Let's talk for a while about SSD wear, shall we? Did you

File: 2017-07-23_17-06-55.png (23KB, 467x476px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 467x476px

I have 4 SSDs in different PCs and all of them works perfectly. This is the oldest one, bought in april'13. 3 other is 850 evo 250(D:) and 500GB(different system), and cheap adata(sf550 IIRC) in a laptop.

>>61519215
Came close to it once with a Crucial M4 from 2013, replaced it with an Intel SSD. Apparently I have 150 TB written (on NAND, host writes are a bit lower but why is there such a disparity?) even though I don't even have my page file on it. The hell's going on?

>>61519324
If a web browser like chrome uses your ssd, it will write and read the shit of it. Check your resource monitor during browsing

File: SSD-Z.png (27KB, 418x435px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 418x435px

>n/a
>n/a
>n/a
>n/a
>n/a
Nice tool you're shilling here.

I've had 2 SSDs die.

One was a first gen Kingston SSD. No trim support and only 64gb. My system bsod'd and I rebooted and kept using my PC, but after a few more crashes I realized my SSD went read-only. I paid $130 in 2010 for it and warrantied it in 2013 when it died. It got replaced with a much better but still cheap Kingston 64gb ssd. Some whore stole the 64gb SSD replacement after I fucked her.

Second one was a mushkin chronos 120gb SSD with a sandforce controller similar to the ocz vertex 3. It died after a single year and was outright failure.

Now on a crucial mx200 that seems to be doing fine

>>61519782
it's such a shitty ssd that it's not even in the database :^)

File: 1433196086201.jpg (361KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 1600x1200px

>>61519787

i have 2 kingston 64gb ssds from ages ago as my primary drives

one for win 7 one for debian

havent skipped a beat but thanks for giving me anxiety pal

it will matter less and less as we move towards affordable 50TB SSDs.

>>61519985
All 1TB and bigger SSDs are TLC.
It's only a matter of time before they make cells even less reliable, just to achieve cheaper production costs

I dunno about wear but my Mushkin Chronos died about a year after use. Just wouldn't boot one day. Then I tried it again and it worked...for a few hours, then wouldn't boot. Eventually it refused to do anything. I was a lazy ass and never RMA'd it. It wasn't much faster than a SATA 3 drive anyways.

My Samsung 850 evo is going strong a year later.

I'm not sure. My OCZ Arc 100 went full read only mode. The data was 100% accessible so I was able to move it to new SSD. According to the SMART, the disk was healthy, and it was about 1 year old, so I think it couldn't be wear issue but who knows...

>>61522270
my crucial ssd did the same thing. i'm back to using a western digital hard drive to boot from and it's not hugely slower at booting up desu.

>>61519215
You probably should worry about SSD wear given that you use a SSD with defective firmware that writes a few hundred GB a day even if you don't use it much.

>>61519215
>Should anyone be worried in 2017 about losing all data after downloading too much anime?

If you download that many chinese sex cartoons a failing ssd is the least of your problems.

Basically:

MLC NAND: ~3,000 P/E cycles
V-NAND: ~6,000 P/E cycles

256GB 960 prp m.2: ~1,500,000 GB writes
512GB 840 evo: ~1,500,000 GB writes

Normally the controllers will reduce hotspots by engaging in wear leveling, outlive the NAND, and turn your SSD read-only once all the NAND cells are worn to oblivion.

>tl;dr
You'll probably die or replace your SSD before it wears out.

>>61522315
The worst part is I can't RMA this drive... because the data is fine. I have on it my private files, work data, keepass database, apps, games, scans, medial records... I tried to explain that to OCZ, but they insisted to send the drive to them. Nope. Warranty for hdd/sdd is a scam.

>>61522479
They have to test the drive to make sure you're not shitting them. Couldn't you have backed up your stuff and formatted it?

>>61522506
Nope, full read only. I tried to DD it but with no luck. Not a single sector was overwritten.

File: ssd.png (27KB, 418x438px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 418x438px

>>61519215
I've just realised thanks to this that I plugged my shit into the wrong goddamn SATA port when I took everything apart to clean it the other day. Only running at SATA 2 speed.

>>61522544
Hah, didn't think of that. Welp, that's fucked.

>>61519215
>anime
Go to hell

>>61519787
>Some whore stole the 64gb SSD replacement after I fucked her
wut

>>61522578
Hello fellow R*dditor! I'm with you on this, I too hate all these animeposters on this board! Say, why don't we ditch all these losers and back to /r/ragecomics/ instead?

File: SSD-Z_2017-07-23_14-09-21.png (31KB, 418x431px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 418x431px

>>61519215

System

File: SSD-Z_2017-07-23_14-09-29.png (26KB, 418x431px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 418x431px

>>61519215
>>61524023

Games

File: add.png (33KB, 426x438px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 426x438px

>>61519215
>>61519782
>>61524023
>>61524034
>writelets

File: SSD-Z_2017-07-23_10-20-41.png (46KB, 824x401px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 824x401px

One of these days I'm going to join the glorious promised land of PCI solid states

>>61524177
> glorious
Not so glorious.