>6c/12t i7
>6c/6t i5
>both the same price as current generation, i.e 350$ and 250$
>support for older lga 1151 motherboards
>better IPC than ryzen
>all core turbo over 4.3/4.1GHz
>overclockable to at least 4.5GHz on all cores
i wanted to get ryzen and support amd. but for the same price i can get both more cores and better IPC.
i'm sorry AMD. you tried but intel already has an answer. better luck next time.
Remember when Skylake-X was supposed to be 6 cores at high clocks and completely BTFO AMD?
>>61656912
>Actually beliving this rumormill bullshit
The previous "Leak" looks almost the same in terms of layout and has much lower numbers. Obviously the guy just re-released it with higher numbers to bait more retards like you into beliving it.
>>61656912
>4.3GHz on all cores out of the box
>Poozen struggles to hit 4GHz at 1.4V+
It is quite literally over for AMD.
>>61656912
>6c/12t i7
>6c/6t i5
Nothing to see here, old Kaby user will stay with 7700k for gaming while production people already own an 8c/16t Ryzen.
Maybe intel will produce something new in the next five years.
>>61658585
Congratulations on not looking at the post literally right above your own, retarded shitstain.
>>61658641
>(((production people)))