"Firefox is security friendly''

cannabinoids nigger. do some research before posting shitty "concerned citizen" memes

>>61576201
>Swedish globalist shill.jpg

>>61576201
You can also ingest cannabis like it's food, which would kill you if you tried it with tobacco.

>>61576115
Literally nobody says smoking marijuanna is safe but tobacco is not safe. Smoking anything is bad. But you can consume marijuana safely so there. :P

>>61576115
All that stuff is changed by default on icecat.

>>61576575
>Literally nobody says smoking marijuanna is safe but tobacco is not safe
Globalists in Sweden, USA and Canada do
Search google for "Marijuana festival"

>>61576115
You can use Tor Browser without Tor. It's basically hardened Firefox without bloat. Just remove all default addons in Tor Browser and change "network.proxy.socks_remote_dns" to false in about:config, then restart. Don't forget to install uBlock Origin (and uMatrix)

>>61577811
do you trust the tor bundle?

>>61576115
what the firefox options in the cyb pastebin? any details on that list?

>>61576201
>ha ha dude weed
The burning of it is what causes the cancer, you dumb cunt.

The only way to consume plant-based drugs is via vaping.
ACTUAL vaping, not this faggy hipster shit e-vaping.
e-vapes burn the chemicals at temperatures that denature the molecules dangerously. More so the oils, producing aldehydes.
You can filter these chemicals that can degrade with heat, but it is costly.
It's the same reason refined coconut oil is expensive. That shit's top-tier for deep-frying though. Refined oils are the only way you should ever eat deep fried foods.

>>61576115
Sunde is so disgusting to just look at, you don't even need to know who he is to find him repulsive

>>61579567
>Leftist
>Swedish
>Don't write code since 2005
>never fought for free-speech
>believes racists should be in jail
Basically Richard Stallman

>>61579652
He's a fucking nigger, he's always on about how they were fighting for freedom of information when them and the swiss guy that financed the whole pirate bay operation were making mad money.
The fat guy that ran the whole thing along with him and anakata probably wishes he had turned their ass in. He was visibly pissed at Sunde in the documentary when they were on the run in thailand.

File: 1501094026195.gif (93KB, 636x370px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 636x370px

>>61576115
HURR DURR
>look at all these settings you can customize
>using default

File: 150103330597-ve.gif (240KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 320x320px

>>61576115
>Firefox is just as bad a Chrome
No it isn't, you alarmist fuck.
>disable all these standards to stop fingerprinting, so you can be fingerprinted by having them disabled
Plus, the blame here is from web developers and the W3C, not Mozilla for building a browser that follows the standards.
>disable safebrowsing and all the safety features because they download lists of domains to block
>install uBlock Origin and these new, trendy, addons that will enhance privacy by downloading the same lists of domains to block from the same sources
Are (you) actually retarded?

>>61579731
There is always a leftist using the pirate party to profit for themselves..
I speak from experience.
>>61579744
Default firefox is basically google chrome, actually it is no different than google chrome except for false-sense of security

>>61579744
>google safebrowsing
>safety features
>implying ublock easylist is from google
>implying the txt file isn't in your computer instead of google servers

File: firefox_2017-07-26_19-55-47.png (198KB, 1108x438px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1108x438px

>>61579910
You mean faux leftist, Neij was extremely right wing and he was Sunde's friend and cofounder of TPB. The guy that financed them by lending them the servers is also a known businessman who has been involved in many right wing initiatives.
Sunde is just a nigger who lies about basically everything for a bit of notoriety.

>>61580014
to be fair far-right in Sweden is center-left in the rest of the world ... but anyway I don't trust democrats either
Democrats = Socialists

>>61579744
You have no fucking idea what you're talking about

>>61579910
No it isn't, you alarmist fuck.
>>61579939
Google's safebrowsing is easily deactivated from the GUI configuration. No need to use about:config at all.
Other shit, like disabling Referrer altogether and Clipboard Events, actually makes it easier for websites to fingerprint the users.

>>61580111
>like disabling Referrer altogether and Clipboard Events, actually makes it easier for websites to fingerprint the users.
Citation needed

Telemetry is not enabled by default.

Safebrowsing's comparisons are done locally, the only thing it does remotely is periodically fetch a list from google. It's not really a huge problem but you can safely disable it, there's even an option in the usual options menu to do that.

Changing the behavior of referers can break certain sites which is why this is best left alone and you should use an addon to manage them on a site by site basis.

Setting plugin.scan.plid.all to false will effectively remove and disable plugins which might not be intended.

>>61580375
>Safebrowsing's comparisons are done locally
false
>>61580375
>can break certain sites
such as?

>>61580375
>Setting plugin.scan.plid.all to false will effectively remove and disable plugins which might not be intended.
Lie

>>61576115
I smoke weed every day and dont have cancer. Checkmate /pol/fags

>>61580308
Only an idiot would believe that servers don't use omitted information to fingerprint users. It would be fairly easy to know there's a user using Firefox (spoofing UA doesn't work since the lack or presence of certain HTML5 features can be used to fingerprint, too) that is making several requests to X server from this IP and has certain things disabled (canvas, beacons, etc.)
Do you guys honestly think that if a server expects to receive some information and receives nothing it just throws it's hypothetical arms in the air and stops tracking? They can effectively use both the information you're transmitting and the one you're not to track.
The only hope is for the EU to force websites to honor Do Not Track; or to use the same browser and OS that everyone is using and do exactly what everyone else is doing.

>>61580415
>>Safebrowsing's comparisons are done locally
>false
Comparisons are done locally and then a partial hash of the url is sent to google for verification purposes.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-does-phishing-and-malware-protection-work#w_what-information-is-sent-to-mozilla-or-its-partners-when-phishing-and-malware-protection-are-enabled

>>can break certain sites
>such as?
Ones that have automatic redirects like most sites with download links. I think 4chan may work unexpectedly if you fuck around with them too because it uses them to detect bots.

>>Setting plugin.scan.plid.all to false will effectively remove and disable plugins which might not be intended.
>Lie
Firefox will not find any plugins you have installed so they might as well not even be installed at all. I tried it on another profile and the only plugin left was the openh264 one that ships with firefox.

>wrote a wall of text and didn't cite one reason to why not disable (=set value to 0)
If you are so desperate change the value to 1 which will send fingerprint only for links you click

>>61580512
>redditor can't quote
>claim 4chan is affected
Also

plugin.scan.plid.all

only prevents firefox from scanning your system it doesn't prevent new plugins from being installed.

>>61576115
>just as bad
>firefox makes it easy to disable telemetry through their regular settings interface
>even asks you when you first open firefox if you'd like to send performance data to them
>meanwhile in chromiumland you literally have to fork the source code to be able to get to a somewhat safer configuration

Firefox aren't as good a privacy champion as it should be but it's miles better out of the box than Chromium, to say otherwise is literal shilling.

>>61580512
>partial hash of the url is sent to google for verification purposes.
between sending a ''''''partial hash of the url is sent to google for verification purposes'''''' and not sending anything at all which is the best alternative?

>>61576638
it's a widely accepted fact that any smoke is highly carcinogenic when ingested.
thing is weed is thought to kills the cells in your lungs, rather than leaving them damaged/mutated like tobbaco smoke does

>>61580556
>default firefox is just as bad
>he proceed to list reasons why customized firefox is better
Can't you read?
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox
>Default firefox
Default firefox

>>61579744
If we all disable them, they can't be used to fingerprint individuals. We'll all be seen as one mass.

>>61580587
If everyone did the same thing, yes. But since we all have different browsing habits, some of us may login to certain websites, and not all of us connect from the same IP address, range or even country; they can still fingerprint at some level.

>>61579230
>The burning of it is what causes the cancer
Like anyone can say with certainty what does and does not cause cancer, as if it's some well understood condition and not a highly specific and personal problem. Even if you could provide some citation your statment may as well be
>the burning might cause cancer
in the same way it's said for legitimately everything else on the planet
>drinking from plastic containers might cause cancer
>being in the sun might cause cancer
>working in a job that requires a soldering iron might cause cancer
I won't be surprised if they one day can say with confidence
>turns out it was 100% just genetics the whole time, oops
You better not misconstrue my position here and make me some weed advocate, I just hate how people throw cancer around at everything, it's like fear mongering but without a purpose or gain.

>some people migrate to Firefox because it's customizable
>these people disable telemetry
>Mozilla's data shows that almost nobody is customizing the browser
>start removing "old unused cruft"
>people who migrate get mad at Mozilla
jej

>>61580858
>claim your browser is privacy-focused
>geo location, google botnet, telemetry and dns kikery by enabled default

>>61580900
Geolocation is part of the HTML5 standard and is actually useful for mobile devices but even on mobile firefox it's not enabled by default, its click to play you have to explicitly consent to sending your location before it does anything.

Telemetry is not enabled by default.

>>61580937
>is actually useful for mobile devices
why?

File: IMG_2779.jpg (98KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1280x853px

>>61580858
We've really done it this time

>>61580812
>Like anyone can say with certainty what does and does not cause cancer

They can, specially after years of study, even more if it's tobacco, alcohol or drugs.

Firefox is still very secure, the fact that even Tor browser uses Firefox as a base and not Chrome proves just how secure and private it is.

>>61580967
It's probably more an opinion but I think it could be useful on mobile devices because they'll tend to be moving around a lot more. Geolocation can fill in location information automatically when you're traveling so you can get results that are local.

>>61581028
>Tor browser invented by NSA itself
>pedo node
>a standard of privacy

>>61581067
>so you can get results that are local.
>a good thing
If anything geolocation should be disabled and enabling it should be under tab-> preferences -> WARNING: ENABLE GEO LOCATION [x]

>>61581094
If a website wanted to they could get your general location from your IP address. Location by itself isn't very useful for tracking purposes it's only useful for that when its paired with other stuff that is unique to you like the fact that you disabled webgl, set the browser to block referers, blocked all plugins, disabled the clipboard. That will identify you uniquely

>>61581174
I don't have any respect for people like you
In fact I respect more a serial killer (because it's his nature) than degenerates Pharisees such as yourself

ITT: Google shills on suicide watch

File: 1500929865555-o.png (403KB, 620x820px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 620x820px

>>61581094
>>61581174
Geolocation is disabled by default and even when it's enabled, the browser will ask you before sending it to the website. [spoiler] Not that it matters since websites can infer location by IP anyway. [/spoiler]
Mozilla's geolocation is a service that sends periodically your location to Mozilla so they can create a more accurate map and perfect their geolocation. They do this to provide an crowd-founded, open-source alternative to Google's, Microsoft's and Apple's geolocation services (which are the most popular and have most of the marketshare.)
GNOME's Map program and KDE, for instance, use Mozilla's geolocation service to find your location. If you wanted to make a similar program you could use it. It's the less cancerous alternative.
For more information: https://location.services.mozilla.com/

>>61581028
false

>>61582420
t. Mozilla pajeet PR

File: 1497157096411.jpg (110KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 640x640px

>>61576115
>pale moon has most of these disabled by default
based furry