138
special features

>>61670981
are you just made because VEGA did not deliver as expected to beat the 1080 ti?

Go wack it to your hentai because you seem as salty as your cum that you sip on and share with RAJ

>>61670982
who's the Porsche 911?

File: AMD-Radeon-RX-Vega-64-Performance-Battlefield-1[1].png (193KB, 1213x558px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1213x558px

>worse performance than 1080 confirmed by AMD

>>61671208
why is 4k such a meme

>>61671208
>it took 2 years to get one generation leap in perf

>>61671190
I'd say Qualcomm is VAG, with the 911 being Snapdragon. Europe small displacement turbo cars are ARM.

File: 4kisameme.png (37KB, 593x294px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 593x294px

>>61671215
Works On My Machine™

>>61666529
Just want to let you know that I get you anon.

>>61671229
>60Hz
>only one 1080Ti
eh

>>61671243
>anything more than 60Hz
nice meme /v/

File: VegaFE-Chart1[1].png (14KB, 572x381px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 572x381px

>>61670323
>actually thinking this
God some bad news for you kiddo

>>61671259
Can human eyes even see above 60 hz?

>>61671286
Human eye can't see past 60 graphics cards

>>61670553
>Okay so it's going to be somewhere between 1080 and 1080ti perfor-
>leaks show Vega losing to a 1080 in DOOM
>no it's going to be 1080 performance at the very least becau-
>official RX Vega launch slide deck shows inferior performance to the 1080 and double the power consumption
>B-BUT GAMING DRIVERS FE IS NOT A GAMING CARD MUH SPECIAL FEATURES

>>>/r/AMD

>>61671294
Which is why the Vega64 is shit because 64 is above 60.

>>61671303
Yeah you wouldn't even be able to see your games or you card
Too easy to lose, what a terrible product

>>61666358
I buy what I can live with.

Look, intel is a shit company, I hate everything about them and zen was the deadline for I require a new cpu, if amd was absolute shit, I was going to get a 6800/6850 and call it a day.

Amd, for my purposes was the better buy, even if some of my use cases it's slower than intel, and because I am not giving money to intel, i'm happier for it.

as long as amd is competitive, and lets be clear, with cpu and gpu they are competitive, ill buy with what company I like better, and as it turns out both intel and nvidia are companies I despise, but due to only 2 companies are in either one's field, I don't get a third option

Volta is sept, right?

>>61671364
early 2018

>>61671353
>AMD
>Competitive GPU
>One year late
>Bigger TDP
>AMD bias benchmarks puts them at equal which means real benchmarks will have them lower

The only competitive thing about Vega is the price but if you have a problem with paying extra 50 dollars for a superior card then you shouldn't be buying 500 dollar graphic cards.

>>61670868
a while ago, amd said they would be better by up to 30% then the competition at their given price range.

amd just put out a 400$, 500$, and 600$ gpu
Shit is going to be interesting.

It also seems like they are getting devs to use half precision or something of the like, something nvidia fucking gimps to hell and back on their gpus, but amd is double single. Honestly interested to see impacts that this has on games.

>>61671364
March 2018

File: 1493613016611.jpg (67KB, 743x755px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 743x755px

>>61671375
>>61671397
osoi

>>61671391
I was more thinking polaris, seeing as over 1440p is fucking retarded, its hard to justify anything higher then a 1060 6gb or a 4/580

and I would MUCH rather give my money to a company that puts out good drivers for a line of gpus, not just the newest gpus line nvidia does, do we really need to bring up the halo wars beta to show how much nvidia fucked everyone who bought a 700 series gpu?

>>61669997
>380
>144hz monitor
Ugh this triggers me

But it's literally 1080 performance

>>61671485
...while being $200 more expensive

File: 1498795178894.jpg (249KB, 1014x1024px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1014x1024px

I think I'm going to go for the 56

>>61671495
But its the same price as a 1080

File: shills all the way down.png (265KB, 868x756px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 868x756px

>>61665741
>>61666364
Hmm...

>>61671508
>actually thinking stock Vega with shit boost clocks will match a 1080
Only the liquid version boosting to 1677MHz will

>>61663664
I like the part where volta is due out in a matter of mere months and has double the performance in a 200-250watt package

>>61664213
i got banned for calling raja a curry nigger who shat out a overpriced hot power sapping peice of literal shit lele

>>61671545
the x80 Ti Volta won't be out so soon, first will be the x80 card with overclocked 1080 Ti performance

>>61664936
>Hell amd can't even publish drivers on montly basis
what is the point

>>61664936
>Since when amd has good drivers?
Since Crimson came out. NVIDIA drivers are fucking trash, t. 1080 Ti owner.
>Hell amd can't even publish drivers on montly basis
IF you have been at all up to date with driver releases for the last year you'd see that AMD and NVIDIA are head-to-head in number of releases.

>>61671559
isnt it well above 1080 ti oc performance?

>>61671625
Nice concern trolling.

>>61671633
?

File: 01a89efeb31e1aa8377405b8f3bcac65.jpg (85KB, 630x472px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 630x472px

>>61663664
>Requires 1kW reactor to power the damn thing
Yeah, nah, no thanks.

>>61671629
What makes you think that?

>>61663664
1070 performance

now

1080ti performance

along the way

>>61672170
1080 Ti performance in 2021

>>61663664
Well... it costs 400$ instead of 600$(launch price) so for poorfags it's kind of worth it...

>>61672186
The cut down version costs $400 which competes with the 1070

>>61672179
kek

So is it really going to be that bad? I legit considered selling my 1070 since prices are inflated now and getting the $499 vega instead.

>>61672476
That would be a sidegrade

>>61671539
they benchmarked the stock version and it was faster than a 1080

1677Mhz will be closer to 1080ti than 1080

>>61672504
Uh, no. 1600MHz Vega is similar to a 1080 FE, but the 1080 has significantly more OC headroom.

Vega will come nowhere near even the stock 1080 Ti, let alone custom cards or overclocked ones.

File: AMD-Radeon-RX-Vega-64-UltraWide-Performance-Versus-GTX-1080.jpg (109KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1024x576px

>>61672514
This clearly says Vega 64, not Liquid Cooled Edition. Custom and liquid cooled models will be noticeably fast.

>nvidicucks

File: 1347660234526.jpg (31KB, 383x445px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 383x445px

>>61672572
>tfw my 980 Ti is still among the best

>>61672484
If he gets the 56 yeah. 64 is ahead of the 1070.

>>61672572
>marketing slides with botched numbers
nice one

>>61672198
.. that's what i said?

>>61672747
>priced the same as the 1070
>double the power consumption
>only compares to the 1070 in amd sponsored titles
yeah great deal

>>61663664
b-but non-reference 1070s are not fair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>61672772
wtf did benchmarks leak?

>>61671208
>tfw Fury X
At least it'll still have value when I got to sell it. I'm sure I can get at least $300 for it now. Will the prices of Vega get buttfucked because of miners?

>>61664058
I was waiting for it just like I was waiting on Fury before it.
Glad I didn't wait it out until they were in stock. I hope they do manage to be competitive at the high end in the near future with infinity fabric. Otherwise Nvidia will pull an Intel and intentionally set back progress with small incremental upgrades at exorbitant cost.
Huge blow especially when VR can use all there performance it can get to enhance ppd and FoV.

1070 level performance

>>61664268
Current amd foss drivers better than nvidias blobs in multiple cases.

File: 1481426119242.jpg (136KB, 1440x2392px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1440x2392px

400w of 1070 performance

>>61664996
Source?

>>61663664
people will buy this for mining.

>>61666361
tard

File: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9SLzYvNjkzMDQyL29yaWdpbmFsLzAxLVNvbGlkd29ya3MtU2NvcmUucG5n.png (28KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 711x533px

>>61671283

File: siggraph_vega_architecture-41.png (180KB, 2667x1500px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 2667x1500px

>>61671298
>http://www.anandtech.com/show/11680/radeon-rx-vega-unveiled-amd-announecs-499-rx-vega-64-399-rx-vega-56-launching-in-august

>Speaking of Fiji, there’s been some question over whether the already shipping Vega FE cards had AMD’s Draw Steam Binning Rasterizer enabled, which is one of the Vega architecture’s new features. The short answer is that no, the DSBR is not enabled in Vega FE’s current drivers. Whereas we have been told to expect it with the RX Vega launch. AMD is being careful not to make too many promises here – the performance and power impact of the DSBR vary wildly with the software used – but it means that the RX Vega will have a bit more going on than the Vega FE at launch.

>>61671283
>SPECviewperf instead of SPECapc
Come the fuck on software in SPECviewperf is ANCIENT.

>>61671539
>http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2990-vega-frontier-edition-undervolt-benchmarks-improve-performance

Vega FE has no problem holding 1600mhz undervolted to 1.09v and 280 watts, and the hardware design appears to be similar enough that I don't see why the air cooled Vega 64 wouldn't be capable of the same thing.

>>61669165
>>61669997
>>61670094
>>61670110
>>61670111
>>61670910
>>61671035
>>61671107
>>61671113
>>61671148
>>61671283
>>61671298
>>61671545
>>61671554
>>61673445
>>61673598
>>61674200
Kill yourself.

>>61670981
Please off yourself

>>61675282
>unironically quoting anandtech
>>>/r/pcmasterrace/

File: 1501362880452.gif (2MB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x200px

>Wanted to replace my Fury X
>Vega is a 20% increase at most

I can probably still sell it for like $300 though right?

>>61675670
>http://www.gamersnexus.net/news-pc/3004-rx-vega-64-and-vega-56-power-specs-price

>As for power tuning, we asked whether this was just tightening of the power target or if actual power performance features were enabled under the hood. Turns out, RX Vega isn’t just a matter of restricting power target, they’re actually doing something for power optimization. We couldn’t get explicit examples at this time. One thing we do know is that the voltage targets change, so voltage checks are at different frequencies than FE, and voltage should be lower. We’d expect that this will align with our findings in the undervolting testing on Vega: Frontier Edition, where power consumption can equalize while improving performance. It’s still AVFS, but just a better tuning profile than FE.

>We also asked AMD’s architects, including Mike Mantor, about whether DSBR was actually disabled in Vega: Frontier Edition or whether it was just a rumor. The architects loosely confirmed that tile-based rasterization was in fact disabled for Frontier Edition’s launch, which we think mostly aligns with statements about pushing the card out in time, and noted that DSBR will be enabled on both Vega FE and RX Vega on launch of RX Vega. We asked about expected performance or power consumption improvements, but were not given any specifics at this time. Wait for launch on that, though – we’ll get that information.

>>61671190
IBM PowerPC

>>61671208
That is exactly the same performance out of 1080 reference, except at 1080p (1080 gets 14 more FPS)

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/geforce-gtx-1080-ti-review,14.html

>>61670910
NVidia gimps intentionally. AMD gimps because their driver team is on a shoestring budget.

>>61663664
embarrassing

>>61675898
It's less about budget and more about time.

>>61675772
It's been posted. >>61666898

im running an r9 390 currently

do any of amd's cards that came out after it have a lower power draw?

>>61675696
It can be up to 35% if the 4k results are anything to go by.
>>61675908
Even though BF 1 results showed it was even with the 1080 you still say this? >>61675880

>>61671364
q3 2018

>>61676075
300w vs 180w
>>61675988
Vega 56

>>61665150
It have power consumption of a 1080ti. Are you sure nobody buys ti's too?

File: 1501472519658.gif (3MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x281px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkyhvCdJ_vM

VEGAS 1070 FIRE BURNING ON THE DANCE FLOOR!

>>61673552

Lol, I just sold my year old 480 for 350 euros, I'm sure you'll get like 450 from some crazy miner.

>>61677390
Kill yourself housefires spammer.

>>61677258
ti's actually perform well though

File: original.gif (2MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x202px

>>61677390

>>61679901
Lol TOLD