>PAJEETWARE dingdongs

>windows 10 built in top of windows 8
kek

>anon says it so it must be true

>>61441907
sounds legit 4 me

File: 17861753_10154270824150723_8762694714780720208_n.jpg (26KB, 636x584px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 636x584px

>>61441907
there was other guy who went into detail about office development and the retarded bureaucracy in microsoft

and some dude who answered questions before windows 7 or 8 came out

>>61441709
this pic gives me the heebie jeebies everytime.

>>61441907
It's so oddly specific, detailed, and lengthy that I'd have a hard time believing it not being true.
It sounds a LOT like a company I used to work at that pulled similar retard-level management things.

>>61441709
>what it takes to add a dropdown
So there's a .cpp file that defines the behaviour and a .xaml file that defines the look of the UI.
If you want to add a new dropdown of course you're going to just copy the piece of xaml that defines it elsewhere and simply change the entries.
Same for the callback, it's mostly the same for every dropdown just with different ids.
String resources are required for localization. The only issue is the sequential id requirement.

There is absolutely nothing wrong or unusual about this process.
If you've ever worked with Android you'll know that it works exactly the same except that it generates resource ids for you.
The green guy is just retarded.

>>61441709
>Incompetent coder copy and pastes shit
>Whinges when it doesn't work
>It doesn't work because they just copy and pasted it

>>61441709
Used to work in Office, this is mostly true.

Isn't this good from a botnet point of view? Assuming those anons are legit and the code is a huge ball of spaghetti, how can they do much surveillance?

>>61445211
Because surveillance doesnt require cleanly organized and structured code. It just requires data gathering, even if the software doing it is fucktarded.