prove me wrong
why don't you prove your point first
>>61495437
>mfw smartphones have more cores on average than desktop PCs and laptops
>>61495437
Smartphone might be good for very lightweight single task that requires minimal writing effort.
Other than that your claim is false.
>>61495437
smartphones are only good for communicating and displaying information
Actually smart phones are barely competent at any tasks.
>>61495437
no
The pic is correct.
Go fuck Ur self, I'm only doing this BC I go not computer
>>61495517
says who?
>>61495517
>all those cores, still slower than single core Athlon XP.
>>61495437
"a single task", not "single tasks"
is it good at being able to display porn
it is not good at making calls, texting, browsing the internet, etc
>>61495721
"Single tasks" means it can do multiple tasks, one at a time
>>61495745
"being good at single tasks" means there is a pool of multiple tasks it excels at, but that is not the case
it is "good at a single task", porn displaying
I can listen to music and browse the internet just fine on my smarthpone, 2 tasks is multiple not single.
>connect the smartphone to a larger display
what do I win?
>>61495437
>implying background tasks aren't tasks at all
>>61495852
but they aren't
>>61495437
Both are good at both single and multiple tasks, so it's true.
>>61495805
eye-cancer
>>61495882
what are they then?
>>61495903
botnets
>>61495903
background tasks
>>61495437
your wrong proof=me
>>61495927
still a task
On my phone I am currently:
Listening to music
Downloading an app
Communicating to people on telegram
Watching a video
And running a few background processes
These tasks run simultaneously
Therefore
U r wrong
>>61495675
Please go poo in another thread, Pajeet
>>61495517
Yet those cores will never run anything.