>Overclocked Ryzen 3 1300X ($129) beats i7-7700K ($339) in

>>61604711
RIP in pieces

it's not even 8 threads right right?

That's a cherry picked as fuck benchmark, but the reality still is that an overclocked R3 1300X is a great CPU.

>Stock 7700K

>>61604711
How the fuck.

>>61604711
oy vey, this is very disturbing.. we'll have to up our rebates

>>61604711
Intel pajeets btfo

>>61604773
1 Ryzen core vs 1 Intel thread, maybe?

>>61604779
Mother of all programs!

File: 1493967449274.jpg (510KB, 1315x794px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1315x794px

>>61604757

>>61604801
ahahah

>>61604773
How the fuck indeed. It's even faster that Ryzen 5.

>>61604871

new stepping ;))))))))))))))

File: 1501013225673.jpg (12KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x168px

>>61604711
noooo!! this can't be happening

The question is can I mine monero with it?

File: 24174407648l[1].jpg (231KB, 752x752px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 752x752px

>>61604711
No 7700K in this one. But look at the productivity score.
It does seem high for the overclocked 1300

>>61604961
Yeah and make $3 a month.

>>61604744
Sure it is. Look at the OC3D review. It's a subtest of the PCMark10 benchmark.
But it's somethign to try to understand about what goes on with these chips!
And that's the great part about this. Gallons and coffee and review upon review!

File: Capture.png (166KB, 942x480px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 942x480px

+24% performance
+140% cost

what are you some kinda a poorniggerfaggot?

File: 1497636697284.jpg (68KB, 750x655px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 750x655px

>>61604983
>>61604711
Enjoy the OC housefire

>>61605058
These userbenchmark and cpuboss sites are shit though. I'd have to read up on my specific kinds of software.
Would I pay twice the price to render 25% faster in Premiere? Probably.

>>61605081
Not mayo TIM though. The guy who made OP's graph said he cooled the overclocked chip with the stock cooler, without seeing alarming temps.

>>61605058
Using cpuboss in 2k17...
>nomie

>>61605081
>amd
>housefire
>not intel
I hope you realize how retarded you look right not

>>61604711
Literally doesn't make a difference. People who buy those $100-$300 CPUS only care about video games or budget. Why to fuck even the 4c Ryzen can't oc beyond 4Ghz is a mistery to me.

>>61605148
Node limitation.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-cpu,5149.html

Intel BTFO

What was the power consumption though?
I don't care much for performance, I'm interested about performance per energy consumed.

>>61605196
Fuck all according to gamers nexus.

>>61605081
Sick graph mate

File: xd.jpg (24KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 499x499px

>bought 7700k
>underclocked
>undervolted
>turned off hyperthreading

pretty comfy here

>>61605081
What does the red graph represent?
Sorta want

>>61605276
Doesn't that just turn it into a 2500K?

>>61604711
Hardware Unboxed is hellbent on shilling Ryzen by making cherrypicked graphs

He literally OCs 1200 and 1300s and compare them to stock Intels

>>61605444
i3-7350K shouldn't even be on the list as it's in a completely different price bracket at $160 w/o a stock cooler and requires Z270 mobo to OC.

File: rypoo gaming.jpg (591KB, 1702x1349px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 1702x1349px

>>61604711
Too bad it's utter trash for gaming

>>61605481
/g/ - Gayming

>>61605444
This fuck that fanboy

>>61605481
Too bad you already tried this song and dance in that other shit thread and got your stupid ass handed to you there, too.

>>61605494
You're right, most people will ofcourse buy that cpu for running passmark all day

>>61605499
>I ignored the facts and tried to get the 7350k out of the equation
>this way the 1300x seems less bad

Doesn't change reality that this thing is horrible for gaming.

Look at it, it's literally below a 930 in 3 of the benchmarks

>>61605494

that's the point though

if Ryzen sucks at gaming, then why doesn't it come with an iGPU so you don't have to buy a dedicated GPU?

AMD are retards

>>61605444
Is this trolling? You can't OC locked Intel cpus, it's not AMD's problem.

File: 1443859768881.jpg (156KB, 474x595px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 474x595px

>>61605524
>you can't oc a 7350k

>>61605512
Along with bentium, i3 and, golly, an i5

>>61605529
7350k+z chipset+aftermarket cooler puts it against 1400, not 1300 or 1200.

>>61605512
i7-930 is a 4 core 8 thread CPU that cost $300 when it came out, so your comparison is pretty retarded.

>>61605530
What an amazing gaming cpu

>>61605524
>you can't OC a 7700k
>you can't OC a 7350k
>you can OC a k Intel CPU

>>61605543
It's not retarded when a 2 core 4 thread cpu from Intel (the 7350k) is miles above it but the 4 core 4 thread cpu from AMD is below it.

Try again

>>61604711
How the fuck does it beat the r5's

File: 24174455730l[1].jpg (246KB, 752x1002px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 752x1002px

Here's one with four games in one graph

>>61605542
They don't seem to want to understand this fact.

>>61605548
You can, it just so happens to be a R3 review, so its contenders are unoverclockable 7100 and 7300

>>61605542
Not if you factor in more expensive memory kits you are obligated to use with Ryzen

And even then, considering how big the gap is, that looks like 20$ well spend

>>61605481
>tfw my 4770k is literally the same as a 1700X

Welp

I guess I'm waiting for Cannon Lake or Ice Lake

>>61605564

>muh gaymes

Back to your containment board /v/ermin

>>61605563
They don't seem to be overclocked. But feel free to call the developer and ask how PCMark 10 is put together.

>>61605543
>in 2010

>>61605583
You are not obliged to use expensive memory with r3

File: 1489432398837.jpg (353KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1000x1000px

>>61605588
Funny thing is. I have never been to /v/ once.
Not a single time.

>>61605610
You are, if you want good results because of infinity fabric it is heavily dependent on the use of fast ram

File: merchant.jpg (79KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 501x585px

>>61605481
Steve look like a jew, is he ?

I play games in 4k.
Getting tired of my bulldozer are the r3 okay for 4k gayming?

>>61605620
>dat glorious mane
Yeah...no

>>61605542
>z-chipset
Entry level Z270 boards are like 10$ than B350 4+1 VRM housefires
>aftermarket cooler
Just as with Ryzen, you're not getting that 4.0 at 1.35V on the stock cooler. Unless you enjoy fires of course.

>>61605619
Any DDR4 will do just fine. IF scales with ram speed, but so are intel processors apparently.

>>61605588
>>61605562
Samefag. Angry the OC3D graph destroyed his cherry picked points.

>>61605638
Cheapest b350 is 65-70, cheapest z270 is 100-105, that's not a $10 difference.
Hardware unboxed managed that overclock on a stock cooler with acceptable temps. 3.8-3.9 is definitely achievable with stock cooler.

>>61605638
>you're not getting that 4.0 on the stock cooler
Tell that to hardware unboxed, who did exactly that. Said temps were fine.

>>61605667
>Cheapest b350 is 65-70
And the VRM temps are 110+

>>61605639
Again, the differences between ram speed are much greater with Ryzen then they are with Intel due to the use of infinity fabric scaling with memory speed

>>61605685
You're thinking of X299

>>61605685
On a 1800x maybe. Any VRM will easily get you to 4.0 on a ryzen 3, it consumes 40w tops. You seem to have no idea of what are you talking about, so please stop.

File: 1448705572008.jpg (73KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x333px

>>61605663
>destroyed
>it's still well below the 7350k oc

lol

>>61605564
>Gears of war 4 CPU render
>CPU render
You realize if they had omitted that this graph would prove the R3 1200 is only 9 FPS below an I9 7900X OC in an average over 3 games? Intel can only pull ahead when you go full retard and ignore the GPU. That's pretty embarrassing.

>>61605686
We gotta give Intel this.
Intel stops seeing major gains from RAM speed before 3200MHZ
Ryzen seem to level around 3600

File: housefire.webm (777KB, 1198x712px) Image search: [Google]

777KB, 1198x712px

>>61605081
Sure

>>61605633
>4K gayming
Your bottleneck is likely the GPU, but get an R5 so you can alleviate CPU bottlenecks, too.

>>61605686
Actually no, ram scaling is somewhat on par with kaby lake platform. IF only affects core latencies between CCXs, they are not as important for Ryzen 3. Anyway, 2666 is attainable on any ddr4 ram with the latest BIOS.

>>61605705
>source my ass

>>61605701
Your argument was not that the i3 was better.
To my knowledge it's more expensive.
You argument was these R3 chips are shit for gaming. Looks just fine to me for a budget part.

>>61605730
>actualy no
Actualy yes

Ryzen 3 consists of two ccx's with both 2 cores disabled you fucking idiot

>>61605744
It is, and?

>>61605739
It's not fine when it's worse than the competition which is roughly in the same price bracket.

Ryzen cpu's don't exist in a vacuum you know

>>61605750
His point is that then the IF still comes into play

File: Untitled-1.png (114KB, 1457x825px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1457x825px

i3-7350K build is $85 more expensive and that's with several mail-in rebates. They aren't in the same price bracket ..

>>61605750
And so it matters

File: 1491835275725.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>61604711
I CAN'T TAKE THIS ANYMORE

>>61605759
Again, you have to understand what IF is for to properly assess its importance. Demand for memory bandwidth is lesser when the cpu has only 4 threads.

>>61605762
>not picking a cooler for the ryzen cpu
>expecting a 4 ghz overclock
lol

>>61605756
>roughly
For the modern penny pincher it looks like a good purchase

>>61605768
In theory, somewhat. Do you have benchmarks to back up your assertion of R3 scaling better with ram speeds than i3s?

>>61605781
Well you can count it out for the use in most htcp's since it doesn't have an igp

>>61605779
Once again. Both OC3D and Hardware Unboxed suggest that that's entirely fine.

>>61605468
well, to be honest the Ryzen also needs a B350/X370 motherboard to overclock, and not the entry-level A320 boards.

>>61605196
idle 44W like the other Ryzens (more than intel), on torture loop some 97-105W.

Another test in German (but the numbers are numbers):

https://www.computerbase.de/2017-07/amd-ryzen-3-1300x-1200-test/

>>61605779
Stock cooler is decent enough
Besides you could pick up a 212 Evo and Ryzen would still be $50 cheaper

File: Untitled-2.png (111KB, 1457x825px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1457x825px

>>61605779
That still would not close the price gap, and you can get to 3.8 GHz easily anyway.

Here's an even more compelling reason not to bother with the i3-7350K, though.

>>61605795
That's a completely different talk than this gayman shit.
But I fully agree with that. Raven Ridge is gonna make these parts less desirable.

>>61605792
Do you have benchmarks that it to back up your assertion that it doesn't matter for R'3'?

No

Is it reasonable to expect it matters since the r5's and r7's are very sensitive for ram frequency and the r3 is based on the same architecture?

Yes

>>61605620
you mean the guy from hardware unboxed? yeah he looks jewey

>>61605809
>that still would not close the gap

Fuck you're right, that 15 bucks is definately not worth all these extra fps

>>61605481

>>61605809
>6c 12t Ryzen cheaper than 2c 4t Intel
SIR PLEASE DELET

>>61605834
I can't believe Intel shills are so desperate they've resorted to defending a botched attempt at an unlocked dual core that Intel had to drop prices on just to get people to stop laughing at it. And it's still a joke.

>>61605822
They are certainly not "very" sensitive for RAM speeds, not overly more so than Intel. You are just grasping for straws to somehow justify the existence of lesser kaby lakes.

>>61605839
Fast cores > many cores

File: 1492855909643.png (944KB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1228x1502px

>>61604801
>>61604952
>>61604983
>>61605720
FUCK AMD
FUCK LISA SU
FUCK JIM KELLER
FUCK RYZEN
FUCK INFINITY FABRIC

>>61605849
>not overly more so than Intel
Fuck this shit I'm out of here

This much denial of reality is too much to handle. How do you people even take yourself seriously.

>>61605853
1600X is consistently faster in pretty much anything

File: 1500514601432.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>61605481
>>61605515
>>61605512
>>61605444
>>61605562
>>61605701
>>61605529
>>61605583
>>61605638
>>61605685
>>61605779
>>61605822
>>61605834
>>61605853

>m-muh maximum fps
>muh more expensive ram
>muh clock speeds
>muh stock cooler only does 3.9 instead of 4.0
>m-uh iGPU

Right from a certain point of the thread, it suddenly floods in.

Intel's damage control team has arrived

>>61604711
>>61604983
Probably just reveals how rigged as fuck, buggy, and unrepresentative trash these synthetic benchmarks are and that no respectable hardware reviewer should use them.

Cinebench is fine, since it's a benchmark made from an actual bit of productivity software.
Like if Epic or Crytek had a benchmark based on their engine, that'd make sense compared to 3dmark which is not.

This is why you see things like CPU-Z "update" their benchmark to make Ryzen worse. It was retarded before, and still is. Just a very limited and not very transparent synthetic benchmark.
Aida64 benchmarks are okay since they're transparent, though. Yet for some reason no one uses them.

>>61605862
Please, control your temper tantrum. We all know IF scales with ram speeds, however it does not yield it much benefit compared with intel, especially once we're past 2667, which is attainable on a cheapest ram.

>>61605720
Holy shit. What the fuck is wrong with Intel?

>>61605878
What about stuff like winrar, handbrake and blender.
They're not even real synthetics.

File: 137493504156.jpg (105KB, 460x538px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 460x538px

>>61605481
>video goyims

Recap:
The only intel CPUs that matter right now are the ultra low end Celerons and Pentiums for low budget machines and 7700K for gaymen.
In any other case just get a Ryzen.

>>61605939
7700K stutters in some demanding games with nothing running in the background.

File: Mysterious Merchant.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>61605950
SHHHHHHHHHHHH. Delet pls.

>>61605333
More like a 4670

>>61605444
You can get a Ryzen 4 or 6 core to 4GHz on a $60 B350 motherboard 95% of the time.
You need a $100+ 280mm AIO and a $115+ Z270 board to get a 7700k much above stock. Not a fucking comparison.

>>61605481
You know at 5GHz the 7250k uses like 170watts, right? That's much more than an 1800X uses with 4x the cores.
Shows what shills Gamer's Nexus are, using benchmarks with a $80+ cooler compared to the stock cooler of the 1300X but only comparing the CPU cost itself for their conclusions.

>>61605542
Puts it against the 1600, more like. You aren't getting a 7350K to 5GHz with a 212 Evo.

>>61605779
Idiot.

>>61605801
I got my AB350M Pro4 board for $47.

>>61605939
>7700K for gaymen
only for low resolutions and high refresh rates
also see >>61605950

Look how the game constantly dips below 60 because 7700k can't handle it at 100% load, leaving 1070 underutilized
https://youtu.be/RaM3UU6uFfY?t=139

File: 655eb12c2b7361a3fc222aed47ce4546.png (259KB, 799x471px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 799x471px

>>61605939
As if the R3 1200 weren't enough, G4560 is hilariously also being threatened .. by a $100 bulldozer APU. You can't even make this shit up anymore.

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-A12-9800-RADEON-R7-12-COMPUTE-CORES-4C-8G-vs-Intel-Pentium-G4560/m178624vs3892

The iGPU on the A12-9800 is 200% faster than the iGPU on the G4560.

File: 1489160516428.png (245KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 800x612px

>>61605876
Intelcucks are desperate as fuck, anon

>Multi-core doesn't matter!
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
>Power usage doesn't matter!
>Temperatures don't matter!
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>Stutters don't matter!
>Streaming doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Locked platform features don't matter!
>*NEW* Synthetic loads don't matter!
>*NEW* Burnt pins don't matter!

>>61605939
>Celerons
nope
>Pentiums
1200 replaced it
>7700k
only for high fps but with mild stutters

>>61605481
>literally 10% to 20% difference
>for 200% the price

These Intel shills are really gettin' BTFO.

>>61606459
Celeron are actually decent value for being $40. They're based in modern, relatively not gimped core architectures since Sandy Bridge.

Sadly their history preceeds them and they earned a very bad reputation.

File: [HorribleSubs] Gabriel DropOut - 01 [720p].mkv_snapshot_21.34_[2017.01.14_02.07.10].jpg (70KB, 620x616px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 620x616px

>>61606227
>the fucking Excavator derived Bristol Ridge also coming to give Intel a kick before the monster that is Raven Ridge arrives

ryzen are great all rounders, no contest.
Now if only amd would remove the poo from the loo and got their shit together in the gpu side of things

Thinking of getting a pc soon and not sure between AMD or Intel. Surely games are much better optimized for Intel CPUs paired with Nvidia GPUs, Ryzen does look so good but as my primary activity at the moment is gaming, i only see the positives from intel and not AMD simply because games don't support it as well as they do Intel CPUs.

I'm open for discussion and help for my future purchase

>>61606697
Polaris is decent
Vega is shaping up to be shit though

File: 1501247423929.png (138KB, 658x426px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 658x426px

/g/ - Pajeet designated board

>>61605853
>every ryzen x chip is fast
>even stock 1600 can go fast
many fast cores ftw

File: Intel_Shills.png (32KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x600px

>>61606717
fake

>>61606764
Dolphin emulator doesn't use more than 2 threads. That reviewer recommended R3 btw.

>>61606227
Yes but the per-core performance is about 45% lower, even if it has twice the cores single core matters at that speed.

I'd recommend the A12-9800 though just because B350 > Intel platforms

File: 2.jpg (703KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 2048x1536px

>>61606717
>muh nintoddler games

maybe i'm an idiot but shouldn't reviews be based on:

1. what will the PC be used for - use scenario
2. what total $ are to be expensed - $ budget for said scenario

ex: i want to play (insert game/s here) and i have $800 for it; what is the best system that money can buy

>>61604779
MCPs away!!

File: 1498692555928.jpg (112KB, 691x771px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 691x771px

>>61604711

Was there any report on stutter with the 4/4 Ryzen parts or is that an Intel issue specifically?

>>61606978
>common sense and fairness
>paid benchmarks
Choose one.

>>61605481
beats 7300 which is its main competitor

ITS TRASH

>>61606978
Reviewers started these synthetic benchmark memes that nobody will ever use in the real world, 4-5 years ago it was just old and current gaming titles.

Since Ryzen's release the /g/ AMD marketing team started trumpeting the 'quad-core can't multi-task' meme and '/g/ uses Cinebench and Handbrake' meme when in reality 99% of us just play videogames.

File: s-bc08b2da9de7a779970687a7d0e31a6cd5947e8c.jpg (39KB, 500x666px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x666px

>>61605512
oi what a complete suprise a shill compares a 180 msrp cpu with a 120 msrp cpu i wonder where i saw this before....

oh yeah remember when amd launched 1800x saying it was a competitor of 6900k and the shills constantly tried to compare it with 7700k?
yeah..

>>61607299
>99% of us just play videogames
Sure thing dumb summer fag

>>61607317
Oh what a complete surpirse AMD can't beat a 2010 cpu with a quad core yet Intel beats it with a dual core 4 thread cpu (7350k)

Try again

>>61607317
Who's this server lemon

It also beats the R5s. And it would probably have beat the R7s.
Something is screwy with their numbers.

>>61606776
Probably because if you have 4 cores it's harder for bloat to stutter your vidya.

>>61607332
7350k released q1 of 2017
shills time travel back to 2010 and launched it then

/g/ is advancing faster than nasa these days

>>61607355
/g/ has unlimited neetbux, NASA has a pretty small budget.

>>61606227
Amada a CUTE

>>61605720
That Lack of Heat Transfer from Cpu to Waterloop.
That Cheap Thermal paste is fucking Amazing Deliding isn't a option anymore holy fuck.

File: Capture.png (150KB, 1145x478px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1145x478px

I was going to go Ryzen, but this was too good to pass up.

>>61604711
kms for fucking buying a i5 7600k wtf was I thinking

>>61607906
WHERE IS THIS

>>61604711
please be deleting this sir

>>61604983
r3 is 2+2 or 4+0?

>>61607942
2+2, best way to harvest die while maintain performance consistency across sku

>>61605801
>Leistungsaufnahme

that's a mouthful

>>61605481
look at the price difference Intel Marketing Employee, you should talk to your bosses about lowering I7 prices.

>>61607922
He has their shill discount, you can't get it for>>61607926
the same price.

File: sauce.png (461KB, 648x720px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 648x720px

>>61607334

>>61607975
>yfw it's 2 of the furthest cores
or they only pick the nearest one?

>>61608053
They probably pick whatever cores are working in a particular die.

I can't wait for raven ridge to destroy intel in the laptop segment.

Will AMD make dual core cpus for laptops?

>>61605734
not him, but source is on the graph
are you retard?

>>61605276
why would you do it??

>>61608135
>dual core cpus for laptops
for what purpose? Ryzen 3 is quad core and it already uses like no power at all. It could go even lower with better binning and lower clocks.

>>61608135
>low tier laptops marketed for normies
>small numbers

why, that would be retarded.

>>61608197
Wont Raven Ridge be a single CCX + GPU?

>>61608430
Single CCX is still a quad core.

>>61608526
They'll just throw the defective parts out??!?

>>61606942
>Supposedly an addult
>Laughs and mocks people who likes certain games

Why are you even alive?

>>61608567
If they can't use them in R5 or R3 they'll melt them and reuse the silicon.

>>61605276
MADMAN

>>61605276
for what purpose

>>61608581
Anon theres no such thing as adults, Just grown up Children

File: 1482574053190.jpg (7KB, 267x323px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 267x323px

>>61604711
>overclocks by 0,5GHz
>barely beats the i7
Well, at least you tried

>>61608661
It shouldn't even be coming close to it, retard.

>>61608738
It's not tho, AMD only scores on synthetic benchs
>>61605481

File: Untitled.png (113KB, 655x466px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 655x466px

>>61608661

>>61608771
Stay mad, dumb jewpoo

https://youtu.be/U6Mwc5hhPEE?t=723

>>61608775
>Not wanting to spend $200 more for less performance
Are (You) some kind of poorfag?

File: 1401475560734.gif (2MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x500px

>>61608775
Are you poor? Can't afford a high end, functional CPU?

>>61608775
POOTEL STUTTERFIRES BTFO

>>61608802
Nice video nigger, but you forgot we are talking about Ryzen 3 and i7s

>>61608775
BTFO HOW CAN INTEL JEWS EVEN RECOVAR???

File: 11157-ryzen-5-pib-left-facing-1260x709.png (263KB, 1260x709px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1260x709px

Is it possible to unlock locked Ryzen 5 cores and make it Ryzen 7?

>>61608849
i7 is shitty and obsolete tho, nobody buys intel anymore

>>61608802
>quadcore with dualcore performance
wtf I love amd now

File: yardsale.jpg (580KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 1280x1280px

>>61605587
Cannonlake is going to be mobile only and by all indications Icelake will have no performance improvements. muh dedicated voice recognition and muh dedicated vr

>>61608867
Because it's the Year Of Linux Desktop, everybody's busy compiling gentoo with

>>61608882
>1200
>what is binning

>>61606978
R5 1600 with a cheap ASUS or ASRock B350 board (probably mATX) and... well you're going to have trouble getting a GPU for a reasonable price.

In March/April you could get RX470s for like $95-$125. Now RX570s are $250 cause of miners.

>>61609227
When the fuck was an RX470 ever that cheap?

>>61609631
Presumably on sale. RX470 was the $150 price point card, wasn't it?

File: 1496144069161.jpg (273KB, 1032x774px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1032x774px

>>61604711
SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP

Desktop raven ridge won't come sooner than Q1 2018, right? Need build something barebones in near months for soho use and really don't wan't to invest in 1151.
Why did they even bother to release bristol ridge to retail?

>>61608863
No
They are physically destroyed, the days of re-activating cores are over

>>6160527
Only you can prevent house fires

File: Mommy.jpg (28KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 480x270px

>>61604711
SHE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

File: 1409077692981.jpg (15KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 250x250px

>>61604711
Buy pls goy

File: 125839407220091116intel.jpg (30KB, 380x255px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 380x255px

>>61604711
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

File: 48bf30695041b83432ae02f9225e5ddb.jpg (45KB, 590x475px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 590x475px

>>61604711
REPORTING FROM OUTSIDE INTEL HQ

it's a madhoud go- I mean guys

>>61604711
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little goy? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Jewish Defense Force, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Lisa Su, and I have over 300 confirmed house fires. I am trained in shalom warfare and I’m the top TIM applicator in the entire IHS division You are nothing to me but just another Anti-Semite. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across Israeland your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, goy. The house fire that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, goy. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over six million ways, and that’s just with my TDP. Not only am I extensively trained in shilling, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the Linus Media Group and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little anti-semite. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn goy. I will shit silicon all over you and you will burn in it. You’re fucking dead, goy.

>>61609684
Yeah, but it never was actually that cheap, even pre-ETH boom.

>>61609722
They released it for your exact use case. You want the later developments on this platform but also need something right now. This way, when Raven Ridge releases you can upgrade from your budget holdover CPU to the best APU on the market.

>>61609910
kek

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-28 at 11.16.31 AM.png (60KB, 360x114px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 360x114px

>>61609910
Holy shit
CAPTCHA: Jerusalem internet

>>61605058
Neck yourself, you go back to where you belong www.youtube.com

>>61609997
I'm pretty sure it will be just wasting half of the price of bristol ridge (build something now, wait for raven ridge, sell bristol ridge). It's really sad they don't have roadmap for this shit, that's all.
But still I'll think about jumping am4/bristol ridge wagon now, thanks for input.

>>61605481
TOTALLY NOT ALTERED BENCHMARKS AMIRIGHT?
WORTH THE 2000 EXTRA SHEKELS *laughs in jewish*

>>61609631
>When the fuck was an RX470 ever that cheap?

hmm... >>61609227
>In March/April
It almost says it right there.

>>61605564
>cpu render
The same kinds of idiots that record vidya games with SOFTWARE ENCODING using HYPERCAM 2.0 are the ones that make these stupid "graphs"

File: 1468688412809.jpg (225KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 3000x3000px

>>61610141
(You)

>>61605762
>no aftermarket cooler
>going to overclock till 4ghz
Enjoy your HOUSEFIRE

>>61610203
It overclocks fine with the stock heatsink,
But have a (You) anyways.

>>61606717
>benchmark
>emulate WII GAMES
Sure its efficiënt to emulate the powerpc arch

>>61610224
You sure the fucker won't thermal throth on you?

>>61610331
Nope, see:
>>61605638
>>61605667
>>61605678
>>61605808

>>61609910
Fine™ Pasta©

>>61610259
PowerPC is more efficient than x86 so it is makes sense to emulate it to test the efficiency of CPUs.

>>61611076
>PowerPC
>50% less processing power and 10% less power compunction than Intels counterpart
>more efficient than anything

even ARM is better than disaster that is PowerPC

I am completely out of the loop.

Is there a Ryzen CPU that significantly outperforms my 4690k for less than $200?

>>61611116
1600 demolishes it in any task that requires more than 4 threads.

>>61611138
Do they have roughly the same per-core performance?

>>61611161
I dunno, bench yours in cinebench single core to compare. Overclocked ryzen is roughly 162.

>>61611076
(You)
Are
Fucking
Retarded

>>61611220
What part of single core did you not understand?

>>61611176
Just got 168 on a 4690k OC'd to 4.3Ghz. Pretty close I'd say, albeit other 4690k's could OC higher.

>>61611279
Yes but 1600 has THRICE as many threads as your CPU.

>>61605481
He's right though, it does suck for gaming. I don't know why there are this many AMD shills on /g/, is everyone really that poor?

File: Human_chromosome_21_from_Gene_Gateway_-_with_label.png (112KB, 1382x705px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1382x705px

>>61611076

How fucking stupid are you? Emulation from the get-go has a massive overhead and depends on implementation

I cannot fathom how utterly idiotic you appear to be. God I hope you're just trolling because otherwise you have to be borderline retarded.

File: hope-2.jpg (28KB, 375x307px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 375x307px

will dolphin emulation get better with ryzen? I guess they mostly rely on high clockrate so possible improvement is limited

Yet it still can't compile shit without segfaulting lmao

>>61611395
Dolhpin emulator uses only 2 cores.
CEMU uses 3.

>>61611409
Rpcs3 uses 8+ threads, and I can't confirm but I believe Xenia is at least 8.

File: .png (441KB, 894x1508px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 894x1508px

>>61604711
Wow my shilltel deal is worthless now.

File: 1468158916277.png (280KB, 752x548px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 752x548px

>>61611579

>Don’t Forget!
>To get a deal, you must complete the required Learning activities. You’ll receive credit for any Learning activity you’ve already passed.

>Get Your Perks!
>If you completed the first four Score with Intel® Core™ Learning activities during week one of the competition, you’re eligible for these perks!

so you're a shilltel employee I assume

I wonder how many colleagues you have shilling here 24/7

File: .png (697KB, 1092x696px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 1092x696px

>>61611721
I actually don't like Intel, but I'm literally one of the top Intel shills. Waiting to cash out points for stuff, and resell their overpriced CPUs for monies.

>>61611812
You'd better hurry, they will become even more worthless when covfefe lake arrives.

>>61611579
>6850K for $149
where?!

>>61611873
>>>6850K for $149
>where?!

you have to work for the jew company and do their web seminars, check >>61611812
and >>61611721

>>61611860
Nah people still buy their CPUs like crazy on ebay. I think I had 3 consecutive sales of their E-series CPUs for over double what I paid for from the shill site even after fees and they were all bought and paid for within an hour of listing.
>>61611873
work wageslave retail.

>>61611812
fucking bennett

I bet that faggot is in this thread shilling away as well

>>61611812
So this is how a shill leaderbord looks like

I'm curious is there any incentive in shilling in something like 4chan? Like how is your "sales success" measured? I assume you can't extrapolate which 4chan user bought an Intel CPU based on your shilling.

>>61611940
>>61611935
It's actually not direct shilling. It's doing their retarded eLearnings and literally have their retarded factoid ingrained in your mind. Here's a demo video
https://my.mixtape.moe/oainjq.mp4

>>61612038
how low has linus fallen

wait he always was after the low hanging fruit

>>61612072
Linus doesn't have his low hanging fruits anymore, his wife had him cut them off.

>>61612112
A vasectomy doesn't require cutting them off though. Just the connection is severed.

File: intel1.jpg (237KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1920x1440px

>>61604711
It
is
over.

Intel is fucked.

>>61605543
>2010

>>61609910
Fucking brilliant

>>61612413
>powerful intel demonstration

>>61604711
>>61605481
>even i5 beating 1600 in everything
kek

>>61611721
Did anyone even shill for Bulldozer? Who the fuck even bothered to make that image?

>>61612593
r3>i7>i5>r5

File: 52df50bf19.png (430KB, 500x481px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 500x481px

>>61608811
Of course I can, which is why I went with AMD :^)

>>61612606
Yes amdtards shilled bulldozer but it's nothing compared to nu-/g/

File: lavalake.jpg (281KB, 1599x899px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1599x899px

>>61605121
It's normalfag
go back to r/rgbmr/ with your tryhard bullshit.

Also that is userbench in the pic.

>>61610079
Hit that like button and sub if you want more

>>61612369
may as well be the same thing.

>>61612713
Drink bleach

>>61605148
All Ryzen are at least 4c; Ryzen 7 is 8c.

>>61605481
get lost img_xxxx

>>61611348
Intel CPUs are hardly any better and cost significantly more. Not only that, but if you happen to do anything else BESIDES gaming, the higher core count of the Ryzen CPUs will fuck the Intel CPUs over any day.

>>61613105
>pajeet is illiterate
color me surprised

>>61613231
>being this new