Ain't the current CPU Naming Scheme pretty bad?
Ain't it obvious that we need a standardization of naming CPUs?
Ain't INTEL naming scheme bad?
Ain't AMD shaming themselves by copying how INTEL names their CPUs?
>>61366312
You mean the architecture names?
I think shintels and aymds have had quite decent names. with the exception of kikeripper and epik
We should name then after Starcraft units
>Hydra
>Zealot
>Viking
>Baneling
I'd name them after concentration camps
>>61366312
Absolutely. We should rename the companies too while we're at it.
>SchekelSchoah KikeRipper 1488HH
It's functional, and I'm glad that Ryzen is going over to the smarter Intel scheme
>>61366534
Intel scheme is smart?
IDK, i think its idiotic to not be able to count properly
>i3, i5, i7, i9
where are the i2, i4, i6, i8?
>>61366443
kike=them circles...