>don't mind me, just coping the code from this bsd licensed

File: 54c88358872c5_-_webcam-hackerb-0807.jpg (104KB, 630x419px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 630x419px

I love these "hacker" images.
They are funny.

File: hacker_hire-100697015-large.jpg (38KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 700x467px

>>61346834

File: maxresdefault.jpg (224KB, 2122x1415px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 2122x1415px

>>61346849

What's wrong with people copying free/libre software and using it in proprietary applications? The point is so that everyone can use it, including people you might not like, doing things you might not approve of.

>>61346849
This guy looks like he came out a call of duty game.

>>61347142
but if it is closed, no user can improve it further, and probably had to pay for something op got for free

>>61347213

Let's say you release some program X that uses a permissive license, and someone else makes a program Y that uses a proprietary license, and Y incorporates some or all of X within it. Sure, your users can't improve upon Y... but nothing that the developer of Y does has any effect on X (unless they choose to contribute code back, and you as maintainer can choose to reject it if it from the repository if it isn't BSD licensed as well). You can still improve upon X all day long, completely unaffected by what Y is doing.

So again, what's the problem?

>>61347213
Ya the stuff that is free to improve is so improved...
>plan9 cat: 32 lines
>gnu cat: 783 lines

>>61346743
couldn't wait until a general, right