Post those boot times

Fuck off, sysd cock sucker.

Really slow over here.
OpenSUSE with KDE on this one SSD.

File: Screenshot_20170716_174624.png (5KB, 873x17px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 873x17px

>>61404865
Sorry forgot picture

>>61404227
>>61404696
Gentoo on an M.2 or something?

>>61404888
Arch on my T440S, as far as I know its just a SATA3 SSD

Startup finished in 4.637s (kernel) + 35.318s (userspace) = 39.956s

File: boot-time1.png (3MB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2880x1800px

>>61404227
How did you get kernel time so low?

>>61404227
Post pape please

File: 2017-07-16-181215_1280x800_scrot.png (18KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 1280x800px

nothin personnel kid

>>61404227
>3.4ms firmware

I wish

>>61404227
My Windows 10 machine literally takes 4.6 second from power button to desktop

File: 2017-07-16-121328_1920x1080_scrot.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61405133
Just looked for pointless shit in this list, and started hacking away non-vital stuff.

>>61405154
AHAH
faggot, time to update grandpa

File: BQ6IevO-4k-resolution-wallpaper.jpg (279KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1920x1200px

>>61405141

I never understood the fascination with boot times.
I mean fuck, I cold boot maybe once a month, otherwise I just sleep the machine.

>>61405168
>blame
>systemd cool like old *nix ganstas yo
fucking fail

>>61405194
For desktops, I agree, but I restart my laptop all the time.

>>61405168

I wish I had the knowledge to know what exactly to disable without feeling like I'm doing something terribly wrong.

4.552s wicked.service

Ths is what I get at the top of my goddamn list.

>>61405133

usually done through gimping the shit out of the kernel and putting everything not necessary for bootup in a module

you might get a bit of a performance benefit through compiling some drivers into the initramfs too but ymmv

>>61405210
For me, fucking mariadb was adding over a second to the boot time. What the fuck is an sql daemon doing that adds a second to boot time?

>>61405207
Hibernation

>>61405154
kek

File: 2017-07-16-122610_1920x1080_scrot.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61405133
Here are the flags, not sure if it will help you but here ya go

File: boot-time2.png (364KB, 1136x1785px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1136x1785px

>>61405168
Damn that's clean. Might do a fresh install to get rid of some of this garbage. How are you not overheating? Are powertop/upower/thermald not necessary?

File: 2017-07-16-123859_1920x1080_scrot.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61405436
I have upower but its disabled, I dont ever overheat and my fan is off most of the time

>using systemd

>Startup finished in 2.241s (kernel) + 968ms (userspace) = 3.209s

File: minutes.png (39KB, 605x407px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 605x407px

>boot times
Why..
Last one was like a minute I guess.

After I upgraded to 4.12 my time dropped from 45 to 22

Startup finished in 7.201s (kernel) + 14.956s (userspace) = 22.158s

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-17 06-52-59.png (34KB, 882x612px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 882x612px

>>61404227

Startup finished in 3.755s (kernel) + 9.090s (userspace) = 12.845s

Fucking dhcpcd takes 7.5 seconds to load, what the fuck.

Startup finished in 7.772s (firmware) + 1.057s (loader) + 2.462s (kernel) + 1min 1.518s (userspace) = 1min 12.811s

Startup finished in 2.999s (kernel) + 7.459s (userspace) = 10.458s

10 years old Core 2 Duo laptop with an SSD

>>61404227
is that you Luke?

`Startup finished in 3.061s (firmware) + 60ms (loader) + 1.510s (kernel) + 1.575s (userspace) = 6.207s`

I'm using systemd-logind.service for automatic login though, without it that time would be 960ms shorter

asus ux301la laptop, i7 + dual SSDs on arch with zen kernel

How to check on W7
>yes I r newfag

File: 2017-07-17-023527_943x583_scrot.png (562KB, 943x583px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 943x583px

>>61411493
I guess you should get out.
Maybe visit google.

>>61404227
Is that bumblebee status bar?

File: screenFetch-2017-07-17_01-15-14.png (1021KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 1366x768px

Nbd

>>61411609
>hurr durr i r linxu superior user my way or the high way use googl newFag

>>61412083
He's right though. No idea why would anyone think that saying "pls spoonfeed" me is a better idea than using a search engine beforehand

>>61412062
Post blame please. I'm impressed.

File: 2017-07-16-194655_776x72_scrot.png (164KB, 776x72px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 776x72px

why doesnt this work

>>61412175
And don't forget that trying to improve cold boot time, yes cold boot time not fucking hibernate hybrid boot/fast boot that is typical of windows in 8.1 and 10, is really fucking annoying on windows.

>>61406337
T. Non-linux user

>>61414185
there are linux distros that don't use the dick

File: 140521934536391k4g.jpg (5KB, 148x154px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 148x154px

>comparing boot times
what is it, 2008 all over again?
anything boots under 10-15 sec now, and it's enough

>>61414233
10 seconds is pleb

>>61414252
why should I care about another 5 secs?
literal ricers

>>61414274
5 seconds to boot? nigger really?

File: 1498848998558.png (80KB, 743x299px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 743x299px

>>61405233
It doesn't add a second to boot time, it takes a second to start. Run systemd-analyze critical-chain

The second number is how long it took to start, but the first number is how long other units had to wait for it. For example, clamd took 12 seconds to start on my computer, but it was only blocking other processes for 1.6 seconds.

File: 2017-07-17-065203_3600x1080_scrot.png (938B, 407x18px) Image search: [Google]

938B, 407x18px

feels bad man

File: kek.png (55KB, 1466x133px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1466x133px

boot device: samsung 950 Pro nvme drive

>>61414634
that's ridiculous, my 10 year old laptop does better

>>61414766
Yeah my shittop from 2005 booted to desktop in under 3 seconds lol

i have full disk encryption, so this really isnt a concern for me.

File: 1488146696904.gif (168KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 375x375px

>>61404227
>unironically using lennartware

What is that wallpaper?

Startup finished in 2.481s (kernel) + 2.092s (userspace) = 4.573s

>>61404227
Startup finished in 3.801s (kernel) + 6.687s (userspace) = 10.488s

>>61404227
>boot time
What did he mean by this?
t. Samsung 960 Evo user

File: firefox_2017-07-17_06-33-33.png (54KB, 208x178px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 208x178px

>>61404227

File: WHAT THE FUCK BOOT TIME 4.7 SECONDS AAAHHHH DESKTOP.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

posting favorite boot time

>>61415159
disgusting

>>61404227
>muh few seconds
what's the point? post your uptime, kiddies

$ uptime
07:15:11 up 12 days, 10:31, 11 users, load average: 0,50, 0,53, 0,69

Windows has started up:
Boot Duration : 31585ms

>>61415484
>muh uptime
See? I can do that as well.

>>61415504
that's pretty bad for windows
HDD?

>>61415783

950 pro

Windows loads things in the background once the desktop appears for like 25 of those seconds. The boot time from the end of POST to desktop is only like 5 seconds.

>>61415159
>not naming it archarin

>>61415854
Surely you meant bakarin.

>>61408796
How can see that?

>>61416533
To check your real boot time in windows, go to event viewer, applications services logs, then microsoft, windows, then click on diagnostics-performance
event 100 listing is boot performance

File: IMG_20170717_095438.png (1017KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 1366x768px

>>61413774
Shut down last night but here's a fresh one

>>61405131
Seek help.

>>61404345
fuck off Stallman

Since this a boot thread, can somebody explain why my Ubuntu won't get past the login screen unless I boot into Safe Mode/whatever and then hit resume boot?

>>61404227
>turning your computer off for any reason

kek

>>61406657
how is this possible?