Have you NN supporters looked at the actual NN laws? NN is all about CENSORSHIP!
>(a) Whoever-- (1) in interstate or foreign communications-- (A) by means of a telecommunications device knowingly-- (i) makes, creates, or solicits, and (ii) initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent, with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass another person;
...
>(C) makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who receives the communications;
...
>(2) knowingly permits any telecommunications facility under his control to be used for any activity prohibited by paragraph (1) with the intent that it be used for such activity, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Read it for yourself: https://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/1934new.pdf
Let's get something else straight: it's not just ISPs that have a dog in this fight. Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Conde Nast, all of whom censor content, are pro-Net Neutrality. The idea that Title II will somehow prevent censorship is insane - we already have censorship on the internet and Title II will do absolutely nothing to stop Google/Facebook/Twatter/Conde Nast from censoring whatever they feel like censoring. In fact, the "Net Neutrality" passed down by the FCC does exactly what people say it's supposed to prevent - censorship - and it's important to cut through the bullshit and expose what's really going on here, which is one corporate lobby (websites) astroturfing public opinion to get a different corporate lobby (ISPs) to do them a favor by not throttling their traffic.
>>61355601
Oh no it's retarded
>>61355660
libtard detected
go home tourist
>>61355601
HOLY FUCKING SHIT!
shills btfo
It's describing 4chan. Does that mean 4chan will get shut down? If so, good
>>61355601
Trump knew what he was doing, the free market is always right. You can't win with regulation, let the free market fix this.
>>61356270
show me a free market then, because as it stands, this is putting the cart before the horse.
>>61356270
>let the free market fix this
Yep. And it's being fixed now. net neutrality is the biggest political power grab ever. Dems wanted to use it to silence anti-globalism critics and conservatives.
Support it goyim!!!!!!!!
>>61355601
The political shills like you are the biggest idiots in this mess. The corporate shills at least get paid to advertise against their own interest. You? You do this shit for free and will suffer in the long run. And you get nothing out it.
>>61357776
wtf i hate net neutrality now
>>61358462
this
>>61357776
>even the cucks are less stupid than altmeme
Sadly.
>>61357776
>pic
truth
>>61355601
>protests against NN
>baits to a different bill
>posts the bill that is the reason we need NN in the first place
Just how low effort can your bait be, /pol/ack?
>>61355601
>Don't trust ISPs
>Don't trust the government
Can't they just leave something that isn't broke alone?