Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
M-muh women suck at coding 2017-07-17 12:49:24 Post No. 61419110
[Report] Image search: [Google]
M-muh women suck at coding 2017-07-17 12:49:24 Post No. 61419110
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1494659874030.png (239KB, 696x720px) Image search:
[Google]
239KB, 696x720px
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/12/women-considered-better-coders-hide-gender-github
Holy shit /g/ completely and UTTERLY blown the fuck out. It's time for you losers to step aside and let meritocracy take hold
>The researchers looked at approximately 3m pull requests submitted on GitHub, and found that code written by women was approved at a higher rate (78.6%) than code written by men (74.6%).
>>
>>61419110
>meritocracy
look mom, i learned a new word from /pol/
>>
>>61419110
There are more Man interested in coding so there are probably more guys that suck at it. But womens that code are:
1- Womens that really like coding a lot.
2- Womens that have studied how to code properly.
>>
>>61419110
Too bad they're all requests to change gender pronouns.
>>
>>61419110
78.6% vs 74.6%
WHAT IS STATISTICALLY INSIGINIFICANT
fucking news ""portal""
>>
> How do they know they were "women" if their identities were hidden?
Checkmate SJWs
>>
>>61419355
Over a 3M sample it isn't
>>
>>61420072
Have they checked other git repositories for variance?
Otherwise, you and the commenter have no data what is significant
On the sidenote, what was the set of commits one and the other gender pushed?
I too can get a documentation commit accepted
Anyway, I'll just post this dilbert strip here for reference
dilbert com/strip/2017-07-11
>>
>>61420202
Shut up loser
>>
>>61420555
>See reasoning against "statistics" on insufficent data
>Get mad
>Insult poster
Oh, I'm sorry, did I hurt your gender identity?
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1