>every photo bucket image ever posted on the web is now

yeah pretty funny

That's what happens when retards use shit sites.

Not as bad as when imageshack wiped all their data.

File: 1500692481070.png (484KB, 574x516px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 574x516px

>>61500143

yeah, unfortunately there were loads of retards using that site though and posting shit to forums so it's all gone and some of them are dead so it's never coming back.

Who still uses photobucket in 2017?

>>61500218
nobody, but lots of people used it in the past

>>61500218
eBay sellers. Well at least they were, out of habit, until now.

This is what will become of all the imgur links and embeds by 2025

>>61500319
If you browser 2000 forum web, will find any outside resource is dead.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-22 at 1.45.15 PM.png (385KB, 1055x565px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1055x565px

>>61500319

>tfw it already happens

>>61500218
Kill yourself, you shit brained fucktard.

>>61500177
that was a shame
shit started getting slow as fuck towards the end too.

>>61500319
>It's estimated that by 2025 there will be free unlimited cloud hosting for everyone with ads.

>keep telling people to not use photobucket
>they still use it
>photobucket starts telling people to not use photobucket
based

File: fe6aa1580a1cce3bdfb3b44aee8c22ce6fff245b_hq.gif (994KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 500x280px

>>61500319
>This is what will become of all the imgur links and embeds by 2025

>imgur still exists in 2025.
>there will be a free and open intenet in 2025.

Better check your worldline.

imageshack all over again

File: 1337515621485.png (270KB, 500x488px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 500x488px

>entire fucking forums of just this

imagine when imgur wipes all their shit

>>61500406
that happens only when someone ass imgur to delete the image or if the uploader deletes it

>what's wrong with it?

>>61502020
who?

The NSA should provide free image hosting. They are going to collect all the memes and usage anyway. Save a step

My tinypic images from 2007 still work, photocucket BTFO

Why did people even use photobucket? It's terribly slow with bloated scripts.
Since the first time I browsed an album on there, I always tried to avoid it when looking for pictures.
Somehow it became very popular.

File: ASWoYkq[1].png (146KB, 830x786px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 830x786px

>>61500049
Well that's one way of guaranteeing that your company will go bankrupt within the year.

> Wanna use this image hosting site for images on your forum post? Pay us.
> Wanna browse your image on the site without getting malware from shit ads? Pay us.
> Want us to not downscale your photo to an 800 by 600, 10% quality JPEG? Pay us.
> Want customer support for something that is supposed to "just werk"? Pay us.
> Want to be able to host as many images with us as you can for free with one of our competitors? Pay us.
> As a thank you for paying us, we offer you these unspecified "promo opportunities"

>>61505376
this, every time i accidentally land on photobucket, i go back and find another source well before it has a chance to load (not hard considering how fucking slow it is)

There are only two rules on the internet:

1. Save everything you like, because it won't be there tomorrow.
2. Anything you post is there forever and will never disappear.

>>61505578
> 2. Anything you post is there forever and will never disappear.

Unless you host it on photobucket.

>>61505610
2 is more in reference to things like posting nudes and saying racist stuff on forums, and is not meant to be taken as a cloud-backup endorsement.

File: 1495122221737.png (637KB, 640x617px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 640x617px

Real fuckin annoying when I'm trying to read up on designs on a forum from years ago about foundry propane burners

>>61505626
the harder you try to remove something, the harder it is to remove
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect