IT'S NOT FAIR AMDBRO'S, 2017 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE OUR YEAR!

>>61651426
Well Ryzen exists and it's raping intel. But what a suprise the poo in loo pajeets failed.

>>61651458
Raja's literally the only pooloo and he has a good record. The chinks are behind literally every single fuck up since Fiji. Power hungry, under performing, CLEARLY bottlenecked. The original GCN team was slowly let go and the chinks took over and this is the result. A hot and hungry mess that has more compute than the front-end can feed.

>>61651426
1080-tier card with more power consumption...ayy

>>61651507
I mean including Fiji

>>61651426
t. mosche

>>61651426
J-J-Just wait™

>>61651458
>and it's raping intel
(lol

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-31 13-48-25.png (57KB, 722x516px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 722x516px

>>61651426
It was, for me. I switched from intel-nvidia build to this one. Day to day tasks have never been smoother.

>>61652423
>Redundant exit and maximize buttons
Absolutely fucking disgusting.

File: the darkness within.png (187KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 568x612px

>>61651426
I wonder who's behind this post.

>>61651511
but 200 shekels cheaper

it still sucks tho, we were expecting a ryzen-tier rape

>>61651507
It's power hungry and "under performing" because it uses a hardware scheduler. You remember, like GTX 480 back in the day? That had a hardware scheduler just like AMD cards do now.

Nvidia gets good power efficiency because they use software scheduling on their cards now. I bet you were one of those people laughing over nvidia sucking in "asynchronous compute", even though here you are complaining that the thing that makes AMD good at it is making their cards eat power like a fat kid eats icecream.

File: 1498692555928.jpg (112KB, 691x771px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 691x771px

>>61651426
you're not even using the right meme image for the text you posted.

stupid kike shill fuck off

File: GeForce_GTX_1080_SM_Diagram_FINAL.png (82KB, 698x1220px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 698x1220px

>>61652988

That's not really the case. Nvidia doesn't use hardware scheduling because it's architecture doesn't benefit from that as much as AMD's. That doesn't mean it eschews it altogether.

Instead, they do more in software and let the hardware/driver portion drive lower level features that would make scheduling better such as preemption at the instruction level and having dynamic scheduling queues.

Reread the Anandtech review on the 1080.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/10325/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-and-1070-founders-edition-review/4

>July 20, 2016

AMD really dropped the ball...

>>61652988
the last nvidia card with a hardware sc was the 7xx
and volta (the true volta not that rebranded shit they launched) is rumored to have some 300w of usage because of the hardware sc
the current design of gcn is good on everything but games

File: 20507805_10156492089929942_4376078918530712443_o.jpg (172KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 2048x1536px

well at least ssg destroyed nvidia so thats something

>>61651629
Moshe*

Just wait until next year bro

File: what the.jpg (180KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 2048x1536px

>>61653836
Also that.

>>61652524
Where do you half-wits get this idea. The msrp is an identical $499 before the $50 aib mark up, and no the 56 cu won't match the 1080 it will sit 15% over the 580. You won't even get one anyway before miners buy them all.

>>61655317
You cant mine with the type fo memory in Vega cards (HBM).

>>61655317
>it will sit 15% over the 580
wut?

I don't think anyone really expected AMD to BTFO both of it's competitors, both of whom are larger than they are, in the same year. Vega is still fairly competitive even if it runs too damn hot.

Of course the mods don't care about this shithole board anymore because they're now leaving all-caps crying wojak shitposts up on the front page.

>>61653836
Are they patented ssd on gpu? Can nvidia just make their own ssg?

>>61655317
More like 15% slower than the 64 cu.

File: 69d.jpg (8KB, 200x258px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x258px

>>61655317
>architecture improvements that might or might not improve performance
>55% more shaders than RX 580
>10% more clock

>it will sit 15% over the 580

>>61656841

No one wants a 300w graphics card that runs at the same speed as their competitors which goes at half that wattage.

>>61657188
>runs at the same speed
We'll have to see what the final benchmarks look like as it's obvious the drivers used for testing with Vega FE were incomplete.
>which goes at half that wattage.
It's 60% higher wattage, not half. If it was half the 1080 would run at ~150 watts. That's what the 1070 runs at.

>>61651426
Wait for Drivers(TM)

Vega is memory bandwidth bottlenecked in games and DSBR, which isn't turned on yet in Vega drivers, should exactly alleviate that bottleneck.

Until we know how well they've implemented DSBR we won't know how Vega's going to really do in games.

This entire thread should've been 404'd hours ago. Mods are asleep post sinks.

>>61652524
>it still sucks tho, we were expecting a ryzen-tier rape
Who the fuck was expecting that
How much of a fucking fanboy can you be