GG

>and yes, just over 3000

hahaha

3200+ OVERCLOCKED? YES PLEASE.

>>61353466
>3k cinebench pts without being a fire hazard
THANK YOU BASED AYYMD

>>61353466
>16 core
>4GHz
>1K
rip intel

File: 1499953102756.jpg (75KB, 682x776px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 682x776px

>>61353531

File: 1416816372032.png (11KB, 211x246px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 211x246px

>>61353466
>just over 3k
>not even breaking a sweat
what now

>vega family
confirmed 3 cards

File: TB2rgQ7xblmpuFjSZFlXXbdQXXa_!!2341477237.jpg (349KB, 1060x1047px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1060x1047px

This is the 18 core Xeon that Intel's i9 will be based on. The only way Intel could beat TR with this is if they crank up the clocks and TDP to socket melting levels.

>>61353596
It supports 32gb DIMMs for 256GB memory.
>>61353606
She also means WX Vega/Radeon Pro Vega SSG etc etc

>>61353606
>>vega family

RX, FE, Instinct, Pro, SSG.

Way more than 3 cards.

File: 1465616750550.jpg (79KB, 484x587px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 484x587px

>>61353466
>1920x 12c/24t 3.5 base 4.0 boost
>$799

>>61353615
>It supports 32gb DIMMs for 256GB memory.
Alright im sold.

How is that benchmark even relevant?

No fucking software you retards ever run will effectively use 16 cores.
It's an artificial and irrelevant benchmark.

>>61353637
t. Brian JUSTnich

>>61353637
Its not relevant up until you to perform actual work on it and you need all the processing power,example 3D rendering or video production.

>>61353637
Brian, I get it, you are losing your job, things are tough, keep it together! Be strong!

>>61353637
HEDT is not for you. Go home.

>>61353466
KIKE STATUS: RIPPED

>>61353637
good goy

>>61353637
t. doesn't have a server and is proud of it.

>>61353637
I produce pop and metal and we use anywhere from 100 to 400 tracks in a big project. I can't see audio producers buying intel anytime soon.

>>61353574
Damn that don't look good.
I mean price wise it's very good, but 7900x is almost as same as tr 12 cores. The only reason should be clock.

File: 1496876457729.jpg (186KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 900x1200px

Fuck this, where the game benchmark

>>61353610
That is what I'm thinking, once imtel increase cores it need to lower frequency then tr meet or even suprass with same ipc or better cache..
I-9 rebadged is doa

>>61353610
>The only way Intel could beat TR with this is if they crank up the clocks and TDP to socket melting levels
Isn't that what Intel has been doing for the last 2 years?
>hurr let's just copy Steamroller, look how well it has worked for AMD

File: Screenshot from 13-07-2017 15:55:34.png (23KB, 686x194px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 686x194px

>>61353780

>>61353780
And tdps aren't that good. I would probably top 200-250w if so, but it's sweet for a 16c 4 ghz

>>61353780
Literally non issue since i have 1200W PSU i got for my 480GTX.

>>61353466
2600k masterrace here
does AMD boost speed mean 4.0 on all 16 cores or is it like on intel? Also in theory would NH-D15 be enough to run 1950x @ 4.0+?

>>61353857
Asianricer is dat you?

>>61353867
1-2 cores of course

>>61353877
here is a bonus.
I have two 1200W psu.
Dont ask.

>>61353884
If it's anything like EPYC, which can hit max turbo on 12 cores, TR should be able to hit 4.0 on 4+

>>61353867
It's probably 3.6-3.7 for all core boost.
>>61353891
Why tho.

>>61353867
>>61353884
I'd gamble 4-6 cores, epyc can do 12 core turbo for it's highest frequency, all core for 2.7 GHz

>>61353884
>>61353907
>>61353909
So basically if I want 4GHz+ on ALL cores I should buy 1800x? OK

>>61353924
1800X is 3.7GHz all cores.

>>61353833

Dual Xeon TDP spec = "330W" Actual 100% load power draw = 453W
Dual EPYC TDP spec = "360W" Actual 100% load power draw = 327W

One thing is not like the other. When will Intel stop lying about their TDP?

>>61353466
pretty new to /g/
every time i've had an amd i've had problems with it, to the point where now i just use a macbook only
can anyone here convince me this processor wont crap out after 6 months? can anyone convince me that radeon graphics cards actually work these days?
does anyone actually use this shit day to day

SELL ALL INTEL STOCK ASAP

>>61353944
>every time i've had an amd i've had problems with it
Don't know why you've had such bad luck but I've been using AMD CPUs since the Thunderbird and never had any issues.

>>61353935
Thats boost, or are you saying you can't OC it a little more?

>>61353944
Who the fuck changes O.S. because of a processor?

>>61353942
>lying about their TDP?
There's no set definition of TDP, so everyone has their own version of it.


Not to say Intel's TDP has nothing to do with reality, it really doesn't and this goes back to 15W ULV mobile chips drawing 30W+

>>61353942
Intel just accidentally second Presshot.

>>61353963
Stock turbo boost, you can OC it of course.
You can do the same for threadripper, but for those extra 400MHz over the stock turbo you're looking at well over 30-40% more power used, for something close to 10% more perf

>>61353944
AMD GPUs are poo.
AMD CPUs are good again.

>>61353750
What? If you scale the 12c result down to 10c you get 2025 points. If it doesn't runs at 100C stock it will already be a slaughter.

>>61353991
>AMD GPUs are poo.
What?
The only meh one was Fiji.
Mostly due to being double Tonga and nothing else.

File: 1364687830114.jpg (89KB, 428x510px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 428x510px

>>61354006

>>61354018
That's a gay goldface.

AMD will never beat Intel, sorry boys. It will always be its retarded brother

>>61354035
t. Brian JUSTnich

>>61354035
>actually resorting to delusional shitposting
W E W
E
W

File: 1497095537464.png (355KB, 777x656px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 777x656px

>>61353637
SEETHING :^)

JIM KELLER
JEM KILLER
JEW KILLER

File: 1313618431214.jpg (13KB, 294x313px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 294x313px

>>61353466
1950X "overclocked" to a constant 4GHz on all cores

File: r3.png (686KB, 1162x662px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 1162x662px

RIP i3, RIP poorfag pentium. I'd say RIP i5's but they're pretty much dead already.

>>61353971
i just gave up having a computer. i just use the macbook they give me at work, and i've got a second hand 2015 macbook pro that i don't use that i bought off my brother for £400.

File: 1425064642713.png (25KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x800px

>>61354035

File: massive.png (938KB, 1196x605px) Image search: [Google]

938KB, 1196x605px

>>61354125
probably doable, it has the same core density as an 1800X, and a lot of IHS surface too

>>61354125
3200 on CB @4.0gz? It's possible.

File: lol.png (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

>>61354035

As a /v/tard I'm looking forward to how the Threadrippers will benchmark in games. Been looking to upgrade from an i5 and since I have no fire insurance I'm skipping i9s. If things keep going the way they seem to I'll be getting my first AMD cpu soon.

what's the r3 prices though?

>>61354133
>RIP pentium
but these ryzens will be more expensive than all of the pentiums
only overpriced i3s will be destroyed and i5s too because you can overclock the ryzens unlike cheap i5/i3s

>>61353466
Holy shit, these look great. I'm definitely going with a 1700 now and then going all in with 7nm TR whenever that releases. Pretty good shit.

>>61354214
> Threadrippers will benchmark in games
Intel cripples AMD the performance with some vodoo code.
Dont expect miracles I dont understand how AMD is not suing over it.

>>61354223
G4560 is already up to $80.

>>61354214
it will perform basically like an 1800x seeing that it's extremely rare games make use of more than 8 cores, but you can play any game and still have enough processing power left for a lot of stuff

>>61354258
>$80
fucking hell, is this because miners buy them or what?

>>61354214
It's two Ryzen 7 1800x's quite literally "glued together".
Don't expect miracles in gaymen perf.

>The 1900X 10-core will probably be $599

OH MY DICK CAN'T TAKE IT

>>61353935
>>61353924

You can get 1800x to 4GHz even with b350 chipset, just be aware of the cooling method

>>61354278
intel increased the price on it so people start buying i3s

>>61354278
Just market pressure. Everyone's buying them over the i3's.

>>61354287
there won't be a 10 core one, only those 2 shown

>>61354239
Yeah I've seen that in the past but chalked it up to AMD pootier hardware. I was but a lad back then.

>>61354260
This is mainly what I'm looking for. Too many times I'm watching Twitch or a video on my second screen while playing a game and my frames drop like a rock because my CPU is at 100% load.

>>61354294
>>61354292
>>61354278
https://www.techpowerup.com/235035/intel-pentium-g4560-cannibalizing-core-i3-sales-company-effectively-kills-it

>>61354287
There's not going to be a 10core model.
CCX is always power of two.

>>61354300
>>61354307
Wait, what? Yesterday everyone said there'd be 10-core, 12-core, 14-core and 16-core?

>>61354323
>everyone
Who?
You have to be fucking retarded to have no knowledge of how Zeppelin works.

>>61354302
>Too many times I'm watching Twitch or a video on my second screen while playing a game
It has more than enough power for that,hell might even throw some more load on it.

>>61354323
those shitty leaks were wrong, it's stupid to have so many different cpus just because of 2 cores

>>61354331
>>61354339
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!

I DON'T WANT A SHITTY 8 CORE CPU AND I DON'T FUCKING NEED 12 CORES!

>>61354381
>shitty
1700 is stellar.

>>61354307
Is there a way to disable all but one core so the chip is effectively a single core with a ton of cache?

File: luigis_chinese_cowboy_impression_is_so_offensive_that_marios_stomach_ulcer_practically_explodes_and_he_is_unable_to_ask_luigi_to_stop_being_so_fucking_racist_0.jpg (116KB, 487x376px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 487x376px

>>61354214
1600x is the best Ryzen CPU for gaming.
It's the same performance (and sometimes even more) than the 1800x for half the price.

>>61354006
>The only meh one was Fiji.
it was great in the nano desu

Hopefully we get a vega repeat of that once the normie cards are out

>>61354398
>Not the X

>>61354407
It's only possible to turn off cores in powers of 2

>>61354416
There's definetly going to be a Vega Nano.
HBM cards are MADE for that.

>>61354258
rumour is that they're cutting production of them too because the i3 is such shit value compared to a pentium

kek, Intel's 18 core part doesn't even exist and AMD is going to release TR next month. By the time their nuclear reactor competitor releases, Zen2 might just be on the corner.

>>61354438
fuck I can't wait

the original looked qt as fuck especially with a full-cover water block

but two or three of them would be perfect with a kikeripper cpu for a vm hosting build

>>61354413
>1600x
>basically the 1600 without the cooler and with a higher price
just overclock the 1600 and you will save $50+

>>61354499
Looks like early august for TR, later this year for 18 core shitshow.

>>61354515
4c/4t against 2c/4t is a nobrainer anon

>>61354529
I wonder how low clocks on 18c model will be.

>>61354535
unless the 2 core intel has similar performance in games, in that case g4560 wins big even with the high $80 price that it has right now

>>61354554
They'll be high, that'll just end up a nuclear furnace though

>>61354554
see
>>61353610

>>61354569
>>61354554
there's even some speculation that they'll need a new socket because the current one can't pump enough power for clockspeeds not be dogshit

>>61354576
at least it's not a 400W tdp


:^)

>>61354576
>16 cores
>180w
>housefires

>>61354594
:^)

File: Mysterious Merchant.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>61354576
intel processors are battled tested. pls buy intel core i9. I work at intel.

>>61354597
It's 16coarz with 3.5ghz CLOCKS.

File: [HorribleSubs] Watashi ga Motete Dousunda - 08 [720p].mkv_snapshot_20.21_[2017.07.07_00.15.10].jpg (82KB, 600x688px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 600x688px

>>61353466
Holy shit!

Intel 18 cores 36 threads 165W

Efficient, powerful with real AVX-512 performance

File: 1189215622091.jpg (25KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 300x300px

>>61354148
>>61354151
Two days ago in another thread I was saying I'd be happy with a cosntant 3.8
This is shaping up to be a very nice launch.

>>61354554
>>61354569
They'll be a pathetically low base but with a massive "turbo" so Intel can point to that when it blacks out your neighbourhood and burns down your house.

>>61353780
>>61354576
>>61354616
reminder to report shitposters

>>61354616
165W tdp with 1kw power consumption.

>>61354606
>intel processors are battled tested
As the pilot flame on flamethrowers?

>>61354616
>>61353610
lol. It already lost.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-13_10-58-40.png (82KB, 1255x237px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1255x237px

Wait, what the fuck?

>>61354713
grab and run

>>61353466
High clock speed, 16 core CPU, for $1K?
Sign me up please
Thanks AMD

>>61354713
It's been on sale for almost a week now.

>>61354724
You forgot 256gb memory per socket.

>>61353466
Sorry but 1k is too expensive. It needed to be around 800.

>>61354745
>i need 50 threads under $200
man can dream

Jesus Christ just ban phoneposting already or make it pass only.

>>61354749
32 at 800 actually

File: 1497570305904.jpg (112KB, 691x771px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 691x771px

>>61354616

>>61354759
The pittance they give you for posting these goes straight into your power bill.

>>61354759
rangeban for this nigger when?

File: threadripper cooler.jpg (70KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1024x576px

Now this is a heatsink. And the seperate dies are soldered. Threadripper is going to run nice and cool.

>>61354803
>no DH-15 equivalent for threadripper announced
this is kinda sad really

>>61354740
Didn't know that, even more to be excited about.

It's feels weird being excited about a new CPU.

>>61354822
You know there's probably one in the works.

File: 1488933859408.png (604KB, 800x523px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 800x523px

>>61354616
>real AVX-512 performance
Yeah if you pay extra

>>61354139
Get out normie.

>>61353610
>zion gold
shaloooooooom!

>>61354713
Prime day prices

>yfw playing while encoding video while using vms without burning your house down

INTEL'S BUTTBLASTED OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND SLIDES WHEN?

Will the 1950x bottleneck my gt730?

>>61355160
Threadripper is only as fast as its glue

>>61354087
youre not funny

>>61355160
I think you'd need a Pentium 4 to bottleneck that.

>>61353705
audio producers will buy whatever comes in their Mac.

>>61355376
and thunderbolt went open source. expect amd to crush mobile market.

>>61353944
Stay away from AMD gpus, they are terrible. People shill them all day on here but they will give you nonstop issues and shit performance, avoid them.

>>61356117
i had 480GTX catch fire.
It was from EVGA after driver update.
so yea.

When will we see 7920X and 7960X?

With such a premium over the Threadripper parts I really want to see banchmarks

File: 18c lul.jpg (349KB, 1060x1047px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1060x1047px

>>61356234
That's 7980XE.

>>61356234
only in the end of the year, they need to assemble some xeons with increased clockspeeds, mayonaise and disable RAID 1 and 5

>>61356273
You forgot disable 2 memory channels.

>>61356294
yeah, this too

they'll need a now socket if they want to put those things at higher clockspeeds too

>>61356322
Oh boy.
No.
Please not Presshot 2.0.
Not again.

>>61356322
Even then, it's going to cost $2000 for maybe 400-500 extra cinebrunch points over TR. And it'll be impossible to cool unless they solder it.

>>61356344
>And it'll be impossible to cool unless they solder it.
These will be really-really-really hard to cool even with solder.
Single die and small surface area of 2066 is a recipe for housefire you've never seen before.

>>61356375
What are the chances they just cancel it and release only the 12 core? Or just cancel all of them?

>>61356395
No.
No-no-no.
That would be marketing disaster of unseen heights.
Worse than /g/ shitposting in SKL-SP marketing slides.

>>61356395
maybe they'll cancel it when they see that not even their 8 core HEDT is selling and then brian will be fired

>>61354417
Why pay extra when you can OC, and this is coming from someone who bought a 1700x and OCed it to 3.8 all core.

>>61357227
>what is binning
an 1800X uses considerably less power than a 1700 at the same clockspeeds

>>61357289
But no 1700x.

>>61356117
Someone is retarded. I have two 480s and before than ran a 290 and a 280. AMD have decent gpus as long as you aren't a retard and expect to hit nVidia clock speeds.

>>61354139
Hardware isnt the problem, you are.

>>61354616
>165W
LMAO, keep on dreaming dude

>>61354512
the 1600X have better chance of being clocked higher though
my 1600 isn't stable a 3.9 GHz with 1.4 Volt

>>61357289
My 1700 is at 1.27 at 3.8GHz, a whooping 0.03 more than 1800x.

>>61353466
One (1) THOUSAND dollhairs.

>>61353753
For Minecraft?

>>61353637
>game 2-3 cores
>discord 2-3 cores
>browser 4 cores
>music 1 core
...
Etc

File: 1499260848675.jpg (76KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 600x600px

>just over three THOUSAND

>>61353944
I have a R7 1700 at 3.6GHz
Paired with a RX 570 4GB

Runs like a breeze, use it for 3D modeling, animation and rendering. The only problems I've had are with windows 10.

>>61359141
Windows 7 still supports all your hardware correct?

>>61358989
That's not how it works.

>>61359234
Yes it is you retard.

>>61359234
that's actually exactly how it works in regard to the CPU scheduler on windows, only old poorly coded applications all pile up on CPU0. its why all the benchmarks showing an i3/i5 doing well in games are so unrealistic, who the fuck closes programs on modern systems unless they are poorfags. more cores means more responsiveness.

besides, these CPU's aren't targetting the shit-tier consumer gaming/facebook crowd, they are meant for professional work with compiling, rendering, and VM flavor workflows that DO use as many threads as you can throw on it. if you can save yourself a few hours/days on a render, it pays for itself very quickly.

>>61353750
What? 12 is 20% more than 10, and AMD's 12c/24t chip scores 11% more than Intel's 10c/20t chip. It also uses less power and is quite a lot cheaper. If you're using applications that scale to 10 cores, they're going to scale to 12 too.

AMD wins this round by miles, even without considering Intel's chips are stupidly hot whilst AMD's will be nice and cool due to large, soldered heat-spreaders.

Wanted lanes, don't care too much for superfluous cores. Anyone else think the 12-core is overpriced? I wanted a <$650 HEDT CPU with non-gimped PCI lanes. Disappointed! : (

>>61359489
if I recall, threadripper also has 8/10 core parts in the works that all include the same amount of lanes/memory slots in the config due to the way the CCX's are configured (think two r3 CCX's). Infinity Fabric is some magical stuff and this architecture will allow AMD to scale as high as they want. Intel is in legit full panic mode because it costs them a fortune to manufacture a single 24c die, and with defects they are just throwing money away, meanwhile AMD only has to manufacture a single 8c die.

>>61359602
10 core part is impossible, 8 core part will directly compete with R7s.

>>61359162
Ryzen does not (officially) support Windows 7

>>61359611
>8 core part will directly compete with R7's
>while offering double the PCIE lanes
>and double the memory channels
no, thats not how it works.
also, a 10C part with two R7 CCX cores disabled is actually very possible.

>>61353466
>>61353574
Is anyone getting depressed from how advanced these new processors are? Unless everything moves to the cloud, we'll eventually see this become standard for home computers. This means mainstream software is going to go much further downhill. Fuck, if Intel's claim about their new i9 being able to hit 1 TFlop, that means any dual processor I9 or Threadripper build would be just as powerful as one of the lower end top 500 supercomputers from 2006.

>>61359629
CCX need to be symmetrical to retain cache and latency coherence.

>>61359611
There may or may not be an 8c/16t part but a 10c/20t part is certainly not impossible. They made a 4c/8t part by disabling two cores per CCX ffs, anything can happen!

I'd be amazed if we didn't see 3c/3t or 3c/6t Raven Ridge APUs next year.

>>61359611
>>61359629
Unlike 1700X vs 1800X, "1900X" 8-core is actually distinguishable and desirable. I'm the anon who complained about 1920X price. If there is in fact a "1900X" 8-core on TR4, I WILL buy it. (I will NOT buy 1700/X/1800X, they are not desirable and not enough of an improvement over my current rig)

>>61359649
I haven't read anything of the sort, regardless though they will have an 8c part, since even Epyc has an 8c variant (Epyc 7251) and thats Four CCX with 2c each so theres no technical limitation holding them back.

>>61359664
CCX needs to be symmetrical to maintain cache and latency coherence.

>>61359644
mainstream software won't go downhill because you need to make it actually use the additional cores

>>61359614
bud it does work doesn't it?
Im asking because i plan on building a rig but i dont want windows 10

>>61359679
7251 is 8 CCX with 1 core and 4Mb of L3$ each.

>>61359694
Epyc is 4 CCX total (2 memory channels per CCX)

>>61359684
No you don't, every individual program will just become so shitty that it uses an entire core. I will say that I'm interested in seeing how the CPU usage would be displayed on a dual processor Epyc machine when that comes out, given they'd need 128 different graphs.

>>61359712
EPYC is 4 Zeppelin dies you fucking retard.
Each Zeppelin has 2 CCX, 4 GMI links, 32 PCI-E lanes, some onboard I/O and 2 DDR4 channels.

>>61359725
I guess I'm fucking up the CCX term with dies, either way there are going to be 8c TR parts 100% since there are already Epyc parts with it.

>>61359756
There are 8c EPYC parts for a reason. These are for I/O or L3$ bound workloads.
8 core TR directly competes with 1800x.

>>61359715
there is only so much you can do on a single core performance wise

File: rms1339615412795.jpg (58KB, 645x430px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 645x430px

Looks like glueing together desktop CPU parts works out pretty fine

>>61359782
again dude, not everyone wants to be limited to dual channel DDR4 / 32 pci-e lanes, they will 100% sell it, same as the 8c/16c Epyc, there is a market for it.

>>61359807
How the fuck do you even price it?

>>61359814
the same way intel price their i5's and market them as i7's on x299 you fucking mongoloid. the bill of materials is the exact same as that of the 12c and 16c parts, with just some more cores disabled, if anything they are saving money by using them instead of just throwing them away.

Ryzen7 1800x has already had like two price drops and it isnt 500$ retail anymore, you can find them for around 390-420$ US, so the 8c TR can fit into the 450-500$ pricepoint and shift the 1800X's a bit further down because everyone knows the 1700/1800/X variants are identical and are only the first batch of silicon.

File: 1497790106502.jpg (162KB, 800x627px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 800x627px

That's a big chip.

>>61359644
>modern processors are getting massively powerful
>I'm still using a Phenom 9550 quad core that came out in 2008
>only things my computer has problems with are some AAA games from under 2 years ago (of which I've only tried 3 because there was a free weekend on Steam) and ridiculously bloated web pages (which I almost never have to deal with because I don't allow every script)
>still can't motivate myself to upgrade
It is kind of depressing.

File: bigcpu4u.png (270KB, 770x578px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 770x578px

>>61359907

>>61359986
CRASHING INTEL WITH NO SURVIVORS

File: T H I C C.jpg (190KB, 1919x1080px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1919x1080px

>>61359986

>>61360083
Need a Ryzen Threadripper pillowcase. I want to sleep on it. And a dinnerplate.

>>61359913
>muh gayems
Of course it still works, they specifically cater to the lowest common denominator, so their possible market is as big as possible.

File: 1479547813958.png (184KB, 660x720px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 660x720px

>>61359913

File: 1488198536475.png (495KB, 1070x601px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1070x601px

>>61353637
JUST