In case you contribute to the so-called "largest developer community", you should know that you're financing not only their programming site, but a whole network of sites you may not really like. Here are two examples of their obvious agenda:
https://parenting.stackexchange.com/?tab=month
https://politics.stackexchange.com/?tab=month
Go back to /pol/. 99% of stackexchange sites are great.
>two websites about politics and parenting
>"their obvious agenda"
What did he mean by this?
Fuck off, OP
It's people who use it, not website
>>61457899
See any top-voted answer on either of those sites, or even the top-voted questions.
They're basically "How to be a cuck for dummies."
>>61457928
Ok.
>>61457899
>>61457873
>"I see no problem xDDD looks like a helpful portal"
"How to handle a 2 year old's preconceived ideas about the “gender” of toys"
>>61457928
so you are saying that it´s stackoverflow's agenda even though the people upvoting the questions are the users?
that´s like
someone asked a question about how to write fizz buzz
and people voted it up to the top
and suddenly you go and say
STACKOVERFLOW HAS AN AGENDA something something FIZZ BUZZ
>>61457965
Ok.
>>61457970
Yeah, their team is totally unbiased! Totally apolitical, scientifically-minded people!
Can't wait for them to open a conservative.stackexchange.com! Maybe this summer?
>>61458010
Ok.
>>61458010
>Can't wait for them to open a conservative.stackexchange.com! Maybe this summer?
yeah i can´t wait for that too just like they totally opened liberal.stackexchange.com
if they are so biased go and show me their articles or how they ban and censor people
oh wait you won´t because your fear is baseless
>>61458024
It's "OK." or "Okay."
>>61458010
>>61457831
>i don't understand how stackexchange works
cool
>>61458042
https://politics.stackexchange.com/search?q=trump
https://parenting.stackexchange.com/search?q=gender
>>61458063
Ok.
>>61458072
retarded questions by retarded users what´s your point?
also i would guess you also reffer to those questions that are closed?
i skimmed a couple of them and none are like
>something positive about trump
closed
take this https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/16674/could-donald-trump-flee-to-russia?s=10|0.5108
for example
a clear anti trump question
and oh wonder it is closed and downvoted?
but what about my liberal agenda?
>>61458176
nice cherry picking. 1 pro-trump example for each 1000 anti-trump threads
Since you like to select your bias, try to find a single top-voted non-SJW answer for a popular thread on the parenting site
>>61457873
>Muh safe space
Fuck off to Berkeley
>>61457831
fuck off to /pol/ with your political activism
>>61457831
>2 year old already inherently understands gender roles
>This is bad to modern parents
Cancer
>>61458091
>>61458024
>>61457976
You're not funny.
>>61458210
again how are userthreads stackoverflows agenda
they offer a platform and retards use it do you want them to forbid the posting of anti trump shit?
and for fucks sake do you even understand who is voting this questions up?
>>61458295
Don't try to use logic. He won't understand. If it's not an all caps one-liner with a pepe pic it just goes in one ear and out the other.