>AI
When will this fucking meme end? ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DOES NOT EXIST YET AND HAS VERY STRICT CRITERIA TO BE CALLED TRUE AI.
>>61635906
but i heard that zuckerberg personally programmed a hard AI to run his house
How do you prove to others that you have self awareness, self determination, feelings, consciousness, a soul/spirit?
Many of these things may not even be required to qualify as 'AI'.
All that AI may require is the ability to perform it's actions to the best of its abilities within the boundaries we set.
>>61636368
>All that AI may require is the ability to perform it's actions to the best of its abilities within the boundaries we set
That's not AI then fucktard
It'll end when people start calling it statistics again. This bullshit meme marketing needs to stop.
>>61635906
What if computers have been semi-intelligent all along? Where does the ability to process information become intelligence?
>>61636394
Is it intelligent to fool the average person into thinking it is human? Does it perform it's job adequately?
That may all that be required to be an artifiical intelligence but may not qualify as truly 'sentient'
Would they then have rights?
Do we really want free thinking robots?
>ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DOES NOT EXIST YET
No shit, dumbfuck. We're building the backbone of AI right now. Every time you fill out a captcha, it gets a little closer to a final product.
Put is another way.
Someone knocks a cup off a table. The robot has the ability to save the cup from hitting the ground and breaking. Does it decide 'Fuck it. It's not my problem' and let it break or does it decide to catch it because it may please the master of the house? Or does it just catch it because that is the best outcome programmed into its 'brain? The last one does the job of the second without having to worry about mental gymnastics like free thought.
Of course the big worry is will AI sacrifice one person for another. How do you decide whether to hit that person crossing the street because the brakes will not stop the vehicle in time or swerve into a lamp post, possibly injuring the passenger?Also who is liable for insurance purposes?
AI means intelligence in a human way.
Computers are essentially equivalent to a library of books in earlier times.
Just because you come up with a much more complicated version of the Dewey decimal system to retrieve data from this library (which is what AI ultimately is) doesn't mean this library you have suddenly becomes capable of becoming an agent in a human sense.
No matter how many books your library has, no matter how complex your Dewey decimal code is, the library does not have an emergent consciousness or emergent agency.
>>61636758
You're in a board full of brainlets who believe the news Edina when they talk about "AI". Save your good posts for /sci/
>>61636808
News media*
>>61635906
I agree, its just pseudoscience. Just like "neural networks" even though they have nothing in common with actual neurons.
Every AI algorithm I've heard of until now is nothing more than a regular program.
It reminds me of those Japanese robots programmed to hug people and how they were presented as displaying emotions. As if a machine performing a coded mechanical action has anything in common with the human psychology behind such gestures.
Only imbeciles think AI is anything more than a regular program.
>>61636808
>Save your good posts for /sci/
>/sci/
>good
>>61635906
You don't need actual real AI to have the problems.
Just have a smart enough neural network that can cheat their jobs well enough and you have an robopocalypse in name of collecting user data.