why did nobody tell me about this I can finally use linux

what?

>>61368074
He learned that tge free piece if shit has a file system

>>61368056

Are we still memeing about thumbnails?

Please let me tell you, you actually run it at a proper resolution instead of fucking 800x600.

What about .webm thumbnails?

>>61368102
woah, hoold up there, we waited 15 years for jpg thumbnails.
I'm sure we get webm thumbnails maybe around 2030!

File: .png (2MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1200px

>>61368056
install OS X

>>61368284
Apple shill plz go

>linux

GNU/Linux or as I've recently taken to calling it GNU+Linux.

>>61368351
What if he is running, for example, Alpine OpenRC/musl/BSD/BusyBox/Linux?

>>61368362
He's running a DE on what clearly looks like X.
He's 99% running on GNU corelibs and coreutils.

>GNU+Linux.

>>61368370
>99% running
bold claim
Also won't it make more sense to call it KDE/Linux LOL

>>61368392
no

>>61368362
Something with KDE

>>61368284

Its macOS now get with the times

Multiple desktop environments already came with file managers that have thumbnail view available by default. Not to mention that where thumbnail view was not available natively, it could be installed as third party software. Stop pretending like "Linux" determines whether or not you have thumbnails in the file picker. This is /g/, you're supposed to be a little more tech literate than this.

also
>using localized software

>>61368056
Whats with the resolution?

>>61368646
Netbook or Virtual machine.

KDE has a lot of cool shit and is much more customizable than what macOS has.

However, it's way, way, WAY buggier, and performance is not that great.

>>61368284
Fuck off Daniel

>GTK still doesn't have filepicker thumbnails
>have to compile a patch yourself without instructions

>>61368700
KDE connect is the shiznit.

>>61368776
I'm going to try openSUSE because KDE Neon is getting too unstable for me. It's pissing me off to no end.