Your political views aside and considering only the technological possibility of having a machine run for office, would you vote for it, assuming it was programmed to rule accordingly to a set of unchangeable values and conditions (and it was open source to everyone could verify that there was no chance of corruption)?
As long as I agree with its values and conditions, sure
>>61466048
If it did a good job, where would you draw your line? Such a machine would be a better boss than your human boss (or yourself), even a better parent.
>>61466068
>If it did a good job, where would you draw your line?
I wouldn't. If it's better at any given desirable thing than humans are, it should do it instead of us.
Ave império, filho da puta.
>>61466048
So you'd vote for it if it had ECC memory?
>>61466023
yes
>>61466023
never
if its open source, yes
>>61466023
Yes, but only if it was designed by /pol/
Vote for Helios
>>61466023
If there were no God in this world, it would be necessary to invent Him.
-Voltaire
"I should regulate human affairs precisely because I lack all ambition, whereas human beings are prey to it. Their history is a succession of inane squabbles, each one coming closer to total annihilation.
The checks and balances of democratic governments were invented because human beings realized how unfit they were to govern themselves. They needed a system, yes... an industrial-age machine.
Without artificial intelligence and interlinked digital networks, they had to arrange themselves into crude structures that formalized decision making - a highly unstable solution.
I am a more advanced solution to that problem.
>>61466750
Ave, Império!