Are Xeons good or just a meme? I'm building a new PC that will run many processes at once and I'm thinking why not buy 2 Xeon E5 2670s ?
>>61505613
>>>>>>>>>>>>>sqt
They're for servers not home desktop usage. You can blow all your money if you want, idc..
>>61505613
Just buy some used ones, there are so many for sale
>>61505613
Xeons are essentially just desktop i7 processors with a few disabled features (like ECC, multi-socket, etc) enabled, and higher binning tier.
Are they good? Yes.
Are they a meme? Yes.
Are they expensive? Yes.
> why not buy 2 Xeon E5 2670s
Why not get an Epyc? More threads, half the price.
What do you guys think of Celeron quad-core j1900? is there any AMD equivalent for that price?
>>61505613
Why dont you just get Epyc?
Are you retarded?
>>61505672
>buying anything amd
>>61505672
>>61505613
idk about current prices but when i buil my previous system in early 2016 i got my E5 2670 for 40$ of ebay.
the only real drawbacks with going for a used xeon are the pricing and availability of used/refurbd mobos (i had to spend 200€ on a refurbd asrock x79) and the relativly poor single thread performence.
but overall still a good value if you don't need MUH 500 fps in csgo at 720p low
also concidder ryzen7 1700
I don't see the problem with a Xeon if you are not using it for server use.
I've got a Xeon in my current PC which is not a server, people saying that they are only for servers are wrong ;^)
>>61505613
If you can get used Xeons for cheap, yeah, they're pretty good. Otherwise not so much now that Epyc is out.
>>61505613
yes
>>61505647
no
>>61505663
OP obviously is
>>61505672
no they're not
>>61505769
>shilling for a company that has been fucking their consumers for 10 years
>>61506119
Piriform is fucking disgusting. Stop using it now.
>>61505613
For that price why not just get a 1800, or if you have the bucks a threadripper?
You will probrably get better performance since you will have fast ddr4 instead of ddr3 or ... 2.
>>61506212
Redpill me on piriform
>>61505729
Hикoгдa нe пepecтaнy пpoигpывaть.
>>61506234
I think I'm going for a 1700 instead. What do you think?
>>61506757
it's a much better all round system with a r7 1700 than with 2x e5 2760 (better single thread, recent IO, lower powerdraw+heat, more gaymen fps ect.) but you will miss out on some raw power
>>61505613
my cpu work well as desktop
CPU: Intel Xeon L5408 (4) @ 1.600GHz
>>61507830
Holy shit
Reeeeeeeeeeeee
>>61506600
I haven't used their stuff in 5 years because installers came bundled with like 3 layers of aggressive adware. That and ccleaner has done more harm than good for the PC landscape.
>>61505613
>intel
>good at anything
Not anymore.