Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
What would you do in this situation? 2017-07-19 01:43:36 Post No. 61447060
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What would you do in this situation? 2017-07-19 01:43:36 Post No. 61447060
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1129ab1d8beb70e13205c705595ace02--collection-the-supreme.jpg (36KB, 498x668px) Image search:
[Google]
36KB, 498x668px
How do you deal with someone who is brought in or steps into a project you have been working on and they end up messing up a whole project and setting everything back a month?
Lets say this person is in "senior leadership" and they were brought in as to advise but later it turns out they had no idea what they were doing and they ended up causing many, many headaches for you and your project.
>>
>>61447060
accuse him of sexual assault
get him fired
git revert back 1 month
it helps if ur a gril btw :3
>>
I listened and received "advice" to take my project in a direction by senior management and they didn't even understand what they were doing.
1. It is my fault for listening to management?
>>
>>61447261
or a convincing trap
>>
What would you do in this situation?
2017-07-19 02:45:46
Post No.61448008
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1500427539678.jpg (59KB, 655x527px) Image search:
[Google]
59KB, 655x527px
>>61447998
>trap
>>
File: 1496630628556.jpg (19KB, 480x362px) Image search:
[Google]
19KB, 480x362px
>>61447060
You realize that it's not your project, that you've become too invested in the work you're doing for someone else and are treating their changes (the company's preferred changes) as an assault on something that wasn't yours to begin with. Their presence is a vote of non-confidence in you, and the fact that they aren't able to contribute effectively is evidence that you haven't been communicating enough information to both them and your usual management.
>>
>>61448094
>(the company's preferred changes
Do you know me?
Also, it turned out the company prefeered changes is what we already agreed not to do, than a senior manager steps in and mentions why not keep it the "preferred config"
IT DOESN'T work that way
>>
>>61448094
They took the project in a whole different direction for a few weeks
They didn't listen to me and went with the "senior manager" guidance
I agreed with them and went along with it
Weeks go by and it turns out what they "provided" doesn't actually work and I wasn't aware it was an issue. The suggestions I brought up do work
How am I wrong again? I have been more than helpful with EVERY dept who can be brought in on this
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3