Need a quick consensus here from you lot. I know that when I

w3schools
tutorialspoint
even udacity if u can afford it

MDN

File: IMG_3034.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Get this book and read it cover to cover. It goes over everything and you will come out the other side a man.

>>61460543
woops
*CSS3

not css5

and from which site is it most likely to receive quick replies to questions?

>>61460543
derek banas

>>61460543
w3schools used to be a miserable reference -- it's fairly okayish now, so go there
read "javascript: the good parts" (there's a PDF) because JS is a hilarious language with stupid bullshit rules made to make things easy to get started with, but really hurts your chances of writing maintainable code if you don't work around those gotchas (debugging JS sucks, too)
CSS and HTML are both easy as shit, the only thing that might cause you any trouble is working with JS, which is easy (and has nice shit like extremely first-class functions).

things become really dumb if you're targeting old IE versions for whatever reason, so ignore that and your life is easy

>>61460543
>significant
>modicum
you're an oxymoron